Ubisoft drops the ball again... Rainbow Six Vegas delayed AGAIN

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Man

The ONLY game i wanted in March is delayed

First it was gonna come out in December, then they said March, and Now they say April. And please dont give me that crap that i have never seen a delay. This is the second delay and its not even a little one. ITS OVER A MONTH MORE NOW!

And also, for all the people who just say get another game in march and then get R6 in april. Not to be rude, but that is stupid. I am not made of money. I cant just keep on buying games every month. I get around 1 game every 3-5 months.

You might ask "why do you have a ps3?". Well thats because i saved up for two christmas' and two birthdays.

IM JUST PISSED, thats all

director13

You have the right to vent, however if there's any delay its not going to be like a week. That's just silly.

As far as waiting it out til April, there is a big slew of demos on the way for March, one of which is R6:V. A nice free way to pass time if you ask me.

Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

xFilter

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

Avatar image for Mark2099
Mark2099

1008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#53 Mark2099
Member since 2006 • 1008 Posts
Lets face it, its a B!+cH to develop for the PS3, especially if your porting a 360 game.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#54 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

The_Rick_14

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
NCAA Hoops 2k7 is now delayed until March 20th as well. It was supposed to be out in January.  That's pathetic and inexcusable. The game will be out after the NCAA tournament begins.  Laughable even.  How much different is this game from NBA 2k7 which was a freaking launch title?
Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
NCAA Hoops 2k7 is now delayed until March 20th as well. It was supposed to be out in January. That's pathetic and inexcusable. The game will be out after the NCAA tournament begins. Laughable even. How much different is this game from NBA 2k7 which was a freaking launch title?ramey70
Where exactly are you getting this from?? I was in EBGames yesterday and was told the 13th and everywhere I've looked it still says 13th.
Avatar image for xFilter
xFilter

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 xFilter
Member since 2004 • 36 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

rahzel54

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.

Well keep talking and those who own the 360 have been enjoying Vegas for sometime now and in 2 days will be in enjoying it's second GRAW and you don't think something's up? You think UBI would screw PS3 owners and lose money while the PS3 version of GRAW2 and Vegas takes longer to develope? Wake up. Next month the 360 owners are getting downloadable content for Vegas and PS3 owners are still waiting for the game itself. Being a fanboy is one thing but being blind is another. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17491&type=wmv

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/815/815419/vid_1745783.html

Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#58 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

xFilter

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.

Well keep talking and those who own the 360 have been enjoying Vegas for sometime now and in 2 days will be in enjoying it's second GRAW and you don't think something's up? You think UBI would screw PS3 owners and lose money while the PS3 version of GRAW2 and Vegas takes longer to develope? Wake up. Next month the 360 owners are getting downloadable content for Vegas and PS3 owners are still waiting for the game itself. Being a fanboy is one thing but being blind is another. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17491&type=wmv

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/815/815419/vid_1745783.html

wow... just wow... theres no denying the PS3 is complex. thats not what we were arguing, troll. GT:HD and Warhawk have NO relevance to games being delayed. i agree that the complexity of the PS3 is causing the delays. but this will change soon enough when the SDK for devs mature and games become easier to develop for the PS3. the PS3 is only a few months old. 3 of Sony's big first-party developers are working on SDK for third-party developers as we speak. you do know that SDK do mature you know? dev tools years down the road won't be the same as the ones that were released on launch. developers even said the PS2 was even harder to develop for, but did that stop great games from coming out, on a system that had inferior power to its competition? this time, the ps3 is at least as powerful as the 360. you need to wander back into your own place (the 360 boards) because you're obviously trolling.
Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

xFilter

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.

Well keep talking and those who own the 360 have been enjoying Vegas for sometime now and in 2 days will be in enjoying it's second GRAW and you don't think something's up? You think UBI would screw PS3 owners and lose money while the PS3 version of GRAW2 and Vegas takes longer to develope? Wake up. Next month the 360 owners are getting downloadable content for Vegas and PS3 owners are still waiting for the game itself. Being a fanboy is one thing but being blind is another. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17491&type=wmv

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/815/815419/vid_1745783.html

I think what you're forgetting is that I have played and like the 360. Didn't know I was in system wars here?? Anyway, as far as waking up, you should try some coffee yourself. The PS3 is a completely new technology.

NEW TECHNOLOGY TAKES TIME TO LEARN.

Its that simple. Frankly, I don't mind waiting for Vegas and I'm not planning on picking up GRAW2. So, Ubi hasn't lost anything from me. When you say something's up you make it sound like a conspiracy.

When I made the decision a year ago to not get a 360 and wait for the PS3 ,I did so understanding that things would get delayed. It's the people of todays society who ignorantly place blame and point fingers because from their outside view things look wrong.

If you think something's up, then stick to your 360, and if thats the case then I have to ask the question...what are you doing in this forum anyway?
Avatar image for xFilter
xFilter

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 xFilter
Member since 2004 • 36 Posts
[QUOTE="xFilter"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

rahzel54

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.

Well keep talking and those who own the 360 have been enjoying Vegas for sometime now and in 2 days will be in enjoying it's second GRAW and you don't think something's up? You think UBI would screw PS3 owners and lose money while the PS3 version of GRAW2 and Vegas takes longer to develope? Wake up. Next month the 360 owners are getting downloadable content for Vegas and PS3 owners are still waiting for the game itself. Being a fanboy is one thing but being blind is another. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17491&type=wmv

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/815/815419/vid_1745783.html

wow... just wow... theres no denying the PS3 is complex. thats not what we were arguing, troll. GT:HD and Warhawk have NO relevance to games being delayed. i agree that the complexity of the PS3 is causing the delays. but this will change soon enough when the SDK for devs mature and games become easier to develop for the PS3. the PS3 is only a few months old. 3 of Sony's big first-party developers are working on SDK for third-party developers as we speak. developers even said the PS2 was even harder to develop for, but did that stop great games from coming out, on a system that had inferior power to its competition? this time, the ps3 is at least as powerful as the 360. you need to wander back into your own place (the 360 boards) because you're obviously trolling.

I own both thank you.

Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#61 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="xFilter"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

xFilter

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.

Well keep talking and those who own the 360 have been enjoying Vegas for sometime now and in 2 days will be in enjoying it's second GRAW and you don't think something's up? You think UBI would screw PS3 owners and lose money while the PS3 version of GRAW2 and Vegas takes longer to develope? Wake up. Next month the 360 owners are getting downloadable content for Vegas and PS3 owners are still waiting for the game itself. Being a fanboy is one thing but being blind is another. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17491&type=wmv

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/815/815419/vid_1745783.html

wow... just wow... theres no denying the PS3 is complex. thats not what we were arguing, troll. GT:HD and Warhawk have NO relevance to games being delayed. i agree that the complexity of the PS3 is causing the delays. but this will change soon enough when the SDK for devs mature and games become easier to develop for the PS3. the PS3 is only a few months old. 3 of Sony's big first-party developers are working on SDK for third-party developers as we speak. developers even said the PS2 was even harder to develop for, but did that stop great games from coming out, on a system that had inferior power to its competition? this time, the ps3 is at least as powerful as the 360. you need to wander back into your own place (the 360 boards) because you're obviously trolling.

I own both thank you.

that still doesn't avoid the fact that you're obviously trolling. go back to the 360 boards, or system wars if you're going to post crap like that. i was fine when we were arguing about Warhawk and GT:HD, but your last post was not necessary.
Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#63 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
[QUOTE="xFilter"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="xFilter"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="xFilter"]You don't find it odd 2 games were released like that after years of developement not going retail? Simply sold as a download and not even a complete game. Can you imagine the money both developers lost.

rahzel54

No I don't. If Warhawk tried to make the single player better and sacrificed the online, I feel like they'd sell far less and like rahzel said, the fact that it is a downloadable game has nothing to do with anything.

In the case of GT:HD, I don't think they wasted anytime at all. GT:HD was on par to be GT4 on PS3. Anyone who has GT4 already has that. By jumping the gun with GT5 they can produce a true next gen racing sim faster than if they finished GT:HD first.

exactly.

Well keep talking and those who own the 360 have been enjoying Vegas for sometime now and in 2 days will be in enjoying it's second GRAW and you don't think something's up? You think UBI would screw PS3 owners and lose money while the PS3 version of GRAW2 and Vegas takes longer to develope? Wake up. Next month the 360 owners are getting downloadable content for Vegas and PS3 owners are still waiting for the game itself. Being a fanboy is one thing but being blind is another. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17491&type=wmv

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/815/815419/vid_1745783.html

wow... just wow... theres no denying the PS3 is complex. thats not what we were arguing, troll. GT:HD and Warhawk have NO relevance to games being delayed. i agree that the complexity of the PS3 is causing the delays. but this will change soon enough when the SDK for devs mature and games become easier to develop for the PS3. the PS3 is only a few months old. 3 of Sony's big first-party developers are working on SDK for third-party developers as we speak. developers even said the PS2 was even harder to develop for, but did that stop great games from coming out, on a system that had inferior power to its competition? this time, the ps3 is at least as powerful as the 360. you need to wander back into your own place (the 360 boards) because you're obviously trolling.

I own both thank you.

that still doesn't avoid the fact that you're obviously trolling. go back to the 360 boards, or system wars if you're going to post crap like that. i was fine when we were arguing about Warhawk and GT:HD, but your last post was not necessary.

Maybe he listened?

Oh and rahzel....nice to see someone who knows a lil something about what they're talking about
Avatar image for xFilter
xFilter

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 xFilter
Member since 2004 • 36 Posts

I backed up every single claim with links. Go back and read my original post it was simple, Don't blame Ubisoft.

You want to call me a troll feel free and I do own both the PS3 and the 360. If I only owned the PS3 would I be pissed off at all the delays you bet. People spent alot and I mean alot on their PS3 only to see great titles going to the 360 while the PS3 version is pushed back.

Years ago I bought the N64 and I got sick and tired of delays and games getting cancelled so I went out and purchased a PS so I could enjoy games and to get my moneys worth out of my console. Don't tell me your not sick of delays.

Avatar image for Rakuho
Rakuho

7008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 Rakuho
Member since 2007 • 7008 Posts

Looking at 3 different sites, and they all say that Rainbow Six Vegas for PS will be released the 24th of April and not the 20th of march...Ubisoft has dropped the ball again with this game, I was excited at first but now I'll just buy a different 1st person shooting game.

mrc_45

I knew that for a long time now, don't look at GS release dates they're off sometimes, just like in this case. R6V is gonna be available in April, just like that mech game.

Avatar image for Ryuku
Ryuku

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 Ryuku
Member since 2003 • 1166 Posts

I backed up every single claim with links. Go back and read my original post it was simple, Don't blame Ubisoft.

You want to call me a troll feel free and I do own both the PS3 and the 360. If I only owned the PS3 would I be pissed off at all the delays you bet. People spent alot and I mean alot on their PS3 only to see great titles going to 360 while the PS3 version is pushed back.

Years ago I bought the N64 and I got sick and tired of delays and games getting cancelled so I went out and purchased a PS so I could enjoy games and to get my moneys worth out of my console. Don't tell me your not sick of delays.

xFilter
Personally im really sick of the delay its only human... to think that way im very close in getting a 360 .. just for vegas and up coming GRAW2 .. but i'll hold .. i hope i can hold ..
Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts

I backed up every single claim with links. Go back and read my original post it was simple, Don't blame Ubisoft.

You want to call me a troll feel free and I do own both the PS3 and the 360. If I only owned the PS3 would I be pissed off at all the delays you bet. People spent alot and I mean alot on their PS3 only to see great titles going to 360 while the PS3 version is pushed back.

Years ago I bought the N64 and I got sick and tired of delays and games getting cancelled so I went out and purchased a PS so I could enjoy games and to get my moneys worth out of my console. Don't tell me your not sick of delays.

xFilter
I realize that you backed up your claims with links. And I agree with you that Ubi is not to blame. However, I say no one is to blame, because as I've stated, its new technology. and as rahzel and myself have stated new technology takes time to learn. Its the nature of technology, people must constantly learn whats new and as soon as you do that...there is something else thats new. Your mention of the 360 in your one post is what made you look like a troll. I also spent a lot of my hard earned cash on my PS3, but seeing as I don't own a 360, I dont mind titles going to 360 also since I'll just get them for PS3. Your point about the 64 just proves what I said earlier. New technology, new learning curve. And finally as I've stated before, no I'm not sick of delays because I'll get the game when it finally hits. Until then I have things to do like work, and go to school, and hang out with friends.
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#68 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
Yea Vegas and Fear are delayed till April.  Its on gamestop's website.  Well thank god i played both games on my 360.  Sucks for ps3 owners waiting on this game.  
Avatar image for kinq
kinq

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 kinq
Member since 2004 • 931 Posts

Good since now I can get Oblivion without thinking of Vegas

Avatar image for LiquidMetal14
LiquidMetal14

8196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 LiquidMetal14
Member since 2003 • 8196 Posts
[QUOTE="director13"]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Man

The ONLY game i wanted in March is delayed

First it was gonna come out in December, then they said March, and Now they say April. And please dont give me that crap that i have never seen a delay. This is the second delay and its not even a little one. ITS OVER A MONTH MORE NOW!

And also, for all the people who just say get another game in march and then get R6 in april. Not to be rude, but that is stupid. I am not made of money. I cant just keep on buying games every month. I get around 1 game every 3-5 months.

You might ask "why do you have a ps3?". Well thats because i saved up for two christmas' and two birthdays.

IM JUST PISSED, thats all

The_Rick_14

You have the right to vent, however if there's any delay its not going to be like a week. That's just silly.

As far as waiting it out til April, there is a big slew of demos on the way for March, one of which is R6:V. A nice free way to pass time if you ask me.

