Avoiding the console death spiral [Scary Article]

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37773 I hope the European launch works out, I hate to see any of this article come to fruition.
Avatar image for lusitanogamer
lusitanogamer

9338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 lusitanogamer
Member since 2006 • 9338 Posts
The Inquirer? Don't make me laugh...
Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
so the article in the inquirer says that halo is gonna be the reason that PS3 wont win? right... apparently they forgot Halo 1 and 2 were also exclusive to the box. since they are reserving a PS3 about every 20 seconds last article we saw, and thats at one store in europe, i got a hunch its not gonna be a problem.
Avatar image for whitey6
whitey6

1646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 whitey6
Member since 2005 • 1646 Posts
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37773 I hope the European launch works out, I hate to see any of this article come fruition. pimperjones
Please, Sony has too many AAA first party games to go into that death spiral. I would say that Sony could go into that spiral, but like I said, a lot of the really really really popular games on Sony, will never go to MS or Nintendo because they are owned by Sony.
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
I really hope the European launch is successful. I like the Playstation too much to see it die, I was unfortunate enough to see one of my favourite consoles die once (Dreamcast) I don't need another.
Avatar image for stinkeyb
stinkeyb

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 stinkeyb
Member since 2005 • 713 Posts
wow thats deep! i have faith in the ugly duckling turning into the beautiful swan.
Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
I really hope the European launch is successful. I like the Playstation too much to see it die, I was unfortunate enough to see one of my favourite consoles die once (Dreamcast) I don't need another. pimperjones
the difference was Sega for the most part couldnt keep a console alive, Sony was the one that beat the dreamcast, and made the most successful console pretty much ever with the ps2, i have no doubt it will be fine, the launch will blow people away, and the games will kickass
Avatar image for lusitanogamer
lusitanogamer

9338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 lusitanogamer
Member since 2006 • 9338 Posts
The PS3 won't die, don't pay attention to this bs. The PS3 has many great exclusive games coming for it, some of those you haven't even heard of.
Avatar image for Charlie2688
Charlie2688

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Charlie2688
Member since 2005 • 1364 Posts

A thing that I find pathetic is that Developers are afraid of making more PS3 exclusives cuz there aren't many PS3 in the market but the PS3 wont sell more if there aren't more exclusives...so basically developers are hoping that magically people buy the PS3 for no reason and maybe...maybe making some exclusives now that they would have a wider market...a market that ironically the don't want to create by helping a new born PS3 with early excluisives

In a case Kojima and Konami with MGS4 they are taking their chances cuz they know that MGS4 is a system seller and with the mega success they had with the previous Playstation sys and MGS games they have their niche there that can be exploited to create a bigger market and release even more games later on

A bad example is Sega that knew VF5 has a niche with the PS fans and Sony but crapped their pants to think they are gonna get stuck cuz the PS3 will NEVER sell and they ported it ot the 360 in hopes of attracting the "other" side of the market and making more money (WOW specially from the fact that the game is a port from an arcade game) but by making that generous gesture they killed on step of the PS3 in the good direction since the game was a success with the critics (maybe except Jeff I-have-no-real-friends-that-is-why-I-need-online) that could have encouraged more PS3 sales

In another view we see Capcom with DMC4 a game that has also a niche in the PS consoles but its a game that is in the fine line between "if you wont sell more PS3 we will make this multi plat and go the Sega way" unluckily they dont have such a strong product to have the Kojima console seller insurance and in any case you were wondering about Dead Rising and Lost Planet...well when Capcom revealed they were about to cancel these game cuz they had little faith in the 360s japan market you think twice about "Capcom loves the 360"

Sadly in this gen its sad cuz developers come with BS like "we want all consoles to share this great game" when they decided to make multi plat a previous exclusive, that its only a false way of saying "were are crapping our pants about x consoles market but hey were wont do anything to help it" 

Sony need desperately now to secure there Euro launch and with at least another 1.5 million sold cuz of launch getting a total of more than 3 mil they can be assured that developers will start looking twice about not making a PS3 exclusive...

