i'm dloading the demo as of right now. i'll play it and make as an objective comaprison as possible. i think mgs4 has a lot of fantastic technical detail, but i didn't find it to be the most beautiful game... (and i realize that has a lot to do with my personal preference) i think we can all be objective about the textures being average in mgs4 (i hope).
I agree with all people saying its different game art MGS4 being more realistic, that doesnt mean MGS has better graphics they just appeal more to you KZ2 on the other side has some better effects, meaning a more technical work on it graphics are mostly opinions since art direction not always appeals to everyone and imao thats what makes both games hard to compare
As far as objects and moddles i think the two games are pretty close. but killzone2 has alot more ofevery thing being done at once. lots more effects like explossions ect. the lighting is better as well as a few other things.
the graphics in the KZ2 demo are awesome, but to me the outlining of the gun doesnt seem as smooth as the videos ive seen, the outlining of it seems a little more jagged, like it needs a little better antialiasing or something., and the light that reflects off of the gun seems better in videos too than in the demo. still looks crazy good though
[QUOTE="winner-ps3"][QUOTE="IMAHAPYHIPPO"]Has anyone else realized this. After playing the demo its pretty obvious, metal gear just looks better. Now by no means is killzone a bad looking game, its pretty damn good looking, but for all this hype for how awesome the graphics are, the demo was a pretty big letdown. Anyone agree? Disagree?IMAHAPYHIPPO
strongly disagree! kz2 demo not final build and honestly the kz2 beta looked better than kz2 demo
do your homework, it is the final build...
Your telling him yo do homework... You must have failed in school.
Log in to comment