Who Wants Red Dead Redemption In Pc?

  • 51 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MrGamer0101
MrGamer0101

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MrGamer0101
Member since 2010 • 59 Posts

I Dont Know why Rockstar are not releasing Red dead redemption In PC??????

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

I Dont Know why Rockstar are not releasing Red dead redemption In PC??????

MrGamer0101
Get it for one of the consoles if you want it that badly.
Avatar image for saruman354
saruman354

10776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 saruman354
Member since 2004 • 10776 Posts

Already have it on PS3 so I wouldn't buy it again just because it came out on PC. Great game, but I thought it was a little overrated and I have no confidence in Rockstar after I played GTA IV on PC

Avatar image for charmingcharlie
charmingcharlie

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 charmingcharlie
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

Not really interested in "cowboy" games and with Rockstars history of extremely poor ports on the PC means I would avoid it like the plague anyway. However if you want to play RDR or any of Rockstars past, present or future catalogue then you are probably best purchasing a console. It is pretty clear Rockstar are no longer interested in developing for the PC now (not that they were that bothered before).

Avatar image for Matrix
Matrix

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Matrix
Member since 2002 • 1456 Posts
I wish but Rockstar already announced long ago that they had no plans for it on PC whatsoever. Makes me sad...
Avatar image for Nick3306
Nick3306

3429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Nick3306
Member since 2007 • 3429 Posts
I could care less, it would probably be a terrible port like GTA IV was anyways.
Avatar image for BlueHarvest28
BlueHarvest28

323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BlueHarvest28
Member since 2010 • 323 Posts

I do, I would buy it again

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
It sucks' I have it on ps3...
Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

i haven't played it yet, but im willing to wait.

plenty more fish in the sea. :D

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#10 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
I doubt any PC gamer wouldn't want RDR on PC, but i can't help but wonder if this is trolling thread.
Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

It wouldn't bother me if it came to the PC but I wouldn't buy it either. I have zero interest in the game. It wouldn't even be a Steam sale purchase.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
Like i5750at4ghz (my god, cpus are being sentient!) said if you wanna play it that badly just get an xbox360 or PS3. We get an RDR thread every week.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

I Dont Know why Rockstar are not releasing Red dead redemption In PC??????

MrGamer0101
Because Rockstar is made up of several studios. I think Rockstar North was the one that hired the pc devs last year and Vancouver and Toronto are busy with Max Payne.
Avatar image for tanerb
tanerb

1300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 tanerb
Member since 2003 • 1300 Posts

Well they better use those people for LA Noir

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

I don't mind that it's not on PC. It gave me a reason to actually dust off my PS3. Now if I can only find a few more games that are worth playing on my PS3 I may actually get over the regret of buying one.

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts
I do if nothing is announced by end of this year I'll get it once it hits bargian bin prices on ps3.
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

I didn't care for it.

Avatar image for Brazucass
Brazucass

482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 Brazucass
Member since 2009 • 482 Posts

I would pre-order it today. But it seems they dont want to earn some millions.

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

Kinthalis
Yeah me 2 game would shot up very high on my to by list if it was ported to pc.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

Kinthalis
None of those things makes for a better game. Better graphics maybe.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#22 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

i5750at4Ghz
None of those things makes for a better game. Better graphics maybe.

Yes, it does...Trust me. From having played RDR on PS3, the game would be a million times better on PC. The aiming is horrible with a controller in that game, the auto-aim is the worst I've seen. It takes all the fun out of combat . 60 FPS helps for the gameplay to be smother, and higher draw distances help immersion. Besides the obvious facts he mentioned the engine is also very moddable ( GTA IV) It would result in a MUCH MUCH better game on PC.
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

i5750at4Ghz

None of those things makes for a better game. Better graphics maybe.

Says you.

I consider immersion part of the gameplay experience. Terrain popping up out of the eather 5 feet from my character and blurry, pixelated low rez textures, low resolution frames with eye gouging aliasing everywhere is NOT my idea of immersive visuals.

Might be yours, and then, hey more power to you. But it's not mine. A rich visual exprience improves immersion and therefore improves the game for me.

