Poll Is Donald Trump a racist? (94 votes)
When I was in high school back in 2010-2011, I remember believing Trump was racist after reading online about many of his racist controversies. And that was years before he ran for president.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
When I was in high school back in 2010-2011, I remember believing Trump was racist after reading online about many of his racist controversies. And that was years before he ran for president.
That's discrimination and racism. Congrats. You finally admitted your racism.
Who said discriminate using race? In fact I explicitly said I didn't advocate for using race.
Are you trying to suggesting discriminating and being selective is racist? Even if you don't use race.
Yes you did....you said it would only be logical for a landlord to reject black applicants for open apartment units.
Apparently you missed what he was responding to.
And yes I said using statistics for selectivity is scientifically valid. IF you had statistics, I wouldn't consider using the statistics as a motivation for prioritizing applicants the same as racism even if it both ended up racially discriminating.
Can you tell me why discriminating based on probability is racist?
That's discrimination and racism. Congrats. You finally admitted your racism.
Who said discriminate using race? In fact I explicitly said I didn't advocate for using race.
Are you trying to suggesting discriminating and being selective is racist? Even if you don't use race.
Yes you did....you said it would only be logical for a landlord to reject black applicants for open apartment units.
Apparently you missed what he was responding to.
And yes I said using statistics for selectivity is scientifically valid. IF you had statistics, I wouldn't consider using the statistics as a motivation for prioritizing applicants the same as racism even if it both ended up racially discriminating.
Can you tell me why discriminating based on probability is racist?
I was responding to your continued racism in this thread.
I was responding to your continued racism in this thread.
Your responded to a direct quote where I said people proxy characteristics to discriminate and I don't advocate or discriminating based on race, and then you said that was racist.
You've been advocating discrimination on race and hiding behind statistics this entire thread. You're not fooling anyone. And for the record poverty has a correlation to crime. Not race.
I was responding to your continued racism in this thread.
Your responded to a direct quote where I said people proxy characteristics to discriminate and I don't advocate or discriminating based on race, and then you said that was racist.
You've been advocating discrimination on race and hiding behind statistics this entire thread. You're not fooling anyone. And for the record poverty has a correlation to crime. Not race.
I've been saying that discriminating based on statistics isn't the same as discriminating based on hate and unfounded beliefs. You don't seem to understand the difference or you don't care about the difference.
And the statistics on race/crime are not equal. Poverty/IQ/Culture are all correlated to crime. And some races, currently black communities commit crime disproportionally. In fact if you look at the IQ statistics that the Army collects they are distributed in a similarly to race / poverty / violent crime. Blacks on average have more testosterone which on one hand... gives them an advantage in sports.. on the other hand their criminality is much more likely to be violent (on a population level) and have prostate cancer at almost 2:1 compared to whites.
So yes, poverty is correlated to crime, so is IQ, culture and also race. But no one suggested race is causation.
That's discrimination and racism. Congrats. You finally admitted your racism.
Who said discriminate using race? In fact I explicitly said I didn't advocate for using race.
Are you trying to suggesting discriminating and being selective is racist? Even if you don't use race.
Yes you did....you said it would only be logical for a landlord to reject black applicants for open apartment units.
Apparently you missed what he was responding to.
And yes I said using statistics for selectivity is scientifically valid. IF you had statistics, I wouldn't consider using the statistics as a motivation for prioritizing applicants the same as racism even if it both ended up racially discriminating.
Can you tell me why discriminating based on probability is racist?
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
But you do espouse racist ideologies.
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
But you do espouse racist ideologies.
No I don't, you speak imprecisely.
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
But you admitted it's OK to discriminate based on race-based statistics...
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
But you admitted it's OK to discriminate based on race-based statistics...
And that doesn't mean I'm advocating for people to do it without extremely good reason to do so. I don't think its immoral if you have statistics to back up your priority of choices. Because the entire fucking world works when you use statistics to prioritize correctly. If race has a large enough consequences then discrimination isn't the only probably, there are community differences that have to be tackled one way or the other.
