they are waiting till there have been reported enough official reviews on sites like gamerankings or metacritic, I suppose. So they can maketheir score the way so others can't complain about it. Uncharted got the lowest score from GS, but there are also 2 or 3 others with the same score. With Ratchet, they really made a mess, having the absolutley lowest score, and that's what they want to avoid this time (maybe).
The sticky official Uncharted thread here was full of people complaining about the low score and telling that they want to quit their supscriptions AND they(GS) were not allowed to delete this thread. Also, in this famous thread some guys discovered that Cnet and MS are actually partnered. Again many other users read this, even though that they might not have been interested in this topic but rather just wanted to discuss about Uncharted but now have a different opinion about GS and it's creditibility. Just imagine what happens if UT3 gets a 5.0 and another official sticky UT3 thread here... hell will open for GS, literaly.
BUT, many sites are waiting aswell, to see how the game's doing. It's strange that only a few sites have reviewed it so far. I really think that manyreviewers here try to avoid being called... ...well, we are not allowed to talk about that here any longer anyway.
Also, the PC version has been already reviewed which is also a reason why some sites just don't have the time to do it all twice.
Log in to comment