I think sony should come out with an extremly down graded verison of the PS3...

  • 87 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ajefferism
ajefferism

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 ajefferism
Member since 2006 • 2006 Posts
i think what you want is a PS2.... and thats only $129, go buy one.
Avatar image for Dogmatic923
Dogmatic923

734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Dogmatic923
Member since 2006 • 734 Posts
i think what you want is a PS2.... and thats only $129, go buy one.ajefferism
um, if yo have read anything by now you should have read that i do own a ps3 already. My concern is not with the price for ME. ITS FOR THE OTHER 95 million who haven't bought in YET. I was suggesting possible was were people could get in, by having not only a 100 price cut but a 300 dollar price cut. PS3 would proably reach 30 million if not more in a year or maybe 2. Come on, SOnys greastest system is at or below the 5 million mark when Wii is at almost 8 million, my point is that Sony needs to reach out to market who can afford their product
Avatar image for Dogmatic923
Dogmatic923

734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Dogmatic923
Member since 2006 • 734 Posts
[

thats why you dont work for sony and u just blog lol ... that was the dumbest stuff i've heard since it was was said that paris hilton got punished more harshly than she should have

um, whats so dumb about making a product more affordable, no matter how you do it, so more people buy your product and therefore make more of a profit. Whats dumb is the PS3 sales. And why do you have to be so insulting?



But the problem is that the PS3 IS affordable.

true, but so are million dollar homes for movie stars. Its so evident that for people to enjoy a 360 or ps3 you have to have internet connection, 1000 to 2000 HDTV set, for ps3 blue ray movies which are way more expensive, $60 games, no matter how you spin it to get the best out of this generation you need some cash. Its not like alreay having a tv, put you conntection in dial up, and buy a 150 system, with $20 platuim hits. The true hardcore have bought in already and now the numbers are trickling up at best.


huh? what's the point?

point is that not everyone can afford the current price tag on the ps3, so something should be done to change that

Avatar image for willxcool
willxcool

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#55 willxcool
Member since 2006 • 2038 Posts

the PS3 was made to be future proof not 5 years like the oither one console instead of realseing aothe r SKU in a couple get it all otver withh now.coolasj19

You nailed it bro, yeah ps3 will be like the future thing when the rest are like rooting

Avatar image for Dogmatic923
Dogmatic923

734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Dogmatic923
Member since 2006 • 734 Posts
This is the stupidest post ever. You're an idiot for saying this. Ne way they had a 20 GB that didn't sell at all and now its off the market. What's the point of having a ps3 with all of this stuff out of it. The point is to have the blueray player, not only does it play movies, but games are blue-ray to, duh.AdaMoochUD
the 20 gb version still sold at a really high price as well 500 bucks, if it was at 400 i think it would have done so much better
Avatar image for Dogmatic923
Dogmatic923

734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Dogmatic923
Member since 2006 • 734 Posts

[QUOTE="coolasj19"]the PS3 was made to be future proof not 5 years like the oither one console instead of realseing aothe r SKU in a couple get it all otver withh now.willxcool

You nailed it bro, yeah ps3 will be like the future thing when the rest are like rooting

um, do you guys have any idea how much technology will change 5 years from now LOL LOL LOL. Gezz, most people act like the ps3 was taken out of the future or it fell from a UFO craft or it is some top secret government system that wont get cirrculated into the normal popluation in like 5 years. In 5 years the competion could bring out a system that could easily trump the ps3 just because of how technology progresses. Furthermore, i don't think it was wise for Sony to neglect teh present to secure the future. I mean, they are at par with the competion on some things and other things we allowe time for them to catch up on because they are behind a year. but still, to claim you look into the futre and now what going to happen to support you case is not very wise
Avatar image for riceboyzz
riceboyzz

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 riceboyzz
Member since 2004 • 138 Posts

I think they should first make a ps3 that hasa stripped downblue ray player or DVD that devs could still make games on for both verison, if thats even possiable. This way if someone really wants the dvd player in their ps3 they would just end up buying the $600 version. I think they should take out the WIFI, and drop the 60gb down to a 30 gb. Also, take out all backwards capabilities technology. Then sell the system for $300 without a wireless controller and with a wired one. Also, take out the HDMI ports it that save money too.

