I don't think history will be kind to Trump at all.
Trump isn't a leader, he's a bully with power. He has no interest in enacting change in leading by example or collaboration, his idea of "leadership" is to dictate, and if he doesn't get what he wants, he immediately enacts punitive measures. Which isn't an unusual trait for someone who's spent his life in business which often necessitates such hardball approaches to achieving goals, but in the context of political nuance where the dynamics of diplomacy and governance are much more intricate, it relegates him a reactionary simpleton in addressment of multi-faceted and extraordinarily complex issues. That he's a narcissist and egomaniac who believes he's wiser and more competent than everyone else in every subject and so dismisses all other qualified advice only exacerbates this fault.
I am one that believes his isolationist and antagonistic approach will be viewed as ultimately weakening us as a nation, along with our allies in combating global threats. Him pulling out of the WHO (for one recent example), while he may have some grounds in justification, is knee-jerk and myopic when they are currently working towards remedies for a global pandemic, dependent upon our funding. If he held such an issue with them, why was this not done when people weren't dropping dead? There's no foresight or plan, he's a reactionary who takes whatever opportunity that arises to punish others for current political grievances, even if it hurts people he purportedly cares for.
His environmental denialism, the stripping of protections, reputation for ignoring facts, trying to redefine the concept of truth, starting, propagating and encouraging unfounded conspiracy theories, and repudiating science for political grounding isn't going to shine favor on him in retrospect.
This is to say nothing on his divisive personality and strategy of inflaming political lines at every turn through his rhetoric and behavior. He doesn't only not lead, he makes a concerted effort to inflame every situation into a political and ideological firestorm, to drive a wedge between every individual, at times when we need to be coming together. He's an agent of chaos, a divider, and that is an intentional strategy he chooses to abide by, one encouraged by his corrupt mentor, Cohen, and is why all his followers love him.
None of his positives, whatever they are, are enough to overcome these shortcomings. History will be hard on him.
Log in to comment