Add to that 60+ FPS which can help improve GUI and gameplay mechanic function smoother and you've got yourself the complete package.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

GeneralShowzer
None of those things makes for a better game. Better graphics maybe.

Yes, it does...Trust me. From having played RDR on PS3, the game would be a million times better on PC. The aiming is horrible with a controller in that game, the auto-aim is the worst I've seen. It takes all the fun out of combat . 60 FPS helps for the gameplay to be smother, and higher draw distances help immersion. Besides the obvious facts he mentioned the engine is also very moddable ( GTA IV) It would result in a MUCH MUCH better game on PC.

Game would be the exact same. All of those changes are aesthetic.
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

Almost forgot one of the best reasons...

MODS!!!

Can you imagine what the modders could do with this game?

Sweet!

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#26 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] None of those things makes for a better game. Better graphics maybe.

Yes, it does...Trust me. From having played RDR on PS3, the game would be a million times better on PC. The aiming is horrible with a controller in that game, the auto-aim is the worst I've seen. It takes all the fun out of combat . 60 FPS helps for the gameplay to be smother, and higher draw distances help immersion. Besides the obvious facts he mentioned the engine is also very moddable ( GTA IV) It would result in a MUCH MUCH better game on PC.

Game would be the exact same. All of those changes are aesthetic.

Didn't you read anything i wrote? The aiming wouldn't suck with mouse and keyboard . The auto-aim literally takes out all the fun out of shooting with rifles. Mods are just aesthetic? Have you seen all the non graphical mods for GTA IV? So much fun to be had. And as i said 60fps is not aesthetic, it helps game-play to be smother. This is a game that would be tons better on PC, and not just because of better graphics.
Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#27 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

I want it on pc, but one of my brothers already bought it for our 360 so unless there were a bunch of features for the pc version I probably wouldn't buy it.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#28 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

I have it for console, but I would love to see it on PC, the possibility for mods could be huge in RDR, same with the increased graphics.

But just if people could add a few more little things to do or missions it would be even better.

- Mods

- Better graphics

- Better FPS

- More options for controls (any controller you want or k+m)

That would be alot of fun

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Yes, it does...Trust me. From having played RDR on PS3, the game would be a million times better on PC. The aiming is horrible with a controller in that game, the auto-aim is the worst I've seen. It takes all the fun out of combat . 60 FPS helps for the gameplay to be smother, and higher draw distances help immersion. Besides the obvious facts he mentioned the engine is also very moddable ( GTA IV) It would result in a MUCH MUCH better game on PC.

Game would be the exact same. All of those changes are aesthetic.

Didn't you read anything i wrote? The aiming wouldn't suck with mouse and keyboard . The auto-aim literally takes out all the fun out of shooting with rifles. Mods are just aesthetic? Have you seen all the non graphical mods for GTA IV? So much fun to be had. And as i said 60fps is not aesthetic, it helps game-play to be smother. This is a game that would be tons better on PC, and not just because of better graphics.

Mods no doubt, who love to see that. His original point had nothing to do with mods though.
Avatar image for krisooooo
krisooooo

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 krisooooo
Member since 2007 • 100 Posts
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Everyday for the past year i read the same thing about how bad of a port GTA IV was... Well you know what? After i patched it to 1.04 i played through it TWICE, the dlc too! And i have a freaking AMD Athlon 3200+, that's 2.00ghz single core and the game ran great with lowered settings and resolution, i'm talking 15-30 fps. (more heated firefights brought it down to 15, like the bank job) Anyway, that processor is a piece of s*** but the game still ran with no problems. What the hell is wrong with the port?
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

I'd love to see it for PC.

The game intersts me, but I'm not spending $300 on a console just to play 1 game. Plus console graphics suck.

On the PC you'd have a much better game anyway. No pop-up, smooth 60+ FPS, larger view distances, better textures, and we'd probably get all the DLC for free.

Get on it Rockstar! I've got money to throw at you!

GeneralShowzer

None of those things makes for a better game. Better graphics maybe.

