Windows 8 - The Start Menu is BACK !!!

  • 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

...well, sort of... not from Microsoft...yet...

http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/292958,bring-the-start-menu-back-to-windows-8-with-start8.aspx

Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

Not like we'll die without the start menu..

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Not like we'll die without the start menu..

tjricardo089
Of course not, and who knows, maybe the NEW start menu system will be better in the long run. I just wanted to post this for those that want to stick with the classic Start Menu.
Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts
Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.jer_1
The lack of a final build might be the biggest of its problems...oh wait, 7 wasn't a looker at this point, Vista looked terrible.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#6 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Stardock has better work for these kinds of things imo.

Avatar image for Tixylixx
Tixylixx

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Tixylixx
Member since 2011 • 312 Posts

I don't mind the new start menu and I like how Microsoft ties everything up to one account, like logging into your PC is now via your hotmail account.

My problem with the new start menu is it's fullscreen only and makes you switch between that and desktop. I want it to a window so it keeps me in the desktop like the original start bar.

I never want to see the Metro app stuff either, it may be good on tablets but it doesn't work on a desktop, especially all the scrolling sideways with a small bar on the bottom.....

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
Meh... I'm happy with Win7... I'll pass on Win8
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.jer_1
WTF? Windows 8 for the most part looks like Win7, they both look great. Are you trying it on a Black and White Monitor?
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

I don't mind the new start menu and I like how Microsoft ties everything up to one account, like logging into your PC is now via your hotmail account.

My problem with the new start menu is it's fullscreen only and makes you switch between that and desktop. I want it to a window so it keeps me in the desktop like the original start bar.

I never want to see the Metro app stuff either, it may be good on tablets but it doesn't work on a desktop, especially all the scrolling sideways with a small bar on the bottom.....

Tixylixx
Yes I agree, but the idea is that the desktop is just another APP. I think the way MS designed Win8 is a GREAT MOVE for them. It's beating Apple to the point where everything comes together flawlessly. Imagine when the Win8 Tablets start appearing. On the flip side, I'm sure there will probably be a PROFESSIONAL version which has the desktop as default.
Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts

[QUOTE="Tixylixx"]

I don't mind the new start menu and I like how Microsoft ties everything up to one account, like logging into your PC is now via your hotmail account.

My problem with the new start menu is it's fullscreen only and makes you switch between that and desktop. I want it to a window so it keeps me in the desktop like the original start bar.

I never want to see the Metro app stuff either, it may be good on tablets but it doesn't work on a desktop, especially all the scrolling sideways with a small bar on the bottom.....

FelipeInside

Yes I agree, but the idea is that the desktop is just another APP. I think the way MS designed Win8 is a GREAT MOVE for them. It's beating Apple to the point where everything comes together flawlessly. Imagine when the Win8 Tablets start appearing. On the flip side, I'm sure there will probably be a PROFESSIONAL version which has the desktop as default.

or msconfig and uncheck the Metro 'app' most probably.

Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts

[QUOTE="jer_1"]Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.DanielDust

The lack of a final build might be the biggest of its problems...oh wait, 7 wasn't a looker at this point, Vista looked terrible.

That's bullsh*t. Windows 7 looked good from RC on.

It is silly to say it looks atrocious though.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#13 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.

Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)

I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.

Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)

I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.

Lach0121
Ur a composer? :)
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#15 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.

Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)

I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.

FelipeInside

Ur a composer? :)

Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.

Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]

[QUOTE="jer_1"]Wow, windows 8 looks atrocious. I'd be willing to bet that lack of a start menu is the least of it's problems.guynamedbilly

The lack of a final build might be the biggest of its problems...oh wait, 7 wasn't a looker at this point, Vista looked terrible.

That's bullsh*t. Windows 7 looked good from RC on.

It is silly to say it looks atrocious though.

You're confusing good looking with incomplete/missing visual elements. It looked good overall, but the first betas were missing a lot of small visual elements and the theme effects and overall look weren't complete, which is exactly what's happening with this first public beta of Windows 8, but the other person said it was atrocious because he/she didn't even bother checking anything else, just that random screenshot from that article, a screenshot of an incomplete part of Metro.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

Like I said in another thread, if it meets my needs, which would be gaming, composing, recording, and general computing needs.. with the same performance (or better) as Windows 7.

Then why shouldn't I go with it? it will be supported longer. (in theory)

I don't mind new menus, or things like that, as long as they are intuitive and progressive, and not a step backwards. Though so many people are threatened that any change is a "step backwards," religions, politics, even down to these forums with things like a classic start menu.

Lach0121

Ur a composer? :)

Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.

Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.

Great stuff, I've always wanted to learn to play an instrument. Good luck with it all.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#18 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Ur a composer? :)FelipeInside

Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.

Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.

Great stuff, I've always wanted to learn to play an instrument. Good luck with it all.

Much appreciated, yeah we plan on having a decent little home studio for us, and our friends, to make music in.

It will take some time, and money, getting it all setup, but I think it will all be worth it. Just add to even more music on the internet for eveyone to have the option to enjoy.

Getting an instrument is first step... Best way to get better at any instrument, is to have fun while playing it, and practicing. That creates a more genuine incentive than anything else could hope to spark, including monetary incentive. Genuine fun with it, will feed the passion of it like nothing else.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

Yea, still Amatuer at it, but I am.

Though I have been playing guitar for about a decade now, I am quite a bit better at that lol.

Lach0121

Great stuff, I've always wanted to learn to play an instrument. Good luck with it all.

Much appreciated, yeah we plan on having a decent little home studio for us, and our friends, to make music in.

It will take some time, and money, getting it all setup, but I think it will all be worth it. Just add to even more music on the internet for eveyone to have the option to enjoy.

Getting an instrument is first step... Best way to get better at any instrument, is to have fun while playing it, and practicing. That creates a more genuine incentive than anything else could hope to spark, including monetary incentive. Genuine fun with it, will feed the passion of it like nothing else.

Yeah, I've always wanted to learn to play the piano. Not for work or earning money, just to learn it and say I can play an instrument. I can get an electronic keyboard from a friend of mine but the problem is always money in this world. Lessons/Course cost money and also free time which lately I struggle to get.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
windows 8 looks bad i think i will just stick with 7 and I haven't done that for a long time... I even used Vista since beta... yeah
Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

Not like we'll die without the start menu..

tjricardo089
I don't mean to alarm anyone, but I possibly will...
Avatar image for FreakShowScot
FreakShowScot

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 FreakShowScot
Member since 2012 • 75 Posts

people will probably get used to the new start menu but right now it's weird to use if you don't have a touch screen

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

people will probably get used to the new start menu but right now it's weird to use if you don't have a touch screen

FreakShowScot
Doubt it. People who use computers for their profession, are not going to put up some gimmicky crap that reduces their productivity.
Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts
Win 8 is clearly designed for tablets at this point. Unless there is a very simple method of getting a more mouse and keyboard friendly UI then I will be skipping this version of Windows. Skipping Vista did me no harm and I think Windows 7 is just fine.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Win 8 is clearly designed for tablets at this point. Unless there is a very simple method of getting a more mouse and keyboard friendly UI then I will be skipping this version of Windows. Skipping Vista did me no harm and I think Windows 7 is just fine. bonafidetk
Skipping Vista actually did you a favour...
Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

i really need to get windows 7 before the release this. any word on the release date?

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

i really need to get windows 7 before the release this. any word on the release date?

TheShadowLord07
At this stage just wait for Win8, should be out near end of this year.
Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.

MlauTheDaft
How can the first real step towards interaction from MS be a step backwards? that's nonsense.
Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

[QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]

Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.

DanielDust

How can the first real step towards interaction from MS be a step backwards? that's nonsense.

First step? Are you sure know the definition of interaction?

Metro is clearly designed with touch screens in mind and it directly impairs our "classic" control schemes. And no, touch controls are in no way superior to M/KB, especially not on a PC.

It's simply the wrong tool for the job.

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]

Metro is just plain wrong for PCs. Pro or not, it's a step backwards in terms of interaction.

MlauTheDaft

How can the first real step towards interaction from MS be a step backwards? that's nonsense.

First step? Are you sure know the definition of interaction?

Metro is clearly designed with touch screens in mind and it directly impairs our "classic" control schemes. And no, touch controls are in no way superior to M/KB, especially not on a PC.

It's simply the wrong tool for the job.

Yep. Touch sensing input devices have their place, but they should in no way, be treated as a replacement for the mouse.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

It's a tool designed for an interactive desktop, for people that care about ease of use and the visual aspect, the old, current way is fine, refined, does the job well, but...who cares? just because it works fine, we should stop caring about going further?

And who said anything about touch controls? I'm sensing a lot of misguided, pointless hate towards Metro. It's fine if you don't care, but not caring doesn't mean inventing random reasons and excuses to hate on it.

Interfaces will evolve, we need them to evolve, it's the reason they aren't the same as 30 years ago, let's not focus on a crack at our feet in a 1000 km road, being close minded didn't help anyone.

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts
[QUOTE="DanielDust"]It's a tool designed for an interactive desktop, for people that care about ease of use and the visual aspect, the old, current way is fine, refined, does the job well, but...who cares? just because it works fine, we should top caring about going further? And who said anything about touch controls? I'm sensing a lot of misguided, pointless hate towards Metro. It's fine if you don't care, but not caring doesn't mean inventing random reasons and excuses to hate on it.

How is something that inhibits use, moving forward? The current obsession with touch devices is incredibly annoying.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]It's a tool designed for an interactive desktop, for people that care about ease of use and the visual aspect, the old, current way is fine, refined, does the job well, but...who cares? just because it works fine, we should top caring about going further? And who said anything about touch controls? I'm sensing a lot of misguided, pointless hate towards Metro. It's fine if you don't care, but not caring doesn't mean inventing random reasons and excuses to hate on it.C_Rule
How is something that inhibits use, moving forward? The current obsession with touch devices is incredibly annoying.

I don't like touch devices, but Metro works just fine with a mouse and it doesn't inhibit use, ever used it or you're just assuming things based on "pictures that move"?

It's also a tool...it's not the new desktop, you guys are like complaining about media player running at startup covering your desktop and that would be silly, right?

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts
Yes, been using it on a VM.
Avatar image for Gamesterpheonix
Gamesterpheonix

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Gamesterpheonix
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts
There was already a registry hack for this. I used it and got the Start menu while using the Dev Preview. Windows 8 IS impressive so far but to be honest - they should have the start menu as an option if the user wants. Without it Windows 8 is a tablet OS they are forcing onto PC. Its great - dont get me wrong - Im liking Windows 8 but some decisions seems just a LITTLE too desperate. lol. I like the willingness to take a chance and risk and innovate but lol...dont make it harder on the user...ease em in.
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
Simple fix for everyone who wants to use Windows 8 to the same efficiency they used 7. Erase all but the Desktop icon off the start screen. In search preferences remove the search function for any of the "apps." In IE10 (if you use IE) go into the settings and tell it to default to desktop mode. Now place the shortcuts for all the programs you use onto the Start Screen. Arrange them into groups, name the groups, make it nice and tidy, just to your liking. Now just use the Start Screen when you want to open programs. It's easy, just hit the windows key or mouse to where the start button used to be, no harder than 7 (and faster if you use the windows key). You people are thinking you have to do everything from Metro, and you'll be stuck. Not true, if you use Desktop the only thing you will need to use is the Start Screen. How much harder is it to press the Windows key and click on an icon than it is to move your mouse to a start button, navigate a menu and click on a button? You're missing out on some killer boot times, some nice Windows Explorer Tweaks (Ribbon is nice), new task manager is nice, new file copying is nice, also Windows natively supports .iso mounting now! IE10 is even pretty solid! Trust me, setup Win8 like I describe here and you'll think to yourself Windows 8 is a solid successor to Windows 7. I'm a senior electrical engineering student. I do a lot of work from this computer and if it was hindering me I wouldn't be using it. Give it a try and stop crying, please, it's worth it.
Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
[QUOTE="Marfoo"]Simple fix for everyone who wants to use Windows 8 to the same efficiency they used 7. Erase all but the Desktop icon off the start screen. In search preferences remove the search function for any of the "apps." In IE10 (if you use IE) go into the settings and tell it to default to desktop mode. Now place the shortcuts for all the programs you use onto the Start Screen. Arrange them into groups, name the groups, make it nice and tidy, just to your liking. Now just use the Start Screen when you want to open programs. It's easy, just hit the windows key or mouse to where the start button used to be, no harder than 7 (and faster if you use the windows key). You people are thinking you have to do everything from Metro, and you'll be stuck. Not true, if you use Desktop the only thing you will need to use is the Start Screen. How much harder is it to press the Windows key and click on an icon than it is to move your mouse to a start button, navigate a menu and click on a button? You're missing out on some killer boot times, some nice Windows Explorer Tweaks (Ribbon is nice), new task manager is nice, new file copying is nice, also Windows natively supports .iso mounting now! IE10 is even pretty solid! Trust me, setup Win8 like I describe here and you'll think to yourself Windows 8 is a solid successor to Windows 7. I'm a senior electrical engineering student. I do a lot of work from this computer and if it was hindering me I wouldn't be using it. Give it a try and stop crying, please, it's worth it.