This way they get there price cut without having to lose more money and go into the red zone deeper. They would probably reach deep into the 100 million fan pool all more.

And right before i would launch this down graded version, i would have MGS3, FFIII, and KZ2 (assuming it would live up to the hype) ready forbuyingthe same day as the new console.

I think they would sell millions more consoles, and then they could focus on getting more third party support. After, two of the down graded versiion is or they started seeing that they have broke even or was making a profit drop the down graded verison and introduce our 600 version for 450, and then have another ps3, that would have some amazing features like playing 600 channels of tv through the ps3 that would rival any satilight or cable networks. and beable to fully fuction as a fast pc. Alos, coming up with a brilliant new control system that dwarfs the wii. Then i would not sell very many and cause the gaming divion to go into the red, but i would slowily introduce it into the market at 150 more than it would cost to make, probabley around 800. I wwould want to market it so the games would look more like an a side thing rather than a gaming system. I would want to target fathers, and not moms, kids. It would have every sports channle. easy to use recording devise to be able to record several games at once then watch them all latter. If the PS3 is really 1/4 the power of a super computer i would take full advatage of every thing i could and market it to the real descison makers. THe dads

Dogmatic923

If sony would of created a system like that, it wouldn't be a ps3, it waould simply just be a ps2.5, seriously your not asking for a ps3 your asking for a ps2.5.

Avatar image for aznfool07
aznfool07

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 aznfool07
Member since 2005 • 3552 Posts
Sorry but I want 15 - 50 GB per game.
Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#60 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
Soo....you want a PS2 then....
Avatar image for CyanX73
CyanX73

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 CyanX73
Member since 2004 • 3389 Posts
There is no stripping down of a blu-ray player. It just gets cheaper to produce over time. Sony is losing a bundle on each PS3 so even as Blu-ray is cheaper to produce it doesn't mean they'll pass that savings on to us. As a corporation they have this crazy urge to make money. Go figure. They could bring back the 20 gig for under 400.00 dollars and really make an impact but when they had the 20 out no one was purchasing it. When I say no one please don't respond saying "I have a 20 gig" because I'm talking in comparision to the 60. I believe they said it was like 9 to 1 60 over 20 gig model. Who knows. A hundred dollar price cut, games available, and blu-ray winning the boring high def movie war all amounts to more reasons to buy a PS3.
Avatar image for urio1
urio1

1576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 urio1
Member since 2007 • 1576 Posts

[QUOTE="urio1"]some of the stuff dogmatic said did actually make sense but u really can't remove BD because thats one of the reasons that the PS3 is so awesome.... i think that many people do not want to pay for a video game console but wat most people fail to realize is that the PS3 is an ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM..... and lets face it, with all of the updates coming out the PS3 will eventually be able to do anything... even cook my dinner and arrange my dates lmao jp i can do dat stuff myself but still i think Sony should do this... leave the 60 GB version out on sale but instead offer a version with around15 GB(idk wat icould possibly do with 60 GB or even 15 GB besides game demos)remove HDMI and use component A/V instead which is much cheaper and just as good... include a wired controller... no complact flash/SD/micro??? slots lol ummm no more wi-fi oh and instead of the blu-ray being able to play movies they should sell that function as an add-on like Microsoft did i hope i didnt sound stupid... does any1 agree with me?Dogmatic923
yeah, you said it better than me, but thats the main point i want to underscore is make a verison that is affordable to the masses and doesn't cost sony to loss money on every system sold. I should of stuck with that instead of giving my techinacl advise, but anyway, i like how you said it

thanks lol but dats just my opinion and most of it was based on wat u said but a solid price around 300 would really help out alot

Avatar image for urio1
urio1

1576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 urio1
Member since 2007 • 1576 Posts

