Call Of Duty PS Vita, being made by the developers of Burning Skies...

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xPatrickBateman
xPatrickBateman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 xPatrickBateman
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
It's really disappointing that Activision handed this game off to Nihilistic. No zombie mode is also a deal breaker.
Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

It's really disappointing that Activision handed this game off to Nihilistic. No zombie mode is also a deal breaker. xPatrickBateman

It barely has a decent multiplayer from the looks of it, complaints from sites say it is a Resistance Burning Skies Reskin with a slapped over Modern Warfare skin, so all the issues and complaints about Resistance have carried over.

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts
[QUOTE="Granpire"]

I'm going to go against the grain here and say that this looks decent enough. Playstation Blog is the only publication I know of so far that's had an actual hands-on demo, and they've said that the game has a good Call of Duty feel:

"Call of Duty Black Ops: Declassifiedis real, and weve played it. I think the highest compliment I can pay it is to say that, well, it looks and plays like Call of Duty. The running and gunning, the aiming down the sights, the familiarBank Gothicnotices popping up when you land a long-range shot or end an opponents killstreak, the weapon loadouts and multiplayer modes theyre all here, rendered onPS Vitas luscious OLED screen and playable with dual analog sticks in a mobile setting for the first time."

Sure, they work for Playstation, but I see some positive here. It's still got a lot of what people love about Call of Duty, even if it isn't running at 60FPS, and the graphics aren't as bad as some people make them out to be("these are PSP graphics!").

Worth a read if you want a positive point of view, for once.

Blake135
I just think what is the redeeming quality of this game? It looks horrible while having a 30 FPS ? It has the same controls as Resistance, multiplayer is small with maps being reused, and so on. I just think right now the game has nothing going for it, it has no redeeming quality and the game is supposed to be released in less then 3 months? Not trying to be negative here but the game just looks horrible, I have seen IOS games with better value and graphics, it honestly looks like a game for IOS, and their expecting us to shell out $50 for this game ? Nope Sony can get stuffed.

More than 30fps be nice but as long as its still fluid motion and not choppy it won't bother me. Like all the other games I've enjoyed at the 30fps. Unless it is more than 8 player I don't need big maps, just well designed ones. Which I think even burning skies has. I also enjoyed the controls so I don't see that as a bad thing unless you can name a better control setup that would interest me more.
Avatar image for gokuofheaven
gokuofheaven

3452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 gokuofheaven
Member since 2004 • 3452 Posts
I am pretty sure most COD players stick around for the addictive multi-player aspect of the series and not the graphics. Everyone is just butt-hurt now because the PS-Vita is "suppose" to have ps3 like graphics and because of this suddenly the game sucks? I am not a COD player, but this is common sense.
Avatar image for Granpire
Granpire

2749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

#55 Granpire
Member since 2008 • 2749 Posts
What's wrong with the controls? I thought controls were one of the few things the game did well, based on the demo.
Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

[QUOTE="Blake135"][QUOTE="Granpire"]

I'm going to go against the grain here and say that this looks decent enough. Playstation Blog is the only publication I know of so far that's had an actual hands-on demo, and they've said that the game has a good Call of Duty feel:

"Call of Duty Black Ops: Declassifiedis real, and weve played it. I think the highest compliment I can pay it is to say that, well, it looks and plays like Call of Duty. The running and gunning, the aiming down the sights, the familiarBank Gothicnotices popping up when you land a long-range shot or end an opponents killstreak, the weapon loadouts and multiplayer modes theyre all here, rendered onPS Vitas luscious OLED screen and playable with dual analog sticks in a mobile setting for the first time."

Sure, they work for Playstation, but I see some positive here. It's still got a lot of what people love about Call of Duty, even if it isn't running at 60FPS, and the graphics aren't as bad as some people make them out to be("these are PSP graphics!").

Worth a read if you want a positive point of view, for once.

p4s2p0

I just think what is the redeeming quality of this game? It looks horrible while having a 30 FPS ? It has the same controls as Resistance, multiplayer is small with maps being reused, and so on. I just think right now the game has nothing going for it, it has no redeeming quality and the game is supposed to be released in less then 3 months? Not trying to be negative here but the game just looks horrible, I have seen IOS games with better value and graphics, it honestly looks like a game for IOS, and their expecting us to shell out $50 for this game ? Nope Sony can get stuffed.

More than 30fps be nice but as long as its still fluid motion and not choppy it won't bother me. Like all the other games I've enjoyed at the 30fps. Unless it is more than 8 player I don't need big maps, just well designed ones. Which I think even burning skies has. I also enjoyed the controls so I don't see that as a bad thing unless you can name a better control setup that would interest me more.

You still didn't give me a answer in what the Pros of the game was. Fluid movement and decent controls is not something to be gleeful about, that is something that should be the *norm* for video games.

Avatar image for Granpire
Granpire

2749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

#57 Granpire
Member since 2008 • 2749 Posts
Sure, it's not going to be a must-get Vita title that will blow us away with unique ideas, but it just might be a decent portable Call of Duty at best. It might not be mind-blowing, but if it gets down the basics that made Call of Duty the great game it is, that's fine by me...
Avatar image for flowersjf
flowersjf

2856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#58 flowersjf
Member since 2008 • 2856 Posts
Sure, it's not going to be a must-get Vita title that will blow us away with unique ideas, but it just might be a decent portable Call of Duty at best. It might not be mind-blowing, but if it gets down the basics that made Call of Duty the great game it is, that's fine by me...Granpire
Same here, I think everyone is expecting a console-like experience on the Vita version which is possible but unlikely.
Avatar image for Jethawk11
Jethawk11

296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Jethawk11
Member since 2011 • 296 Posts

Bad choice. I love the idea of the COD experience on a handheld, but this game so far looks far too watered down for its own good. Hopefully the full experience will get to the Vita within a couple years.