Yes, it does...Trust me. From having played RDR on PS3, the game would be a million times better on PC. The aiming is horrible with a controller in that game, the auto-aim is the worst I've seen. It takes all the fun out of combat . 60 FPS helps for the gameplay to be smother, and higher draw distances help immersion. Besides the obvious facts he mentioned the engine is also very moddable ( GTA IV) It would result in a MUCH MUCH better game on PC.

Thats why you turn off auto aim. I had no problem with manual aiming at all.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
Meh. I'm somewhat interested, but then again I can just rent it for my PS3
Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

I already have it on 360, looks great for a console game, I dont see a need to buy it for pc for a small graphic upgrade.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

I would love it on pc if done right, I mean a version of this game that runs at a decent framerate and can be controlled properly would be epic. Most pc versions are much better than the console versin by a huge margin, but I suppose rockstar could screw it up...

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

I already have it on 360, looks great for a console game, I dont see a need to buy it for pc for a small graphic upgrade.

Advid-Gamer
the framerate and controls are seriously lacking on console.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

If they do port it they should do a proper pc port

good optimization

The Bully and GTA IV were horrible at this

Improved visuals

although GTA IV supported graphical features not present in the console version, it barely made the game look better and it killed the fps. I'm thinking much higher res textures because the increased memory of the PC.

Tweaked animations

GTA IV was clunky with a controller and it was even more clunky with the WASD keys. Turning should be fast and responsive (no more running in a circle when you press W then S) or hell copy Mafia 2's movement.

dx11 support

not asking for tess or some other dx10/11 specific feature, I just want to see increased optimization and the ablity to adjust AA levels

Fix the cover system

Right click = pop out of cover to aim

NO GFWL

I hate it, stop using it

Dedicated servers with a server browser that support mods

I would like it if free mode had like a 40 player cap (only in free mode) with a higher level of pedestrians, that would be coooooooooooooooool.

Apex clothing on the main character

... !

I loved RDR on the PS3 and I would pay like $40 for it again on the PC if all of the above were met.

Avatar image for Ownsin
Ownsin

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Ownsin
Member since 2007 • 1331 Posts

If they do port it they should do a proper pc port

good optimization

The Bully and GTA IV were horrible at this

Improved visuals

although GTA IV supported graphical features not present in the console version, it barely made the game look better and it killed the fps. I'm thinking much higher res textures because the increased memory of the PC.

Tweaked animations

GTA IV was clunky with a controller and it was even more clunky with the WASD keys. Turning should be fast and responsive (no more running in a circle when you press W then S) or hell copy Mafia 2's movement.

dx11 support

not asking for tess or some other dx10/11 specific feature, I just want to see increased optimization and the ablity to adjust AA levels

Fix the cover system

Right click = pop out of cover to aim

NO GFWL

I hate it, stop using it

Dedicated servers with a server browser that support mods

I would like it if free mode had like a 40 player cap (only in free mode) with a higher level of pedestrians, that would be coooooooooooooooool.

Apex clothing on the main character

... !

I loved RDR on the PS3 and I would pay like $40 for it again on the PC if all of the above were met.

SAGE_OF_FIRE

Wishful thinking :roll:

Avatar image for Matrix
Matrix

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Matrix
Member since 2002 • 1456 Posts
Don't get why so many people whine about GFWL. Works fine for me and my friends. I've never had a problem with it. My guess it's mainly pirates that complain about it. Anyways, I'd pre-order RDR in a heartbeat if it were announced for PC. Better graphics, better load times, better frame rate, sometimes better sound, mods, etc. Too bad LA Noire isn't coming out on PC either. Game looks schweet....
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

IF Rockstar decided to actually try on their console port for once while actually optimizing the game, I would love to see it on PC. The mods alone would make it worth it.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
Don't get why so many people whine about GFWL. Works fine for me and my friends. I've never had a problem with it. My guess it's mainly pirates that complain about it. Anyways, I'd pre-order RDR in a heartbeat if it were announced for PC. Better graphics, better load times, better frame rate, sometimes better sound, mods, etc. Too bad LA Noire isn't coming out on PC either. Game looks schweet....Matrix
Pirates don't care, no drm lasts more than a couple days anyway. GFWL is just MS' crappy attempt at Steam.
Avatar image for charmingcharlie
charmingcharlie

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 charmingcharlie
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

My guess it's mainly pirates that complain about it.Matrix

Your guess would be wrong then because pirates disable GFWL from the game. If you don't understand why people have a problem with GFWL then that is fair enough, but please don't try and start with "oh it is only pirates that complain". It isn't pirates that are complaining it is legitimate customers that are complaining, pirates don't have to deal with GFWL at all.

