Who thinks the ps3 even needs 3D technology.

WHo thinks the ps3 even needs 3d?I dont, think about it, it supports 1080 and how many games even use this feature. from what Ive read in japan they are going to make the games that are 1080 into 3d. For EG... stardust, wipeout hd, pain. Dont get me wrong these are not bad games, whoo hoo they are 1080, who cares they are arcade games. now they want us to sling shot in 3d, just not worth it to me

I really could give a rat's you know what, but I think they are just wasting their time.

I have watched a 3D film on a Samsung 3D TV, not just at the cinema and I must say it looks great. So why not make games 3D? After all 3D is the future of TV, movies and games, even if most people can't afford the technology right now it is still worth making games for people that can in my opinion. Also it will help to improve 3D gaming in the future.

I just dont understand why they are trying to push 3d. they still dont fully use the 1080 hd yet. j5r9s2

I have watched a 3D film on a Samsung 3D TV, not just at the cinema and I must say it looks great. So why not make games 3D? After all 3D is the future of TV, movies and games, even if most people can't afford the technology right now it is still worth making games for people that can in my opinion. Also it will help to improve 3D gaming in the future.

SaaM-x

I place this 3D technology under the "Kinda cool" category, but not the "Necessary" category.

I demoed the Samsung 3D Television (with glasses) and to be honest I couldn't even see anything 3D.

I could barely see any difference and if anything the glasses made the image blurry and lessened my experience from if I were just watching a 1080P HD TV source directly. The blur wasn't like the red/blue glasses, but it still annoyed me to put on glasses. I would describe it more as a "tint" becuase the glasses have a slight tint to them. Like I had to watch the show through a slight haze to get the supposed 3D effect.

So in short, I think this whole endeavor for 3D on PS3 is a giant waste. I want no part of it.

I place this 3D technology under the "Kinda cool" category, but not the "Necessary" category.

Shad0ki11

I can live with or without 3d.

Well... i'm somewhat addicted to technology which is why I surely replace my (full HD) Tv with a 3D model (not just for the 3D alone, I got an early full HD Tv and it shows it's flaws when it comes to upscaling the Tv signal and it sadly hasn't a dvb-c tuner to get the digital channels and I don't feel like buying a receiver/recorder xD). I'm on of the few who can really get into the technology, no matter if it's a movie or a game xD

Oh and btw the whole "3D is nothing new" arguments are just weak - 3D to day is nothing like 3D before. There's a huge difference between colored glasses on a crappy image and an actual HD image without any colorfilters :S It's like saying I don't need a PS3 because games/gamesystem were around for a long time >__>

3D will inevitably be a focus in the future; it's not going anywhere. By doing this now, Sony has patents, and "I did it first" rights. When Microsoft adds 3D support to the next-box, they'll be following sony. It seems stupid now but in a few years we'll see that it was a fantastic choice.

I rather spend the money on something like look better and real. Maybe like superHiDef with a trillions of colors. 3D make my eyes hurt and give me headaches. Plus it doesn't look real or detail enough. I think this 3D thing is waste of money. Also the graphic on the ps3 starting look dull and boring.

I dont want to wear those stupid glasses when i'm gaming and there trying to force people to buy there products yet there are lots of gamers that haven't even got HD tv's.

WHo thinks the ps3 even needs 3d?I dont, think about it, it supports 1080 and how many games even use this feature. from what Ive read in japan they are going to make the games that are 1080 into 3d. For EG... stardust, wipeout hd, pain. Dont get me wrong these are not bad games, whoo hoo they are 1080, who cares they are arcade games. now they want us to sling shot in 3d, just not worth it to me

j5r9s2

better spend their money on something else

1) first I find approximative to want 3D on a screen that is of course 2D, the human eye already barely sees 3D, even Avatar and Alice only used 3D in some scenes but not all movie, you had to wear heavy glasses, the effects themselves were not that groundbreaking ...

2) there is an eye problem called "convergence deficiency", it means the eyes are not well aligned, and as the 3D effect uses 2 images that have a slight gap, the eye doesn't put the images back together and quite often it gives some blur instead of the 3D image ; most people don't know they have it as the only problem you have is when you read your eyes tire fast and you feel sleepy ; I had this once and the Doctor said about 1/3 of people have it and don't know it

I dont want to wear those stupid glasses when i'm gaming and there trying to force people to buy there products yet there are lots of gamers that haven't even got HD tv's.

sukraj

before shoving us 3D, how about making the most outta HD like the console is supposed to?

better spend their money on something else

1) first I find approximative to want 3D on a screen that is of course 2D, the human eye already barely sees 3D, even Avatar and Alice only used 3D in some scenes but not all movie, you had to wear heavy glasses, the effects themselves were not that groundbreaking ...

2) there is an eye problem called "convergence deficiency", it means the eyes are not well aligned, and as the 3D effect uses 2 images that have a slight gap, the eye doesn't put the images back together and quite often it gives some blur instead of the 3D image ; most people don't know they have it as the only problem you have is when you read your eyes tire fast and you feel sleepy ; I had this once and the Doctor said about 1/3 of people have it and don't know it

TheTenth10

The entire movie was 3D and it was absolutely noticeable.

I really could give a rat's you know what, but I think they are just wasting their time.

Melpoe

Leave the innovating to Sony, customers will buy it.

If it's free via system update and if it's optional to use in the games that support it, then I'm cool with it.

If it's free via system update and if it's optional to use in the games that support it, then I'm cool with it.

Ebougile

I can't afford a 3-D TV, so none of this stuff has any relevance to me.

To be honest I really dont care all that much, but is cool and I would definitely take advantage of it if I could afford a 3D TV

I don't think that the PS3 needs the 3D technology. I mean they already have 1080P. They should try to urge more developers to make 1080p games because I feel like a majority of the PS3 games out now are only in 720P. Finish one thing before you start another Sony. I don't really think the 3D gaming will catch on as quickly as they would like. I mean, eventually it might catch on but just not as well as they like. I don't know if we (as gamers) are ready for 3D technology.

I think I care more about getting a new feature than I do about whether or not some of yall aren't going to use it or think the ps3 doesn't need it lol. Geez, one day everyone is up in arms about Linux being dropped, now everyone is up in arms about a new feature being added. I'm just glad Sony runs the show and don't listen to us on SW at all, or else they would go crazy trying to figure which way their business needs to go.

I don't want 3D gaming at all