why did mh1 get bad reviews?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Xeros606
Xeros606

11126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Xeros606
Member since 2007 • 11126 Posts

i wanna know, is it really a bad game? gs gave it 6.5. is mh2 better? is mh1 still worth getting? i really need an rpg fix and so far my options are two worlds mh1, mh2, and finishing diablo 2.

Avatar image for Xeros606
Xeros606

11126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Xeros606
Member since 2007 • 11126 Posts
bump
Avatar image for Xeros606
Xeros606

11126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Xeros606
Member since 2007 • 11126 Posts
bump 2
Avatar image for lvin5992
lvin5992

2969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 lvin5992
Member since 2005 • 2969 Posts
when a game gets a 6.5 that usually means its bad
Avatar image for Xeros606
Xeros606

11126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Xeros606
Member since 2007 • 11126 Posts

when a game gets a 6.5 that usually means its badlvin5992

yeah but the player reviews were good. :?

Avatar image for devilmaysuck
devilmaysuck

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 devilmaysuck
Member since 2004 • 134 Posts

mh2 sold 1.5million copies in japan.

its 1 of the best game ever created.

if you got friends who can play with you, then MH2 is a must buy.

some people bought PSP just for 1 game, thats MH2.

Avatar image for SeanN003
SeanN003

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 SeanN003
Member since 2007 • 468 Posts
Monster Hunter and 2 are mostly hack and slash or monster killing games. There's not as much story in it, so it might not be a good fix for an RPG, but it's still a decent game.
Avatar image for BurningChimaera
BurningChimaera

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 BurningChimaera
Member since 2007 • 1255 Posts

Well, the gamespot editors also have their own preferences and tastes, so you can't really blame them for giving a game a low rating even if everyone else says it's good.

For instance, I gave Daxter a low rating while everyone else gave it a high one. So the editors might not have liked it.

Avatar image for death1505921
death1505921

5260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 death1505921
Member since 2004 • 5260 Posts

Well, the gamespot editors also have their own preferences and tastes, so you can't really blame them for giving a game a low rating even if everyone else says it's good.

For instance, I gave Daxter a low rating while everyone else gave it a high one. So the editors might not have liked it.

BurningChimaera

Same I hated Daxter, so boring.

Avatar image for B-bad
B-bad

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#10 B-bad
Member since 2002 • 5705 Posts

different people have different taste the games are great but they aren't for everyone. Lack of online play hurts the games in some reviewers opinions but playing it in adhoc mode is great plus there's enough single player mission to keep you busy for a long time.

MHF 1-2 arent for everybody but if you get into the games they are a blast to play and a real show piece of the PSP power.

Avatar image for comelstr
comelstr

677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 comelstr
Member since 2005 • 677 Posts
dont rely on GS reviews there reviews are less than par i rember when they game Metroid prime 3 8.5 and other sites gave it a nine just read the player reviews
Avatar image for smollett13
smollett13

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 smollett13
Member since 2006 • 118 Posts

I actually enjoyed it and was not impressed with the review it got from GS. I enjoyed it so much, I think it was the first game review I gave! =) I'm awaiting my MH2 though.....I hope it's a worthy successor!

-S

Avatar image for TheCheat23k
TheCheat23k

1240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TheCheat23k
Member since 2004 • 1240 Posts

To me, you should always just think of the Gamespot review as just another players review and not really pay anymore attention to it than you would to a user review...as its only one person reviewing the game. It would be better if they had several people rate the game and average the score, but this would make reviews take a LOT longer.

For me though, MHF1 and 2 are two of the best if not the best two games ever made, but I've seen other people who hate them. Watch some videos, view pics, and read reviews and see if its your kind of game. MHF1 and 2 aren't much different in terms of quality of gameplay, so don't think that the first one sucks, because it is a masterpiece in my book.

Avatar image for loopyliger91
loopyliger91

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 loopyliger91
Member since 2006 • 118 Posts
gamespot takes off points for alot of unneccessary things. so i suggest you get it. or part 2 which is an awesome games. foorget gamespot...just in this case
Avatar image for Xeros606
Xeros606

11126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Xeros606
Member since 2007 • 11126 Posts

To me, you should always just think of the Gamespot review as just another players review and not really pay anymore attention to it than you would to a user review...as its only one person reviewing the game. It would be better if they had several people rate the game and average the score, but this would make reviews take a LOT longer.

For me though, MHF1 and 2 are two of the best if not the best two games ever made, but I've seen other people who hate them. Watch some videos, view pics, and read reviews and see if its your kind of game. MHF1 and 2 aren't much different in terms of quality of gameplay, so don't think that the first one sucks, because it is a masterpiece in my book.

TheCheat23k

what game can you compare it to? the way reviewers describe it makes it sound like oblivion without the storyline. thats not a bad thing, the story of oblivion is uninteresting and the related quest are boring compared to side quests(i guess its because you pretty much know how the game will end from the beginning, but with side quests you dont really know what will happen next.)

Avatar image for smollett13
smollett13

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 smollett13
Member since 2006 • 118 Posts

MH doesn't really have a story other than you're are this person out to hunt monsters. You redo missions over and over to gather supplies, and to sharpen your skills. As you progress via missions to kill a certain type of monster, you get harder monsters.

Unless MH2 is different (haven't gotten the Smollett hands on it yet), there is no story other than what's needed to setup a decent world that you can play around in.

If I had to compare it with oblivion, I'd say its like what happens AFTER the main quest. You just run around and do what you want.

-S

Avatar image for BurningChimaera
BurningChimaera

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#17 BurningChimaera
Member since 2007 • 1255 Posts
[QUOTE="BurningChimaera"]

Well, the gamespot editors also have their own preferences and tastes, so you can't really blame them for giving a game a low rating even if everyone else says it's good.

For instance, I gave Daxter a low rating while everyone else gave it a high one. So the editors might not have liked it.

death1505921

Same I hated Daxter, so boring.

The first good opinion I've heard in a while.