Home store prices WOOT!

In my opinion Home as it is... is nothing more then a steaming pile of cow dung but because of that new items and clothing should be made available frequent and at no to very limited cost. 2 DOLLARS !!!!! for a digital chair table or couch or for some ugly clothing made out of the delightfull fabric we know as pixels!

I mean COME ON! I would have to spend like 50 bucks to make my home look even a little decent and when I'm done spending that I cant do much more then dance around or watch warhawk commercials... Home its official you suck!

Woot?

If people dont like home dont use it

I enjoy going and watching movie clips

Hanging in Sully bar

It is far from anything practical, but what has Sony done right as all this gen?

you don't want to be able to talk to gamers and interact with ifriends and find a online game easily?TheTenth10

I do and I realize Home is not answer to anything you mentioned.

you don't want to be able to talk to gamers and interact with ifriends and find a online game easily?TheTenth10

This is the way I look at home also, there's not much more to it. There are some cool things that will happen too like if you go to Japan Home, you can play Galaga, Asteroids and other classics.

Lol. I thought there was a big clearance sale on Home stuff and TC was happy about the prices. SteelAttack

What's Home?CanadianCR

Nothing but a Second life for ps3 or myspace for ps3.You decide lol.

Technically speaking, how can HOME be really "free" when it costs SONY $$$ to hire people to produce, maintain and run it? That "free" service has to be funded somehow doesn't it? No company will give something for free if they can't make $$$ out of it---and as of now, DLC, micro money is the way to go cause there will always be people who are willing to shell out $$$ for trivial things. And then there are people who say then don't use it---but SONY doesn't give a crap about those people.feryl06

If offering useless items is a strategy by Sony to recoup the costs of Home then they are failing, because there is no way they are selling enough dressers, or shirts to cover the cost of Home. It would be so much easier if they had charged a flat rate for a subscription service for the entirety of PSN, rather than optional items that may or may not sell.

[QUOTE="feryl06"]Technically speaking, how can HOME be really "free" when it costs SONY $$$ to hire people to produce, maintain and run it? That "free" service has to be funded somehow doesn't it? No company will give something for free if they can't make $$$ out of it---and as of now, DLC, micro money is the way to go cause there will always be people who are willing to shell out $$$ for trivial things. And then there are people who say then don't use it---but SONY doesn't give a crap about those people.Large_Soda

If offering useless items is a strategy by Sony to recoup the costs of Home then they are failing, because there is no way they are selling enough dressers, or shirts to cover the cost of Home. It would be so much easier if they had charged a flat rate for a subscription service for the entirety of PSN, rather than optional items that may or may not sell.

If offering useless items is a strategy by Sony to recoup the costs of Home then they are failing, because there is no way they are selling enough dressers, or shirts to cover the cost of Home. It would be so much easier if they had charged a flat rate for a subscription service for the entirety of PSN, rather than optional items that may or may not sell.

Large_Soda

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"]If offering useless items is a strategy by Sony to recoup the costs of Home then they are failing, because there is no way they are selling enough dressers, or shirts to cover the cost of Home. It would be so much easier if they had charged a flat rate for a subscription service for the entirety of PSN, rather than optional items that may or may not sell.

emitsu97

Exactly, a strategy that's working.

[QUOTE="emitsu97"][QUOTE="Large_Soda"]If offering useless items is a strategy by Sony to recoup the costs of Home then they are failing, because there is no way they are selling enough dressers, or shirts to cover the cost of Home. It would be so much easier if they had charged a flat rate for a subscription service for the entirety of PSN, rather than optional items that may or may not sell.

Large_Soda

Exactly, a strategy that's working.

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="emitsu97"] Sounds an awful lot like someone's hardware strategy.emitsu97

Exactly, a strategy that's working.

Well, assuming your original comment was talking about the 360, then my comment is valid. Otherwise, yes, we are talking about completely different things.

[QUOTE="emitsu97"][QUOTE="Large_Soda"]

Exactly, a strategy that's working.

Large_Soda

Well, assuming your original comment was talking about the 360, then my comment is valid. Otherwise, yes, we are talking about completely different things.

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="emitsu97"] Uhm, I think your thoughts and words aren't hooked up quite right.emitsu97

Well, assuming your original comment was talking about the 360, then my comment is valid. Otherwise, yes, we are talking about completely different things.

No. I was commenting that Sony ONLY charging for useless DLC they are not going to offset the cost of Home/PSN, but if they'd adopted an Xbox Live-like subscription service from the beginning then they would be better off. That's all I'm saying. :)