This topic is locked from further discussion.
i think killzone is better just cause it looks awesome and the maps are always fun and the new ones that come out are really niffty and cant wait to see more
Meh im sick of the whole call of duty franchise. I am not to big on FPS in general, modern warfare was a good game but thats because it was diffrent from the other ones. unless they do something new again i dont think im going to be playing another COD game anytime soon.
Hate is a very strong word. People just dont like it as much as CoD4 as a comparison... Call of Duty 4 did a lot of good things. I think people are just frustrated that the makers of WaW didn't do a good enough job with the CoD game. It wasn't as GOOD or like CoD4. When someone likes a certain thing, they usually want it more and more. This cannot be said with treyarch as they didnt provide with WaW. How can you screw up a template of the number 1 selling Fps and turn it into utter garbage?
I personally dont like world at war because its world war 2. Ive been playing CoD since the first one on PC and as much as a WW2 buff I am, it gets a bit tiring after a while. Sure they might've added a pacific side of things, but I mean really... CoD4 had so many good changes and things in it that it overshadowed WaW significantly. BUT I am comparing CoD4 players to WaW players only. I dont know about other people that play different games.
WaW online is just a complete mush of randomness. Sniper rifles blow, as do the A.R's. Pretty much every gun. The maps are massive and people camp. Its just not the same as CoD4. The online isn't as intense and close quartered...
I think Im rambling on a bit, I think you get the point. But again, hate is a strong word. People just dont like it as much as other games out there right now..
W@W basically gives you better weapons as you rank up so you're basically screwed until you get to a certain level. COD4 was much better at balancing the levels, and actually put some thought into the design. W@W basically said "ok this template works let's us it", w/out putting much thought into the design.
Because It god negative hype around here once everyone heard Treyarch (sp) was making it...
So people passed and missed on a awsome WW2 style COD4 game. Yes is a painted over COD4, but if you like COD4 and into the WW2 ere aliitle. CODWAW offers a very dark and sinister side to WW2.
Nazi Zombies takes the cake, the first board was great when it was out, but these new 2 zombie maps are awesome....
Its a whole new take on zombies, feels like a new game and huge potential to take it further.....
The CODWAW mini zombie games,,,beats the hell out of fulll new games.....
controls are meh online is meh graphics are big MEH story is OK ...and hard mode is too hard :D CoD is no match for KZ2 and Resistance now those are some real FPSDante_May_DieFunny how you mention Resistance 2. That aside, WAW isn't bad. The Nazi zombies are worth a try and if you love it, you'd go for the map packs as they are packed with action. There is some TACT-ON Co-op campaign where they remove certain levels because they are only possible in singleplayer. Multiplayer is fun, the maps are from small to 1 on 1 tank battle large which isn't that big in theory. The biggest complaint is the overused MP40, a little too accurate for its design as a sub machine gun.
[QUOTE="Dante_May_Die"]controls are meh online is meh graphics are big MEH story is OK ...and hard mode is too hard :D CoD is no match for KZ2 and Resistance now those are some real FPSRhen_VarFunny how you mention Resistance 2. That aside, WAW isn't bad. The Nazi zombies are worth a try and if you love it, you'd go for the map packs as they are packed with action. There is some TACT-ON Co-op campaign where they remove certain levels because they are only possible in singleplayer. Multiplayer is fun, the maps are from small to 1 on 1 tank battle large which isn't that big in theory. The biggest complaint is the overused MP40, a little too accurate for its design as a sub machine gun. What's bad in Resistance 2?That *Spoilers* Hale dies in the end?that game is a perfect masterpiece man its even better then KZ2
[QUOTE="Rhen_Var"][QUOTE="Dante_May_Die"]controls are meh online is meh graphics are big MEH story is OK ...and hard mode is too hard :D CoD is no match for KZ2 and Resistance now those are some real FPSDante_May_DieFunny how you mention Resistance 2. That aside, WAW isn't bad. The Nazi zombies are worth a try and if you love it, you'd go for the map packs as they are packed with action. There is some TACT-ON Co-op campaign where they remove certain levels because they are only possible in singleplayer. Multiplayer is fun, the maps are from small to 1 on 1 tank battle large which isn't that big in theory. The biggest complaint is the overused MP40, a little too accurate for its design as a sub machine gun. What's bad in Resistance 2?That *Spoilers* Hale dies in the end?that game is a perfect masterpiece man its even better then KZ2 It's not that it's a bad game, it's just that the controllers feel like Call of Duty yet you say the controls are nothing compared to Resistance 2. Of course, I only mean the graphics. Aside from that, it's pretty different.
[QUOTE="Rhen_Var"][QUOTE="Dante_May_Die"] What's bad in Resistance 2?That *Spoilers* Hale dies in the end?that game is a perfect masterpiece man its even better then KZ2Dante_May_DieIt's not that it's a bad game, it's just that the controllers feel like Call of Duty yet you say the controls are nothing compared to Resistance 2. Of course, I only mean the graphics. Aside from that, it's pretty different. Then i must be blind if the controls are similar to CoD because Resistance 2 is like those fast action games which i definetly liked..unlike CoD5 you just walk and die in hard mode -_-...
Are you sure you have even played Resistance 2?
The absolute first thing I thought when I started played R2 was "Wow, these controls are exactly like COD"
Then i must be blind if the controls are similar to CoD because Resistance 2 is like those fast action games which i definetly liked..unlike CoD5 you just walk and die in hard mode -_-...[QUOTE="Dante_May_Die"][QUOTE="Rhen_Var"] It's not that it's a bad game, it's just that the controllers feel like Call of Duty yet you say the controls are nothing compared to Resistance 2. Of course, I only mean the graphics. Aside from that, it's pretty different.1337h4xx0rz
Are you sure you have even played Resistance 2?
The absolute first thing I thought when I started played R2 was "Wow, these controls are exactly like COD"
maybe they are like CoD4 but not CoD5 no no i dont think soI see enough people playing it constantly enough and no other game to say that people obsess over it not hate it. My question is why does everyone like CoD?Altiar25
Because all my other friends play it, and I want to play with them :P
It's just that online play on WAW is worse than that of COD4. The campaign is better though but no one judges that. When MW2 comes out, which I have already put on hold until November, WAW will be a thing of the past.
tons of glitches in single player, cheap enemy ai, multiplayer maps suck compared to the intricately made COD4 maps, when you look at people running online they look like they are spazzing out, treyarch has to steal infinity wards engine just to make a sub par game, this is the millionth WW2 game........... Oh and the amount of ways people can break through online maps and be inside walls/under the ground/floating in the air ruins any chance of it being fun.
I hate it;
- Weapons sucks
- Maps Sucks
- Perks Sucks
- DLC Sucks
- Story (obviously) Sucks
- All around Suckage
samuraiguns
most weapons suck
maps ok
perks suck
dlc ok
story sucks
lots of suckage, i agree
i dunno about activision after prototype i said i wasnt going to buy any activision games. it seems like at the last minute they pull the plug on what the developers have done.
about w@w i thought it was to linear procedural scripted with the events. and after the second level where you have to make it up a hill after the little stream and firefight in the middle of that little harbor base; i thought the game was horrible: no direction constant chaos no true input method it seemed to control what it was i intended to do and what was being done on screen. i tough it out to the sniper mission and was more frustrated at the games mechanics, trying to snipe someoune across a roof with bad techniques implemented on the software side to user input was horrible. i toughed it out to the island front missions and found the game more about inner chaos with myself and less of a structure to game in. i traded it in.
they got there money so im sure my complaits are null as it takes a gamer with direction to see intent and action outputed to notice these mechanics i was ill prepared for. maybe if they made a game around these mechanics i would be pleased.
prototype was horrible after coming off my infamous high to play a title that attempted to ride passenger on those feeling but hijack the "ride" with enticement of stealth and merderous action i felt abused. oh well . i traded that game in too.
they got there money.
um every one hates on this game on 360 as well, its just far inferior to COD4, you expect the seiries to get better with each installment not worse.
I think it's a great game. Maybe some of you just don't like it as much as KZ2/Resistance 2 etc. because it isn't exclusive? Hmmm now there's a thought...Duckman5
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment