Ken Levine confirms there will be NO PS3 version of BIOSHOCK!

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cmpepper23
cmpepper23

3281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 cmpepper23
Member since 2005 • 3281 Posts
I could care less. I went to Gamestop(mine isn't biased), and the guy there described this game as Medal of Honor underwater. He didn't say it was bad, he just told me that it wasn't the great game it has been hyped up to be.
Avatar image for tfaa
tfaa

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 tfaa
Member since 2003 • 362 Posts
damn....m$ ia getting really annoying on how they are buying all these exlusives....a$$holes
Avatar image for gizmo_logix
gizmo_logix

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 gizmo_logix
Member since 2005 • 4224 Posts
Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3.Money talks indeed my friend. Trouble is Microsoft is the one who paid first. Archkio
Funny how you are taking about who's being "PAID OFF" and then expect everyone to just rush out and the the Freezebox360 and actually put money in Microcraps pocket! Ha! Not going to happen. Sorry. This is the ways of Microsoft. They TRY to pay people to buy their products. Bribes, bribes, bribes. It's like paying someone to be your friend! :D
Avatar image for Modbetto
Modbetto

775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Modbetto
Member since 2006 • 775 Posts
[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

Remember when the creator of RE4 said that the game would never go on PS2, and if it did he would cut his own head off? Devs. say this kinda stuff all the time. Nothing is oncived at this moment in time, but a year down the road they may say, "Hey, lets bring this awesome game to the PS3 so it can look even better and we can make some money. SONY could just throw some cash their way, and presto-change-o, you got Bioshock on the PS3. Money Talks my freinds, Money Talks.

I could actualy care less, because I have a 360 and a PS3.

Archkio

Sorry, but Nintendo never paid Capcomfor the Resident Evil exclusive, or any other games from the "Capcom 5" initiative. That was Capcom's choice, so they could change it when they wanted.

Bioshock on the other hand, was paided for by Microsoft. Just like Gears, which will NEVER see the PS3.

Money talks indeed my friend. Trouble is Microsoft is the one who paid first.

That's exactly why RE5 won't be on the wii my friend....

Avatar image for Theibault
Theibault

606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Theibault
Member since 2007 • 606 Posts
Personally, I really don't need another shooter. Just my 2 cents.
Avatar image for gamer082009
gamer082009

6679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 gamer082009
Member since 2007 • 6679 Posts
that kinda sucks for people that only have a ps3...bioshock is awesome but theres soo many things that could make it better and the graphics on it are overhypedoutbreak201
The graphics aredefinitelyNOT over-hyped... this game is up there with Gears of War graphically. Clearly you didn't play this game yourself..Bioshock is a rare to it's genre.