Avatar image for kate_jones
kate_jones

3221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 kate_jones
Member since 2007 • 3221 Posts

Overrated game, Controls and gameplay were designed for consoles, heavy heavy auto aim, auto lock and bullet time, bullet time target painting. Not sure how enjoyable that would be on a mouse

Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts

I already have it on 360, looks great for a console game, I dont see a need to buy it for pc for a small graphic upgrade.

Advid-Gamer
Small graphic update really? The graphics would be vastly better, especially with this having a large play area. I have it on the PS3, but would love to see it on PC. Just for the mods alone!
Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12810 Posts

I Dont Know why Rockstar are not releasing Red dead redemption In PC??????

MrGamer0101
It's coming, end of this year probably
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#45 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Played it on the Xbox 360. There was a point in time when I wanted it for the PC even after having played it already on the Xbox, but I'm over it. I'd rather have LA Noire on the PC.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#46 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Overrated game, Controls and gameplay were designed for consoles, heavy heavy auto aim, auto lock and bullet time, bullet time target painting. Not sure how enjoyable that would be on a mouse

kate_jones
I really liked RDR, but it's definitely designed for consoles. The game is frustrating without auto-aim/auto-lock... Like for example riding horseback, and trying to aim at bandits with horses that run faster than a Ferrari. And I hate auto-aim.
Avatar image for RyuRanVII
RyuRanVII

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#47 RyuRanVII
Member since 2006 • 4257 Posts
I don't. But I want LA Noire though.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts
[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]

I already have it on 360, looks great for a console game, I dont see a need to buy it for pc for a small graphic upgrade.

ducati101
Small graphic update really? The graphics would be vastly better, especially with this having a large play area. I have it on the PS3, but would love to see it on PC. Just for the mods alone!

Usually I would say it would get a huge graphic update gojng to pc, but the way things have been going I expect a direct port with better AA. Like some else said already the game was designed for console controls, dont see how this game would be better with Kb/M
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts
[QUOTE="ducati101"][QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]

I already have it on 360, looks great for a console game, I dont see a need to buy it for pc for a small graphic upgrade.

Advid-Gamer
Small graphic update really? The graphics would be vastly better, especially with this having a large play area. I have it on the PS3, but would love to see it on PC. Just for the mods alone!

Usually I would say it would get a huge graphic update gojng to pc, but the way things have been going I expect a direct port with better AA. Like some else said already the game was designed for console controls, dont see how this game would be better with Kb/M

they would just remove auto-aim... easy enough. GTA iv did it well enough, despite other problems.
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

If they do port it they should do a proper pc port

good optimization

The Bully and GTA IV were horrible at this

Improved visuals

although GTA IV supported graphical features not present in the console version, it barely made the game look better and it killed the fps. I'm thinking much higher res textures because the increased memory of the PC.

Tweaked animations

GTA IV was clunky with a controller and it was even more clunky with the WASD keys. Turning should be fast and responsive (no more running in a circle when you press W then S) or hell copy Mafia 2's movement.

dx11 support

not asking for tess or some other dx10/11 specific feature, I just want to see increased optimization and the ablity to adjust AA levels

Fix the cover system

Right click = pop out of cover to aim

NO GFWL

I hate it, stop using it

Dedicated servers with a server browser that support mods

I would like it if free mode had like a 40 player cap (only in free mode) with a higher level of pedestrians, that would be coooooooooooooooool.

Apex clothing on the main character

... !

I loved RDR on the PS3 and I would pay like $40 for it again on the PC if all of the above were met.

SAGE_OF_FIRE

gtaiv looks much much better on pc, but the streaming engine can cause framerates to be inconsistent on any random settings since its not coded properly. Still, consoles were like 15-25 fps at all times for gtaiv and not many complained.