FINALLY a Ported game that's AWSOME LOOKING!!!

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gordon_Slaveman
Gordon_Slaveman

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Gordon_Slaveman
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts

look at the screen comparisions between GRAW 2 on PS3 and 360... it's almost 10x better on the PS3 than the 360, and i didn't think that was possible.....

http://www.n4g.com/M/8/Images//60000/60413.jpg

Avatar image for kingtahktahkhuk
kingtahktahkhuk

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kingtahktahkhuk
Member since 2004 • 2142 Posts
wrong link?
Avatar image for Gordon_Slaveman
Gordon_Slaveman

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Gordon_Slaveman
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts
hahah, whoops soryy, now try...
Avatar image for kingtahktahkhuk
kingtahktahkhuk

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kingtahktahkhuk
Member since 2004 • 2142 Posts

The page cannot be found

nope

Avatar image for sportwarrior
sportwarrior

2462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 sportwarrior
Member since 2003 • 2462 Posts

Page not found...

But it seems to me that GRAW 2 isn't a port. I think it was developed simultaneously for both systems.

Avatar image for urio1
urio1

1576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 urio1
Member since 2007 • 1576 Posts

oh yeah the page cannot be found :(

Avatar image for ocelotcougar
ocelotcougar

2099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 ocelotcougar
Member since 2005 • 2099 Posts

One too many L's sir.

http://www.n4g.com/M/8/Images//60000/60413.jpg

Avatar image for Gordon_Slaveman
Gordon_Slaveman

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Gordon_Slaveman
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts
WTF!!?! I suck at life... o well... but even if it isn't a port, that's still so much better lookin' than the 360's version, and that just proves at even such an early state, the PS3 is more capable than the 360.
Avatar image for kingtahktahkhuk
kingtahktahkhuk

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kingtahktahkhuk
Member since 2004 • 2142 Posts
definitely looks tons better
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7d3c08ed601
deactivated-5e7d3c08ed601

6696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5e7d3c08ed601
Member since 2007 • 6696 Posts

One too many L's sir.

ocelotcougar
wow i didnt think the difference would be that big
Avatar image for fistoflight
fistoflight

7943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 fistoflight
Member since 2005 • 7943 Posts
Graw 2 is not a ps3 import it was in production at the same time as the xbox360 and this was said by the creator of the game. He also said that the teams making both games exchange ideas and stuff to each other to make each version better. So the game isn't actually a port that why it looks so good...
Avatar image for sportwarrior
sportwarrior

2462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 sportwarrior
Member since 2003 • 2462 Posts

It definitely looks better, although how much better I don't know... Probably won't be able to tell until we can compare both side by side in action.

All that aside, I definitely agree... Port or not, it's awesome to see a PS3 game coming out on top of it's 360 counterpart.

Avatar image for Gordon_Slaveman
Gordon_Slaveman

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Gordon_Slaveman
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts

Graw 2 is not a ps3 import it was in production at the same time as the xbox360 and this was said by the creator of the game. He also said that the teams making both games exchange ideas and stuff to each other to make each version better. So the game isn't actually a port that why it looks so good...fistoflight

the point isn't that it's a port or not... that's my mistake, ok, it's not a port. It's the idea that a game from Ubisoft, which i may add had one division dissin the PS3 and did a horrible port of Splinter Cel, looks great. At a time like this, when you have EA saying they are supporting the 360 more, because it has a bigger base, and easier to develope for, and fanboys yellin that PS3 doesn't even look better than a 360. Look at the fact we are 8 months through, only 8 months, and we are getting results like that. Think about what xbots have to say now, and what the future of PS3 holds for us.

Avatar image for fistoflight
fistoflight

7943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 fistoflight
Member since 2005 • 7943 Posts

[QUOTE="fistoflight"]Graw 2 is not a ps3 import it was in production at the same time as the xbox360 and this was said by the creator of the game. He also said that the teams making both games exchange ideas and stuff to each other to make each version better. So the game isn't actually a port that why it looks so good...Gordon_Slaveman

the point isn't that it's a port or not... that's my mistake, ok, it's not a port. It's the idea that a game from Ubisoft, which i may add had one division dissin the PS3 and did a horrible port of Splinter Cel, looks great. At a time like this, when you have EA saying they are supporting the 360 more, because it has a bigger base, and easier to develope for, and fanboys yellin that PS3 doesn't even look better than a 360. Look at the fact we are 8 months through, only 8 months, and we are getting results like that. Think about what xbots have to say now, and what the future of PS3 holds for us.

Aye that why in my post in the other thread I praised the team for working hard on this version and not being lazy :].

Avatar image for imafreshman
imafreshman

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 imafreshman
Member since 2004 • 221 Posts
I didnt like GRAW 2.
Avatar image for Khanezhyray
Khanezhyray

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 Khanezhyray
Member since 2005 • 901 Posts
Mmmm.. Very nice.. I wanted that game for the 360 when it came out, but I was too poor back then... maybe i'll dish out $60 for the PS3 version. I'm tired of the 13 year olds on Xbox live anyways, and I'll need something besides Warhawk to play this fall. (Yes, I've had a 360 since March 2006, and a PS3 since December 2006)
Avatar image for thefoolagain200
thefoolagain200

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 thefoolagain200
Member since 2005 • 1653 Posts
looks awesome
Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts
wow that is a huge difference
Avatar image for legofan712
legofan712

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 legofan712
Member since 2005 • 664 Posts
I guess Blu-Ray can just hold alot more stuff for texturing.
Avatar image for furtherfan
furtherfan

3699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 furtherfan
Member since 2007 • 3699 Posts

sorry, but that's not true. i played both. please for your own sake don't tink it looks much better. it doesn't.

but than again, if you haven't played it on 360, you wouldn't know.. so maybe i should have let you think it does look 10 x better.:-S

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts

the only pic that makes it seem it looks better.. is the one where it shows the player and a distant view.. u can see the 360 with a bit more jaggy lines than the ps3.. but then again.. the pics are diff.. and it coulda been the ss themselves.

Avatar image for AgentH
AgentH

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 AgentH
Member since 2004 • 4636 Posts

If you played the DEMO you can tell it's not a port. I mean look at how realistic the explosion were! The CELL processor handles explosion very VERY good! It was proved at E3 2005! GRAW 2's explosions are the best, yet.

Anyway, it was confirmed that the PS3 version was built using the PS3 hardware from the very first start of its development!

Avatar image for xxgunslingerxx
xxgunslingerxx

4275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 xxgunslingerxx
Member since 2005 • 4275 Posts

sorry, but that's not true. i played both. please for your own sake don't tink it looks much better. it doesn't.

but than again, if you haven't played it on 360, you wouldn't know.. so maybe i should have let you think it does look 10 x better.:-S

furtherfan

did u even click on the link? the ps3 one is clearly better

Avatar image for GenTom
GenTom

5945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#24 GenTom
Member since 2005 • 5945 Posts
I have GRAW 1 and GRAW 2 for the PC, tbh i prefered GRAW 1 on the PC has GRAW 2 is just far too difficult and i don't really like the locations so much. However, since buying a PS3 and palying the GRAW 2 demo i think it's different enough from the PC to warrent dishing out another £40, really enjoyed the demo and it looks great, specially throwing grenades at the humvee's and watching them blow.
Avatar image for furtherfan
furtherfan

3699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 furtherfan
Member since 2007 • 3699 Posts
[QUOTE="furtherfan"]

sorry, but that's not true. i played both. please for your own sake don't tink it looks much better. it doesn't.

but than again, if you haven't played it on 360, you wouldn't know.. so maybe i should have let you think it does look 10 x better.:-S

xxgunslingerxx

did u even click on the link? the ps3 one is clearly better

link doesn't work, but i've seen the screens yesterday. the problem with the screens is that they are not from the same part of the game. that's strange, cause that would be EASY (SAME GAME).

GRAW2 is a game that looks great in some areas, and not so great in other areas. you need to compare the SAME areas.

i finished the game on 360 (good but not great by the way, too easy). and compared the two demo's.

Avatar image for Zell_Forever
Zell_Forever

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#26 Zell_Forever
Member since 2004 • 264 Posts

Holy crap! :O

I must say the difference makes the xbox360 version look like a PS2 game, however, that is only one screenshot.
Maybe the "x360" screens are pre-release pics during developement?

I won't believe that until i see an article or more pics regarding that, however if it's true, wow!

Avatar image for AgentH
AgentH

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 AgentH
Member since 2004 • 4636 Posts

Holy crap! :O

I must say the difference makes the xbox360 version look like a PS2 game, however, that is only one screenshot.
Maybe the "x360" screens are pre-release pics during developement?

I won't believe that until i see an article or more pics regarding that, however if it's true, wow!

Zell_Forever

Believe it man. GRAW 2 on PS3 is NOT a port. Simple.

Avatar image for Ade_Newman
Ade_Newman

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Ade_Newman
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts

Page not found...

But it seems to me that GRAW 2 isn't a port. I think it was developed simultaneously for both systems.

sportwarrior

If the recent EA quote is to be believed about prefering 360 and having two teams for games then I guess ur right :)

Ade.

Avatar image for moshakirby
moshakirby

1502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 moshakirby
Member since 2006 • 1502 Posts
I prefer the characters from the 360 version, you can make out more detail, everything on the PS3 is really dark and blury
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#30 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts
I'm not sure the comparison is fair. They didn't take the pictures at the exact same location. Different locations have different lighting. The way i see it, they chose a location with fairly flat lighting for the 360 and the exact opposite for the ps3.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
sorry but ive played both versions and the ps3 version is not the better one....the ps3 exclusives is where its at with games..
Avatar image for Jamie_1987
Jamie_1987

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Jamie_1987
Member since 2006 • 1822 Posts
look how long we had to wait... I would expect it to look way better then the 360 version, I played the ps3 demo and I own the 360 version of graw2 and I can tell you there isn't really much of a difference, the explosions do look a little better on the ps3, only thing I'm worried about is how the online will play, Rainbow 6 on psn compared to xbox live was disappointing.
Avatar image for PapaRocks
PapaRocks

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 PapaRocks
Member since 2007 • 199 Posts
I might purchase this but I don't trust side by side screen shots that are not the same areas.
Avatar image for TIMMY01978
TIMMY01978

507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TIMMY01978
Member since 2005 • 507 Posts
this is ridiculous you can clearly see they took shots of a floor in a building with no detail on the 360 side, then on the ps3 side they took a shot of dirt and grass, the purpously took different shots to try to make the 360 ver look worse. Some of the pics look about the same, some have a little more detail on the ps3 because they took different shots. I think it looks about the same, if the ps3 ver looks a little better it's probably because they had a few extra months to do it. Lets wait until the final it comes out though, because the same thing was said about oblivion because some of the textures looked a little sharper on the ps3. But overall it was said on every site that the 360 crushed it in graphics.
Avatar image for pumpkinescobar
pumpkinescobar

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 pumpkinescobar
Member since 2002 • 982 Posts

this is ridiculous you can clearly see they took shots of a floor in a building with no detail on the 360 side, then on the ps3 side they took a shot of dirt and grass, the purpously took different shots to try to make the 360 ver look worse. Some of the pics look about the same, some have a little more detail on the ps3 because they took different shots. I think it looks about the same, if the ps3 ver looks a little better it's probably because they had a few extra months to do it. Lets wait until the final it comes out though, because the same thing was said about oblivion because some of the textures looked a little sharper on the ps3. But overall it was said on every site that the 360 crushed it in graphics.TIMMY01978

i agree. the game looks great on the 360. the colors in those pictures look muted and dulled on purpose. the game is actually much more colorful and vibrant. that comparison was obviously made by a fanboy who was purposefully trying to make the 360 version look worse.

Avatar image for chrisjackson85
chrisjackson85

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 chrisjackson85
Member since 2006 • 357 Posts

i think the graphics are similar to the360, but the ps3 also has the added bonus of much better explosions, damn they look so real-like.

the game got difficult towards the end of the demo though with all all those soldiers and that helicopter, i just hope the game is not really difficult. Even though i do like a challenge, i really dont like games that are too-hard, only time will tell, but its a fantastic game.

Avatar image for squirrelgrrrl84
squirrelgrrrl84

298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 squirrelgrrrl84
Member since 2004 • 298 Posts
this is ridiculous you can clearly see they took shots of a floor in a building with no detail on the 360 side, then on the ps3 side they took a shot of dirt and grass, the purpously took different shots to try to make the 360 ver look worse. Some of the pics look about the same, some have a little more detail on the ps3 because they took different shots. I think it looks about the same, if the ps3 ver looks a little better it's probably because they had a few extra months to do it. Lets wait until the final it comes out though, because the same thing was said about oblivion because some of the textures looked a little sharper on the ps3. But overall it was said on every site that the 360 crushed it in graphics.TIMMY01978
hmm it seems to me that everything i've read and seen about oblivion indicates that the ps3 version is easily superior graphically compared to the 360 version, with sharper textures and better draw distances. i don't know what site you're talking about that said the 360 version was superior, but i've never see it... but yeah, the comparison shots of graw shown seem to indicate the ps3 version as easily superior, but you really just can't tell because of the vastly different locations and lighting situations.
Avatar image for Funglip
Funglip

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Funglip
Member since 2004 • 458 Posts
I played the demo and some areas look alsolutely black and i couldn't see anything. Is it suppose to be like that and thats better than the 360 version or they will fix in the final game??
Avatar image for MGS-SolidSnake
MGS-SolidSnake

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MGS-SolidSnake
Member since 2007 • 107 Posts
i thought the demo was awesome. made me want to buy the game.
Avatar image for sim_dude_uk
sim_dude_uk

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 sim_dude_uk
Member since 2005 • 348 Posts

Holy crap! :O

I must say the difference makes the xbox360 version look like a PS2 game, however, that is only one screenshot.
Maybe the "x360" screens are pre-release pics during developement?

I won't believe that until i see an article or more pics regarding that, however if it's true, wow!

Zell_Forever

If you want to see more difference, go to the 360 GRAW 2 on gamespot compare to the PS3 GRAW 2 on gamespot and there is a difference.

Avatar image for Thomas-Crown
Thomas-Crown

30371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Thomas-Crown
Member since 2006 • 30371 Posts
Well, the pic (link) shows the differences but is the demo which convinced me to get the game... Excellent visual and Game-play is intense and enjoyable.
Avatar image for shroom76
shroom76

1764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#42 shroom76
Member since 2007 • 1764 Posts

haha graiinnn graiin graaaaaaiiinnnn

360 has GRAIN

Avatar image for bob_the_can_man
bob_the_can_man

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 bob_the_can_man
Member since 2007 • 605 Posts
We Should stop Posting the rabid monkeys are eyeing us from the sidelines.
Avatar image for chrisjackson85
chrisjackson85

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 chrisjackson85
Member since 2006 • 357 Posts

dirt and graw2 are perfect demos, as they have done their job and made me want to purchase both.

i 'cant' say the same for other titles such as heavenly sword.

Avatar image for Game_Lover500
Game_Lover500

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Game_Lover500
Member since 2007 • 420 Posts

Awesome

Avatar image for MdBrOtha04
MdBrOtha04

1828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 MdBrOtha04
Member since 2003 • 1828 Posts
I got demos for Graw 2 on both the 360 and the PS3. The PS3 version was dark in some areas. It also didn't look as sharp.

Although I was plaing it at 720p verus 1080p for the 360 version.
Avatar image for TIMMY01978
TIMMY01978

507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 TIMMY01978
Member since 2005 • 507 Posts

Well most games look better on 360 that are on both systems, Madden looks and runs better, Virtua Fighter also does. And if you look at Exclusives, I dont think anyone would argue Gears of War and Bioshock have better graphics than any ps3 game to date. Gamespot did a graphical comparison of a couple games I will give you the link for it. But basicly the comparison was a wash, even though 360 looked better on more games, all the games were very close. With Oblivion it they said the character models looked better on ps3 but the roads and ground looked better on 360 because the color was so bland and washed out on ps3. That's pretty sad considering Bethesda had months to make the ps3 look better on this game. Also GRAW 2 had alot more time to spend on the PS3 version. If you compare a game that came out on the same day, the 360 ver always looks better, IE Madden 08, Armored Core, etc. 360 games overall look better.

[QUOTE="TIMMY01978"]this is ridiculous you can clearly see they took shots of a floor in a building with no detail on the 360 side, then on the ps3 side they took a shot of dirt and grass, the purpously took different shots to try to make the 360 ver look worse. Some of the pics look about the same, some have a little more detail on the ps3 because they took different shots. I think it looks about the same, if the ps3 ver looks a little better it's probably because they had a few extra months to do it. Lets wait until the final it comes out though, because the same thing was said about oblivion because some of the textures looked a little sharper on the ps3. But overall it was said on every site that the 360 crushed it in graphics.squirrelgrrrl84
hmm it seems to me that everything i've read and seen about oblivion indicates that the ps3 version is easily superior graphically compared to the 360 version, with sharper textures and better draw distances. i don't know what site you're talking about that said the 360 version was superior, but i've never see it... but yeah, the comparison shots of graw shown seem to indicate the ps3 version as easily superior, but you really just can't tell because of the vastly different locations and lighting situations.

Avatar image for squirrelgrrrl84
squirrelgrrrl84

298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 squirrelgrrrl84
Member since 2004 • 298 Posts

Well most games look better on 360 that are on both systems, Madden looks and runs better, Virtua Fighter also does. And if you look at Exclusives, I dont think anyone would argue Gears of War and Bioshock have better graphics than any ps3 game to date. Gamespot did a graphical comparison of a couple games I will give you the link for it. But basicly the comparison was a wash, even though 360 looked better on more games, all the games were very close. With Oblivion it they said the character models looked better on ps3 but the roads and ground looked better on 360 because the color was so bland and washed out on ps3. That's pretty sad considering Bethesda had months to make the ps3 look better on this game. Also GRAW 2 had alot more time to spend on the PS3 version. If you compare a game that came out on the same day, the 360 ver always looks better, IE Madden 08, Armored Core, etc. 360 games overall look better.

TIMMY01978
no argument about the other stuff, and i remember seeing the gamespot comparison from back when the ps3 first came out and the 360 won that comparison hands down. however, graphically, oblivion on the ps3 definitely surpassed the 360 version overall, according to everything i've seen review and comparison wise (i do remember something about some cobblestone texturing that was pretty weak on the ps3 for whatever reason, though). in side by side video comparisons that were on gametrailers, the ps3 clearly had better texture (foliage specifically), character models, and draw distances. the one real aspect that was slightly lacking was color vibrancy, which has since been resolved with the ps3 'full rgb' setting. given how much time they had to optimize the ps3 version, it should have looked better than it did, but it still was (is) the graphically superior version.
Avatar image for tokenisadog
tokenisadog

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 tokenisadog
Member since 2007 • 232 Posts

awesome!

i never picked it up for the 360 but now im getting it for the ps3

Avatar image for fistoflight
fistoflight

7943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 fistoflight
Member since 2005 • 7943 Posts
[QUOTE="TIMMY01978"]

Well most games look better on 360 that are on both systems, Madden looks and runs better, Virtua Fighter also does. And if you look at Exclusives, I dont think anyone would argue Gears of War and Bioshock have better graphics than any ps3 game to date. Gamespot did a graphical comparison of a couple games I will give you the link for it. But basicly the comparison was a wash, even though 360 looked better on more games, all the games were very close. With Oblivion it they said the character models looked better on ps3 but the roads and ground looked better on 360 because the color was so bland and washed out on ps3. That's pretty sad considering Bethesda had months to make the ps3 look better on this game. Also GRAW 2 had alot more time to spend on the PS3 version. If you compare a game that came out on the same day, the 360 ver always looks better, IE Madden 08, Armored Core, etc. 360 games overall look better.

squirrelgrrrl84

no argument about the other stuff, and i remember seeing the gamespot comparison from back when the ps3 first came out and the 360 won that comparison hands down. however, graphically, oblivion on the ps3 definitely surpassed the 360 version overall, according to everything i've seen review and comparison wise (i do remember something about some cobblestone texturing that was pretty weak on the ps3 for whatever reason, though). in side by side video comparisons that were on gametrailers, the ps3 clearly had better texture (foliage specifically), character models, and draw distances. the one real aspect that was slightly lacking was color vibrancy, which has since been resolved with the ps3 'full rgb' setting. given how much time they had to optimize the ps3 version, it should have looked better than it did, but it still was (is) the graphically superior version.

Yeah I admit the xbox 360 versions are looking better than the ps3 ported versions except for oblivion of course. But once the developers start getting a hang of making the games for the ps3 the games on both consoles are gonna look equal or the ps3 is gonna look better. Than again most of the games that are out on the xbox360 that look better than the ps3 are ports from ubi soft and ea... Except madden of course with the 30 fps on the ps3.