Ken Levine confirms there will be NO PS3 version of BIOSHOCK!

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/08/24/levine-confirms-no-ps3-bioshock-and-does-mea-culpa-on-pc-issues/

"Joystiq just got off the phone with Ken Levine, lead designer for BioShock, and was told that the PC version's issues are overblown because the game's high profile has placed it under a microscope. He fully admits they "screwed up" and notes that patches are most definitely in the works. Furthermore, there is no PS3 version of BioShock in development or planned.

Then there is the lingering question of the rumored PS3 version of BioShock found in the PC code. Levine responds quite clearly, "I promise you, there is no secret plan about the PS3 that we're keeping from people. There's no PS3 development going on that we're hiding. There's lots of stuff that gets into game code, plans change over time and we got an exclusive deal with Microsoft ... that's not a Rosetta Stone discovery."

We'll have the full Ken Levine interview up as soon as the lovely and joyful transcription process finishes."

---------------------------

That's it, from the man himself. The constant wishing can end now, cause it's not happening. EVER.

Avatar image for joelejuif
joelejuif

1667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 joelejuif
Member since 2003 • 1667 Posts
There is no interview shown and he's talking to the PC designer...Not even the Xbxo360 or the Lead designer in all this...
Avatar image for Sonyntendo
Sonyntendo

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Sonyntendo
Member since 2007 • 174 Posts
:cry:
Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

There is no interview shown and he's talking to the PC designer...Not even the Xbxo360 or the Lead designer in all this...joelejuif
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? The CREATOR of System Shock and Bioshock said FLAT OUT that the game will NEVER be on the PS3 because Microsoft paid for the exclusive. They got DIRECT QUOTES from the man, and will put up the full interview soon (read the articleand you'd know that).

And you're STILL spinning this?

Avatar image for outbreak201
outbreak201

8372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#6 outbreak201
Member since 2005 • 8372 Posts
that kinda sucks for people that only have a ps3...bioshock is awesome but theres soo many things that could make it better and the graphics on it are overhyped
Avatar image for KoolEmpty
KoolEmpty

1081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KoolEmpty
Member since 2002 • 1081 Posts
No one has ever lied about anything before...might as well trust everyone
Avatar image for w7w7w7w7w7
w7w7w7w7w7

4891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 w7w7w7w7w7
Member since 2006 • 4891 Posts
I don't care, already have it and beat it.
Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
No one has ever lied about anything before...might as well trust everyoneKoolEmpty
Indeed. It was only hopeful Ps3fanboys assuming that 3rd parties MUST port to the PS3... we now know that's not the case.
Avatar image for black_awpN1
black_awpN1

7863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 black_awpN1
Member since 2004 • 7863 Posts

Remember when the creator of RE4 said that the game would never go on PS2, and if it did he would cut his own head off? Devs. say this kinda stuff all the time. Nothing is oncived at this moment in time, but a year down the road they may say, "Hey, lets bring this awesome game to the PS3 so it can look even better and we can make some money. SONY could just throw some cash their way, and presto-change-o, you got Bioshock on the PS3. Money Talks my freinds, Money Talks.

I could actualy care less, because I have a 360 and a PS3.

Avatar image for KoolEmpty
KoolEmpty

1081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 KoolEmpty
Member since 2002 • 1081 Posts

[QUOTE="KoolEmpty"]No one has ever lied about anything before...might as well trust everyoneArchkio
Indeed. It was only hopeful Ps3fanboys assuming that 3rd parties MUST port to the PS3... we now know that's not the case.

I'll be playing it on PC in the meantime, but until it doesn't happen, I won't be surprised if it does...if you get my drift. Thanks for the link though.

Avatar image for fistoflight
fistoflight

7943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 fistoflight
Member since 2005 • 7943 Posts
There I told you guys there is no way it's gonna be on the ps3 any time soon or at all... Soo lets just drop bioshock on ps3 now and talk about other games...
Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Remember when the creator of RE4 said that the game would never go on PS2, and if it did he would cut his own head off? Devs. say this kinda stuff all the time. Nothing is oncived at this moment in time, but a year down the road they may say, "Hey, lets bring this awesome game to the PS3 so it can look even better and we can make some money. SONY could just throw some cash their way, and presto-change-o, you got Bioshock on the PS3. Money Talks my freinds, Money Talks.

I could actualy care less, because I have a 360 and a PS3.

black_awpN1

Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.

Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3.

Money talks indeed my friend. Trouble is Microsoft is the one who paid first.

Avatar image for -oG-ShAdY
-oG-ShAdY

1385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#15 -oG-ShAdY
Member since 2006 • 1385 Posts

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

Archkio

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

Avatar image for coolasj19
coolasj19

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 coolasj19
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts
this is news to us HOW????
Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Archkio you are such a lemming man... very sad. How long you had the account sitting there before you posted this? Just made it so you could start some trouble? Have you found the real link yet? No? I wonder why... :roll:-oG-ShAdY
What areyou talking about? The link is real.. even Microsoft devs (chespace) on Neogaf are talking about it... how blind can you be?

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=183666

Avatar image for RahKayne
RahKayne

3436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 RahKayne
Member since 2003 • 3436 Posts

You guys don't understand, when companies say X game will never come to system, sure they mean it. However it doesn't mean that any future tweaks to the game will not.

Bioshock: Big Sisters for example, can come out for the PS3. Similar to MGS2: Subsistance or whatever it was called.

Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

-oG-ShAdY

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

MICROSOFT PAID EPIC TO MAKE GEARS A MICROSOFT EXCLUSIVE. EPIC CANNOT BRING GEARS OF WAR TO THE PS3IF THEY WANTED TO BECAUSE MICROSOFT PUBLISHES IT AND HAS THE RIGHTS.

This is all very public knowledge. How can you not be aware of this?

Avatar image for black_awpN1
black_awpN1

7863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 black_awpN1
Member since 2004 • 7863 Posts
[QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

-oG-ShAdY

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

Exactly, Just like Hideo Kojima with MGS4. If he dosent want MGS4 on the 360, then its not going to the 360. Its as simple as that.

BTW: I would love for Cliffy B to come out during a MS press conference and tell everyone that his game is going to PS3 and give aJohnCena sizedF U to Bill Gates. (of course, thats a death sentence. Gates could have you erased if he wanted to.)

Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

You guys don't understand, when companies say X game will never come to system, sure they mean it. However it doesn't mean that any future tweaks to the game will not.

Bioshock: Big Sisters for example, can come out for the PS3. Similar to MGS2: Subsistance or whatever it was called.

RahKayne

It's not a matter of him just saying that he wantsit only forthe360, like Mikami did with RE4 on the Gamecube. Microsoft PAID for the exclusive.

There's no PS3 development going on that we're hiding. There's lots of stuff that gets into game code, plans change over time and we got an exclusive deal with Microsoft ... that's not a Rosetta Stone discovery."

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts

Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.Archkio

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

Avatar image for -oG-ShAdY
-oG-ShAdY

1385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#23 -oG-ShAdY
Member since 2006 • 1385 Posts
[QUOTE="-oG-ShAdY"][QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

Archkio

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

MICROSOFT PAID EPIC TO MAKE GEARS A MICROSOFT EXCLUSIVE. EPIC CANNOT BRING GEARS OF WAR TO THE PS3IF THEY WANTED TO BECAUSE MICROSOFT PUBLISHES IT AND HAS THE RIGHTS.

This is all very public knowledge. How can you not be aware of this?

Games can go to different publishers. But you could be right. I'm still being honest about Cliffy B... he does whatever the hell he wants.

Avatar image for TheSystemLord1
TheSystemLord1

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#24 TheSystemLord1
Member since 2006 • 7786 Posts

u mk a new account 2 post dis wow lemmingz are loserz
hi381

You talk like that and you live in a suburb? Wow, **** are losers.

Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="Archkio"]Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.Pariah_001

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

Except that they'd have to get Microsoft's permissionfor that, since Microsoft paid for the exclusive.

Chances are MicrosoftGames Division won't allow that. This is all common sense.

Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="hi381"]u mk a new account 2 post dis wow lemmingz are loserz
TheSystemLord1

You talk like that and you live in a suburb? Wow, **** are losers.

I ignored his comment cause I can't even read it. :?
Avatar image for etbny22
etbny22

1697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 etbny22
Member since 2005 • 1697 Posts
[QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

-oG-ShAdY

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

microsoft published gears of war thats why it will not be on the ps3.
Avatar image for donnygorgas
donnygorgas

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 donnygorgas
Member since 2005 • 2531 Posts
I tried to tell you it was nothing but internet speculation.
Avatar image for PecansAreNuts
PecansAreNuts

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 PecansAreNuts
Member since 2007 • 906 Posts
Damn I was planing to get the PS3. Maybe not now...
Avatar image for Archkio
Archkio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Archkio
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I tried to tell you it was nothing but internet speculation.donnygorgas
I never understood why people trust internet ramblings over the words of the creator himself. In this thread even!
Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts

There is no interview shown and he's talking to the PC designer...Not even the Xbxo360 or the Lead designer in all this...joelejuif

He is talking to ken levine the guy that wrote the story and did the creative direction basicly the main guy for both versions pc and 360.

Ive been saying this all week that theres definitly an exclusive deal, ive posted facts to prove that exclusive deal but people just keep denying it and saying it would come to ps3 one day.

Its like the 360 fangirls refuse to admitt mgs4 is exclusive to ps3.

Hopefully this will put an end to bioshock on ps3 and we can talk about real ps3 topics, although i feel for those ps3 only owners as bioshock is awesome just got it today played around an hours and its amazing so far.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts

that kinda sucks for people that only have a ps3...bioshock is awesome but theres soo many things that could make it better and the graphics on it are overhypedoutbreak201

WHAT, the graphics are overhyped, so every reviewer so far has overhyped the graphics, nonsense, bioshock is one of the most beautiful next gen games out so far, i own both ps3 and 360 and ps3 has nothing that graphicly compares to bioshock out yet, but it will.

These kind of comments make me laugh, probably the same people that were saying its coming to ps3 2-3 days ago are now going to say no biggie that game is over-hyped anyway killzone 2 will own it.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts

Remember when the creator of RE4 said that the game would never go on PS2, and if it did he would cut his own head off? Devs. say this kinda stuff all the time. Nothing is oncived at this moment in time, but a year down the road they may say, "Hey, lets bring this awesome game to the PS3 so it can look even better and we can make some money. SONY could just throw some cash their way, and presto-change-o, you got Bioshock on the PS3. Money Talks my freinds, Money Talks.

I could actualy care less, because I have a 360 and a PS3.

black_awpN1

Yes money talks, microsofts money that paid for exclusive rights for bioshock.

No matter how much money sony offered they couldnt make it for ps3 unless they broke the contract with microsoft which they would then be sued for millions, its not going to happen unless its a timed exclusive but all the evidence points towards a 360 and gfw exclusive game, it even says on the box only on xbox360 and windows.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts
[QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

-oG-ShAdY

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

What are you crazy, gears of war is a first party game, microsoft would have paid towards development costs and they paid millions for marketing, and gears of war is an exclusive franchise.

Cliffy b does not do what he wants he does what the owner of epic tells him to,what the manager tells him to mike epps or something and he will do what mark rein tells him to. cliffy b doesnt own epic or is even in management he is a lead designer.

Epic brought gears to pc because microsoft let them or that was the deal in the first place, its only going to be on microsoft platforms.

I kind of agree that the guy that posted this was looking for a bit trouble, but ive seen you in bioshock topics this week talking about it coming to ps3 and then somebody gives some facts straight from the horses mouth and you start talking rubbish.

If you read the article it said we will post the full interview once we have written it up.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts
[QUOTE="-oG-ShAdY"][QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

black_awpN1

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

Exactly, Just like Hideo Kojima with MGS4. If he dosent want MGS4 on the 360, then its not going to the 360. Its as simple as that.

BTW: I would love for Cliffy B to come out during a MS press conference and tell everyone that his game is going to PS3 and give aJohnCena sizedF U to Bill Gates. (of course, thats a death sentence. Gates could have you erased if he wanted to.)

Its nothing alike, mgs4 is a thrid party game publsihed by konami and developed by kojima productions, theres a possibilty that could come to 360 although i doubt it.

Where as gears of war is a first party game published by microsoft, and microsoft have an exclusive deal for a gears of war trilogy.

Gears of war 1,2 or 3 will not be on ps3.

People really need to do some homework before making silly comments.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts

[QUOTE="Archkio"]Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.Pariah_001

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

No they couldnt because microsoft have an exclusive deal with 2K, when will people read the links properly that people offer.

God i have to leave this thread its full of fangirls from each side, 360 fangirls rubbing this news in the face of ps3 owners and ps3 owners sulking .

Avatar image for Da_lil_PimP
Da_lil_PimP

4241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Da_lil_PimP
Member since 2006 • 4241 Posts
[QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

[QUOTE="Archkio"]Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.shadystxxx

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

No they couldnt because microsoft have an exclusive deal with 2K, when will people read the links properly that people offer.

God i have to leave this thread its full of fangirls from each side, 360 fangirls rubbing this news in the face of ps3 owners and ps3 owners sulking .

[QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

[QUOTE="Archkio"]Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.shadystxxx

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

No they couldnt because microsoft have an exclusive deal with 2K, when will people read the links properly that people offer.

God i have to leave this thread its full of fangirls from each side, 360 fangirls rubbing this news in the face of ps3 owners and ps3 owners sulking .

6 posts in a row :|
Avatar image for Da_lil_PimP
Da_lil_PimP

4241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Da_lil_PimP
Member since 2006 • 4241 Posts

Damn I was planing to get the PS3. Maybe not now...PecansAreNuts

You were going to a get a PS3 because of a rumour :|

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts
[QUOTE="Archkio"][QUOTE="-oG-ShAdY"][QUOTE="Archkio"]

...Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3...

-oG-ShAdY

Dude, Microsoft didn't pay for Gears to be exclusive. If Epic decided that they wanted to bring it to the PS3 they could. I wouldn't say things like that Cliffy B does what every Cliffy B wants. They even made Gears better for the PC. I really couldn't care less about this. My last comment. This needs to go to the System Wars forum.

MICROSOFT PAID EPIC TO MAKE GEARS A MICROSOFT EXCLUSIVE. EPIC CANNOT BRING GEARS OF WAR TO THE PS3IF THEY WANTED TO BECAUSE MICROSOFT PUBLISHES IT AND HAS THE RIGHTS.

This is all very public knowledge. How can you not be aware of this?

Games can go to different publishers. But you could be right. I'm still being honest about Cliffy B... he does whatever the hell he wants.

Games like gears of cannot go to different publishers, or games like bioshock, gears is a massive success and is an exclsuive microsoft franchise, epic can not take gears to midway or gears2 or3 and say publish our game because they have a deal with microsoft and that exclusive 360 deal has made them millions and probably there most succesful game yet they are not going to screw up a good thing.

And once again cliffy b does not make decisions on things like this for epic, sweeny mark rein and that other guy mike somthing they are the top dogs at epic.

Avatar image for gamenux
gamenux

5308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gamenux
Member since 2006 • 5308 Posts

don't care. Even if there is a bioshock on ps3, I am not planning on buying it. I did not buy it for PC, why would I buy it if it is on ps3. I pass on this game. Just notmy type. that's all.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#41 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts
[QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

[QUOTE="Archkio"]Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.Da_lil_PimP

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

No they couldnt because microsoft have an exclusive deal with 2K, when will people read the links properly that people offer.

God i have to leave this thread its full of fangirls from each side, 360 fangirls rubbing this news in the face of ps3 owners and ps3 owners sulking .

[QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

[QUOTE="Archkio"]Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.shadystxxx

Likewise, 2K could so the same with Bioshock if they wanted.

No they couldnt because microsoft have an exclusive deal with 2K, when will people read the links properly that people offer.

God i have to leave this thread its full of fangirls from each side, 360 fangirls rubbing this news in the face of ps3 owners and ps3 owners sulking .

6 posts in a row :|

Is that against the rules or something.

I came into the topic late and responded to certain peoples comments mainly silly comments.

And you posted to say 6 posts in a row, if you had a problem with my posts you could of said which part of the comment you didnt like.

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
No they couldnt because microsoft have an exclusive deal with 2K, when will people read the links properly that people offer.

God i have to leave this thread its full of fangirls from each side, 360 fangirls rubbing this news in the face of ps3 owners and ps3 owners sulking .

shadystxxx

2K is third party. Meaning that the contract you speak of doesn't last forever.

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts

What are you crazy, gears of war is a first party game, microsoft would have paid towards development costs and they paid millions for marketing, and gears of war is an exclusive franchise.shadystxxx

No. It's second party.

Stop trying to lecture us on the politics of gaming-business when you clearly know nothing on the subject yourself.

Avatar image for Symphonycometh
Symphonycometh

9592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#44 Symphonycometh
Member since 2006 • 9592 Posts

Yay...I landed right in the middle of an argument again...:(

Innevitable considering the topic...

As I thought: the rumors of Bioshock were just as sad as the MGS4 rumors.

Avatar image for i_DUB
i_DUB

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 i_DUB
Member since 2005 • 202 Posts
This is Why I own a 360, PS3, Wii, DS, PSP. Would have been nice for PS3 owners.
Avatar image for ringbling
ringbling

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ringbling
Member since 2004 • 969 Posts

That's pretty stupid to think that anyone would pull that Ken gave an absolute no to a PS3 version. He ONLY said that they are CURRENTLY not coding for a PS3 port. This means many things, namely that they are working on PC/360 patches to address issues in the game, and WHY would they start coding a PS3 port just two days after it's release?

There will very likely be a PS3 version, Oblivion was never supposed to hit PS3, then suddenly it did - so all of you 360 fanboys who keep posting that it's not coming to the PS3 need to just go back to your Xbox 360 furnace of a game setup and try to not get the manual pages stuck together.

Avatar image for NickinAround
NickinAround

3430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 NickinAround
Member since 2003 • 3430 Posts

That's pretty stupid to think that anyone would pull that Ken gave an absolute no to a PS3 version. He ONLY said that they are CURRENTLY not coding for a PS3 port. This means many things, namely that they are working on PC/360 patches to address issues in the game, and WHY would they start coding a PS3 port just two days after it's release?

There will very likely be a PS3 version, Oblivion was never supposed to hit PS3, then suddenly it did - so all of you 360 fanboys who keep posting that it's not coming to the PS3 need to just go back to your Xbox 360 furnace of a game setup and try to not get the manual pages stuck together.

ringbling

Actually, Oblivion was always intended for PS3. Actually, he said, "Furthermore, there is no PS3 version of BioShock in development or planned."
Where is currently in that sentence. That was an absolute. That and exclusivity kind of crushes it.
Avatar image for Symphonycometh
Symphonycometh

9592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#48 Symphonycometh
Member since 2006 • 9592 Posts
[QUOTE="ringbling"]

That's pretty stupid to think that anyone would pull that Ken gave an absolute no to a PS3 version. He ONLY said that they are CURRENTLY not coding for a PS3 port. This means many things, namely that they are working on PC/360 patches to address issues in the game, and WHY would they start coding a PS3 port just two days after it's release?

There will very likely be a PS3 version, Oblivion was never supposed to hit PS3, then suddenly it did - so all of you 360 fanboys who keep posting that it's not coming to the PS3 need to just go back to your Xbox 360 furnace of a game setup and try to not get the manual pages stuck together.

NickinAround


Actually, Oblivion was always intended for PS3. Actually, he said, "Furthermore, there is no PS3 version of BioShock in development or planned."
Where is currently in that sentence. That was an absolute. That and exclusivity kind of crushes it.

Kojima said something similar, but that doesn't stop anyone.

Avatar image for stolz1975
stolz1975

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 stolz1975
Member since 2005 • 422 Posts
Bicshock is way overrated
Avatar image for stolz1975
stolz1975

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 stolz1975
Member since 2005 • 422 Posts
Bicshock is way overrated