I think only Ubisoft knows... maybe they started on the 360 version first and they're done.. maybe they are further tweaking the PS3 version for framerate and online..
I think only Ubisoft knows... maybe they started on the 360 version first and they're done.. maybe they are further tweaking the PS3 version for framerate and online..
Because Sony gamers dont care much for a GRAW2. So Ubisoft wants to help 360 out as much as possible and sell as many on the 360, and they probably cant create the game at the same time to release on both platforms. Who cares anyways this game is a rehash series like their splinter cell series.
I think only Ubisoft knows... maybe they started on the 360 version first and they're done.. maybe they are further tweaking the PS3 version for framerate and online..
any number of possibilities whitey6
Microsoft owns Ubisoft so... I think thats why.microsoft doesnt own ubisoft.
I think only Ubisoft knows... maybe they started on the 360 version first and they're done.. maybe they are further tweaking the PS3 version for framerate and online..
any number of possibilities whitey6
Microsoft owns Ubisoft so... I think thats why.
I don't understand this comment. If Ubisoft had the majority of Microsoft interest then why are they releasing a PS3 game?
It's actually EA who purchased about 20% of Ubisoft
cuse of how hard it is to make games for the ps3 for now.......tahts y some games r comin out later......thats my opinion.......i cant wait for saints row ps3.......bigger better just more badass than the 360
Because of the all mighty dollar, the numbers do the talking in this world. PS3 has a lower user base then the other system which shall remain unnamed. Ubisoft like every other publisher in the world including Mars, only care about potential sales. The unnamed system has way way way more users at this point in time hence it only makes sense for Ubi$oft to place more emphasize on the system that will generate to most potential sales. There's no such thing as loyalty in business, it's all about the dough. Trust me once PS3 hits that magic number in global user base then all those companies will come crawling back like bums. PS3's taking the blows now but we'll be back on top.
microsoft probably paying for the extra months.. i wouldnt be surprised.. if they pay people to troll on gaming forums.. why wouldnt they pay to delay a ps3 game.. its pathetic
microsoft probably paying for the extra months.. i wouldnt be surprised.. if they pay people to troll on gaming forums.. why wouldnt they pay to delay a ps3 game.. its patheticdavez82
.... well... i hope you are joking... man.. conspiracie theory FTW....
i think its cause it got started later or microsoft signed a deal with ubi for the game and this is all contract reasons. later ate for ps3 means better sales for microsoft (for people who own both systems, of course they would get the first release if they dont care what system). more than likly contract. sonys already gotten rid of teh "hard to devlope for" problem, its called dev kits each ssytem has one, and releasing them takes a while and thats why new systems game sells are slow at the beggining. people need to practice with the devs.
is it cause the ps3 verison is gonna b better =)Fais93
Your kidding right?? The correct answer is that they obviously started on the 360 version first and needed more time to complete the PS3 version of the game.
Because of the all mighty dollar, the numbers do the talking in this world. PS3 has a lower user base then the other system which shall remain unnamed. Ubisoft like every other publisher in the world including Mars, only care about potential sales. The unnamed system has way way way more users at this point in time hence it only makes sense for Ubi$oft to place more emphasize on the system that will generate to most potential sales. There's no such thing as loyalty in business, it's all about the dough. Trust me once PS3 hits that magic number in global user base then all those companies will come crawling back like bums. PS3's taking the blows now but we'll be back on top. pimperjones
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]Because of the all mighty dollar, the numbers do the talking in this world. PS3 has a lower user base then the other system which shall remain unnamed. Ubisoft like every other publisher in the world including Mars, only care about potential sales. The unnamed system has way way way more users at this point in time hence it only makes sense for Ubi$oft to place more emphasize on the system that will generate to most potential sales. There's no such thing as loyalty in business, it's all about the dough. Trust me once PS3 hits that magic number in global user base then all those companies will come crawling back like bums. PS3's taking the blows now but we'll be back on top. Jack-Thompson
Just like the Sega Dreamcast
yah i agree.. the dreamcast had a much more userbase before the ps2 and now look what happened.. i think the ps3 version will be better anyways.
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]Because of the all mighty dollar, the numbers do the talking in this world. PS3 has a lower user base then the other system which shall remain unnamed. Ubisoft like every other publisher in the world including Mars, only care about potential sales. The unnamed system has way way way more users at this point in time hence it only makes sense for Ubi$oft to place more emphasize on the system that will generate to most potential sales. There's no such thing as loyalty in business, it's all about the dough. Trust me once PS3 hits that magic number in global user base then all those companies will come crawling back like bums. PS3's taking the blows now but we'll be back on top. Jack-Thompson
Just like the Sega Dreamcast
Yeah it's sad how the tables can turn so quickly in the world of business. One day it's ass kissing and the next it's screw you we're going with the new guy. Sony is finally getting a taste of being the underdog. A Bittersweet Life. Give me a dime for every company that's postponing there PS3 lineup. Sony will come back.
microsoft probably paying for the extra months.. i wouldnt be surprised.. if they pay people to troll on gaming forums.. why wouldnt they pay to delay a ps3 game.. its patheticdavez82
Because of the all mighty dollar, the numbers do the talking in this world. PS3 has a lower user base then the other system which shall remain unnamed. Ubisoft like every other publisher in the world including Mars, only care about potential sales. The unnamed system has way way way more users at this point in time hence it only makes sense for Ubi$oft to place more emphasize on the system that will generate to most potential sales. There's no such thing as loyalty in business, it's all about the dough. Trust me once PS3 hits that magic number in global user base then all those companies will come crawling back like bums. PS3's taking the blows now but we'll be back on top. pimperjones
doesn't make sence. think about it, if 360 has such a bigger fan base why not make it exclusive? besides if they want to make money off of both they can release them at the same time. you get the same cash, so why make some people wait? wouldn't be a good investment, i think either it got started later or its a contracted deal with MS
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]Because of the all mighty dollar, the numbers do the talking in this world. PS3 has a lower user base then the other system which shall remain unnamed. Ubisoft like every other publisher in the world including Mars, only care about potential sales. The unnamed system has way way way more users at this point in time hence it only makes sense for Ubi$oft to place more emphasize on the system that will generate to most potential sales. There's no such thing as loyalty in business, it's all about the dough. Trust me once PS3 hits that magic number in global user base then all those companies will come crawling back like bums. PS3's taking the blows now but we'll be back on top. pimperjones
Just like the Sega Dreamcast
Yeah it's sad how the tables can turn so quickly in the world of business. One day it's ass kissing and the next it's screw you we're going with the new guy. Sony is finally getting a taste of being the underdog. A Bittersweet Life. Give me a dime for every company that's postponing there PS3 lineup. Sony will come back.
actually xbox is in the same position as the dreamcast was... sony always prevails in the end.. and i think sony is more evil than MS which is why i think sony can win this.
Yes Sony will win in the end, and they'll punish all those companies that postponed there launch titles with a slap across the face and a contract for higher royalty fees on future titles. Sega will be spared such fate they remained loyal as with EA, but Ubi$oft will be made an example of. Sony won't be forgetting Ubi$oft anytime soon, the Japanese never forget they just smile and take names.
Log in to comment