Why do you guys like BF3

I mean, I just got it and the SP is so bad and a black ops rip off

The MP is a camp fest, I played rush and TDM

No leaning still?

Reg is still kinda iffy

Lacks the cooolness of BF2

Oh and did I mention it's a camp fest? Like in CSS camping while it kindove works depending on the situation won't let you win. Quake obviously it won't work, you won't have control of the map.

So why you guys play this? Much better games like CSS, CS, Quake Live are there. And well obviously BF2.

I don't. Waiting for B2K to give it another try.

I wish they'd port some BC2 maps too.

It's just good old fashioned fun! And quite satisfying,like when you place M15 mines before a tank kills you and then the said tank rolls over your laid mines and booom! hehhe! lovely stuff!

I personally like it much more than CS/S. The great audio/visuals make it really immersive, some of the maps are great, and it allows for a good variety of play styles.

Try conquest, its the best mode in this game.

It certainly has its issues, but overall its a great multiplayer shooter.

because its fun.

You only played rush and team deathmatch in BF game... serious? go try conquest..

I like BF3 because it has amazing sound, great graphics, Fantastic controls, improved animations/movement, the multiplayer has a very high fun factor and most of the level design in multiplayer is great (minus one level).

The campaign is MEH, I will agree with you on that, but the multiplayer is hte best multiplayer shooter since TF2 imo.

I have never boguht a BF game for campaign so that does not bother me much to be honest.

I haven't played with the new patch installed, but I agree that it has it's problems. There is no flashlight in the world that will completely blind me in full sunlight DICE.. Oo... And how can a game that claims to be realistic allow people to run away after being shot in the head with a sniper rifle?? I'll make my final verdict after the new patch...superclocked

Play on Hardcore servers only... people wont take alot of shots to kill when compared to normal.

You recommend us to play BF2 when the only thing you played in BF3 was rush and team deathmatch?

You recommend us to play BF2 when the only thing you played in BF3 was rush and team deathmatch?

klusps

[QUOTE="klusps"]

You recommend us to play BF2 when the only thing you played in BF3 was rush and team deathmatch?

JigglyWiggly_

Karkland comes out in a week or two, find out then.

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

[QUOTE="klusps"]

You recommend us to play BF2 when the only thing you played in BF3 was rush and team deathmatch?

kozzy1234

Karkland comes out in a week or two, find out then.

While I didn't find BF3 (beta) much fun either, we get it; you only like Quake. Must every post of yours be about Quake?

In terms of maps, Caspian Border > Kharg Island > Noshahr Canals > Damavand Peak > Operation Firestorm > Operation Metro > Seine Crossing > Tehran Highway > Grand Bazaar.

That was directed at the people saying which maps suck and which are good.

I mean, I just got it and the SP is so bad and a black ops rip off, The MP is a camp fest, I played rush and TDMJigglyWiggly_

Because it's not a campfest. It requires skill and strategy(most of the time). It has attack helicopters, tanks and jets. And I'm awesome at it?

Because it's not a campfest. It requires skill and strategy(most of the time). It has attack helicopters, tanks and jets. And I'm awesome at it?

airshocker

But that assumes you get in the jets. Usually half team waiting outside the jet.JigglyWiggly_

I don't use jets. I wait for the helicopter, and 8/10 times I get it. If I don't get it I just go and do something else.

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

Because it's not a campfest. It requires skill and strategy(most of the time). It has attack helicopters, tanks and jets. And I'm awesome at it?

JigglyWiggly_

I am still convinced QL is way better, new video just uploaded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLJBd0-xV3c :)

I played normal mode and like while it's better, still pretty campsy and getting exploded while driving car simulator. AT mine hell. Still I can see the apeal if you got a group of friends all in one squad throwing c4 at people, sounds like fun BF2. I just don't think without friends it's very fun.

I am still convinced QL is way better, new video just uploaded

I played normal mode and like while it's better, still pretty campsy and getting exploded while driving car simulator. AT mine hell. Still I can see the apeal if you got a group of friends all in one squad throwing c4 at people, sounds like fun BF2. I just don't think without friends it's very fun.

JigglyWiggly_

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

I am still convinced QL is way better, new video just uploaded

I played normal mode and like while it's better, still pretty campsy and getting exploded while driving car simulator. AT mine hell. Still I can see the apeal if you got a group of friends all in one squad throwing c4 at people, sounds like fun BF2. I just don't think without friends it's very fun.

wis3boi

How is it a camp-fest?

And it requires much more strategy and teamwork than Quake 3.

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

I am still convinced QL is way better, new video just uploaded

I played normal mode and like while it's better, still pretty campsy and getting exploded while driving car simulator. AT mine hell. Still I can see the apeal if you got a group of friends all in one squad throwing c4 at people, sounds like fun BF2. I just don't think without friends it's very fun.

wis3boi

Why? Because the conquest games are still the good old battlefield nostalgia to me. Biggest problem for me though is the maps. They aren't as big as the ones we had on BF2 but the B2K maps look huge, so faith is restored in humanity.

Why do we like it? Because its a good game. People's complaints are usually wafer thin and are either down to petty things or them sucking at it. The only people I feel for are the ones who the game just doesn't work for like always crashing and never finsing games

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

I am still convinced QL is way better, new video just uploaded

I played normal mode and like while it's better, still pretty campsy and getting exploded while driving car simulator. AT mine hell. Still I can see the apeal if you got a group of friends all in one squad throwing c4 at people, sounds like fun BF2. I just don't think without friends it's very fun.

cain006

Depth or no depth, they are still very different games that can't really be compared.

How is it a camp-fest?

And it requires much more strategy and teamwork than Quake 3.

Am_Confucius

Also I did not really come to debate QL/Q3A/CPMA/RA3 vs BF3. I just wanted to ask why its fun compared to like a better game BF2 is available or CSS. I mean you could easily say BF2 has the same issues, I am just saying BF2 is the better version even though it has the same problems.

Play conquest, the game is loads of fun.

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

[QUOTE="klusps"]

You recommend us to play BF2 when the only thing you played in BF3 was rush and team deathmatch?

Karkland comes out in a week or two, find out then.

I am not saying it should be quake. I am saying the TDM stuff should be like CSS.

I am not saying it should be quake. I am saying the TDM stuff should be like CSS.

JigglyWiggly_

Why should it be like another game. Its fine how it is. TDM doesn't work in BF anyway. They just added it to keep the CoD crowd happy.I for one find no fun to be had in TDM in BF3. The games mechanics aren't built for it

I am not saying it should be quake. I am saying the TDM stuff should be like CSS.

JigglyWiggly_

^^great post, you just summed up the entire game's multiplayer, and its relation to previous BF's.

I have seen some instances of 'organic' teamwork where players see what each other are doing and support them, but this is haphazard compared to the coordination in previous BF games.

I still have a lot of fun with elaborate lone-wolf manouvering, which can actually be very effective, such as back capping with a humvee or van where you jump into the gunner seat and stay totally still while capping the point so that if an enemy spawns and starts looking around they think the vehicle is empty then you shoot them before they can react.

I've also played in a squad with friends using voice chat and such, and its amazing how a single coordinated squad can turn the tide of battle. If this level of teamwork was present by default, this game would be so much more interesting.

Did the final product turn out better than the Operation Metro beta, which i found to be a horrid campfest among other things? lostrib

No its far more polished. It has its problems sure but its nowhere near as glitchy and messed up as the beta was. Also its a lot more fun

^^great post, you just summed up the entire game's multiplayer, and its relation to previous BF's.

I have seen some instances of 'organic' teamwork where players see what each other are doing and support them, but this is haphazard compared to the coordination in previous BF games.

I still have a lot of fun with elaborate lone-wolf manouvering, which can actually be very effective, such as back capping with a humvee or van where you jump into the gunner seat and stay totally still while capping the point so that if an enemy spawns and starts looking around they think the vehicle is empty then you shoot them before they can react.

I've also played in a squad with friends using voice chat and such, and its amazing how a single coordinated squad can turn the tide of battle. If this level of teamwork was present by default, this game would be so much more interesting.

with_teeth26

In the grand scheme of things everything in BF3 is just messy, and it really boils down to just hoping your team is likeminded and knows what they could doing - but that's all solitary thinking, or a few players communicating amoungst themselves. There's no commander to tie it together or chain of command to allocate roles.

It's all very empty and hollow; it's not really like a 'battlefield' at all in these respects. Which is why I'm looking forward to Planetside 2, the first did the whole chain of command thing outstandingly.

ITT the OP believes only Quake-like games requires skill and tactical thinking.

ITT the OP believes only Quake-like games requires skill and tactical thinking.

Cwagmire21

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

ITT the OP believes only Quake-like games requires skill and tactical thinking.

wis3boi

You have a lot of Jet screens yet everytime I play with you, you never get in one :P

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

ITT the OP believes only Quake-like games requires skill and tactical thinking.

seanmcloughlin

You have a lot of Jet screens yet everytime I play with you, you never get in one :P