END OF FILE

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
Why didn't Sony bring out the big guns in North American launch. Gran Tourismo HD would have sold at least half million PS3 alone. Then there's Heavenly Sword which incidently is on the back of the PS3 box but is nowhere to be seen. I blame Sony. They should have released the console with their three top exclusives directly from Sony Studios.
Avatar image for lusitanogamer
lusitanogamer

9338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 lusitanogamer
Member since 2006 • 9338 Posts
Why didn't Sony bring out the big guns in North American launch. Gran Tourismo HD would have sold at least half million PS3 alone. Then there's Heavenly Sword which incidently is on the back of the PS3 box but is nowhere to be seen. I blame Sony. They should have released the console with their three top exclusives directly from Sony Studios. pimperjones
I'd rather have a good game than a rushed game. I think Sony is doing the right thing with their 1st and 2nd party exclusives, they're taking their time to put a great product on PS3's owners hands.
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]Why didn't Sony bring out the big guns in North American launch. Gran Tourismo HD would have sold at least half million PS3 alone. Then there's Heavenly Sword which incidently is on the back of the PS3 box but is nowhere to be seen. I blame Sony. They should have released the console with their three top exclusives directly from Sony Studios. lusitanogamer
I'd rather have a good game than a rushed game. I think Sony is doing the right thing with their 1st and 2nd party exclusives, they're taking their time to put a great product on PS3's owners hands.

Thats may be a good move for people who like Sony but it's the worst move when your in a battle. In war you don't say hey lets keep all my powerful units in reserve and defend the country with our pathetic troops cause by the the time you release your best troops the wars over. Sony could have sold an extra million units had they released GT HD and Heavenly Sword along with RFOM. There's no excuse for the lack of AAA first party titles at launch when you've had 1 year to prepare.
Avatar image for Kimahriii
Kimahriii

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Kimahriii
Member since 2003 • 456 Posts

Its silly to think any of the big 3 are going to fail at this point I think the console wars are going to be different unlike the old days a console winning does not = the competition dying. The PS2 killed the Gamecube and Xbox in sales but yet they are both back with more consoles and I doubt even if the PS3 is not #1 this time that there won't be a PS4 and so on. Unlike the old days there is now enough gamers to support 3 consoles beside the hardcore gamers who buy every console.

I think the competition is healthy and going to be that way for a while and its stupid to say a console that barely been out for 3months is going to failure when people camped out for weeks for it, got shot for it, sold it for 3-4x its original price on ebay and in 3months sold almost 2mil consoles with limited supply(I still have yet to see a PS3 at a store for sale)

Avatar image for Charlie2688
Charlie2688

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 Charlie2688
Member since 2005 • 1364 Posts

Dude how the HELL are you gonna send your "powerful units" if they are not ready? this is ABSURD, look at heavenly sword its been almost 5 months since the PS3 launch and its not even ready! even Resistance was kind of rushed for it to be released in the launch but they got lucky cuz it was an excellent title for a launch (contrary to what GS or the 360 fanboys wanna inform you) dude its a BASIC thing for a console launch to suck...look at the Wii it used as its best weapon A GAMECUBE PORT dude that is like WTF if you ask me, the Wii launched sucked as bad as the PS3 but all changed cuz fo the over-hype of "positive" feed back and the magical number"250" next to it (that if you ask me its a death trap that is showing clearly every day as developers continue to ignore the console in each consecutive new game announcement) but hey the media wanna inform you that the PS3 launched sucked and want you to forget about the Wii launch...and don't get me started with the 360s launch

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

Dude how the HELL are you gonna send your "powerful units" if they are not ready? this is ABSURD, look at heavenly sword its been almost 5 months since the PS3 launch and its not even ready! even Resistance was kind of rushed for it to be released in the launch but they got lucky cuz it was an excellent title for a launch (contrary to what GS or the 360 fanboys wanna inform you) dude its a BASIC thing for a console launch to suck...look at the Wii it used as its best weapon A GAMECUBE PORT dude that is like WTF if you ask me, the Wii launched sucked as bad as the PS3 but all changed cuz fo the over-hype of "positive" feed back and the magical number"250" next to it (that if you ask me its a death trap that is showing clearly every day as developers continue to ignore the console in each consecutive new game announcement) but hey the media wanna inform you that the PS3 launched sucked and want you to forget about the Wii launch...and don't get me started with the 360s launch

Charlie2688
They had a whole extra year to make those titles ready for launch. By not releasing Gran Tourismo HD at launch they lost a good half million unit sales if not a million. Sony knew they were gonna face tough competition at launch what I don't get is why they didn't prepare. It's the case of spreading yourself too thin, Sony was too busy pimping out BluRay tech and producing hollywood flops (Basic Instinct 2) that they ignored their bread and butter which is gaming royalties. A Jack of all trades is a king of none. Sony needs to get their priorities straight in the future.
Avatar image for clsnbrdr616
clsnbrdr616

572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 clsnbrdr616
Member since 2005 • 572 Posts

Its silly to think any of the big 3 are going to fail at this point I think the console wars are going to be different unlike the old days a console winning does not = the competition dying.

Kimahriii
I have to agree with you there. Your right, the PS2 beat the Gamecube and Xbox hands down, but the Xbox and Gamecube stayed alive pretty easily. I think they will all survive... it's just too early to see which one becomes the most popular.
Avatar image for OmegaDark
OmegaDark

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#18 OmegaDark
Member since 2003 • 800 Posts
[QUOTE="pimperjones"] Sony was too busy pimping out BluRay tech and producing hollywood flops (Basic Instinct 2) that they ignored their bread and butter which is gaming royalties. A Jack of all trades is a king of none. Sony needs to get their priorities straight in the future.

Wow, the amount of ignorance on these boards never ceases to amaze me.
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
[QUOTE="OmegaDark"][QUOTE="pimperjones"] Sony was too busy pimping out BluRay tech and producing hollywood flops (Basic Instinct 2) that they ignored their bread and butter which is gaming royalties. A Jack of all trades is a king of none. Sony needs to get their priorities straight in the future.

Wow, the amount of ignorance on these boards never ceases to amaze me.

Sony spent more money producing hollywood flops this year then most gaming studios spend on development for an entire console's lifespan. What I'm simply saying is it's dangerous for a company to expand beyond their means. Instead of spending 130 miilion of a say Stealth or whatever other money losing film endevour that Sony's playing with. They could have outsourced 3-5 2nd party developers to create exclusive PS3 launch titles which in turn would have strengthened there NA launch.
Avatar image for TJSAGE
TJSAGE

3540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 TJSAGE
Member since 2006 • 3540 Posts
Cant compare the 2 yet on games and sales because they keep refering to sales at the end of the year, at the end of 06 how much longer was the 360 out for. 

1 thing I agree is that " In the end, the better the games, and the more exclusive the games, the more consoles you sell."

There are just some of those games that you see and say I have to get that console now because of that game.  Once you have that system you kind of fall into a support for that console.  I would like to see more exclusives for the PS3, but if Sony could make it possibe I would make all developers who have their game come out for all systems or port games make it that the PS3 will always have 1080p resolution and a ton of added content, maps, gameplay, whatever packed on the blu ray disks to take advantage of its size.  SO in a way yes its the same game but kind of exclusive for the PS3  
Avatar image for firestorm91
firestorm91

4538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#21 firestorm91
Member since 2006 • 4538 Posts
What I don't get is how Sony had ALL this time (delaying the PS3 launch) to make killer games (not all Sony developers are working on the PS3) and now we are stuck waiting for the PS3 to climb a mountain. Sony put themselves in a position that they never had to be in. :( I just hope everything works out...
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
What I don't get is how Sony had ALL this time (delaying the PS3 launch) to make killer games (not all Sony developers are working on the PS3) and now we are stuck waiting for the PS3 to climb a mountain. Sony put themselves in a position that they never had to be in. :( I just hope everything works out...firestorm91
Exactly can you believe Sony spent 130 million on "Stealth" which made like 2 dollars. Even with hollywood martian accounting Sony had to have at least spent 100 million on that turd. If Sony spent 100 million on PS3 launch titles we'd have like twice the amount of games we have now and wouldn't have to stand 360 fanboy redicules.
Avatar image for NooBAFIED
NooBAFIED

4136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 NooBAFIED
Member since 2006 • 4136 Posts
sad lame wow
Avatar image for Ericvon71
Ericvon71

3219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Ericvon71
Member since 2004 • 3219 Posts

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37773 I hope the European launch works out, I hate to see any of this article come to fruition. pimperjones

Oh my the Inquirer..........LOL

You must be new!!

Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
you people worry over stupid crap. the PS3 launch was better than PS1 and PS2, how can you be worried? any of you own a multi billion dollar company? thought not, pretty sure Sony can handle themselves, they dont really need a back seat driver. i mean, all they really did was put out a innovative console with a extremely powerful processor, great media capabilities, and blu-ray, how dare they spend a little extra time cause they had problems with their blu-ray drive. too bad they didnt release it when it was scheduled so we could have a piece of junk that fails like a certain box. maybe we can go to all the developers of the games, and make sure they rush those out so those can suck for us to. quit your complaining, its all coming, we got plenty of great games coming, updates to help with any problems, and developers realizing its potential and porting or making games for it. if you check a post that was here earlier, the makers of Unreal Tournament 3 have stated they will be making that for PC and PS3, then porting it to the box, and they are using the PS3 version for a demo. what more do you people want, my god
Avatar image for T-Zone
T-Zone

4525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 T-Zone
Member since 2003 • 4525 Posts
That site had MS written all over it...
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

pimperjones your ignorance never stops amazing me

....if only things were as simple as you want them to be be :(

As a small recommendation I suggest you read a little about Sony on Wiki :)

Charlie2688

Suggestion ignored

Ignorance is bliss.

Take my suggestion. Quit trolling

Avatar image for JiveT
JiveT

8619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 JiveT
Member since 2005 • 8619 Posts
Did anyone read the article? Why not argue his points instead of flipping out over the word "inquirer" its not a tabloid article by any stretch.
Avatar image for Goku004
Goku004

754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Goku004
Member since 2006 • 754 Posts
[QUOTE="Charlie2688"]

Dude how the HELL are you gonna send your "powerful units" if they are not ready? this is ABSURD, look at heavenly sword its been almost 5 months since the PS3 launch and its not even ready! even Resistance was kind of rushed for it to be released in the launch but they got lucky cuz it was an excellent title for a launch (contrary to what GS or the 360 fanboys wanna inform you) dude its a BASIC thing for a console launch to suck...look at the Wii it used as its best weapon A GAMECUBE PORT dude that is like WTF if you ask me, the Wii launched sucked as bad as the PS3 but all changed cuz fo the over-hype of "positive" feed back and the magical number"250" next to it (that if you ask me its a death trap that is showing clearly every day as developers continue to ignore the console in each consecutive new game announcement) but hey the media wanna inform you that the PS3 launched sucked and want you to forget about the Wii launch...and don't get me started with the 360s launch

pimperjones
They had a whole extra year to make those titles ready for launch. By not releasing Gran Tourismo HD at launch they lost a good half million unit sales if not a million. Sony knew they were gonna face tough competition at launch what I don't get is why they didn't prepare. It's the case of spreading yourself too thin, Sony was too busy pimping out BluRay tech and producing hollywood flops (Basic Instinct 2) that they ignored their bread and butter which is gaming royalties. A Jack of all trades is a king of none. Sony needs to get their priorities straight in the future.

dude they didn't even have an extra half million units to sell....
Avatar image for gamewhat
gamewhat

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 gamewhat
Member since 2007 • 926 Posts
Yeah, what ever.....people have been saying garbage like this since the ps3 came out. It aint going no where, but up. Whats wrong with you people, there aint no doom and gloom for any console. 
Avatar image for TE_Lawrence
TE_Lawrence

6934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 TE_Lawrence
Member since 2005 • 6934 Posts

[QUOTE="firestorm91"]What I don't get is how Sony had ALL this time (delaying the PS3 launch) to make killer games (not all Sony developers are working on the PS3) and now we are stuck waiting for the PS3 to climb a mountain. Sony put themselves in a position that they never had to be in. :( I just hope everything works out...pimperjones

Exactly can you believe Sony spent 130 million on "Stealth" which made like 2 dollars. Even with hollywood martian accounting Sony had to have at least spent 100 million on that turd. If Sony spent 100 million on PS3 launch titles we'd have like twice the amount of games we have now and wouldn't have to stand 360 fanboy redicules.

:?

Movies got bigger budgets because there's more sources for financing them like product placement (You do not see VAIOs in Sony's games) and there's also more sources for revenue (Cinema release, video release, out-leasing to TV channels) where the box office alone many times surpasses the production budgets.

Yes Sony made a blunder with Stealth in 2005 but the director had previously made two box office hits xXx and The Fast and the Furious (a wonder people only realised that his movies suck when Stealth was released).