[QUOTE="urio1"]some of the stuff dogmatic said did actually make sense but u really can't remove BD because thats one of the reasons that the PS3 is so awesome.... i think that many people do not want to pay for a video game console but wat most people fail to realize is that the PS3 is an ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM..... and lets face it, with all of the updates coming out the PS3 will eventually be able to do anything... even cook my dinner and arrange my dates lmao jp i can do dat stuff myself but still i think Sony should do this... leave the 60 GB version out on sale but instead offer a version with around15 GB(idk wat icould possibly do with 60 GB or even 15 GB besides game demos)remove HDMI and use component A/V instead which is much cheaper and just as good... include a wired controller... no complact flash/SD/micro??? slots lol ummm no more wi-fi oh and instead of the blu-ray being able to play movies they should sell that function as an add-on like Microsoft did i hope i didnt sound stupid... does any1 agree with me?hama666

It wouldnt be possible to be honest. The 360 uses the HD-DVD drive as an optional addition, however its not the console's game format. DVD-9 is what the 360 uses. Whereas blu-ray more or less IS the PS3. All PS3 game discs are formatted in blu-ray discs and it is blu-ray which makes the PS3 seem superior to the 360. If they got rid of it, it would just be a glorified PS2 with better visuals. And thats only going to harm sales even further.

wow good point lol i didnt know dat it runs on DVD-9 but hmm blu-ray really is the PS3 in a sense... but isnt the 360 just a glorified xbox with better visuals and media capabilities??? i mean the ps3 is a glorified ps2 with better visual and media capabilities as well but as we all have noticed many developers favor the PS3 because it gives them the chance to get very creative with the video games that are produced :o lol and in the end dats really all dat matters

Avatar image for osirisomeomi
osirisomeomi

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 osirisomeomi
Member since 2007 • 3100 Posts

Well, let's see what they can remove. They need bluray (same speed), the cell, the RSX, the ram (same amount, same place), they need a hard drive of some sort, they need a controller...

Well, so they can do things like remove the wireless, downgrade the HDD, remove the memory card readers, and dumb down the casing, right? They already DID that with the 20 gig and nobody wanted it.

Avatar image for mattyomo99
mattyomo99

3915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 mattyomo99
Member since 2005 • 3915 Posts

with out the blueray its not a ps3 anymore... Its useless

Avatar image for JudgementEden
JudgementEden

2832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#66 JudgementEden
Member since 2004 • 2832 Posts
[QUOTE="Password1233456"][QUOTE="Dogmatic923"][QUOTE="player2k"][QUOTE="Dogmatic923"]

I think they should first make a ps3 that hasa stripped downblue ray player or DVD that devs could still make games on for both verison, if thats even possiable. This way if someone really wants the dvd player in their ps3 they would just end up buying the $600 version. I think they should take out the WIFI, and drop the 60gb down to a 30 gb. Also, take out all backwards capabilities technology. Then sell the system for $300 without a wireless controller and with a wired one. Also, take out the HDMI ports it that save money too.

This way they get there price cut without having to lose more money and go into the red zone deeper. They would probably reach deep into the 100 million fan pool all more.

And right before i would launch this down graded version, i would have MGS3, FFIII, and KZ2 (assuming it would live up to the hype) ready forbuyingthe same day as the new console.

I think they would sell millions more consoles, and then they could focus on getting more third party support. After, two of the down graded versiion is or they started seeing that they have broke even or was making a profit drop the down graded verison and introduce our 600 version for 450, and then have another ps3, that would have some amazing features like playing 600 channels of tv through the ps3 that would rival any satilight or cable networks. and beable to fully fuction as a fast pc. Alos, coming up with a brilliant new control system that dwarfs the wii. Then i would not sell very many and cause the gaming divion to go into the red, but i would slowily introduce it into the market at 150 more than it would cost to make, probabley around 800. I wwould want to market it so the games would look more like an a side thing rather than a gaming system. I would want to target fathers, and not moms, kids. It would have every sports channle. easy to use recording devise to be able to record several games at once then watch them all latter. If the PS3 is really 1/4 the power of a super computer i would take full advatage of every thing i could and market it to the real descison makers. THe dads

Dogmatic923

thats why you dont work for sony and u just blog lol ... that was the dumbest stuff i've heard since it was was said that paris hilton got punished more harshly than she should have

um, whats so dumb about making a product more affordable, no matter how you do it, so more people buy your product and therefore make more of a profit. Whats dumb is the PS3 sales. And why do you have to be so insulting?



But the problem is that the PS3 IS affordable.

true, but so are million dollar homes for movie stars. Its so evident that for people to enjoy a 360 or ps3 you have to have internet connection, 1000 to 2000 HDTV set, for ps3 blue ray movies which are way more expensive, $60 games, no matter how you spin it to get the best out of this generation you need some cash. Its not like alreay having a tv, put you conntection in dial up, and buy a 150 system, with $20 platuim hits. The true hardcore have bought in already and now the numbers are trickling up at best.

This is a severely idiotic post. First off i got my HDTV for $800, not $1000-2000. Not to mention you can definately get them cheaper depending on size and other stats.

Blu-Ray (not "blue ray") is not WAY more expensive. What are you so cheap you cant afford an extra $5 or so!?

Its not that expensive compared to DVD.

Same thing with the $60 game argument, sure if you look at the whole price its expensive. But if you just realize its only $10 more than a 50 dollar game then its not so bad.

Oh and why must you mention dial-up? I have always said dial-up is as good as dead. Dial-up is not good for ANYTHING!

The connection is slow and unreliable, with its constant disconnects. Grow up, noone has dial-up anymore.

Avatar image for VampiraJen
VampiraJen

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#68 VampiraJen
Member since 2005 • 340 Posts

i like my ps3 just the way it is, but i can understand the idea of having a stripped down version. some people just was a games console and not all the extra stuff. dont know why they're not carrying o with the cheaper20 gig version. a lot of people who fancy a ps3 are put off by the price right now, or have no intrest in the all the added features

Avatar image for Gamerboi27
Gamerboi27

3261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 Gamerboi27
Member since 2005 • 3261 Posts
ya...its called buying a ps2
Avatar image for KEM92
KEM92

1368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 KEM92
Member since 2006 • 1368 Posts
if they did all that you'd be the only one buying it.
Avatar image for F1sTDaCuffS
F1sTDaCuffS

2570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#72 F1sTDaCuffS
Member since 2005 • 2570 Posts

I think they should first make a ps3 that hasa stripped downblue ray player or DVD that devs could still make games on for both verison, if thats even possiable. This way if someone really wants the dvd player in their ps3 they would just end up buying the $600 version. I think they should take out the WIFI, and drop the 60gb down to a 30 gb. Also, take out all backwards capabilities technology. Then sell the system for $300 without a wireless controller and with a wired one. Also, take out the HDMI ports it that save money too.

This way they get there price cut without having to lose more money and go into the red zone deeper. They would probably reach deep into the 100 million fan pool all more.

And right before i would launch this down graded version, i would have MGS3, FFIII, and KZ2 (assuming it would live up to the hype) ready forbuyingthe same day as the new console.

I think they would sell millions more consoles, and then they could focus on getting more third party support. After, two of the down graded versiion is or they started seeing that they have broke even or was making a profit drop the down graded verison and introduce our 600 version for 450, and then have another ps3, that would have some amazing features like playing 600 channels of tv through the ps3 that would rival any satilight or cable networks. and beable to fully fuction as a fast pc. Alos, coming up with a brilliant new control system that dwarfs the wii. Then i would not sell very many and cause the gaming divion to go into the red, but i would slowily introduce it into the market at 150 more than it would cost to make, probabley around 800. I wwould want to market it so the games would look more like an a side thing rather than a gaming system. I would want to target fathers, and not moms, kids. It would have every sports channle. easy to use recording devise to be able to record several games at once then watch them all latter. If the PS3 is really 1/4 the power of a super computer i would take full advatage of every thing i could and market it to the real descison makers. THe dads

Dogmatic923

ive already stated this, they should just rip off the wii idea. then it wil be theres.

