I've only played the original and the three PS3 games. I really enjoyed the PS2 original. I finished it but I can't really remember much about it. It was a long time ago. The three PS3 games are good too. I thought ToD was the best of the PS3 games. I really can't understand why ACiT is considered by many to be superior. To each their own, I guess.
I've only played the original and the three PS3 games. I really enjoyed the PS2 original. I finished it but I can't really remember much about it. It was a long time ago. The three PS3 games are good too. I thought ToD was the best of the PS3 games. I really can't understand why ACiT is considered by many to be superior. To each their own, I guess.x-2tha-z
[QUOTE="IceBlazerX"][QUOTE="Chaos_Bladez"]Up Your Arsenal, then Ratchet & Clank 1, then A Crack in Time. Such a great series but I think it should take a LONG vacation. There is too much of a good thing ya know. Not really man, there's isn't such thing as that, but if they took a few years to make any thing else than A4O crap I'd say yes. There is not a "too much of a good thing" rule to you? So if they made (your favorite game franchise here) every single year, you'd never get a little tired from it? I love Ratchet and Clank (I've beat them all from at least 3 to 10 times each) but some things need breaks to not feel like it is being driven into the ground.
hmm.. for me the best ratchet and clank was when you had to get every item - that was r&c 1/2? I dont like the way they give you a load of 'basic' equipment like the heli-pack, rocket pack, grind boots etc. You used to have to earn those goods, which helped you get to new areas when you finally got them. More rewarding.
Log in to comment