Or just skip Windows 8 and stick with Windows 7 :D Problem solved.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Windows 8 is a very smart move by MS to bring together the PC, the Tablet and the Phone into one OS, and try to get ahead of Apple and the iPad. Yes, for KB/M users the Start Menu will get some getting used to, and there might be a PRO version with a more similar start menu to Win7 who knows. But everyone has to understand that MS HAD to do this, it's the next logical step in their market plan.
Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="Marfoo"]Simple fix for everyone who wants to use Windows 8 to the same efficiency they used 7. Erase all but the Desktop icon off the start screen. In search preferences remove the search function for any of the "apps." In IE10 (if you use IE) go into the settings and tell it to default to desktop mode. Now place the shortcuts for all the programs you use onto the Start Screen. Arrange them into groups, name the groups, make it nice and tidy, just to your liking. Now just use the Start Screen when you want to open programs. It's easy, just hit the windows key or mouse to where the start button used to be, no harder than 7 (and faster if you use the windows key). You people are thinking you have to do everything from Metro, and you'll be stuck. Not true, if you use Desktop the only thing you will need to use is the Start Screen. How much harder is it to press the Windows key and click on an icon than it is to move your mouse to a start button, navigate a menu and click on a button? You're missing out on some killer boot times, some nice Windows Explorer Tweaks (Ribbon is nice), new task manager is nice, new file copying is nice, also Windows natively supports .iso mounting now! IE10 is even pretty solid! Trust me, setup Win8 like I describe here and you'll think to yourself Windows 8 is a solid successor to Windows 7. I'm a senior electrical engineering student. I do a lot of work from this computer and if it was hindering me I wouldn't be using it. Give it a try and stop crying, please, it's worth it.trastamad03
Or just skip Windows 8 and stick with Windows 7 :D Problem solved.

Well I'm just saying if you decide to upgrade or build a new machine and you're considering Windows 8 it's just useable as Windows 7 if not more so. The media hypes the Metro interface and they haven't been doing a good job showing you how easy it is to still use the desktop as the primary GUI. They give the impression everything has to be done from Metro and they're sacrificing keyboard and mouse precision for touch. That however is the case, and if people would just try it out they would see that. Windows 7 is a great OS and many people will not upgrade simply because it will meet their needs for a long time.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="trastamad03"][QUOTE="Marfoo"]Simple fix for everyone who wants to use Windows 8 to the same efficiency they used 7. Erase all but the Desktop icon off the start screen. In search preferences remove the search function for any of the "apps." In IE10 (if you use IE) go into the settings and tell it to default to desktop mode. Now place the shortcuts for all the programs you use onto the Start Screen. Arrange them into groups, name the groups, make it nice and tidy, just to your liking. Now just use the Start Screen when you want to open programs. It's easy, just hit the windows key or mouse to where the start button used to be, no harder than 7 (and faster if you use the windows key). You people are thinking you have to do everything from Metro, and you'll be stuck. Not true, if you use Desktop the only thing you will need to use is the Start Screen. How much harder is it to press the Windows key and click on an icon than it is to move your mouse to a start button, navigate a menu and click on a button? You're missing out on some killer boot times, some nice Windows Explorer Tweaks (Ribbon is nice), new task manager is nice, new file copying is nice, also Windows natively supports .iso mounting now! IE10 is even pretty solid! Trust me, setup Win8 like I describe here and you'll think to yourself Windows 8 is a solid successor to Windows 7. I'm a senior electrical engineering student. I do a lot of work from this computer and if it was hindering me I wouldn't be using it. Give it a try and stop crying, please, it's worth it.Marfoo
Or just skip Windows 8 and stick with Windows 7 :D Problem solved.

Well I'm just saying if you decide to upgrade or build a new machine and you're considering Windows 8 it's just useable as Windows 7 if not more so. The media hypes the Metro interface and they haven't been doing a good job showing you how easy it is to still use the desktop as the primary GUI. They give the impression everything has to be done from Metro and they're sacrificing keyboard and mouse precision for touch. That however is the case, and if people would just try it out they would see that. Windows 7 is a great OS and many people will not upgrade simply because it will meet their needs for a long time.

