[QUOTE="bluntiss"][QUOTE="MERC_RECONN"][QUOTE="Sokol4ever"] Halo killer .. lol.
I'm sorry I just don't see why are you in the same stupid wagon where nothing else exists then a "good shooter".
It's probably just me, but I had more enjoyable time with Resistance then Halo series, or even my Half-Life 2 on PC.
Then again if you are still using that mentality of: "oh look at the score, it's a killer!" then nothing will change your one sided thinking.
Halo or especially Halo 3 is not a killer, it's a good game, a good FPS game. The only reason you're being so simple minded it's because you are brainwashed by Hype, Media and advertisement. Until you realise that, there is no such thing on PS3 as "Halo Killer" lol..
MERC_RECONN
I love you man....say it again!!! lol...just kidding.
Resistance? Resistance was so plain and boring.. Nowthat was a generic shooter. Nothign special at all.. Half likfe I'll agree with you that it's on the same level as halo maybe just maybe a little better but that's only cause it was on pc. But resistancewas overhyped for nothing. Chronicles of Riddick was a far better game then this. HAlo set the rules for fps shooters. Tehy came up with the whole scoring system, integrated vehicles and multiplayer in the same maps flawlessly.Innovative guns, story etc what didresistance have? Anyways, halo killsresistance
LOL...part of what say about the inovation of halo is true, but in todays FPS those are standard feature's...therefore making halo a standard shooter, which isn't a bad thing. Warhawk is a good example.
goldeneye started the multiplayer craze in shooters, and as far as innovative guns what was so special about Halo's weapons besides each one had a plasma version? If you're saying the Hailstorm isn't innovative then something is wrong. As for Resistance being boring, there is a far greater variety in enemy compared to Halo. The only place I give Halo 3 the advantage is the map editor and replay feature.
Log in to comment