Another thing is that those money could not have been moved to a game because they came from different investors, a way to split the risk, the big studios should be more seen as publishers for other movie studios than sole investors.

In the end taking risks which may end up as flops has brought Columbia Pictures from the edge of bankruptcy to the annually highest or second highest grossing studio for the last 5 years (2005 was a total blunder) and setting the record for highest annual box office gross twice.

Did anyone read the article? Why not argue his points instead of flipping out over the word "inquirer" its not a tabloid article by any stretch. JiveT

No it's worse, have you even bothered to look at its previous articles? The Inquirer has been way off so many times that it has become the laughing stock.

It's so sad that it's not even funny and what is the point of debating something not even people in System Wars wouldn't waste time on?

Avatar image for Uzburacuz9
Uzburacuz9

712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Uzburacuz9
Member since 2007 • 712 Posts
[QUOTE="OmegaDark"][QUOTE="pimperjones"] Sony was too busy pimping out BluRay tech and producing hollywood flops (Basic Instinct 2) that they ignored their bread and butter which is gaming royalties. A Jack of all trades is a king of none. Sony needs to get their priorities straight in the future.

Wow, the amount of ignorance on these boards never ceases to amaze me.

you know what dude? i agree with you. its pathetic. and its only in the ps3 forums..im 100% with sony but this ignorance is hurting the cause,not helping it.
Avatar image for deadkingdg
deadkingdg

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 deadkingdg
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts
[QUOTE="lusitanogamer"][QUOTE="pimperjones"]Why didn't Sony bring out the big guns in North American launch. Gran Tourismo HD would have sold at least half million PS3 alone. Then there's Heavenly Sword which incidently is on the back of the PS3 box but is nowhere to be seen. I blame Sony. They should have released the console with their three top exclusives directly from Sony Studios. pimperjones
I'd rather have a good game than a rushed game. I think Sony is doing the right thing with their 1st and 2nd party exclusives, they're taking their time to put a great product on PS3's owners hands.

Thats may be a good move for people who like Sony but it's the worst move when your in a battle. In war you don't say hey lets keep all my powerful units in reserve and defend the country with our pathetic troops cause by the the time you release your best troops the wars over. Sony could have sold an extra million units had they released GT HD and Heavenly Sword along with RFOM. There's no excuse for the lack of AAA first party titles at launch when you've had 1 year to prepare.



Wow, do you really think they hold them back for no reasons? If the games are not out, it's because they are not ready, simple as that. Games take years to make, and launch titles suffer from many disadvantages on every consoles, because devs have to work without knowing the full specs of the console and don't have all the libraries yet. GT HD and Heavenly Sword were not complete by november 17th, I much rather have to wait for everything to be fixed than the game being rushed and turning out disapointing.

Check back history, every gen, Sony has a very bad launch line up, but IMO, it's better like that, since the best games require more work, so they come out later. Nintendo always come out very strong, but it seems to only do great at launch. The N64 and the GC were dominating the PS1 and PS2 when they came out, but the first lap means nothing in a race, only the final one matters.
Avatar image for Hulabaloza
Hulabaloza

1322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Hulabaloza
Member since 2005 • 1322 Posts
The article is right. The PS3 is in danger. It's clearly more expensive for the consumer. It's difficult to work with for the developer. And probably worst of all, it's an ugly prospect for the publisher - pay the most to make a game with the least marketshare.

People expect the PS2 big name games to save it, but the article explains very well why that's not a real good prospect. Square didn't trust DQ on the PS3 - in Japan, what would stop them from seeing Capcom's success on the competition (two million selling games in 6 months), and jumping ship. MGS and FF are the life/death of those companies - they have to be big games. Sony HAS to lock them up, but like the article says, based on a marketshare standpoint, MS could lock them up for less money, cause all they'd need is for the games to be multiplatform. Even losing one of the games at that level will damage the PS3 brand in a big way.

