I have all 3 on PS4, and while I haven't tried the single player for BF4 or CoD yet I would have to think that they're better than killzone. I've never wanted to sell a game so quickly after buying it. It's just boring and the multiplayer feels like it's tried to copy halo and gears of war.
Once I get a PS4, of those, I only plan on getting/playing Killzone SF. I've played all the others, it's a decent franchise, and I might as well play a PS4 exclusive to start with. I've lost interest with FPS overall though, and I avoid Call of Duty and Battlefield now.
BF4 is my first choice of those three although when I do get a PS4 in a years time, BF5 or Bad Company 3 could be announced and I might wait for one of those. Would get Killzone and skip Dog of Duty.
bf4 is good for its multiplayer if you like the destructibility, driving tanks and flying attack helicopters but i wasnt impressed with the campaign. and being more into single player than multiplayer that definitely hurts the game for me. its a short campaign but thats not even my main problem with it. its just boring with a lame story. its obvious they just tacked it onto a primarily multiplayer game so take that for what its worth to you.
killzone has a better campaign in my opinion. ive read some hate posts about it but ive always liked kz games so i could appreciate it a little more.
i havent liked cod since cod4 so i didnt even bother with ghosts. i might check it out used sometime down the road if i find it cheap.
Log in to comment