[QUOTE="Doolz2024"][QUOTE="Ryder123"]
*facepalm*
And what is with all the World at War hate? Give me one good reason that its a bad game, because I'm honestly sick of this bull****. Treyarch also said CoD7 would NOT take place in WW2, don't be so quick to judge.
Ryder123
WaW sucked because it was basically the EXACT same thing as Cod4, only set in WWII, and with a few different perks online. WaW used the CoD4 game engine btw... It was basically a WWII CoD4...just nowhere near as good.No ****, this is what I don't get. World at War is a Call of Duty game, what did you expect? Aliens wearing sombreros shooting bananas at you? Of course it's going to be similar. I'm just as excited for MW2 as you are, but I just can't wait to see everyones faces when they see MW2 is just CoD4 with a few new features and upgraded graphics.
No need to get worked up over this. ;) As Hideo Kojima once said, "It's just a game." :)Now, the MAIN reasons MOST people did NOT like WaW, wasn't because it felt and played like CoD4, but because it was set in WWII, it was made by Treyarch (for some reason a lot of people still have yet to forgive them for CoD3, so they just assume WaW wasn't worth playing "because Treyarch made it"), and because it just wasn't as good as CoD4. Yes it used the same game engine, and basically had the same "feel" as CoD4, but it just wasn't as good overall as CoD4... ;)
People will love MW2 because:
1- IW is making it
2- CoD4 was GREAT, so people automatically will assume this will be as well (they will also assume it will be great b/c of reason #1)
3- There doesn't have to be any major improvements in MW2. CoD4 was a near perfect FPS. It's going to be hard to make any significant improvments, but if IW does, then that is just a bonus for people like me who plan on buying the game :)
Log in to comment