Sony can make changes - release a cheaper PS3 (drop blu-ray), make sure they lock up ALL the big games, etc. But either way, they are fighting for survival right now, not 1st place or, amazingly, even 2nd.
Avatar image for TE_Lawrence
TE_Lawrence

6934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 TE_Lawrence
Member since 2005 • 6934 Posts
Not even a blind fanboy would predict such silly Halo 3 sales or think that it costs twice the amount to develop a PS3 title. Supporting this so called "article" is like putting a "kick me" sign on ones own back :? This uninformed "article" can be added to the pile of BS the Inquirer has been letting out.
Avatar image for GoddBless
GoddBless

937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 GoddBless
Member since 2004 • 937 Posts
I am far from a Sony fanboy (you can check my post history) but I won't even waste my time reading that article. Any article about Sony from the inquirer is biased. They really seem to have something against Sony. As for this thread, some valid points have been made. Charlie made a good point about 3rd Party companies getting scared when they see the difference in marketshare between companies. Look at the fact that companies are more willing to do a game on PS2 than PS3, but yet they will make it for 360 and not Xbox. I always see people say PS3 has only been out for a few months, give it a chance. You have to take into consideration developers are trying to make money now. They can't wait much longer. Microsoft forced their hand by coming out a year early and having about 10mil sold by the time Sony has 1mil. Also there's the fact that Nintendo is selling ridiculous amounts of systems right now. Nintendo is doing the numbers people thought Sony would be doing right now. The funny thing is that people are saying things will pick up when the PS3 gets more games, but what about when the Wii get's more games.
Avatar image for mjf249
mjf249

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#38 mjf249
Member since 2004 • 3000 Posts
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]I really hope the European launch is successful. I like the Playstation too much to see it die, I was unfortunate enough to see one of my favourite consoles die once (Dreamcast) I don't need another. Gzus666
the difference was Sega for the most part couldnt keep a console alive, Sony was the one that beat the dreamcast, and made the most successful console pretty much ever with the ps2, i have no doubt it will be fine, the launch will blow people away, and the games will kickass



The PS2 didn't kill the Dreamcast as many believe. It was Sega. The failure of the Saturn really hurt Sega financially and poor mismanagement led to the inevitable fate of the Dreamcast(remember Sega was in debt when it launched and funded the DC). Also lack of sales didn't really put away the DC as much people believe, it had too do more with the financial crisis Sega faced, and the piracy issues.
Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
I am far from a Sony fanboy (you can check my post history) but I won't even waste my time reading that article. Any article about Sony from the inquirer is biased. They really seem to have something against Sony. As for this thread, some valid points have been made. Charlie made a good point about 3rd Party companies getting scared when they see the difference in marketshare between companies. Look at the fact that companies are more willing to do a game on PS2 than PS3, but yet they will make it for 360 and not Xbox. I always see people say PS3 has only been out for a few months, give it a chance. You have to take into consideration developers are trying to make money now. They can't wait much longer. Microsoft forced their hand by coming out a year early and having about 10mil sold by the time Sony has 1mil. Also there's the fact that Nintendo is selling ridiculous amounts of systems right now. Nintendo is doing the numbers people thought Sony would be doing right now. The funny thing is that people are saying things will pick up when the PS3 gets more games, but what about when the Wii get's more games.GoddBless
problem is you can only make so many games that use a motion sensing controller that are worth a damn, and serious gamers want graphics. not saying its a bad system, its fun, but it only has its niche. the gimmick will wear off, and it will be used for casual gaming and fun when your not playing your box or PS3(depending on which the person has) most people dont have a wii exclusively, cause they just arnt the greatest out there, they are just cheap, and fun, good bang for the buck.
Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="pimperjones"]I really hope the European launch is successful. I like the Playstation too much to see it die, I was unfortunate enough to see one of my favourite consoles die once (Dreamcast) I don't need another. mjf249
the difference was Sega for the most part couldnt keep a console alive, Sony was the one that beat the dreamcast, and made the most successful console pretty much ever with the ps2, i have no doubt it will be fine, the launch will blow people away, and the games will kickass



The PS2 didn't kill the Dreamcast as many believe. It was Sega. The failure of the Saturn really hurt Sega financially and poor mismanagement led to the inevitable fate of the Dreamcast(remember Sega was in debt when it launched and funded the DC). Also lack of sales didn't really put away the DC as much people believe, it had too do more with the financial crisis Sega faced, and the piracy issues.

kinda like how i said Sega couldnt keep a system alive? please take in the whole thing, i did make a small, but obvious note of this. sony just put the last nail in the coffin for dreamcast