Did anyone else feel like GTA4 lacked the things that made you keep playing...

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LilWyte419
LilWyte419

543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 LilWyte419
Member since 2007 • 543 Posts
agree. . .This is the least addicting GTA the I've played. I played san andreas forever , even after if finished the game i still played it for months, but i havent even beat IV and im already bored of it.
Avatar image for -Grieves-
-Grieves-

1708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 -Grieves-
Member since 2007 • 1708 Posts

The problem for me is the lack of incentive to explore.

In previous games, every 10 hidden packages you found was a new weapon at your safehouse. That made it worth checking every alley and carpark. Now, get all 200 pigeons and we will give you an attack helicopter? I think I've probably found 7 so I know it's a reward that I won't be collecting on any time soon, so I have no incentive to look for them.

What happened to the R3 missions? Although I wouldn't call them fun, the advantages that they bestow made it worth getting them done early on in the game.

In previous games, every parked car, every motorbike leaning against a wall was worth trying out because it might just trigger a checkpoint race side mission. This game doesn't seem to have this hidden side mission stuff, so, again I have no incentive to check out the vehicles around me, especially as the Import/Export aspect in this game is for particular vehicles rather than model of vehicle.

I also used to love using a plane or helicopter to get around in, but since there are no planes and getting a helicopter is not really that convenient, I tend to use taxis which just arn't as much fun. People moaned that in SA there was a lot of wasted space in the countryside, but I thought that that was necessary to give enough airspace to be able to use a plane. What R* should have done is fill the empty spaces with races rather than take them out altogether.

I'm still playing the game, and I will finish it, but it has been nowhere near the fun that PS2 GTAs have been.

Avatar image for pro_gamer12345
pro_gamer12345

1801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#53 pro_gamer12345
Member since 2006 • 1801 Posts

The Rhino Tank.

I could imagine a Rhino Tank roaming the streets of NYC but they just didn't include it. :(

Avatar image for hishkarnib
hishkarnib

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 hishkarnib
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts
I totally agree. After I completed the game, I was like, then what? There wasnt anything worth going back for. The huge amount of cash with nothing to spend it on pretty much said it all. There was definitely something missing.Elann2008
Avatar image for hishkarnib
hishkarnib

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 hishkarnib
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts

The Rhino Tank.

I could imagine a Rhino Tank roaming the streets of NYC but they just didn't include it. :(

pro_gamer12345
Avatar image for Denji
Denji

12757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Denji
Member since 2003 • 12757 Posts

Yeah. Aside from graphics and a better diverse city, San Andreas (imo) is still superior to GTA4 in terms of size, things to do, ect. It's like "the next gen version of GTA3".

It also needs more cheats for godsakes. Other GTA games had so many, where did all the freakn' cheats go?? Where's the tank? Why can't I hijack the Subway? Sure, I can live without the planes. But the heli controls are terrible. Heck, the controls over all are just sloppy. I did like the cover system though. It may not be the best, but atleast I'm able to use it.

I just think we'll see "the next gen San Andreas equivalent" pretty soon. Well, I hope so anyways, taking advantage of the PS3's power.

Avatar image for G-Legend
G-Legend

7387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 G-Legend
Member since 2005 • 7387 Posts

GTA IV lacked a lot. I mean it was a great game, but it wasn't what they originally made it out to be. They said you could enter the MAJORITY of stores and houses and you can barely go into any....And yes I do miss the things it lacked like buying houses and feeling like you're on top of the world after you complete the game. With Niko you still feel like the beginning maybe even worse...but whatever. GTA 5 or whatever they decide to do next for GTA will be better...hopefully.

As it stands GTA:SA is the best GTA it was the most improved imo.

Avatar image for Denji
Denji

12757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 Denji
Member since 2003 • 12757 Posts

The problem for me is the lack of incentive to explore.

In previous games, every 10 hidden packages you found was a new weapon at your safehouse. That made it worth checking every alley and carpark. Now, get all 200 pigeons and we will give you an attack helicopter? I think I've probably found 7 so I know it's a reward that I won't be collecting on any time soon, so I have no incentive to look for them.

What happened to the R3 missions? Although I wouldn't call them fun, the advantages that they bestow made it worth getting them done early on in the game.

In previous games, every parked car, every motorbike leaning against a wall was worth trying out because it might just trigger a checkpoint race side mission. This game doesn't seem to have this hidden side mission stuff, so, again I have no incentive to check out the vehicles around me, especially as the Import/Export aspect in this game is for particular vehicles rather than model of vehicle.

I also used to love using a plane or helicopter to get around in, but since there are no planes and getting a helicopter is not really that convenient, I tend to use taxis which just arn't as much fun. People moaned that in SA there was a lot of wasted space in the countryside, but I thought that that was necessary to give enough airspace to be able to use a plane. What R* should have done is fill the empty spaces with races rather than take them out altogether.

I'm still playing the game, and I will finish it, but it has been nowhere near the fun that PS2 GTAs have been.

-Grieves-

I loved SA's massive size and the big country sides. There was so much to explore and I may be a minority, but I actually liked driving from city to city lol

Avatar image for Nerkle01
Nerkle01

1254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 Nerkle01
Member since 2007 • 1254 Posts
If you could soup up your cars, buy property, buy more different types of clothes and buy/use more weapons the game would be 100 times better.
Avatar image for Denji
Denji

12757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 Denji
Member since 2003 • 12757 Posts

Also, THE FRIEND "SYSTEM" MUST DIE

It's like dealing with a bunch of sick, obsessed stalkers that won't leave you alone. Especially the kind that won't call you until you're on the very end of the 3rd island and expect you to drive all the way back to the first island IN AN HOUR (game time)

Also, the "cop zone" is just a front. Cops still randomly spawn infront of you anyways and chase you to the very ends of the universe on 1 star making sure you stay in that circle. Even with a Comet.

Avatar image for DarkHandlez
DarkHandlez

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 DarkHandlez
Member since 2007 • 356 Posts
I was very dissapointed with the soundtrack. GTA San Andreas and Vice City had soundtracks that would make me want to drive around just to listen to the music. On GTAIV there are maybe 2 songs I really like.Dilrod
Agree 100%, hated the soundtrack in GTA 4.
Avatar image for delete-mikey050591
delete-mikey050591

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 delete-mikey050591
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

Can someone explain what Rockstar meant when they said its a "rags to better rags" story when I finished the game with close to a million in money? Stupid.

Missing way too much stuff, almost like they keeping stuff out to hype people up for the next.

Avatar image for jtickner
jtickner

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 jtickner
Member since 2005 • 499 Posts

Currently, I have GTA4, about almost done with it, but since I first popped in the Blu-ray, I felt like I was missing a huge part of my GTA experience. I mean, Yes, it was a great game, but I felt like they left out the little things that made it special. Being a sequel to GTA3(which means, it directly excludes SA and VC) I felt like they didn't deliver the features/extras I wanted. The game plays like an updated version of GTA3, which essencial it should be, but I missed the features like buying property, owning property, car customization, and even the details that made it unique. Being a sandbox, it shouldn't leave out things that made it good, because with sandbox games, it's those features that make it realistic. If I eat myself stupid, hey I should get fat. If I work out, Well my punches should be stronger. Unlike in MGS4, with a game like that, you can't just reuse the same mechanics over and over, because it would be to linear, but with GTA, I should be able to experience new ideas for a change to make it hit me closer to home. Something along the lines of buying cars for example or to give you a more personal connection with things to enhance your gameplay experience. I mean, I thought being that they were crossing over to nex gen, I thought that it would make me feel like I was living niko, not just unlocking his story.

Although there were many features that enhanced fighting, driving, and surviving, but wasn't it the little things in GTA:SA that made it great? Online, they have some of these features, but honestly, the online isn't even that great and it feels like there are more online features then there are single player features. I just think that there are things they could have put in GTA to make it a great game, and still have lots of room to make the next GTA game. I just feel like GTA4 gave me a story, and thats pretty much it. They brought back some features from GTA3 that were phenominal and made it great, but I felt like they left too many things out, or didn't add enough to make it great. But other than that, I wouldn't say the game deserves a "10", more like a 9.

Anyone else fell this way? Or is it just me.

j-bldes

I agree 100% with you on this. I loved it at first but as soon as I came to realise all the missing features I didn't appreciate it as much as I did. I think it just tries to win you over with its overall impressive presentation and once you get past that, it becomes clear that this game is severely lacking in what has made GTA so good.

Avatar image for canesmang
canesmang

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 canesmang
Member since 2008 • 161 Posts
No variety. The game only had 2 hats and two pair of glasses for christ sake . All three islands were the same. They should have gone for multiple cities like SA. Like stated early if feels like a unfinished product. They cut out a lot. Hopefully the next is a ps3 exclusive with no restrictions.
Avatar image for Denji
Denji

12757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 Denji
Member since 2003 • 12757 Posts

Can someone explain what Rockstar meant when they said its a "rags to better rags" story when I finished the game with close to a million in money? Stupid.

Missing way too much stuff, almost like they keeping stuff out to hype people up for the next.

mikey050591

Or to nail'em for DLC. "Pay us extra money for stuff that should've been in the game in the first place"

Avatar image for FULLAUTONICK
FULLAUTONICK

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 FULLAUTONICK
Member since 2008 • 67 Posts

Yes, I agree. What annoyed me the most, though, was the game world. I like Liberty city(and I DO love the game!) but I miss the open world of SA. Three separte cities, country side, desert, and numerous small towns with interesting perks in them....I though it was worth the less detail.

Avatar image for FULLAUTONICK
FULLAUTONICK

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 FULLAUTONICK
Member since 2008 • 67 Posts
Oh, and what also really annoys me, even though the game is great, is the score. 10? Perfect? I'm sure it was great, maybe a 9 something, but it was only the hype that pushed it up to a 10.
Avatar image for Razer1980
Razer1980

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Razer1980
Member since 2007 • 79 Posts
I will agree it lacked and I think it went downhill ever since SA. While I liked SA there were a few things this version of GTA couldve had that couldve made it sweet like having that mob feel to it to where the mob was taking over Liberty CIty. I dont know about you guys but I wouldve like to have made my own mob and gradualy worked my way through owning the city the way Tommy done in Vice City but with a CJ twist. The Mafia and all was what built GTA but to me thay dropped the ball big time and to me this was a big bust. Another thing I didnt like was the fact that the houses werent there. I mean who wants to go to a apartment and only be able to live in one good mansion. To me there is so much they couldve added to this game but they fixed the wrong things. The story was okay at best and why would they allow you to gain weight and eat in SA if you cant do it here. It sucks that you couldnt fix yourself up.
Avatar image for j-bldes
j-bldes

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 j-bldes
Member since 2003 • 443 Posts
I feel that hopefully the next GTA game will be an experience we can truely enjoy. If I had known GTA would turn out like this, I would have just rented it. I have learned my lesson. It's like the only companies I can have faith in is SCEA and Konami. Everyone else is getting to shady for me to trust.
Avatar image for ethanpaige
ethanpaige

13100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 ethanpaige
Member since 2005 • 13100 Posts
Oh, and what also really annoys me, even though the game is great, is the score. 10? Perfect? I'm sure it was great, maybe a 9 something, but it was only the hype that pushed it up to a 10.FULLAUTONICK



Yeah the 10 rating annoyed me after I spent some time with the game as well. MGS4 deserved that rating. GTA4 doesnt. It didn't revolutionize gaming in any way, it just stripped down the previous GTA's and put in fancier graphics and a more advanced physics system.
Avatar image for smeags11
smeags11

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 smeags11
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts
I dont find myself as into it as I was with San Andreas, I played that game like there was no tomorrow, aanive had GTAIV since its release and still am only 38% done it. I just have no motivation to beat it
Avatar image for Liquid-Prince
Liquid-Prince

2277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Liquid-Prince
Member since 2007 • 2277 Posts

Lol your all wrong the game is awesome, its going for a different more subtle realistic approach which makes acheiving cool things in it more satisfying. The graphics and physics are way improved the cars are miles better the shooting is way better all this makes the core gameplay and presentation better!

fhoeiuwhdousah



That's the point. The core is solid, but in GTA, it was all the little things that made the game awesome, otherwise it would just be a standard sandbox game.

Avatar image for SOCA-BOY
SOCA-BOY

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 SOCA-BOY
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I know what you mean and yes GTA is a 9 out of 10 or even a 8.5 after playing it.
Avatar image for j-bldes
j-bldes

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#74 j-bldes
Member since 2003 • 443 Posts
[QUOTE="fhoeiuwhdousah"]

Lol your all wrong the game is awesome, its going for a different more subtle realistic approach which makes acheiving cool things in it more satisfying. The graphics and physics are way improved the cars are miles better the shooting is way better all this makes the core gameplay and presentation better!

Liquid-Prince



That's the point. The core is solid, but in GTA, it was all the little things that made the game awesome, otherwise it would just be a standard sandbox game.

Agreed.

Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts
I agree, I am not sure what it is. This game just gets boring quickly.
Avatar image for Godofnerdyness
Godofnerdyness

3248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Godofnerdyness
Member since 2007 • 3248 Posts

Hmm...Nope. I felt that GTA4 was the best in series, but I know there's a lot of people that disagree.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

The only thing I really liked in the game were the cars and the new shooting system. There werent any new guns really from the other GTAs and the enviroments were kind of repetitive. All the areas seems the same to me

Avatar image for Thought-Pending
Thought-Pending

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Thought-Pending
Member since 2008 • 202 Posts
i felt that this game was a let down, i played gta3 all day, vice city was eh san andreas was eh, and 4 was just eh... i dont know what it is but the lack of innovation or something has just made me grow out of the series.
Avatar image for j-bldes
j-bldes

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#79 j-bldes
Member since 2003 • 443 Posts
Maybe it was the superficial things that drew people to play. I play games to go deeper...In this GTA there wasn't that. I mean, people are entitiled to their playing wants and needs, but was new gunplay and cars and graphics the only reason you liked GTA4? Because if you took the cover system, the car design, and the new graphics, doesn't it feel like a washed down GTA3? I mean, GTA3 all the way to GTA:SA had more depth(gameplay wise) than 50% of GTA4 to me just because of the extras alone that didn't make you feel like it was just some boring side quest, it gave you something to do in a world that made you feel a part of it.
Avatar image for hardcore_nate
hardcore_nate

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#80 hardcore_nate
Member since 2007 • 389 Posts
It was kinda sad on my part, because I was looking forward to it for such a long time, and when I finally got it, I honestly got bored the first mission where you drive Roman to your place. I also agree I want to get fat! And throw up. And work out. Hair cuts, houses. Wow now that I said that, it makes Gta 4 suck! And the online is buggy and glitchy. Yes, I have a state-of-the-art Linksys, so it's not the router :D
Avatar image for jay_rock_
jay_rock_

1720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 jay_rock_
Member since 2003 • 1720 Posts
I agree, I am not sure what it is. This game just gets boring quickly.jtdawg23
Me too just was not that fun after that bank mission...
Avatar image for IRM101
IRM101

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 IRM101
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Thats true, it isnt as good as GTA 3 ... and single player should actually be better than online but it isnt and that just proves that its not as good as the last one.
Avatar image for Champ_1221
Champ_1221

158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 Champ_1221
Member since 2006 • 158 Posts
Definitely. i played it for like 2 days and then i got sick of it. i had to go back to call of duty 4
Avatar image for csadhoo
csadhoo

1462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#84 csadhoo
Member since 2004 • 1462 Posts
i guess ill try to beat it 100%, its just that im not a big GTA fan, never rly had any interest in them. GtA4 is probably the only GTA game i finished storywise. I got distracted with games like MGS4 which offered so much more replay value.
Avatar image for turbo1001
turbo1001

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 turbo1001
Member since 2007 • 164 Posts
In my opinion most of the levels are frustratingly similar. Mostly just go out and kill this guy! If there was some variety in the missions then it would be a much more enjoyable game in my opinion.
Avatar image for Concrete-Jungle
Concrete-Jungle

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Concrete-Jungle
Member since 2008 • 217 Posts
I feel like it was a greezy game, everything was good about it but i was a crazy San andreas player and SA had way more stuff u can do like parachuting, planes, ect. but then i was expecting GTA4 to top it in my eyes i didnt think it was up to par with GTA:SA.I still love the game it really good not perfect.
Avatar image for Yazu13
Yazu13

5185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#87 Yazu13
Member since 2005 • 5185 Posts
I miss the jetpack.
Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#88 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts

GTA4 isn't what I thought it would be either and I feel like lots of these reviews sites lied about it because the game has about 30 10/10 scores off of gamerankings. I have played several better games than gta4 that didn't get half as many 10's as this game got on gamerankings and in the end the game seems to be nothing more than a joke than the next big thing.

I can tell you one thing I won't be buying the next GTA game after this at least not when its first released. I'm going to wait awhile for the game to drop in price and the most I will pay for it is $30 and R* will be lucky to get that after pulling this bs. The worst thing about it all is that people tolerate it.

Avatar image for NYCKing87
NYCKing87

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 NYCKing87
Member since 2008 • 1262 Posts
GTA4 did infact lack things that SA did amazingly. I can't tell you how made I got when I saw that there were only two pairs of glasses to choose from. Wtf? I like to make my characters look cool like I did with CJ in the previous title. But that's besides the point. I feel imo that while it lacked what made GTA SA a great game, GTA4 is still an okay game as the first entry into the new generation of consoles. At the samet ime, there's just something about the game that doesn't drive me to go back. I beat the story mode but I just don't feel like going back.
Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts

I'm glad that GTA IV wasn't a rehash of GTA: San Andreas. San Andreas was a good game, but it was my least favorite GTA to date. I thought it was too heavy on the character customization, the expansive empty drives between areas were boring and it was too much work to maintain your character.

I actually liked the dumber AI of GTA III more than the smarter cops in GTA IV. I could stand on the warehouse by the port and shoot RPG's at cars for hours, taking out the helicopters that came by. Or being able to snipe someone without the cops knowing exactly where I was. But I still find that GTA IV is more of what I like in the series.