In terms of HDTVs for PS3, which company is the best?

I am shopping around for a 32 inch HDTV to use for my ps3 and i would like to get a Sony Bravia but i have limited funds and it seems that VIZIO is the least expensive. does any one know if VIZIO is a good buy? If not, do you have any suggestions for someone looking to get the best value for the least money?

Vizios aren't good for gaming since they usually have alot of motion blur.

For gaming make sure you buy a TV that has at least 120hz

do you have a specific tv to suggest?

i have the Toshiba 40RV525U. look it up

I would say Samsung>LG>Sony>Everything else

Vizios aren't good for gaming since they usually have alot of motion blur.

For gaming make sure you buy a TV that has at least 120hz

LoserMike

Panasonic and Sony bravia.

Sony & Samsung for me.. Future shop & Best Buy has some good deals. But make sure do some research first...

60Hz is fine

i own a samsung 50in 1080p plasma and i also have a samsung 50in led projection.and my mother owns a sony 46in bravia lcd those are all the best tv ive seen ps3 on. i prefer dlp&led projections but i dont recommend them to most their to complex.at the moment my 50in led is breaking down has a big shadow on the right side of the screen. i have a samsung technician comin by anyday im so depreesed.

I have a 52", 120Hz Samsung that I lust very much. I highly recommend it.

Edit: Contrary to the comment above, you CAN notice the 120Hz difference. However, a word of note: 120Hz works be injecting a simulated frame inbetween the frames of the 60Hz source. Sometimes the result is less than desirable, but usually if the source is high quality, so are the interwoven "fake" frames.

120hz is noticeable.. But 240hz is not.. I wish I waited longer on buying a tv.. Those LED TVs looks sweeeet!

Get a panasonic plasma, or a samsung lcd/led, i have a sony it ok, but not as good in picture quality, refresh rate, etc. as plasma.. and sony tv's always cost more just cause its a sony. Get a plasma for gaming.8)

I have a 52", 120Hz Samsung that I lust very much. I highly recommend it.

Edit: Contrary to the comment above, you CAN notice the 120Hz difference. However, a word of note: 120Hz works be injecting a simulated frame inbetween the frames of the 60Hz source. Sometimes the result is less than desirable, but usually if the source is high quality, so are the interwoven "fake" frames.

Sony Bravia. :)Doolz2024

I prefer Sonys. Samsungs are good too, but they lack the sound quality of Bravia's. So unless you have a home theater system, I would pick a Sony.

If you have the funds, Best Buy is currently running a deal where you can buy a 46" Sony Bravia KDL - 46V5100 (1080p and 120hz) for $950, and you get a free PS3 slim, a game (Uncharted 2, LBP GOTY, or the new R&C), as well as a $30 blu-ray movie (can't remember the selection). If you sell the PS3 for $250, it comes down to $700, and you could even make that $600 if you sell the game and the movie too (not including sales tax, of course). I got this deal, and am really satisfied with the TV, and I'm selling the PS3 this weekend (Keeping the game and movie lol).

If you don't have the funds, then I would recommend this Sony Bravia. The guy I recommended it to on this thread bought it, and liked it so much that he sent me a message thanking me for my recommendation. So I would choose this as an alternative to the Best Buy deal.

Samsung and Sony... both are really good, but i think Samsung is less expensive... 8)

I had all three...a Bravia, Samsung, and a Vizio. I can tell you hands down and by a very long shot that Samsung is undoubtedly the best out of any of them. With Sony, you're really paying mostly for the name (surprise). When I bought my Samsung, the HDTV right above it on the wall was a Bravia that was the same size as the Samsung, but had less HDMI ports and a far lower contrast ratio. Some can argue that contrast ratio can't really be compared from one brand to the next, but looking at the same image on both screens I could surely tell the difference. Anyway, the Bravia was also about $500 more expensive than the Samsung, and didn't look near as aestheticaly pleasing as the red beveled Samsung did. Vizio is okay, but they use older parts in their models that are subcontracted out from other people. They are good for their price, but they won't give you near the picture quality you can get with a Samsung.

Samsungs and Bravias are good. My brother got a Vizio and I guess it's pretty good for that low price. Go to CNET.com and browse around the HDTV section and reviews.

I would recommened getting a Sony Bravia. I have a 37 inch one and it seriously rocks!

I am shopping around for a 32 inch HDTV to use for my ps3 and i would like to get a Sony Bravia but i have limited funds and it seems that VIZIO is the least expensive. does any one know if VIZIO is a good buy? If not, do you have any suggestions for someone looking to get the best value for the least money?

mystery1932

I have a 52", 120Hz Samsung that I lust very much. I highly recommend it.

Edit: Contrary to the comment above, you CAN notice the 120Hz difference. However, a word of note: 120Hz works be injecting a simulated frame inbetween the frames of the 60Hz source. Sometimes the result is less than desirable, but usually if the source is high quality, so are the interwoven "fake" frames.

zaphod_b

I'm 100% for Samsung, contrast ratio is insane