...well, sort of... not from Microsoft...yet...
http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/292958,bring-the-start-menu-back-to-windows-8-with-start8.aspx
This topic is locked from further discussion.
...well, sort of... not from Microsoft...yet...
http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/292958,bring-the-start-menu-back-to-windows-8-with-start8.aspx
Of course not, and who knows, maybe the NEW start menu system will be better in the long run. I just wanted to post this for those that want to stick with the classic Start Menu.Not like we'll die without the start menu..
tjricardo089
Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.jer_1The lack of a final build might be the biggest of its problems...oh wait, 7 wasn't a looker at this point, Vista looked terrible.
I don't mind the new start menu and I like how Microsoft ties everything up to one account, like logging into your PC is now via your hotmail account.
My problem with the new start menu is it's fullscreen only and makes you switch between that and desktop. I want it to a window so it keeps me in the desktop like the original start bar.
I never want to see the Metro app stuff either, it may be good on tablets but it doesn't work on a desktop, especially all the scrolling sideways with a small bar on the bottom.....
Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.jer_1WTF? Windows 8 for the most part looks like Win7, they both look great. Are you trying it on a Black and White Monitor?
Yes I agree, but the idea is that the desktop is just another APP. I think the way MS designed Win8 is a GREAT MOVE for them. It's beating Apple to the point where everything comes together flawlessly. Imagine when the Win8 Tablets start appearing. On the flip side, I'm sure there will probably be a PROFESSIONAL version which has the desktop as default.I don't mind the new start menu and I like how Microsoft ties everything up to one account, like logging into your PC is now via your hotmail account.
My problem with the new start menu is it's fullscreen only and makes you switch between that and desktop. I want it to a window so it keeps me in the desktop like the original start bar.
I never want to see the Metro app stuff either, it may be good on tablets but it doesn't work on a desktop, especially all the scrolling sideways with a small bar on the bottom.....
Tixylixx
[QUOTE="Tixylixx"]Yes I agree, but the idea is that the desktop is just another APP. I think the way MS designed Win8 is a GREAT MOVE for them. It's beating Apple to the point where everything comes together flawlessly. Imagine when the Win8 Tablets start appearing. On the flip side, I'm sure there will probably be a PROFESSIONAL version which has the desktop as default. or msconfig and uncheck the Metro 'app' most probably.I don't mind the new start menu and I like how Microsoft ties everything up to one account, like logging into your PC is now via your hotmail account.
My problem with the new start menu is it's fullscreen only and makes you switch between that and desktop. I want it to a window so it keeps me in the desktop like the original start bar.
I never want to see the Metro app stuff either, it may be good on tablets but it doesn't work on a desktop, especially all the scrolling sideways with a small bar on the bottom.....
FelipeInside
The lack of a final build might be the biggest of its problems...oh wait, 7 wasn't a looker at this point, Vista looked terrible. That's bullsh*t. Windows 7 looked good from RC on.[QUOTE="jer_1"]Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.DanielDust
It is silly to say it looks atrocious though.
Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.
Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)
I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.
Ur a composer? :)Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.
Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)
I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.
Lach0121
[QUOTE="Lach0121"]Ur a composer? :)Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.
Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)
I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.
FelipeInside
Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.
Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.
The lack of a final build might be the biggest of its problems...oh wait, 7 wasn't a looker at this point, Vista looked terrible. That's bullsh*t. Windows 7 looked good from RC on.[QUOTE="DanielDust"]
[QUOTE="jer_1"]Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.guynamedbilly
It is silly to say it looks atrocious though.
You're confusing good looking with incomplete/missing visual elements. It looked good overall, but the first betas were missing a lot of small visual elements and the theme effects and overall look weren't complete, which is exactly what's happening with this first public beta of Windows 8, but the other person said it was atrocious because he/she didn't even bother checking anything else, just that random screenshot from that article, a screenshot of an incomplete part of Metro.Ur a composer? :)[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.
Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)
I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.
Lach0121
Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.
Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.
Great stuff, I've always wanted to learn to play an instrument. Good luck with it all.[QUOTE="Lach0121"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Ur a composer? :)FelipeInside
Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.
Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.
Great stuff, I've always wanted to learn to play an instrument. Good luck with it all.Much appreciated, yeah we plan on having a decent little home studio for us, and our friends, to make music in.
It will take some time, and money, getting it all setup, but I think it will all be worth it. Just add to even more music on the internet for eveyone to have the option to enjoy.
Getting an instrument is first step... Best way to get better at any instrument, is to have fun while playing it, and practicing. That creates a more genuine incentive than anything else could hope to spark, including monetary incentive. Genuine fun with it, will feed the passion of it like nothing else.
Great stuff, I've always wanted to learn to play an instrument. Good luck with it all.[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.
Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.
Lach0121
Much appreciated, yeah we plan on having a decent little home studio for us, and our friends, to make music in.
It will take some time, and money, getting it all setup, but I think it will all be worth it. Just add to even more music on the internet for eveyone to have the option to enjoy.
Getting an instrument is first step... Best way to get better at any instrument, is to have fun while playing it, and practicing. That creates a more genuine incentive than anything else could hope to spark, including monetary incentive. Genuine fun with it, will feed the passion of it like nothing else.
Yeah, I've always wanted to learn to play the piano. Not for work or earning money, just to learn it and say I can play an instrument. I can get an electronic keyboard from a friend of mine but the problem is always money in this world. Lessons/Course cost money and also free time which lately I struggle to get.people will probably get used to the new start menu but right now it's weird to use if you don't have a touch screen
Doubt it. People who use computers for their profession, are not going to put up some gimmicky crap that reduces their productivity.people will probably get used to the new start menu but right now it's weird to use if you don't have a touch screen
FreakShowScot
Win 8 is clearly designed for tablets at this point. Unless there is a very simple method of getting a more mouse and keyboard friendly UI then I will be skipping this version of Windows. Skipping Vista did me no harm and I think Windows 7 is just fine. bonafidetkSkipping Vista actually did you a favour...
At this stage just wait for Win8, should be out near end of this year.i really need to get windows 7 before the release this. any word on the release date?
TheShadowLord07
How can the first real step towards interaction from MS be a step backwards? that's nonsense.Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.
MlauTheDaft
[QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]How can the first real step towards interaction from MS be a step backwards? that's nonsense.Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.
DanielDust
First step? Are you sure know the definition of interaction?
Metro is clearly designed with touch screens in mind and it directly impairs our "classic" control schemes. And no, touch controls are in no way superior to M/KB, especially not on a PC.
It's simply the wrong tool for the job.
How can the first real step towards interaction from MS be a step backwards? that's nonsense.[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]
Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.
MlauTheDaft
First step? Are you sure know the definition of interaction?
Metro is clearly designed with touch screens in mind and it directly impairs our "classic" control schemes. And no, touch controls are in no way superior to M/KB, especially not on a PC.
It's simply the wrong tool for the job.
Yep. Touch sensing input devices have their place, but they should in no way, be treated as a replacement for the mouse.It's a tool designed for an interactive desktop, for people that care about ease of use and the visual aspect, the old, current way is fine, refined, does the job well, but...who cares? just because it works fine, we should stop caring about going further?
And who said anything about touch controls? I'm sensing a lot of misguided, pointless hate towards Metro. It's fine if you don't care, but not caring doesn't mean inventing random reasons and excuses to hate on it.
Interfaces will evolve, we need them to evolve, it's the reason they aren't the same as 30 years ago, let's not focus on a crack at our feet in a 1000 km road, being close minded didn't help anyone.
[QUOTE="DanielDust"]It's a tool designed for an interactive desktop, for people that care about ease of use and the visual aspect, the old, current way is fine, refined, does the job well, but...who cares? just because it works fine, we should top caring about going further? And who said anything about touch controls? I'm sensing a lot of misguided, pointless hate towards Metro. It's fine if you don't care, but not caring doesn't mean inventing random reasons and excuses to hate on it.C_RuleHow is something that inhibits use, moving forward? The current obsession with touch devices is incredibly annoying. I don't like touch devices, but Metro works just fine with a mouse and it doesn't inhibit use, ever used it or you're just assuming things based on "pictures that move"?
It's also a tool...it's not the new desktop, you guys are like complaining about media player running at startup covering your desktop and that would be silly, right?
Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.
[QUOTE="Marfoo"]Simple fix for everyone who wants to use Windows 8 to the same efficiency they used 7. Erase all but the Desktop icon off the start screen. In search preferences remove the search function for any of the "apps." In IE10 (if you use IE) go into the settings and tell it to default to desktop mode. Now place the shortcuts for all the programs you use onto the Start Screen. Arrange them into groups, name the groups, make it nice and tidy, just to your liking. Now just use the Start Screen when you want to open programs. It's easy, just hit the windows key or mouse to where the start button used to be, no harder than 7 (and faster if you use the windows key). You people are thinking you have to do everything from Metro, and you'll be stuck. Not true, if you use Desktop the only thing you will need to use is the Start Screen. How much harder is it to press the Windows key and click on an icon than it is to move your mouse to a start button, navigate a menu and click on a button? You're missing out on some killer boot times, some nice Windows Explorer Tweaks (Ribbon is nice), new task manager is nice, new file copying is nice, also Windows natively supports .iso mounting now! IE10 is even pretty solid! Trust me, setup Win8 like I describe here and you'll think to yourself Windows 8 is a solid successor to Windows 7. I'm a senior electrical engineering student. I do a lot of work from this computer and if it was hindering me I wouldn't be using it. Give it a try and stop crying, please, it's worth it.trastamad03Or just skip Windows 8 and stick with Windows 7 :D Problem solved. Well I'm just saying if you decide to upgrade or build a new machine and you're considering Windows 8 it's just useable as Windows 7 if not more so. The media hypes the Metro interface and they haven't been doing a good job showing you how easy it is to still use the desktop as the primary GUI. They give the impression everything has to be done from Metro and they're sacrificing keyboard and mouse precision for touch. That however is the case, and if people would just try it out they would see that. Windows 7 is a great OS and many people will not upgrade simply because it will meet their needs for a long time.
[QUOTE="trastamad03"][QUOTE="Marfoo"]Simple fix for everyone who wants to use Windows 8 to the same efficiency they used 7. Erase all but the Desktop icon off the start screen. In search preferences remove the search function for any of the "apps." In IE10 (if you use IE) go into the settings and tell it to default to desktop mode. Now place the shortcuts for all the programs you use onto the Start Screen. Arrange them into groups, name the groups, make it nice and tidy, just to your liking. Now just use the Start Screen when you want to open programs. It's easy, just hit the windows key or mouse to where the start button used to be, no harder than 7 (and faster if you use the windows key). You people are thinking you have to do everything from Metro, and you'll be stuck. Not true, if you use Desktop the only thing you will need to use is the Start Screen. How much harder is it to press the Windows key and click on an icon than it is to move your mouse to a start button, navigate a menu and click on a button? You're missing out on some killer boot times, some nice Windows Explorer Tweaks (Ribbon is nice), new task manager is nice, new file copying is nice, also Windows natively supports .iso mounting now! IE10 is even pretty solid! Trust me, setup Win8 like I describe here and you'll think to yourself Windows 8 is a solid successor to Windows 7. I'm a senior electrical engineering student. I do a lot of work from this computer and if it was hindering me I wouldn't be using it. Give it a try and stop crying, please, it's worth it.MarfooOr just skip Windows 8 and stick with Windows 7 :D Problem solved. Well I'm just saying if you decide to upgrade or build a new machine and you're considering Windows 8 it's just useable as Windows 7 if not more so. The media hypes the Metro interface and they haven't been doing a good job showing you how easy it is to still use the desktop as the primary GUI. They give the impression everything has to be done from Metro and they're sacrificing keyboard and mouse precision for touch. That however is the case, and if people would just try it out they would see that. Windows 7 is a great OS and many people will not upgrade simply because it will meet their needs for a long time.
Exactly this.
People here seem to think that because Microsoft is releasing an OS, then everyone is FORCED to Upgrade. You don't have to upgrade people.
No, I'm sticking with Win7 cause it does everything well and to be honest, I can't be bothered installing another OS. (I do that at work constantly).
Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right.Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.
Mr_BillGates
Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function).
However desktop is desktop, nobody says they should ditch it, but they somehow feel they're doing that because 8's major "user" enhancements revolve around touch like interfaces, but it's more efficient and easy to use like that.
Let's not forget the major "background" enhancements, that 99% of the users have no clue about, they never did since Windows was invented, not even how much they enhance the performance, if it's faster it's faster, not even close to what's happening, there were huge jumps between XP and Vista, Vista and 7, from what they say 7 to 8 will be the same, in efficiency, performance and yet again various features for users that want a clean, easy, "combined" experience, aesthetically pleasing that will shape according to your needs.
[QUOTE="Mr_BillGates"]Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right. Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function). The search function is awesome in Win7, it's nearly instant. I still have my favorite programs on the start menu though, quick 2 clicks and I'm there.Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.
DanielDust
[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="Mr_BillGates"]Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right. Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function). The search function is awesome in Win7, it's nearly instant. I still have my favorite programs on the start menu though, quick 2 clicks and I'm there. I use Rocket Dock, because I just want a great looking desktop, not icons and crowded taskbar :P, I also used to have various desktop enhancements, Metro like theme, various interactive calendars, watches, etc, but they felt awkward after a while, the unofficial Metro 7 was pretty good, but it lacks basic functionality since it isn't integrated with the OS and it can't run like it should, so I can't wait for the actual Metro where I'll have "pages" for games, media, browsing, certain apps, messaging, etc.Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.
FelipeInside
I think the new Windows 8 is terrible, it's designed for gamers..... yet it has touch screen features. More like casual gamers on their touch screen tablets playing touch screen gamesmep69It's not designed for gamers, at most they advertised for casual gamers, nobody makes OSs designed for gaming, but technically, Windows is THE gaming OS and it was since the first releases, nothing changed till today and nothing major will change with Windows and games once 8 gets released.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment