This topic is locked from further discussion.
Highly unlikely. Games like GeOW are the only reasons for me to play a 360. MS isn't stupid enough to sell their trump card out to Sony, even if its over rated. Just get it on PC, you'll get bored with it in about 8 hours, took that long for me to beat it on hardcore. Online is lacking in variation even with annex which is just like King of the Hill with a fancy name too. My PS3 can do without steroid induced cavemen.
no gears isnt gonna be on ps3 lol. thats a way overated game anyway..........it gets old fast.platnum17
You know you never played it. It's one of the best 3rd person shooters I have ever played and the online multiplayer is so addictive. Now I am going back to play so more Annex.
Anyone who says gears is not good are just fanboys that never played the game.
Didnt liked the game, the characters were too steroid based, the lack of story is also a bummer and I could care less for online, in which 80% of the users take advantages of the glitches, and the other 20 % are cheap bastardskenshinhimura16
You know you never played the game so STFU. This reminds me of Oblivion. It was a horrible game until it appeared on PS3 now it's the best game ever. Fanboys.....
In reply to the OP...GOW will not be on the PS3.
[QUOTE="platnum17"]no gears isnt gonna be on ps3 lol. thats a way overated game anyway..........it gets old fast.Deihmos
You know you never played it. It's one of the best 3rd person shooters I have ever played and the online multiplayer is so addictive. Now I am going back to play so more Annex.
Anyone who says gears is not good are just fanboys that never played the game.
I agree. I'm a bit of a microsoft hater, but I still think gears is badass.I liked Gears and I think it's a good game, but it's not game of the year at all. It's good, just not exceptional.shady_825
its actually a very good canidite for Game of the Year. although I think Zelda won that award. Â
I doubt GoW will go to the PS3. Game exclusivity mostly disappears when the consoles can't afford to keep the exclusive rights, as with GTAIV, but MS has bucket loads of cash to keep it up.
PS I read the first page of this thread and people expressed opinions that GoW was overated and was like "oh noes! don't express your honest opinions on GoW! now some kiddie fan boys are going to fill this thread with attempts at flaming!" but I read the second page and knew it was too late :(Â
I doubt GoW will go to the PS3. Game exclusivity mostly disappears when the consoles can't afford to keep the exclusive rights, as with GTAIV, but MS has bucket loads of cash to keep it up.
PS I read the first page of this thread and people expressed opinions that GoW was overated and was like "oh noes! don't express your honest opinions on GoW! now some kiddie fan boys are going to fill this thread with attempts at flaming!" but I read the second page and knew it was too late :(
donwoogie
Its actually not that overrated. its pretty fun. Â
[QUOTE="rasstarman"][QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"][QUOTE="rasstarman"][QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"]Didnt liked the game, the characters were too steroid based, the lack of story is also a bummer and I could care less for online, in which 80% of the users take advantages of the glitches, and the other 20 % are cheap bastardskenshinhimura16
You know you never played the game so STFU. This reminds me of Oblivion. It was a horrible game until it appeared on PS3 now it's the best game ever. Fanboys.....
In reply to the OP...GOW will not be on the PS3.
Wow you like to assume that every one who doesnt like a game is a fanboy. Kids like you make me laugh. So what somebody didnt like your stupid game, dont you wanna go cry and tell mommy and daddy about it too? And Oblivion still sucks as most WRPGs (except Fable and KOTOR). So kid drink a glass of milk and go to bed is too late for you to be awake.
tata
You are the one that sounds like a kid to me.
Really?? As if I would care what a kid thinks. You know how can I tell you are a kid, you cant differenciate an opinion from a fact. Its easy as that. Well or you are a kid or you have below standard in reading comprehension.
Relax dude. I don't see what you are getting worked up about. SO what if you hate the game but he likes it. There is no reason for you to be callign anyone a child over something so trivial. It makes you look really immature since you could have simply moved on.
[QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"]Didnt liked the game, the characters were too steroid based, the lack of story is also a bummer and I could care less for online, in which 80% of the users take advantages of the glitches, and the other 20 % are cheap bastardsrasstarman
You know you never played the game so STFU. This reminds me of Oblivion. It was a horrible game until it appeared on PS3 now it's the best game ever. Fanboys.....