Exactly this.

People here seem to think that because Microsoft is releasing an OS, then everyone is FORCED to Upgrade. You don't have to upgrade people.

No, I'm sticking with Win7 cause it does everything well and to be honest, I can't be bothered installing another OS. (I do that at work constantly).

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.

Mr_BillGates

Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right.

Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function).

However desktop is desktop, nobody says they should ditch it, but they somehow feel they're doing that because 8's major "user" enhancements revolve around touch like interfaces, but it's more efficient and easy to use like that.

Let's not forget the major "background" enhancements, that 99% of the users have no clue about, they never did since Windows was invented, not even how much they enhance the performance, if it's faster it's faster, not even close to what's happening, there were huge jumps between XP and Vista, Vista and 7, from what they say 7 to 8 will be the same, in efficiency, performance and yet again various features for users that want a clean, easy, "combined" experience, aesthetically pleasing that will shape according to your needs.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_BillGates"]

Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.

DanielDust
Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right. Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function).

The search function is awesome in Win7, it's nearly instant. I still have my favorite programs on the start menu though, quick 2 clicks and I'm there.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="Mr_BillGates"]

Start menu has been useless to me since Vista. Move the search UI else where and the Start menu is completely obsolete.

FelipeInside
Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right. Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function).

The search function is awesome in Win7, it's nearly instant. I still have my favorite programs on the start menu though, quick 2 clicks and I'm there.

I use Rocket Dock, because I just want a great looking desktop, not icons and crowded taskbar :P, I also used to have various desktop enhancements, Metro like theme, various interactive calendars, watches, etc, but they felt awkward after a while, the unofficial Metro 7 was pretty good, but it lacks basic functionality since it isn't integrated with the OS and it can't run like it should, so I can't wait for the actual Metro where I'll have "pages" for games, media, browsing, certain apps, messaging, etc.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="DanielDust"] Same, I barely use the start menu, it's not needed anymore, I only do 2 things with it, search for the app I want or launch the control panel on the right. Start menu is just a thing XP users got stuck on, they probably didn't even notice it was almost entirely useless and inefficient in its current form (because of the search function).

The search function is awesome in Win7, it's nearly instant. I still have my favorite programs on the start menu though, quick 2 clicks and I'm there.

I use Rocket Dock, because I just want a great looking desktop, not icons and crowded taskbar :P, I also used to have various desktop enhancements, Metro like theme, various interactive calendars, watches, etc, but they felt awkward after a while, the unofficial Metro 7 was pretty good, but it lacks basic functionality since it isn't integrated with the OS and it can't run like it should, so I can't wait for the actual Metro where I'll have "pages" for games, media, browsing, certain apps, messaging, etc.

I agree to an extent about Win8 not optimized for KB/M, but people seem to not understand that it was never meant to. Microsoft HAD to get into the touch market to get some off Apple. I might not upgrade my desktop to Win8, might wait for Win9.... but I absolutely cannot wait until a good Windows 8 Tablet hits. It's gonna destroy the iPad in functionality and looks. Of course mindless Apple fanboys are going to go like hungry dogs to buy their next iPad (we saw it yet again a couple of days ago even though Apple released the same product a bit more tweaked). BUT TECHNICALLY, a Windows 8 Tablet will do much more.
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#47 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
Can't you just revert to the traditional desktop interface anyway, though? That's most likely what many people will be doing, I imagine.
Avatar image for mep69
mep69

1926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 mep69
Member since 2008 • 1926 Posts
I think the new Windows 8 is terrible, it's designed for gamers..... yet it has touch screen features. More like casual gamers on their touch screen tablets playing touch screen games
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
I think the new Windows 8 is terrible, it's designed for gamers..... yet it has touch screen features. More like casual gamers on their touch screen tablets playing touch screen gamesmep69
It's not designed for gamers, at most they advertised for casual gamers, nobody makes OSs designed for gaming, but technically, Windows is THE gaming OS and it was since the first releases, nothing changed till today and nothing major will change with Windows and games once 8 gets released.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

7 is going to be the new XP since every company in the world upgraded to it. I don't think they'll hurry to adopt 8. I hope I'll be surprised.