Well first of all, i have call of duty 4 and the game is excellent for me personally is a great game, but here we go again with Gamespot Reviews saying the game solo campaign is too short (and it is like 6 hours the most), and the replay value is what it counts, yes they are right, the graphics are amazing and the sound does stand out, but honestly people in the review of Call of Duty 4 it shows how almost all the reviewers in Gamespot only like first person shooters, because people compare the review in Call of Duty 4 and Heavenly Sword the similarity is almost the same, but they gave CoD 4 a 9 but Heavenly Sword the gave it 8, and i must say that although Heavenly Sword does lacks a litlle of the replay game value that CoD 4 has, and i say little because Heavenly Sword does has replay value not much but it has.
And its just my oppinion but Heavenly Sword has much better Graphics, Better Sound andBetter Storyline so i think that heavenly sword deserve a little more like a 8.9 or a 9.
And for all those saying that this thread has no reality because the two games are different genre, im not saying that heavenly sword is better, the only thing is that we the gamers, the client, the readers are knowladgeable people with minds of our own so please start reviewing with professionalism and dont go biased. So post your oppinion about this
Log in to comment