While I'm pretty sure WoW won't make it to the Ps3, I'd rather have Age of Conan or Warhammer Online on the Ps3. Both games boasts superior gameplay then dumbed down multiplayer Diablo boosted with a half storyline dumbed down RTS Warcraft. Blizzard makes the most boring games ever and I still can't understand how they can be so popular 15 years later. I mean come on, back then we had Eyes of the Beholder which was a much better RPG then Diablo ever was.LordReithgar
Well, someone said in an earlier post that you thought WoW was too repetitive, and I doubt the two games you mentioned will be any different. I know from beta experience on one of them (won't say which one, to avoid breaking NDA) that they are only slightly less repetitive than WoW, it's just how MMORPGs are, no exception so far. As for storyline, well, Warcraft probably has a more in depth storyline than any video game ever made with the exception of Dungeons and Dragons (which is multiple universes, so doesn't really count) and Star Wars. It's about the same size as the LotR universe and depth.
I'm not really trying to defend the game whole-heartedly as I don't play WoW anymore, and (hopefully) never will again. I just don't like how people bash the game because it's popular and it took away your time. As far as I know, videogames are made to waste time.
As for Diablo, well, Blizzard has never introduced anything really new. What they do, better than anyone else, is perfect a style of gameplay. Starcraft/Warcraft for RTS, WoW for MMORPG, Diablo for dungeon crawlers. It seems you have a bias against Blizzard for some reason, maybe because they are popular. While I wouldn't look to a ps3 forum for praise for a PC developer, I would say the majority of people would strongly disagree with "Blizzard makes the most boring games ever." Whether or not you have actually played any of their games, besides WoW, I don't care, just letting you know your opinion is in the minority.
Log in to comment