It was ok. I would buy it if it was like a $30 PSN title. I really can't see myself paying $60 for a game that's purely multiplayer. That's one of the reasons I haven't bought MW2 yet... Sure there's a story mode, but once you play through it once or twice (which won't take hardly any time at all) the game is pretty much all multiplayer. MAG is 100% multiplayer which gives me even less of a reason to buy it. It's fun and all, but I'll probably only rent it.
After my initial shock, I finding I am starting to enjoy it. It reminded me of the first impressions of Warhawk, in at first I hated it but came to enjoy it after adjusting to its gameplay.
failure in my book, horrible graphix. ( if you cant produce good graphix change your art style ) I didnt feel i was playing 256 people either, i had crazier battles in killzone2.
It does feel a bit like warhawk. a game made for teamwork yet everyone running anywhere. Plus I don't think anyone wanted to help our team with our leader letting everyone 30 levels less than him know how useless they are. I liked having lots of objectives to work towards.
failure in my book, horrible graphix. ( if you cant produce good graphix change your art style ) I didnt feel i was playing 256 people either, i had crazier battles in killzone2.Javieralijandro
After my initial shock, I finding I am starting to enjoy it. It reminded me of the first impressions of Warhawk, in at first I hated it but came to enjoy it after adjusting to its gameplay.
dercoo
same feeling here, i played and i was like it feels like warhawk...and in the end the game became addictive and mag is shapping to be a pretty good game...but if the graphics dont become better then i think i might sit this one out, coz graphically it looks horrible, ok its a beta and all so its understandable, but if it stays the same then no good....kz2 and uc2 spoiled me
Log in to comment