That 's what I was thinking. I really hope there is a demo because I want a game this month. If there's a demo then at least I will be hands-on and better gauge my purchase. I know I will like it alreayd I just want to play it.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#71 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts

I backed up every single claim with links. Go back and read my original post it was simple, Don't blame Ubisoft.

You want to call me a troll feel free and I do own both the PS3 and the 360. If I only owned the PS3 would I be pissed off at all the delays you bet. People spent alot and I mean alot on their PS3 only to see great titles going to the 360 while the PS3 version is pushed back.

Years ago I bought the N64 and I got sick and tired of delays and games getting cancelled so I went out and purchased a PS so I could enjoy games and to get my moneys worth out of my console. Don't tell me your not sick of delays.

xFilter
games are not getting canceled, games are getting delayed. again, your GT:HD and Warhawk arguments are not valid because they weren't canceled because of the complexity of the hardware. and Warhawk wasn't even canceled... the only game that was canceled was GT:HD, and again, it was because they wanted to focus on GT5. GT:HD wasn't meant to be the continuation of the series, GT5 is. GT:HD is just GT4 in HD. were not disagreeing with you that the ps3 is hard to develop for. but what you don't understand is that dev tools for consoles always grow as the system grows and developers also learn how the system works so they can optimize games for it easier.
Avatar image for tekakwo
tekakwo

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 tekakwo
Member since 2004 • 93 Posts

Looking at 3 different sites, and they all say that Rainbow Six Vegas for PS will be released the 24th of April and not the 20th of march...Ubisoft has dropped the ball again with this game, I was excited at first but now I'll just buy a different 1st person shooting game.

mrc_45
forget Ubsof now those lazy french canadians whos location i actually down the street for my house. I should go pay them a visit and ask whats up with the graw 2, and rainbow delay. And howcome 360 is getting the game this week but all we are gettin is a trailer,.. not even a demo, a trailer.
Avatar image for director13
director13

1677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 director13
Member since 2004 • 1677 Posts
bump
Avatar image for Xanog1
Xanog1

12332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#74 Xanog1
Member since 2004 • 12332 Posts

I guess Ubisoft realised that you can't release a game if you've done no work on it whatsoever.

I wouldn't be surprised if they delayed Splinter Cell: Double Agent, either.

It is quite odd that a company like Sega can manage to get a game out on two platforms, within two months of each other, but Ubisoft can't manage to port a game in half a year.

Looks like the only PS3 game that has the Ubisoft logo, which will actually arrive on-time this year, is the European version of Oblivion, which doesn't affect me at all.

Avatar image for davez82
davez82

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 davez82
Member since 2003 • 1864 Posts
this is old news, ign was just slow on this one.

This game is typical shooter, its a good game but nothing to get rattled over
Avatar image for FFXNo1
FFXNo1

175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 FFXNo1
Member since 2004 • 175 Posts
I hate Ubisoft crap. The only fanchise I like from all the crap they produce is Prince of Persia, the other games arent of my taste. So I dont care any more.
Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
this is old news, ign was just slow on this one.

This game is typical shooter, its a good game but nothing to get rattled over
davez82
actually IGN was the first to change it to april
Avatar image for Ice-Cube
Ice-Cube

2450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 Ice-Cube
Member since 2003 • 2450 Posts
dude thats very old news we knowCrazy87
I didn't know about this and I roam the boards/site twice a day. That pi**es me off now, i was going to buy it when i get my PS3 end of March. Thanks for the info though.
Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts
yep another blower. but im already getting motorstorm and FEAR so maybe a little gap is good.Takiwara
Actually as soon as you said it, I didn't mind so much. I marked all the days for big releases of PS3 games and found nothing in April at all. Now we have something to look forward to next month. Motorstorm, F.E.A.R., Def Jam, and Oblivion will keep me busy until then.
Avatar image for HunAndras1984
HunAndras1984

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 HunAndras1984
Member since 2005 • 647 Posts

[QUOTE="Takiwara"]yep another blower. but im already getting motorstorm and FEAR so maybe a little gap is good._AsasN_
Actually as soon as you said it, I didn't mind so much. I marked all the days for big releases of PS3 games and found nothing in April at all. Now we have something to look forward to next month. Motorstorm, F.E.A.R., Def Jam, and Oblivion will keep me busy until then.

F.E.A.R. wont keep you busy untill next month because it's been pushed back to next month!:)  Unless you're playing on on your P.C. or 360.

Oblivion is comming out at the end of the month as well....

Since MotorStorm got a bad review.....we don't really have any good games this month comming soon. I mean....8 tracks only???? that's a joke. No split screen??

We'll seen how this things turn out!!!