This topic is locked from further discussion.
BATTLEFIELD 3. Dammit this has to end now, Call of Duty! This crap is ruining originality in the game industry.
Not a single person should buy MW3. I don't care if you like the game, do it for the greater good. Devs shouldn't be able to get away with pumping out the same crap every year. Devs are artists, dammit. Sadly they have gotten fat and turned into cash potatoes.
its going to be done 100 times more call of duty for meHasn't this been done several times already?
Anyways, I voted Battlefield 3. No MW3 for me, thank you.
jer_1
[QUOTE="jer_1"]its going to be done 100 times more call of duty for meHasn't this been done several times already?
Anyways, I voted Battlefield 3. No MW3 for me, thank you.
Chris_Williams
Could you point one out for me? There isn't one on the first 10 pages of PS3 forums!Another one of those threads... anyhoos BF3 for me.
itsphantom994
Like I did with MW2, I'll wait until MW3 gets a major price drop to around $20. BF3 I've been wanting ever since I got B:BC2 (hoping the sp is better than BC2 since those characters were really annoying. the servers also have to be better, which is why it's not yet a day 1 purchase for me).
Fly around in a super fat jet i found sitting on the ground? Or trying my damnedest to get 7 kills without dying to call in a helicopter to hover in one spot? One of the easitest choices i have ever made as a gamer. Next you'll ask if i wanna fight slightly large devil pigs or huge awesome dragons.
I'll be getting both games, both look fairly good however battlefield 3 in my opinion looks much better
after the games are out it will still keep going many times for over a year :P people still ask blak ops or BFBC2 xD battlefield 3 for me, my best friend and brother are geting it and I loved BFBC2, always thought the opnline was better for battlefield aswellHasn't this been done several times already?
Anyways, I voted Battlefield 3. No MW3 for me, thank you.
jer_1
As a new comer to FPS CoD will be better for you. I personally will be getting both. Maybe not on release date, but I will be playing them both before the end of the year.ACx7I hated MW2. The game was a backward step from COD4 imo. But (sorry) I can't stand The kind of people who I encounter COD/MW games.
theres no real reason to buy mw3. excuse to say my friends will get mw3 is rubbish. just tell them lets all get bf3 and done...only reason to get mw3 is if you can only play by camping and if you are a newb.
battlefield 3 all the way
i will be buying both but i to be honest i really wanna see how activision made the game, even though i hope it doesnt fail like BO.ethelwissblack ops is modern warfare 2, mw2 is previous cod. previous cod is previous cod and so on....all the cods are the same exact thing. only difference is perks and few weapons. same fast paced, camping, gameplay, prestiges etc etc. so what can activision do different to this game? this is just another cod. cod 9 or 10 whichever one this is now...
a 4 hour single player and not even a good one? why not kz3 or gears or any other shooter for single player...?BF3 for multiplayer, MW3 for single player. I'm equally excitied for both.
LazyMushroom
[QUOTE="LazyMushroom"]a 4 hour single player and not even a good one? why not kz3 or gears or any other shooter for single player...?BF3 for multiplayer, MW3 for single player. I'm equally excitied for both.
planbfreak4eva
Have you played MW3? How do you know the single player is 4 hours long and that it's no good? I admit the campaign will be short, probably around 6/7 hours but how can you make assumption when you haven't even touched it?
a 4 hour single player and not even a good one? why not kz3 or gears or any other shooter for single player...?[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"][QUOTE="LazyMushroom"]
BF3 for multiplayer, MW3 for single player. I'm equally excitied for both.
LazyMushroom
Have you played MW3? How do you know the single player is 4 hours long and that it's no good? I admit the campaign will be short, probably around 6/7 hours but how can you make assumption when you haven't even touched it?
ok my bad i will re-phrase.... IMO the campaign will be short around 4 hours since all the previous cods had a short campaign. IMO, single player campaign in previous cods has always been the same. disjointed and just random missions that happened back in the day thus making the campaign not good, well atleast for me....better?I got Battlefield 1943 late last year and put over 100 hours into it since then, it's the only Battlefield I've played in the series. I was thinking of picking up BF:Bad company 2 but now I'm waiting for the Battlefield 3 beta this fall, if I enjoy it as much as 1943, They can have my cash...or whats left of it.:lol:
By the way, I've never been into COD. I tried a (single player) demo of black-ops and it was "Ehh"...Maybe the multi-player is better to be fair, but I've never cared enough to look.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment