Regulations That Kept Wall Street and Banks in Check Being Rolled Back

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

From The Washington Post.

The House on Thursday voted to free Wall Street from many of the strict constraints put in place after the 2008 financial crisis, the opening salvo in what is likely to be a protracted battle over deregulation of the powerful banking industry.

Big banks, from Goldman Sachs to Bank of America, would face less scrutiny and other large financial institutions, such as insurance giant MetLife, could escape tougher rules all together under the legislation approved along party lines.

The Trump administration backed the bill as part of a multi-pronged effort to ease banking regulations in order to spur economic growth. The legislation is likely to face stiff resistance in the Senate but it provides a roadmap of sorts for the policies the president plans to put in place as he appoints new regulators. Trump, who has complained about tight lending practices, has ordered three reviews of banking rules, the first of which Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is set to deliver as soon as next week.

Full Story Here

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60856 Posts

Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeah drain that swamp, Trumpy-poo, drain it nice and good!...

OMFG have we forgotten that lesson already?

I know I sure haven't; I graduated in 2008, that was definitely not a fun time to be looking for a job, a place to live, and to be in debt.

Nothing has really been the same since, either. People were let go from jobs and now companies realize A.) people are scared to lose their jobs and B.) people will work to their own personal detriment and do the work of 1.5 people for 0.75 people's pay.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23362 Posts

What could go wrong?

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

Maybe when this turns sour again, you can follow Iceland's example regarding the bankers.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts

This is why you don't put business interests in power. It's also why we need to step up education in this country.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

8138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By judaspete
Member since 2005 • 8138 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

What could go wrong?

Hmmm... nope, I can't think of a single thing.

On an unrelated note, I just saw this movie, The Dark Night. Have you seen it? It was pretty good. Surprised I'd never heard of it before.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts

@Treflis said:

Maybe when this turns sour again, you can follow Iceland's example regarding the bankers.

Hahahahahaha. Good one. That was a pretty good joke if I may say so myself.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

@horgen said:
@Treflis said:

Maybe when this turns sour again, you can follow Iceland's example regarding the bankers.

Hahahahahaha. Good one. That was a pretty good joke if I may say so myself.

Yeah, Fat chance of that happening.

Avatar image for tjandmia
tjandmia

3827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By tjandmia
Member since 2017 • 3827 Posts

So have you guys realized yet that this whole "small government" argument is nothing but a scam to unburden wealthy Republican donors from taxation and regulation, or do you still claim to believe that this shit is good for the country?