What is Gamespot's point?

it is bothering me so much, and I want to share it with all of you!!!

Gamespot gave 8.9 to the guitar hero II for the 360, which is defenitely better than the Ps2 version. Until there, nothing wrong!

but so tell me why PS3 version of oblivion got 9.5 while the 360 version got a 9.6 when the Ps3 version is way better?

this is ridiculous! they have no "criterium"...

whats you thoughts

GH2 on the 360 added new features and content whereas Oblivion on the PS3 did not (Knights of the Nine was already on other platforms months before the release of the PS3 version of Oblivion). Einhanderkiller

i really dont care oblivion is awesome, so is gutair hero

Although I don't really like Gamespot's reviews, I believe the 0.1 lower score of the PS3 version of Oblivion IV is justified by the fact that it's a port.  They've seen the game played before already and that's why they just decided to give it a bit lower score.

Although I don't really like Gamespot's reviews, I believe the 0.1 lower score of the PS3 version of Oblivion IV is justified by the fact that it's a port.  They've seen the game played before already and that's why they just decided to give it a bit lower score.

hyofinkl

thats really not a reason to give it a lower score, they are reviewing the game for people who have NOT played it yet.  they cant just say "oh well we've played it already, its old and no one cares so were gonna dock the score down" 

the other reasons people listed are more plausible, i think they should be fair and rate it the same.  it is the same game after all, it makes the most sense.