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
But you admitted it's OK to discriminate based on race-based statistics...
And that doesn't mean I'm advocating for people to do it without extremely good reason to do so. I don't think its immoral if you have statistics to back up your priority of choices. Because the entire fucking world works when you use statistics to prioritize correctly. If race has a large enough consequences then discrimination isn't the only probably, there are community differences that have to be tackled one way or the other.
And there it is. You advocate racism.
And there it is. You advocate racism.
But I'm not actually supporting it fully. So why are you suggesting that I'm "advocating" for it. The fact is there are appropriate places where population distributions need to be taken into account. Or do you hate reality?
Also what do you mean by "racism"
And there it is. You advocate racism.
But I'm not actually supporting it fully. So why are you suggesting that I'm "advocating" for it. The fact is there are appropriate places where population distributions need to be taken into account. Or do you hate reality?
Also what do you mean by "racism"
And again you advocate racism. You can try and hide and put caveats but racism is racism.
And again you advocate racism. You can try and hide and put caveats but racism is racism.
Define how I'm a racist explicitly. Because again, racism isn't racial discrimination alone.
You are advocating racism in every one of your posts.
And again you advocate racism. You can try and hide and put caveats but racism is racism.
Define how I'm a racist explicitly. Because again, racism isn't racial discrimination alone.
You are advocating racism in every one of your posts.
give an explanation more than "you're just doing it"
And again you advocate racism. You can try and hide and put caveats but racism is racism.
Define how I'm a racist explicitly. Because again, racism isn't racial discrimination alone.
You are advocating racism in every one of your posts.
No I'm not, I'm pointing out that racism is distinctly different than acting on group differences that are based on facts and aren't negligible differences. If your going to call that racist than reality is racist...
We'll never be able to solve any race differences effectively with the way you think, because pointing out differences is racist, and acting on those differences is racist.
No I'm not, I'm pointing out that racism is distinctly different than acting on group differences that are based on facts and aren't negligible differences. If your going to call that racist than reality is racist...
We'll never be able to solve any race differences effectively with the way you think, because pointing out differences is racist, and acting on those differences is racist.
No you're skewing facts to present an argument that it's okay to be racist if you can push statistics in that direction. It's just that simple. And you're not fooling anyone here except perhaps yourself. Race is a human construct to create differences. There is only the human race and different ethnicity with adaptations to environment and cultural differences. Two people of the same "race" but growing up in different cultures will be socioeconomically different.
Statistics without looking at all underlying causes are worthless. They serve nothing but to push your agenda.
The differences in race is a difference because individuals, like yourself, want it to be there. People are people the world over with the same hopes, desires, and dreams. And until bigots realize this they will ALWAYS say there is racial differences. Which is the blanket you wrap around yourself.
No you're skewing facts to present an argument that it's okay to be racist if you can push statistics in that direction. It's just that simple. And you're not fooling anyone here except perhaps yourself. Race is a human construct to create differences. There is only the human race and different ethnicity with adaptations to environment and cultural differences. Two people of the same "race" but growing up in different cultures will be socioeconomically different.
what facts did I skew?
I pointed out there is 0 evidence linking trump to any discriminatory policies from the apartments, or things people misinterpret as racist.
And pointed out in some cases if statistics showed a differences in group than probabilities could be abstracted out and groups can be prioritized or deprioritized. Someone pointed out as profiling.
Statistics without looking at all underlying causes are worthless. They serve nothing but to push your agenda.
And no, you do not need to look at the underlying cause to understand probabilities for choices. If you want to find a solution to the disparities SURE, you need to take a look at the underlying causes. And making priorities for other decisions do not need to tackle whether or not these differences are due to innate characteristics of race or differences in culture or differences due to discrimination.
The FBI link I posted earlier pointed out that white crime is different, and once they started profiling White men to specific commonalities in how white men commit theft, their prosecution rate went up 300%. Why does it matter why white men commit crime in a different manner than black men? Its not important to trying to figure out who committed a crime... only the likeliness their suspect is a white male and should be focusing on white men.
The differences in race is a difference because individuals, like yourself, want it to be there. People are people the world over with the same hopes, desires, and dreams. And until bigots realize this they will ALWAYS say there is racial differences. Which is the blanket you wrap around yourself.
Go tell the army their statistics don't exist, or police that their crime statistics don't exist... This is the most retarded thing I've heard in a long time.
The fact is... THERE ARE RACIAL DIFFERENCES. That is a fact. That doesn't mean you should treat individuals in a particular way... but if you have to prioritize characteristic the fact remains there are different probabilities associated with picking from different racial groups and getting that characteristic. I don't know what hippy reality you live in...
How is this thread still open? It went completely off the rails about 250 posts ago.
Oh yeah. It's an Orange Man Bad thread.
Never mind. Disregard my original question.
Can you just admit that you're discriminating based on race?
Well that is stupid... giving examples of discrimination to illustrate points about the motivations isn't the same as discriminating. I neither own a business or an apartment complex, I'm not a member of law enforcement using profiling... or am apart of any thing that affirmative action effects.
But you admitted it's OK to discriminate based on race-based statistics...
And that doesn't mean I'm advocating for people to do it without extremely good reason to do so. I don't think its immoral if you have statistics to back up your priority of choices. Because the entire fucking world works when you use statistics to prioritize correctly. If race has a large enough consequences then discrimination isn't the only probably, there are community differences that have to be tackled one way or the other.
It doesn't matter if you're advocating it or not. You're still condoning it, and saying it's justified. That alone is racist. Seriously, how old are you?
It doesn't matter if you're advocating it or not. You're still condoning it, and saying it's justified. That alone is racist. Seriously, how old are you?
I'm not condoning racism. I just don't agree that having measureless differences between groups and using that information in a productive manner is racist.
It doesn't matter if you're advocating it or not. You're still condoning it, and saying it's justified. That alone is racist. Seriously, how old are you?
I'm not condoning racism. I just don't agree that having measureless differences between groups and using that information in a productive manner is racist.
Yes yes you are with all your reasons why it's okay. Seriously a little self evaluation will do you wonders.
It doesn't matter if you're advocating it or not. You're still condoning it, and saying it's justified. That alone is racist. Seriously, how old are you?
I'm not condoning racism. I just don't agree that having measureless differences between groups and using that information in a productive manner is racist.
You LITERALLY condoned racial discrimination, which is (wait for it) racist.
Why, why, why is this so hard for you to get????
It doesn't matter if you're advocating it or not. You're still condoning it, and saying it's justified. That alone is racist. Seriously, how old are you?
I'm not condoning racism. I just don't agree that having measureless differences between groups and using that information in a productive manner is racist.
You LITERALLY condoned racial discrimination, which is (wait for it) racist.
Why, why, why is this so hard for you to get????
I just disagree with how you view racism and I don't care. If racism is only discrimination based on race any discussion about race and what we can do to help or protect our selves from groups is racist. Racism requires a belief about race, not just any kind of racial discrimination. The dictionary doesn't have distinct meanings listed... Racism requires an underlying belief as a motivation.
It doesn't matter if you're advocating it or not. You're still condoning it, and saying it's justified. That alone is racist. Seriously, how old are you?
I'm not condoning racism. I just don't agree that having measureless differences between groups and using that information in a productive manner is racist.
You LITERALLY condoned racial discrimination, which is (wait for it) racist.
Why, why, why is this so hard for you to get????
I just disagree with how you view racism and I don't care. If racism is only discrimination based on race any discussion about race and what we can do to help or protect our selves from groups is racist. Racism requires a belief about race, not just any kind of racial discrimination. The dictionary doesn't have distinct meanings listed... Racism requires an underlying belief as a motivation.
