why did gigabyte release a 950 MHz 560 after the 1GHz version?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Gigabyte had released a super overclocked version of the gtx 560 which was clocked at 1000 MHz. But recently I saw they had a different version out that was another super overclockedone but is now at 950 MHz instead. Does anyone have any ideas why this is? was the 1 GHz version encountering problems or anything?

Avatar image for neatfeatguy
neatfeatguy

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#2 neatfeatguy
Member since 2005 • 4415 Posts
These cards are probably ones that couldn't quite cut the 1000MHz speeds. It's like with AMD and their Phenom II x3 CPUs, if they found that 1 of the 4 cores wasn't stable, they would disable it and market it as a tri-core CPU instead of a quad-core. Why sit on a product or toss it just because it doesn't live up to the expectations they had when it was produced? Better to sell it off and recoup some kind of money for it instead of loosing it all. At least, that's how I see it.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Probably for the simple reason that they ran out of 560 cores that ran satisfactorily at 1ghz, so they downclocked them to 950mhz (still very fast) instead. They may have had some issues with their 1ghz SOC 560 Ti's, but I haven't heard about it. I always assumed that it was just an issue of yields.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16910 Posts

6950's with a 30 mhz overclock come very close to a 560 SoC at 1ghz. Overclock the 6950 more than 50 mhz and it will beat any 560 on the planet.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

i can get a gigabyte 6950 for about 8 euro more so should i get that instead of an SOC 560? i've heard the 6950's aren't great at over clocking and the 560 can overclock near the potential of a 6970

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

6950's with a 30 mhz overclock come very close to a 560 SoC at 1ghz. Overclock the 6950 more than 50 mhz and it will beat any 560 on the planet.

blaznwiipspman1
And that was on topic. >_>
Avatar image for thekey
thekey

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 thekey
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

Gigabyte had released a super overclocked version of the gtx 560 which was clocked at 1000 MHz. But recently I saw they had a different version out that was another super overclockedone but is now at 950 MHz instead. Does anyone have any ideas why this is? was the 1 GHz version encountering problems or anything?

seanmcloughlin

I say the number one reason why they did this is for 1 money(to cut down on costs) 2 which is really number one also, is that it may have been over stock of unsatisfactory 560 1GHz cards, that they may have disabled and down clocked them to 950MHz, to cut down on cost and have satistfactory speed and preformance? 3 Or it could have been to gennerate less power consumption and lower heat disapation? Which is usually the case

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Gigabyte had released a super overclocked version of the gtx 560 which was clocked at 1000 MHz. But recently I saw they had a different version out that was another super overclockedone but is now at 950 MHz instead. Does anyone have any ideas why this is? was the 1 GHz version encountering problems or anything?

thekey

I say the number one reason why they did this is for 1 money(to cut down on costs) 2 which is really number one also, is that it may have been over stock of unsatisfactory 560 1GHz cards, that they may have disabled and down clocked them to 950MHz, to cut down on cost and have satistfactory speed and preformance? 3 Or it could have been to gennerate less power consumption and lower heat disapation? Which is usually the case

At the end of the day im sure they have good justified reasons. And its only downclocked by 50 MHz which is very minimalistic. And not even noticeable to most people. Im sure you could see a difference if you tried. 950 MHz OC for a 560 is still insane. I guess 1 GHz just sounded better, Im still gonna be happy with my 950 MHz 560