Killzone 2: Who cares.

[QUOTE="ngoniko"][QUOTE="Blitz_Nemesis"][QUOTE="ngoniko"]

[QUOTE="Blitz_Nemesis"]$40 mill + 120 devs + 2 year of secrecey = POTENTIALBlitz_Nemesis

if they don't deliver, I'm going to slap them

logic much?

so if i'm a "average" company, and I invest 40 million dollars into my company to make it great.... do you see where i'm going with this?

it's a gamble

smart much?

Sony is not owned by 1 person, so if you invest into your company you get more of the company shares and profits

[QUOTE="ngoniko"]

Yea, it's a win or lose situation for them.

taking risk and invest money into a company to make it great is what you learn in economic 101

FireFalkon

do you think that investing 40 million in something that has more chance to flop than tohit is wise?

what you can't understand is how much is on the table this time, if they lose it'll not be another "ah another mediocre game, whatever..." it'll be a direct hit to sony gaming division as a whole.

I did say win or lose situation, and your opinion and gamespot reviews of the game is not greater than the world of gaming community, fanboy took the score and run with it and they got to you, because personaly I liked the game.

I did say win or lose situation, and your opinion and gamespot reviews of the game is not greater than the world of gaming community, fanboy took the score and run with it and they got to you, because personaly I liked the game.ngoniko

[QUOTE="ngoniko"] I did say win or lose situation, and your opinion and gamespot reviews of the game is not greater than the world of gaming community, fanboy took the score and run with it and they got to you, because personaly I liked the game.FireFalkon

wth are you talking about? I didn't say it sucked

wth are you talking about? I didn't say it sucked

ngoniko

[QUOTE="ngoniko"]

wth are you talking about? I didn't say it sucked

FireFalkon

lmfao. you guys made my day.

[QUOTE="ngoniko"] I did say win or lose situation, and your opinion and gamespot reviews of the game is not greater than the world of gaming community, fanboy took the score and run with it and they got to you, because personaly I liked the game.FireFalkon

yeah it looks like a fake CODPMatt722

[QUOTE="FireFalkon"][QUOTE="ngoniko"]

wth are you talking about? I didn't say it sucked

SikKwuN

lmfao. you guys made my day.

[QUOTE="PMatt722"]yeah it looks like a fake CODlonghorn7

[QUOTE="FireFalkon"][QUOTE="ngoniko"]

wth are you talking about? I didn't say it sucked

SikKwuN

lmfao. you guys made my day.

=D im glad someone recognizes kon chasing after the valley of pillows :lol:

its suppose to be the first game to use all 8 processors of the PS3, and i don't know what your talking about the first game was awesome :Plegandary_ACE

I'm just going to copy and paste my response from another post i made a while back. It's all still very valid.

-they have an ambitious target render they know they have to come close to, lest the media backlash begin.

-a previous game to help them know what works and what doesn't (gameplay-related, or otherwise) under their belt (so to speak),

-they have the newest advancements in understanding the PS3's hardware (practically a given for such a big title),

-And the uninterrupted time that those 2 years of silence allowed them to work on it (I know they've probably been working on it longer, but as far as the media retraction for it goes) without having to work on demos and what not.

this may be wat the original killzone was originally aspiring to be.

I mean the first KILLZONE wasn't as bad as everyone thinks. It scored a 7.5 on IGN (one of the few sites I trust for reviews) with these closing comments:

Closing Comments
You're reading about a straightforward shooter limited by technology. All the hype built up to a decent game presented in an intriguing universe and with a stunning sense of art direction. Ironically though, it's the audio and visual qualities (however faulted they may sometimes be) that save the actual underwhelming gameplay of this one from utter mediocrity.

Now even though playing Killzone is to be bombarded by bugs and glitches and technological inadequacies, the whole experience is definitely worth playing. Before you purchase it expecting Halo to spontaneously combust, just remember the profound words of our ratings guide and its 7.0 descriptor, "Killzone is a good game that has some obvious flaws."

http://ps2.ign.com/articles/561/561669p1.html

can you explain me why there is a picture of the game on the back of it's press conference invitation then?

one thing is for sure, it's not the gaming media that is hyping it this time, they've learned their lesson from the last killzone and don't want to take any chances this time.

FireFalkon

That wasn't the press conference invite that was the Killzone invite. It's a pre-Sony conference show to show Killzone. No need to make **** up.