I'm completely speechless...you clearly have no clue what racism is or what it encompasses. You're almost impossible to reason with and it almost seems like you're in denial. Like you know what you're saying is absolutely racist but don't want to admit it.
I'm completely speechless...you clearly have no clue what racism is or what it encompasses. You're almost impossible to reason with and it almost seems like you're in denial. Like you know what you're saying is absolutely racist but don't want to admit it.
Racism requires a belief. You don't seem to understand that. Racism is a belief. What it encompasses depends entirely on that belief being an underlying motivator for actions.
rac·ism[ˈrāˌsizəm]NOUN
- prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
- the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."theories of racism"
Other dictionaries may have additional usageslike Merriam... these are not MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE usages. Discriminating racially isn't alone racist.
racism
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2a: a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles
2b: a political or social system founded on racism
3: racial prejudice or discrimination
With your view everyone is racist... they'll all fall under one of these categories.
Its racist if you help black/brown people because they are statically worse off. Its racist if you don't want to sleep with someone because they're race isn't as visually stimulating. Its racist if you target/avoid particular racial culture. Its racist if you don't let white people say the N word.
Basically in your view, its racist if race ever is a determining factor in anything whether or not it be legitimate measurable differences or illegitimate prejudice. And in some since viewing those actions without taking the time to understand why someone is doing something and calling them a racist is basically bigoted.
@waahahah: and you BELIEVE it’s ok to discriminate against blacks. /discussion
I believe that its ok to discriminate if probability suggests it makes you safer. We discriminate on a regular bases for many reasons and race while not the best indicator of characteristics... there are correlations between race and characteristics.
This thread is interesting to revisit after some of the news stories that broke since the previous response to it.
The Republican party, and the Trump administration as part of it, is systematically stripping minorities of their representation and voting rights through multiple avenues. It's even explicit that it's done along racial lines for political purposes.
We don't know if these people "have racist beliefs", but they're intentionally oppressing minorities. Does it make it better that they may be doing so without actually holding racist beliefs? Worse?
Maybe it doesn't matter. Either way they're selfish pigs who are more than happy to strip other people of their rights based on the color of their skin. Maybe we don't have to "know what's in their hearts" to know that they're scum.
This thread is interesting to revisit after some of the news stories that broke since the previous response to it.
The Republican party, and the Trump administration as part of it, is systematically stripping minorities of their representation and voting rights through multiple avenues. It's even explicit that it's done along racial lines for political purposes.
We don't know if these people "have racist beliefs", but they're intentionally oppressing minorities. Does it make it better that they may be doing so without actually holding racist beliefs? Worse?
Maybe it doesn't matter. Either way they're selfish pigs who are more than happy to strip other people of their rights based on the color of their skin. Maybe we don't have to "know what's in their hearts" to know that they're scum.
No they aren't.
@waahahah: it’s pretty amazing that a lot of modern left still acts like they’re actually against racism.
Trump is only against illegal immigrants. Trump administration has booted multi-skin color illegals.
Race neutrality test failures from the Democrats
Race neutrality test failures = racist
@ronvalencia: I thought that was a trailer for Bird Box 2 for a second, then I remembered those film makers just didn’t like white males specifically
@waahahah: and you BELIEVE it’s ok to discriminate against blacks. /discussion
I believe that its ok to discriminate if probability suggests it makes you safer. We discriminate on a regular bases for many reasons and race while not the best indicator of characteristics... there are correlations between race and characteristics.
Yeah...you're CLEARLY not racist dude....
Yeah...you're CLEARLY not racist dude....
There are subcultures that are race specific, white crime and black crime are DIFFERENT. As I already pointed out FBI used profiling different types of crime to rule out black suspects and increased their prosecution rate by something like 300% for white crime. Real world discrimination against black people happening at a procedural level in the FBI and its effective at prosecuting more whites.
Is that racist?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment