Why is Samsung the only one claiming that their 2280HD moniter is 1000:1

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for monkeychris
monkeychris

508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 monkeychris
Member since 2003 • 508 Posts

I don't understand why every retailer states that it is 700:1 while on Samsungs website, they state it as 1000:01:00. I assume thats just a fancy way of saying 1000:1. Here are links:

1. Samsung "Contrast Ratio : 1000:01:00"

2. Newegg "Contrast Ratio document.write(neg_specification_newline('700:1')); 700:1"

3. Amazon "The Samsung 2280HD features a 700:1 contrast ratio and a 5 ms response time..."

I'm hoping that Samsung has the correct information. Does anyone have any thoughts about this moniter? It's 16:10 but im hoping it will be able to display 1080p material in the correct aspect ratio without much or all visual deficiency. I hate light bleeding so if you have this moniter, can you tell me about its backlight quality?







Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
They have different ways of measuring.
Avatar image for monkeychris
monkeychris

508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 monkeychris
Member since 2003 • 508 Posts

I dont think thats true. If you mean one is dynamic contrast ratio and ones normal, then the numbers are too close. From what i've seen, usually 1000:1 normal contrast ratio is around 3000:1 dynamic contrast ratio.

Does anyone know if this moniter will show 1080p material in the correct aspect ratio?

Avatar image for dmanrevived
dmanrevived

1595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dmanrevived
Member since 2004 • 1595 Posts
Looks like it can do 16:9 and 4:3 aspect ratios. But very doubtful it'll accept 1080p since its native resolution is only 1680x1050.
Avatar image for ryank285
ryank285

1152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ryank285
Member since 2007 • 1152 Posts
wanting 1080p on a 22 inch screen is sheer stupidity.
Avatar image for dmanrevived
dmanrevived

1595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dmanrevived
Member since 2004 • 1595 Posts

wanting 1080p on a 22 inch screen is sheer stupidity.ryank285

It's a monitor. 1080p is noticeable on small size screens at close viewing distances.

Avatar image for mars_elliot
mars_elliot

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 mars_elliot
Member since 2003 • 647 Posts
is it better to have higher or lower contrast? ie.... 3000:1 (larger?) or 700:1 (smaller?)
Avatar image for ryank285
ryank285

1152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ryank285
Member since 2007 • 1152 Posts

is it better to have higher or lower contrast? ie.... 3000:1 (larger?) or 700:1 (smaller?)mars_elliot

the higher the contrast, the better the picture will be. samsung offers 10,000:1 and from what i know, that is the best right now.