In reply to the OP...GOW will not be on the PS3.
How do you know he didn't play it? Youtube some glitch videos if you don't believe him. I agree that I didn't like the game but I'm not into shooters. Story is also a very important aspect of gaming for me and from what I've read it's bland. Haven't you guys shot enough aliens? Wouldn't you like to have a game make you truly feel emotion? Probably not but I know I'm ready for something new. Oh and GOW is God of War. It came first so show some respect.[QUOTE="Warkunt"]to the people that think GOW3 won't be a PS3 exclusive, grow a brain a realize that it's a SONY MADE game. thanks.donwoogie
erm... what?
GoW is made by Microsoft Game Studios..............Â
GOW3 = GOD of War 3. and a God is of higher authority than Gears. thank you very much.
Microsoft is so un-original actually, that they even went as far as to steal the "GOW" initials from Sony. LOL. ok that was a joke, but maybe not. (GOW was released WAYYY before Gears, the killswitch clone). Bungie even ripped off the Power Rangers for Halo and added steroids. GO GO POWER RANGERS!111!!
is this really what gamespot favors over the PS3? the un-originality that Microsoft delivers?
the character design in Too Human looks no different from Halo and Gears. buncha steroid pumped fudge packers.
Gears of war was alright, multiplayer was quite lacking though, i mean i could see how some people love it, but it just seemed really weak to me, i also really didn't like how weak all the weapons felt, its like trying to kill someone by shooting straw at them. ( i've played with like 8 different people on co-op, and none of them can ever make it through that one part with the minecarts in one try, does anybody elses friends suck at that part?)
I sincerly doubt the GeOW 3 will come to PS3 but hey thats what they said about DMC4 and the 360, so you never know what could happen, by then the 360 could very well be winding down by then. So its not beyond immpossible.
Weak? I like Sony and Playstation too bud. But to call a Brutal game like Gears weak is just playing spiteful. Try playing multiplayer against other people instead of the campaign. I gave it a shot with a 48 hour trial to Xbox live and was immediatly hooked. So much that I bought a Live subscription just for that specific game. I know that you're a regular author on this forum, Americahellyeah. Because I too was a few months ago. You know what I discovered in the time that I didn't post here? That it's ok to like any game but hate the corporations that publish them.Gears of war was alright, multiplayer was quite lacking though, i mean i could see how some people love it, but it just seemed really weak to me, i also really didn't like how weak all the weapons felt, its like trying to kill someone by shooting straw at them. ( i've played with like 8 different people on co-op, and none of them can ever make it through that one part with the minecarts in one try, does anybody elses friends suck at that part?)
I sincerly doubt the GeOW 3 will come to PS3 but hey thats what they said about DMC4 and the 360, so you never know what could happen, by then the 360 could very well be winding down by then. So its not beyond immpossible.
americahellyeah
You know you never played it. It's one of the best 3rd person shooters I have ever played and the online multiplayer is so addictive. Now I am going back to play so more Annex.Anyone who says gears is not good are just fanboys that never played the game.Deihmos
 I owned it, and after a while, the cover system got tedious, always having to press a button to hide, the online is awful nowadays because you've got too many people whining about chainsaws or tags, then you've got those who think they're really good at the game, and then you headshot them with a sniper, so they kick you from the game, and then....just when you think you've found a good game, it either goes horribly laggy, or it disconnects you.
 and from what I've heard of Annex, noone actually plays it properly, then just run around killing each other, which need I remind people doesn't count towards the larger kill amount achievements
Epic are not owned by M$, but M$ do own the rights to Gears of War, which is why it'll never be out on a platform other than the 360/PC.
Its like Rare. They are owned by M$ but they cant make games like Goldeneye or Donkey Kong on the 360 because Activision and Nintendo own the rights to those games and characters.
Anyway, people who are saying gears sucks should really give it a good go. Its the best third person shooter ive played, and while it is slightly overated (im thinking it should be around the 9.0 mark) its still an excellent game.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment