considering Warhawk is completely multiplayer, it would be dumb if a review was out for it yet, because not many ppl would be playing with the reviewers. So maybe within the week or next week would be my best guess.
Gamespot usually gives reviews the night before the release. So that would be today, however they may save the Warhawk review for tommorrow cause the MP3 review is going down tonight and they may not wanna blow their load all at once.
I don't care about the reviews! PS3 reviews are flawed! Resistance: Fall of Man deserved at least a 9.0 on Gamespot! Warhawk wont get above 9.0... and might even get a 7.something. I'm getting Warhawk regardless, it looks way to awesome!
I don't care about the reviews! PS3 reviews are flawed! Resistance: Fall of Man deserved at least a 9.0 on Gamespot! Warhawk wont get above 9.0... and might even get a 7.something. I'm getting Warhawk regardless, it looks way to awesome!iMacBot
+ Highly addictive. Fun, fast paced action on land and air. A ton of unlockable skins to customize your avatar or warhawk. An amazing amount of stat tracking available.
- No single player at all, not even bots. Limited number of landscapes to play in. Hefty price for the PSN DL version.
Yeah, but I don't think a game should be penalized for not having a SP campaign. There are certain games which are SP only (e.g. RE4) and certain games that are multiplayer only (e.g. Battlefield 2), and those games are well regarded and highly rated (everywhere, including here on CS), not to mention fully priced at the times of their releases
Warhawk should be rated for what it is - a multiplayer shooter. If anything, it's score should be INCREASED for the fact that the downloadable version of the game will be cheaper than a usual new release. No game can be everything - rate it for what it is.
The new podcast from IGN said that as soon as they start playing with the people who download it today, set up the servers a few times and check the game for lag, etc. they could review it immediately. So at the latest, it should be out by tomorrow.
+ Highly addictive. Fun, fast paced action on land and air. A ton of unlockable skins to customize your avatar or warhawk. An amazing amount of stat tracking available.
- No single player at all, not even bots. Limited number of landscapes to play in. Hefty price for the PSN DL version.
Score 8.0 - 8.5
There ya go. ;)
crck
Watch That be dead on.. I wonder what awards they will give it though.
+ Highly addictive. Fun, fast paced action on land and air. A ton of unlockable skins to customize your avatar or warhawk. An amazing amount of stat tracking available.
- No single player at all, not even bots. Limited number of landscapes to play in. Hefty price for the PSN DL version.
Score 8.0 - 8.5
There ya go. ;)
crck
Why do I get the feeling that Gamespot's actual review will be very similar to this one?
+ Highly addictive. Fun, fast paced action on land and air. A ton of unlockable skins to customize your avatar or warhawk. An amazing amount of stat tracking available.
- No single player at all, not even bots. Limited number of landscapes to play in. Hefty price for the PSN DL version.
+ Highly addictive. Fun, fast paced action on land and air. A ton of unlockable skins to customize your avatar or warhawk. An amazing amount of stat tracking available.
- No single player at all, not even bots. Limited number of landscapes to play in. Hefty price for the PSN DL version.
Score 8.0 - 8.5
There ya go. ;)
Law_man
30 different maps arent alot of maps? There are about 25 configurations of 5 large maps. So yes there is variety in configurations but it would be dishonest to call it 25 true maps because 1. the maps are pretty much symetrical. I.E. the bottom half is a flipped mirror image of the top half. 2. The base and outpost designs are very similar if not exact in some of the 5 large maps. 3. Any way you try to gloss over it there are only 5 environments. There are no relit or weather variations on any of the maps. I would have liked to see a snow level or a rainy version of one of the other maps.
Log in to comment