Avatar image for bear1961
bear1961

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 bear1961
Member since 2007 • 493 Posts

[QUOTE="Doggystyle923"][QUOTE="disismylife"]people.wassup

downgraded PS3 is horrible, but not that extreme. no BD no backward capability and no HDMI(retarded), I bought the PS3 because it can play BD movies, ps2 and ps1 games, and also displaying 1080p. That's the main reason I bought it. So those features should be kept.because now i am in credit card debt!

Avatar image for darkangel_78589
darkangel_78589

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 darkangel_78589
Member since 2003 • 205 Posts
With this kind of mentality, Sony may have as well stuck with the PlayStation 2. Seriously. It isn't as if Sony is making anyone purchase the system. Advancements cost money. IF you aren't really ready to pay for advancements, then stick to what you can afford. I mean, afterall, it isn't as if the PS3 is going away. It's here to stay. And, just because it's at a high price range now, doesn't mean it'll stay that way forever. If one really wants this system, they can either; A.) Work hard to gain the money to purchase it. OR B.) Wait until the price drops low enough that they CAN afford it. However, one shouldn't expect that to happen anytime soon.
Avatar image for bob_dartagnan
bob_dartagnan

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 bob_dartagnan
Member since 2004 • 488 Posts
And I think people like you should be allowed to breed...but that is just my opinion.
Avatar image for bear1961
bear1961

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76 bear1961
Member since 2007 • 493 Posts
And I think people like you should be allowed to breed with breastmilk and hair...but that is just my opinion.bob_dartagnan
Avatar image for ferrarifx
ferrarifx

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 ferrarifx
Member since 2003 • 37 Posts
damn ur an idiot seriously!xxgangstapa777x
Avatar image for fireblazer236
fireblazer236

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 fireblazer236
Member since 2004 • 367 Posts
They already have something like that. Its called a PS2.
Avatar image for Ocram_Zepol
Ocram_Zepol

1199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Ocram_Zepol
Member since 2006 • 1199 Posts
Yeah uh... you just kinda descrbed a PS2. Besides... uhh.. yeah.. not good lol.
Avatar image for Xb0Xer
Xb0Xer

617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Xb0Xer
Member since 2003 • 617 Posts
well all i can say is .....NO HDMI... NO BLU RAY...... ummm dude you have to remember SONY has a agreemant with the makers of BLU RAY that means it must be put in with all there systems why else would they purchase copyright laws and pay so much to have it into there system if they were to just make another system with out it.... in the long run they would lose profit and people would be dissapointed in sony for stepping down the ladder of Next Gen just to make money... either way what your saying is keeping the frickin cheaper PS3 on the market... as you saw my friend it didn't work then and it won't work now... everone wants the best now a days because they don't wanna be left out in the dust when it comes to entertainment... everyone wants to be entertained to the fullest.
Avatar image for darkmanure
darkmanure

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 darkmanure
Member since 2007 • 548 Posts
I nominate this for the most stupid topic of the year.
Avatar image for AlienOverlord
AlienOverlord

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#85 AlienOverlord
Member since 2003 • 790 Posts

Bottom line is that every PS3 needs the Bluray drive, the cell processor and the graphics card. Those things alone probably cost Sony $600 dollars right now. Whatever is left that they can strip down while including those things won't lower the production costs by much. Certainly if the $500 version had been priced at $400 it would have been flying off the shelves, few people could have rationalized spending an extra $200 for the premium version. The problem is even another $100 dollar loss multiplied by the 6 million they would have sold by now is another 600 million dollars lost for Sony. They have this planned out. They figured how much they could afford to lose, they priced it as low as they could, they've planned for cost reductions in production and how and when to lower the consumer price further. They've thought this through.

You're worried about Sony's position and their decision to use Bluray when that puts it out of the price range of average consumers. Don't worry. It's Microsoft that should be worried. PS3 has sold really well considering it's price and relative lack of games compared to it's competition. In two years time Microsoft will have to introduce a new system because the games that will be coming out for the PS3 will make the X360 look like a Wii in comparison and with a couple of price drops everyone will be ready to pay a little more for the PS3 since it has by far the best games. In conclusion, your PS3 was a safe investment.

Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#86 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts

I nominate this for the most stupid topic of the year.darkmanure

seconded.

I mean seriously, after this lets make really economical Ferrari's that are plastic and you have to pedal to make them go, just so Ferrari can increase theier sales :lol:

Avatar image for sonic0491
sonic0491

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#87 sonic0491
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

I think they should first make a ps3 that hasa stripped downblue ray player or DVD that devs could still make games on for both verison, if thats even possiable. This way if someone really wants the dvd player in their ps3 they would just end up buying the $600 version. I think they should take out the WIFI, and drop the 60gb down to a 30 gb. Also, take out all backwards capabilities technology. Then sell the system for $300 without a wireless controller and with a wired one. Also, take out the HDMI ports it that save money too.

This way they get there price cut without having to lose more money and go into the red zone deeper. They would probably reach deep into the 100 million fan pool all more.

And right before i would launch this down graded version, i would have MGS3, FFIII, and KZ2 (assuming it would live up to the hype) ready forbuyingthe same day as the new console.

I think they would sell millions more consoles, and then they could focus on getting more third party support. After, two of the down graded versiion is or they started seeing that they have broke even or was making a profit drop the down graded verison and introduce our 600 version for 450, and then have another ps3, that would have some amazing features like playing 600 channels of tv through the ps3 that would rival any satilight or cable networks. and beable to fully fuction as a fast pc. Alos, coming up with a brilliant new control system that dwarfs the wii. Then i would not sell very many and cause the gaming divion to go into the red, but i would slowily introduce it into the market at 150 more than it would cost to make, probabley around 800. I wwould want to market it so the games would look more like an a side thing rather than a gaming system. I would want to target fathers, and not moms, kids. It would have every sports channle. easy to use recording devise to be able to record several games at once then watch them all latter. If the PS3 is really 1/4 the power of a super computer i would take full advatage of every thing i could and market it to the real descison makers. THe dads

Dogmatic923

your taking out all thats good of the ps3.

Avatar image for s0njas0n
s0njas0n

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 s0njas0n
Member since 2002 • 1044 Posts
errr, no.
Avatar image for lodlod
lodlod

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 lodlod
Member since 2006 • 695 Posts
Well I dont mind your idea man, I mean apart from the no blue ray thing that is :)
Avatar image for LeDavester
LeDavester

271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 LeDavester
Member since 2007 • 271 Posts

I think they should first make a ps3 that hasa stripped downblue ray player or DVD that devs could still make games on for both verison, if thats even possiable. This way if someone really wants the dvd player in their ps3 they would just end up buying the $600 version. I think they should take out the WIFI, and drop the 60gb down to a 30 gb. Also, take out all backwards capabilities technology. Then sell the system for $300 without a wireless controller and with a wired one. Also, take out the HDMI ports it that save money too.

This way they get there price cut without having to lose more money and go into the red zone deeper. They would probably reach deep into the 100 million fan pool all more.

And right before i would launch this down graded version, i would have MGS3, FFIII, and KZ2 (assuming it would live up to the hype) ready forbuyingthe same day as the new console.

I think they would sell millions more consoles, and then they could focus on getting more third party support. After, two of the down graded versiion is or they started seeing that they have broke even or was making a profit drop the down graded verison and introduce our 600 version for 450, and then have another ps3, that would have some amazing features like playing 600 channels of tv through the ps3 that would rival any satilight or cable networks. and beable to fully fuction as a fast pc. Alos, coming up with a brilliant new control system that dwarfs the wii. Then i would not sell very many and cause the gaming divion to go into the red, but i would slowily introduce it into the market at 150 more than it would cost to make, probabley around 800. I wwould want to market it so the games would look more like an a side thing rather than a gaming system. I would want to target fathers, and not moms, kids. It would have every sports channle. easy to use recording devise to be able to record several games at once then watch them all latter. If the PS3 is really 1/4 the power of a super computer i would take full advatage of every thing i could and market it to the real descison makers. THe dads

Dogmatic923

no thanks, i don't want the ps3 to look like the wii60, or whatever you call microsofts new machine, but oh well, wii and 360 are same thing anyways since 360's graphics looks just as good as wii. but yeah, i hope this doesn't happen because i want people to be able to watch blu-ray movies and view games and movies on hd when they get a hdtv.

Avatar image for LittleYoshi
LittleYoshi

1490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 LittleYoshi
Member since 2004 • 1490 Posts

I think they should first make a ps3 that hasa stripped downblue ray player or DVD that devs could still make games on for both verison, if thats even possiable. This way if someone really wants the dvd player in their ps3 they would just end up buying the $600 version. I think they should take out the WIFI, and drop the 60gb down to a 30 gb. Also, take out all backwards capabilities technology. Then sell the system for $300 without a wireless controller and with a wired one. Also, take out the HDMI ports it that save money too.

This way they get there price cut without having to lose more money and go into the red zone deeper. They would probably reach deep into the 100 million fan pool all more.

And right before i would launch this down graded version, i would have MGS3, FFIII, and KZ2 (assuming it would live up to the hype) ready forbuyingthe same day as the new console.

I think they would sell millions more consoles, and then they could focus on getting more third party support. After, two of the down graded versiion is or they started seeing that they have broke even or was making a profit drop the down graded verison and introduce our 600 version for 450, and then have another ps3, that would have some amazing features like playing 600 channels of tv through the ps3 that would rival any satilight or cable networks. and beable to fully fuction as a fast pc. Alos, coming up with a brilliant new control system that dwarfs the wii. Then i would not sell very many and cause the gaming divion to go into the red, but i would slowily introduce it into the market at 150 more than it would cost to make, probabley around 800. I wwould want to market it so the games would look more like an a side thing rather than a gaming system. I would want to target fathers, and not moms, kids. It would have every sports channle. easy to use recording devise to be able to record several games at once then watch them all latter. If the PS3 is really 1/4 the power of a super computer i would take full advatage of every thing i could and market it to the real descison makers. THe dads

Dogmatic923

Dude Sony did what they did because they know that and also they wanted to do it this way.(the way they plan out the PS3)

(Everything cost money) U have a good idea, make ur own system and see why the Sony did what they did for the PS3.

Just saying.......

Avatar image for No_worrys_mate
No_worrys_mate

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 No_worrys_mate
Member since 2007 • 489 Posts
The 20gig version is as stripped down as the Ps3 was going to get except you could of done the Bc by emulation like the Pal Ps3 are doing now which have the emotion chip removed and saved about $20-$30, I mean they alsocould of taken out the card readers but it would look diffrent and would only lower the price by around $8, This is how the Ps3 is, Its future proof and im glad ive got the 60gig one because it has everything you could ever want.
Avatar image for marcbeau7650
marcbeau7650

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 marcbeau7650
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts
sounds like an xbox
Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

The only thing they should downgrade is the harddrive (20 gig) and the Wifi. They've already taken out the PS2 emotion chip so that has been done.

Leave the BR, HDMI and definetly the wireless controller (I mean EVERY other console has wireless now).

If theywerealready planning a $150 or $200 price drop (which I think they are), removing the Wifi and downgrading the harddrive could drive the price to about $350.

To me that's asfar as they should go. If they fiddle with Blu-Ray at all, the PS3 is lost and Sony just commited suicide.

Avatar image for bear1961
bear1961

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 bear1961
Member since 2007 • 493 Posts
The 20gig version is as stripped down as the Ps3 was going to get except you could of done the Bc by emulation like the Pal Ps3 are doing now which have the emotion chip removed and saved about $20-$30, I mean they alsocould of taken out the card readers but it would look diffrent and would only lower the price by around $8, This is how the Ps3 is, Its future proof and im glad ive got the 60gig one because it has everything you could ever want.No_worrys_mate
Avatar image for Rune_295
Rune_295

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Rune_295
Member since 2005 • 173 Posts

Anyway, i think there should be a console that it made for not the elites like us. Dogmatic923

Oh my that is funny