why does microsoft steal all of our good games ;-(

[QUOTE="joshtheboss"]Its all about money. Microsoft is willing to pay extra for mor features so VF5 will have online play.NeoZurg

Its bribery, plain and simple. M$ is bad for the industry. Have you ever seen Somy paying Rockstar for exclusivity of GTA games or buying Quantic Dreams for an exclusive game? Hell no! Sony is honorable and not hypocrites.

Why does Microsoft steal all of our good games?To find a way to come up with that 1 billion dollar price tag to fix the ring of death error on all systems that get it.

[QUOTE="Ultra-Alue"][QUOTE="NeoZurg"]Killzone 2 will destroy Halo 3

MARK. MY. WORDS!

joshtheboss

Bioshock will destory Killzone 2.

Oh my god the water physics, there amazing.

DEFINITELY AAAA, just look at the water physics!

Psh..that game looks boring, i'll still try it out for my 360 but after watching the gameplay video, it looks like another 360 exclusive that lems are gonna hype up, just for the simple fact its a 360 exclusive.

seriously first ... now VF5, and to boot they add online to it all they do is port aaron11291

M$ is not stelling it.

VF5is not asony game, the game belongs to Sega and they are free to do what they want with their games.

The point is thatM$demands 3th party devs to use live on games for x360 as part of the agreement, and you can see why their cost $60.

Sony games cost the same $60 and suck a litle more but you cant complaint coz its all about the brand...

M$ is not stelling it.

VF5is not asony game, the game belongs to Sega and they are free to do what they want with their games.

The point is thatM$demands 3th party devs to use live on games for x360 as part of the agreement, and you can see why their cost $60.

Sony games cost the same $60 and suck a litle more but you cant complaint coz its all about the brand...

GastaS

Why do you come and bash Sony with your last line, in the Sony forum. Its obvious by your profile that you do not have any ps3 games but only 360 games, so why waste your time here?

[QUOTE="GastaS"]

M$ is not stelling it.

VF5is not asony game, the game belongs to Sega and they are free to do what they want with their games.

The point is thatM$demands 3th party devs to use live on games for x360 as part of the agreement, and you can see why their cost $60.

Sony games cost the same $60 and suck a litle more but you cant complaint coz its all about the brand...

TelcharXI

Why do you come and bash Sony with your last line, in the Sony forum. Its obvious by your profile that you do not have any ps3 games but only 360 games, so why waste your time here?

Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration. glorious_blue

To me it sounds greedy and with them buying everything sounds like they are trying to create a monopolization of the gaming industry, just like they do with the computer industry. But that I guess is my crazy crackpot consipiracy theory.

[QUOTE="glorious_blue"]Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration. TelcharXI

To me it sounds greedy and with them buying everything sounds like they are trying to create a monopolization of the gaming industry, just like they do with the computer industry. But that I guess is my crazy crackpot consipiracy theory.

[QUOTE="glorious_blue"]Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration. TelcharXI

To me it sounds greedy and with them buying everything sounds like they are trying to create a monopolization of the gaming industry, just like they do with the computer industry. But that I guess is my crazy crackpot consipiracy theory.

It's not crazy, because it's true. MS wants complete domination over consumer electronics. The next inevitable step would be to start making TVs, or incorporating Microsoft technologies into existing TV brands.

[QUOTE="TelcharXI"]

[QUOTE="glorious_blue"]Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration. Timstuff

To me it sounds greedy and with them buying everything sounds like they are trying to create a monopolization of the gaming industry, just like they do with the computer industry. But that I guess is my crazy crackpot consipiracy theory.

It's not crazy, because it's true. MS wants complete domination over consumer electronics.

[QUOTE="TelcharXI"]

[QUOTE="glorious_blue"]Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration. Timstuff

To me it sounds greedy and with them buying everything sounds like they are trying to create a monopolization of the gaming industry, just like they do with the computer industry. But that I guess is my crazy crackpot consipiracy theory.

It's not crazy, because it's true. MS wants complete domination over consumer electronics. The next inevitable step would be to start making TVs, or incorporating Microsoft technologies into existing TV brands.

theyre actually aiming at the furniture bussiness...i mean have u seen that big @$$ tableM$ $urface..wuts next, a big @$$ couch dubbed M$ Lazyboy?

M$ is not stelling it.

VF5is not asony game, the game belongs to Sega and they are free to do what they want with their games.

The point is thatM$demands 3th party devs to use live on games for x360 as part of the agreement, and you can see why their cost $60.

Sony games cost the same $60 and suck a litle more but you cant complaint coz its all about the brand...

GastaS

Condemned: Criminal Origins
Dead Rising
Elder Scrolls: Oblivion
The Godfather
Just Cause
King Kong
Sneak King
Superma nReturns
Amped 3
Blue Dragon
Championship Manager 2007
Dynasty Warriors 5 Empires

I may be wrong but I don´t think these games have online gaming...
Wait, you mean they need to add stuff like scoreboards and not online gaming?
Then why did´nt Sega add scoreboards instead of onlinge gaming?

Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration. glorious_blue

LOL at the logic. Sony has sold well over 200 million PS the last 2 generations. I think they know a thing or two about how to stay competitive. Those who whine about lost exclusives ignore the fact that the games are still ON the PS3, that Sony has taken away as many exclusives away from MS, that deveopers are independent and need to cover the higher cost of development on a smaller userbase, and really .. what's the big deal that a 360 owner plays the same game that u enjoy and vice versa?

Sony's strategy has evolved over the past years, and you can see that they rely less on 3rd party support (and that 3rd support has gone multi-plat .. NOT ABANDONDED THEM!). Nor do they rely solely on their own studios aka Nintendo. Guerilla Games and Ninja Theory are clear cases of when they've funded and supported a studio with potential and yet give them the freedom to do their thing.