The Witcher 2 - Why no PS3 version?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Dark_Metamorphosis
Dark_Metamorphosis

13353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Dark_Metamorphosis
Member since 2003 • 13353 Posts

Do you guys think that the PS3 wouldn't be able to run the game well, the company couldn't be bothered to port it or do they have a deal with Microsoft?

I really want to play this game. It looks wicked sick, and for an RPG, the combat looks great. So pretty much I will need to buy a new video card
now to run this. I know the game has been out since last year but I saw the extended edition or whatever it's called and I really want it.

For the folks that don't tend to check out non-PS3 titles, I really suggest watching a couple of videos.

Avatar image for anime_gamer007
anime_gamer007

6142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 anime_gamer007
Member since 2007 • 6142 Posts
These things cost money.
Avatar image for MethodManFTW
MethodManFTW

26516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MethodManFTW
Member since 2009 • 26516 Posts
Time. It might come eventually.
Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#4 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts
CD Projekt isn't exactly a huge company and the porting process from PC to 360 is a lot easier than to the PS3.
Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#5 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

Because developers favor Microsoft for some reson.

Avatar image for FriendlyFalcon
FriendlyFalcon

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 FriendlyFalcon
Member since 2011 • 191 Posts

Because developers favor Microsoft for some reson.

ristactionjakso
i thought it was because microsoft bought the rights and made a contract with them to not make it for sony.
Avatar image for johny300
johny300

12496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 johny300
Member since 2010 • 12496 Posts
Because they want to see if its going to sell on the 360 then they might port it.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

If you really wanted it, you could have bought it a long time ago, it's best on PC anyways (It runs on mid cards, which are quite cheap, honestly). It's not like it's a brand new IP, you could have made this exact thread years ago for The Witcher 1 which was on PC.

It's just a matter of money, the developer has finite resources. PC ports are easier to that other console, that's all. They stated if it does well, they may do a PS3 port as well. They would like the IP to be more popular so they could do a Witcher 3 across mulitple machines.

If there was a deal struck for consoles, we users are hardly privy too those deals, they include NDA's.

A deal wouldn't shock me though, that company hardly makes any videogames and seems to be content making strange deals on the side from timed exclusives, Timed DLC, etc. They spend little money, and it fools a vast majority of consumers into thinking these games are exclusive (from COD 30day timed DLC to Elder Scrolls 5 DLC to the first Bioshock timed exclusive). They hardly spend money crafting many games, and have a tiny 1st party, so they employ these tactics to stay ahead of the competition. Is the witcher 2 one such deal? who knows.

I have the game on PC. It's about a year old...decent game for the action rpg genre (88/100 metacritic).

Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#9 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

Microsoft probably paid to get it only on 360.

Avatar image for Venom_Raptor
Venom_Raptor

6959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 124

User Lists: 0

#10 Venom_Raptor
Member since 2010 • 6959 Posts

The developers mentioned it, but said for now they aren't going to, although they won't rule it out in the future. Fortunately I have a 360 aswellso I'm not bothered about no PS3 version.

Avatar image for H_M_1
H_M_1

1150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 H_M_1
Member since 2011 • 1150 Posts
[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

Because developers favor Microsoft for some reson.

FriendlyFalcon
i thought it was because microsoft bought the rights and made a contract with them to not make it for sony.

Or how about Microsoft threatened the developer.
Avatar image for Sokol4ever
Sokol4ever

6717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#12 Sokol4ever
Member since 2007 • 6717 Posts
I never thought Mass Effect 2 will come to PS3 and Final Fantasy XIII to Xbox 360 but it happened. Honestly, I don't see any reason why Assassin of Kings won't come to PS3 down the road. Be patient or grab it on other two platforms. ;)
Avatar image for -Y2J-
-Y2J-

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 -Y2J-
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts
they might be testing the market, if its a big success on the 360 and there is demand most likley they'll port it.
Avatar image for DarthJohnova
DarthJohnova

4599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 DarthJohnova
Member since 2010 • 4599 Posts

I reckon it's probably something to do with the fact that the 360 is easier to develop for, so they want to see how it sells by doing that rather than working around getting to the PS3 as well and it flopping on both. If it sells well, I wouldn't be surprised if we got it. Then again, it could be nothing to do with this and that M$ paid to keep it 'exclusive' to their console.

Just my two cents.

Avatar image for Dark_Metamorphosis
Dark_Metamorphosis

13353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 Dark_Metamorphosis
Member since 2003 • 13353 Posts

If you really wanted it, you could have bought it a long time ago, it's best on PC anyways (It runs on mid cards, which are quite cheap, honestly). It's not like it's a brand new IP, you could have made this exact thread years ago for The Witcher 1 which was on PC.

It's just a matter of money, the developer has finite resources. PC ports are easier to that other console, that's all. They stated if it does well, they may do a PS3 port as well. They would like the IP to be more popular so they could do a Witcher 3 across mulitple machines.

If there was a deal struck for consoles, we users are hardly privy too those deals, they include NDA's.

A deal wouldn't shock me though, that company hardly makes any videogames and seems to be content making strange deals on the side from timed exclusives, Timed DLC, etc. They spend little money, and it fools a vast majority of consumers into thinking these games are exclusive (from COD 30day timed DLC to Elder Scrolls 5 DLC to the first Bioshock timed exclusive). They hardly spend money crafting many games, and have a tiny 1st party, so they employ these tactics to stay ahead of the competition. Is the witcher 2 one such deal? who knows.

I have the game on PC. It's about a year old...decent game for the action rpg genre (88/100 metacritic).

SolidTy

I wasn't following video games very closely until about 6 months ago, so the original release completely passed me by. I saw the ideo
review for the extended edition and thought it looked really cool. I'm not much of an RPG guy but it looks like there's enough action/
adventure in this game that it'd be wortth my while. And it's damn gorgeous too. I think I'll just upgrade my video card tbh. I'm still
running a 9800 GT from 4 years ago but luckily the rest of my PC is still pretty damn up to date. Futureproofing ftw!