What is reverse racism?

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

@theone86 said:

Maybe white people should have thought about that back when it was time for them to pay for their crimes and they were making every excuse in the book not to. And if giving up white privilege is a punishment, then you seriously need to reconsider your definition of punishment. If there really were a just punishment handed out to whites based on the unanswered crimes of their ancestors we'd be talking no less than white genocide. Nobody's asking for that, though. All people are asking for is fair treatment of minorities, acknowledgement of the ways in which they still struggle under a system that disenfranchises them, and a comparatively minuscule amount of social spending meant to correct social imbalances. Just the forty acres and a mule promise would amount to 6.4 trillion dollars, experts estimate that the total amount of stolen black labor would amount to between 25 and 60 trillion dollars. Yet people are screaming their heads off over welfare programs, which come in at a little over half a trillion, and benefit white as well minority citizens? You are more than getting off lucky by paying so little to make up for the years of enslavement, discrimination, and abuse. And like I keep saying, the effects of discrimination don't end when the discrimination does (and it doesn't always end when it's outlawed, either).

So, in short, your question is a false equivalence (more fallacies from a conservative, surprise!) In one case you have a group of people acting out of pure malice and punishing children in a bone-headed attempt to deter immigration, and in the other case you have people trying to acknowledge the ongoing discrimination and effects of past discrimination that have never been properly addressed. Like I said, if white people in decades past would have grown some goddamned balls and owned up to their mistakes we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Your argument is a form of white supremacy. First you defend the people who victimized other people while they're alive, and then you make the case that those who are around after their dead can't be held responsible for their crimes. How convenient, then, that absolutely no one is left to be held accountable for those crimes by that logic. It's almost as if you don't anyone held responsible for racism at all.

I'll tell you what, I'll PM you my real name and phone number, and you can start sending me a percentage of your paycheck every pay period through Zelle if it resolves some of the guilt you have from what your ancestors did to mine. I've been looking at some luxury cars I wanted to upgrade to, and I'm sure that it will help when I'm trying to secure financing. Oh, wait, you probably would rather find a black guy that hates you and would take everything you got as a down payment for his 40 acres and a mule to give it to than to give it to me since I refuse to hold against you things that happened over a century ago to satisfy what appears to be an overwhelming amount of white guilt you are suffering.

Back to our conversation, you never owned a slave and I was never a slave. I'm going to presume that you never called a black person the N-word, and the last time a white person called me the N-word was a few months ago when my ex-wife's (she was Filipino) white boyfriend got an attitude when I texted her and gave her a friendly reminder of some of the stipulations of our divorce decree she wasn't following. You didn't do anything wrong, so you need to stop beating yourself up for the wrong things your great, great, great, great grandfather may have did (for all you know, he may have been part of the Union Army fighting against slavery and never personally owned a slave to begin with).

I am not saying that discrimination never happened since the slave days. My father knows plenty about it being that he was a black man born in South Carolina in the late 50s. I'm just saying that your opinion that you are born guilty and owe something to another person because of the color of your skin is not a healthy way to go through life. When racists are being racist, then we address those particular people with debate, shunning, and (if they break a law during their racist actions) legal action. That doesn't mean we need to punish people that had nothing to do with it, such as the white farmers having their land taken from them because of the past. Assuming you own or plan to own a car, would you be okay if your car was taken from you without compensation for the purpose of giving a black person without a car a vehicle as reparations?

Also, I never defended the racists that are still alive, I said that the decedents of the racists shouldn't be getting punished for it by having their personal property taken from them without compensation. It's one thing to give people welfare (which isn't meant as reparations anyway, it's supposed to help people down on their luck regardless of race), it's another to take the personal property of someone's by force over what someone that shared their skin color did years or even over a century ago.

As for the immigrant children, while I don't agree with them being separated from their parents without due process, even if their parents crossed illegally instead of applying for asylum at a border crossing or embassy, there are plenty of people born and raised in the US that have their children taken away from them when they break the law. If anything, putting a child in the same holding facility as their parents may open that child up to being molested by other prisoners that slip by or overpower their parents and proceed to take advantage of the child if proper precautions are not taken. Molestation is already a huge risk immigrants take with their kids when they are on their way here from Central and South America.

Maybe the problem with my comparison between the white people of today paying for their ancestors' crimes and the immigrant children being punished for their parents' crimes wasn't that it was a false equivalence. Maybe the problem is you are against immigration enforcement altogether and as a result don't feel like people entering the country illegally did anything wrong in the first place. No, I'm not saying that entering the country illegally and doing the things slave owners did to their slaves (beatings, rape, etc.) are the same, before you accuse me of making that comparison.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#52 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 3576 Posts

@n64dd said:
@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:
@theone86 said:

Yes, these practices have ended. No, that doesn't mean their effects are gone. I already stated this, so thank you for either ignoring or failing to understand the substance of my argument. If someone breaks into your house, steals all of your property, sells it off, and spends all the money before getting arrested, does his getting arrested make things right with you? No, because you now have absolutely no property and no possible way to get all of your possessions back. What you are essentially arguing is that even though we have ways of making minorities whole again by attempting to combat ongoing discrimination and right the wrongs of the past, we shouldn't because the past is the past and everyone should just forget about it because reasons.im not sayingwe shouldforget but we should move on, and stop playing victims for how our lifes turn out because "white privilege" holds us back, its nonsense This is like arguing that the person who robbed you shouldn't even be sent to jail because you can't get all your stuff back, and if you can't get all of your stuff back why even make an attempt at restitution in the first place. In other words, it's a bad argument. It's saying that even though white people did and continue to do bad things in the name of white superiority, there should be absolutely no attempt to right those wrongs because they happened in the past. What exactly is the statute of limitations on cultural genocide, pray tell? move on my people where slaughted by the dutch but im not going to blame the dutch for 2 reasons, its not their fault for how my life turns out nor are the people directly involved are alive. Even if they stole a whole plantation that my family worked hard for. Anyway, your argument is itself a form of racism as it attempts to completely absolve anyone capable of addressing ongoing racial injustice of any responsibility. It is an attempt to excuse oppressing minorities because you don't want to be bothered with confronting your own dark history, a history created by white individuals asserting dominance over minorities. so if your father kills someone and dies, you should go prision for that crime using your logic.

And yes, the consequences of the last generation absolutely do affect this generation. The fact that so many minorities live in bad neighborhoods is a direct result of anti-black discrimination. This leads to a lack of access to services, a lack of good policing, increased violence, a lack of access to good food, to good schools. Redlining was a practice where black homes were systemically devalued in comparison to white homes. That means a lack of access to equity, which equates to wealth, which means that it's harder for black families to go to college and that some families are just now being able to send their kids to college where white families in the same situation are in the second or third generation of college-goers. That means they have had more time to build and pass on wealth, and hold a distinct economic advantage over black families in similar situations as them. That is racism. This stuff doesn't just go away once official discrimination is done away with, it festers and affects families for generations. so its whites faults theres more black crime, instead of them being responsible for their own actions.

It doesn't matter that there are poor whites. Racism never precluded whites from being poor, racism made it far more likely that minorities would turn out poor. That there are successful black people also does not indicate that racism is dead. It can indicate progress, but there are still racial disparities, there are still communities reeling from racial discrimination, there is still widespread disenfranchisement and discrimination. the racial equality movement didn't stop with the Emancipation Proclamation, it didn't stop with earning the right to vote, it didn't stop with MLK, and it's not going to stop with Obama and deGrasse Tyson becoming influential public figures. If you can't deal with that, then oh well. Find a safe space or something. me find a safe space? thats why im willing to forgive and your wanting to play victim

A. your link is from 2015. B. it's the Daily Mail, so 99% BS C.https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/6/27/17509140/admissions-bias-personalities-harvard-affirmative-action

You said minorities were looking for handouts, that's implying that they can't compete with whites on a level playing field and tapping into racist animosity towards minorities that has been going for centuries. Further, the whole argument about Africans selling Africans into slavery is HUGELY racist for a whole slew of reasons, but mostly it's just a really classless attempt at victim blaming and acting like minorities are responsible for their own disenfranchisement in an attempt to shift the blame off of the people who actually disenfranchised them.how is it racist to tell the truth that their greed was part of the reasons of slavery. is it because you think its all white peoples fault, Oh, and thanks for trying to use my sex life against me in an argument, guess that's what you gotta do when you have no legitimate argument. Good to know you're a complete douchebag and not just a partial one.

It's not nonsense and calling it nonsense doesn't make it nonsense. I'm the one in this conversation actually substantiating my argument, not you.

Congratulations, you're owed a plantation. Do you know how white supremacy works? When white people come to an "undiscovered" land and claim it as their own, dispossessing whoever was there before, they never have to answer for it. It's always "in the past," or "not my fault." If you were to take back what was yours, in the exact same manner that it was taken from your ancestors, you'd be held fully accountable in a court of law. One standard for white theft, a different standard for black theft. White supremacy. Yeah you know why you'd be accountable in law, because we move on, pick ourselves up and evolve into something better.

That's not my logic, that's a strawman argument. My argument is that white society bears a responsibility to end persistent discrimination against minorities and redress previous injustices to the best that it can. Saying that it ended is not enough. That does not create an equal society, that does not create a harmonious society. If it burdens white citizens that's a small price to pay compared to the price that's been inflicted upon minorities over the years You mean the people that 99% dead, and speaking as a white man it's worth it to pay it not because it's comparatively cheap but because the true value of connecting with other human beings and learning how to really understand and coexist with each other is incalculable. like forgiveness and working together to be an active society, instead of them having a victim mentality. Retribution is a joke and leads to lazy people because of handouts.

You obviously need a safe space if you can't take hearing the idea that discrimination and its effects didn't magically end in 1865.

I already told you how it's racist, because regardless of what other Africans did, Europeans still did something deeply immoral for centuries and were under no duress to do it. Bringing up African slavery in a conversation about white supremacy is an obvious attempt to shift the blame and excuse white slavers.You can't blame one without the others obvious helping hand it's not racist at all It's victim blaming and it's repulsive. Besides that, African slavery was not the same thing as chattel slavery. African slaves were housed in the same homes as their masters, ate food with them, and were part of their families. There were strict taboos against abusing them, and separating them from their families would have been unthinkable to them. Europeans raped them, treated them as disposable cargo, beat them sometimes to death, worked them all day in horrid conditions, killed them when they ran away, separated families, and put them into a system of mass human trafficking. To compare that to a system where servants were treated with respect is a false equivalence, and to do it in order to take attention away from the wrongs committed by chattel slavers is abominable. It's racist, everyone knows it's racist, and you're being told it's racist. That's only a few kind of slaves in Africa too, there was also sacrificial slaves why not bring them, cause it doesn't find your agenda?

Your really picking and choosing facts here. Some not even facts anymore. There's nothing stopping blacks from be successful. You can't blame the past for how peoples lives turn out now. There's plenty of people that move on from what happened to become successful, you're allowing them to have a victim mentality and that only leads to them, blaming others for how there life has turned out instead of being successful.

All slavers were pieces of shit, what does that have to do with any of us though? He's saying all white people should give up their stuff to blacks because of slavery and the racial prejudice that's been over for a while, And most people that it effected are dead.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@npiet1 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@theone86 said:
@ad1x2 said:

You know damn well that you could get the answer for that from Google. Racism is racism no matter what, but some people like to use it to refer to minorities being racist towards Caucasians.

Wrong. It refers to the system of oppression that specifically targets non-white minorities How does it target minorities? built up to reward white individuals with wages of social superiority in exchange for their complicity in keeping themselves financially oppressed and subservient. It is not something that you are, it is something you participate in. Discrimination can occur against all ethnicities, but racism is a system that was designed to uphold white supremacy.

False assumption since East and South East Asians can rival whites in average economic participation and income rates .

It's a no surprise that the top GDP countries are white majority and east Asian countries i.e. USA, EU, China, CANZUK (UK, Australia, Canada, NZ incoming "freedom of movement" union, 4th largest GDP), Japan, South Korea.

Both AMD and NVIDIA are lead by Taiwanese Americans.

the funny thing is if your a minority you have more chances to get scholarships, handouts etc. yet they blame whites when they work hard and as a result have nice things and money.

It depends which "minorities", East Asians doesn't need leftist handouts. Scholarships has to be merit based without set racial quota.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@ad1x2 said:
@theone86 said:

Maybe white people should have thought about that back when it was time for them to pay for their crimes and they were making every excuse in the book not to. And if giving up white privilege is a punishment, then you seriously need to reconsider your definition of punishment. If there really were a just punishment handed out to whites based on the unanswered crimes of their ancestors we'd be talking no less than white genocide. Nobody's asking for that, though. All people are asking for is fair treatment of minorities, acknowledgement of the ways in which they still struggle under a system that disenfranchises them, and a comparatively minuscule amount of social spending meant to correct social imbalances. Just the forty acres and a mule promise would amount to 6.4 trillion dollars, experts estimate that the total amount of stolen black labor would amount to between 25 and 60 trillion dollars. Yet people are screaming their heads off over welfare programs, which come in at a little over half a trillion, and benefit white as well minority citizens? You are more than getting off lucky by paying so little to make up for the years of enslavement, discrimination, and abuse. And like I keep saying, the effects of discrimination don't end when the discrimination does (and it doesn't always end when it's outlawed, either).

So, in short, your question is a false equivalence (more fallacies from a conservative, surprise!) In one case you have a group of people acting out of pure malice and punishing children in a bone-headed attempt to deter immigration, and in the other case you have people trying to acknowledge the ongoing discrimination and effects of past discrimination that have never been properly addressed. Like I said, if white people in decades past would have grown some goddamned balls and owned up to their mistakes we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Your argument is a form of white supremacy. First you defend the people who victimized other people while they're alive, and then you make the case that those who are around after their dead can't be held responsible for their crimes. How convenient, then, that absolutely no one is left to be held accountable for those crimes by that logic. It's almost as if you don't anyone held responsible for racism at all.

I'll tell you what, I'll PM you my real name and phone number, and you can start sending me a percentage of your paycheck every pay period through Zelle if it resolves some of the guilt you have from what your ancestors did to mine. I've been looking at some luxury cars I wanted to upgrade to, and I'm sure that it will help when I'm trying to secure financing. Oh, wait, you probably would rather find a black guy that hates you and would take everything you got as a down payment for his 40 acres and a mule to give it to than to give it to me since I refuse to hold against you things that happened over a century ago to satisfy what appears to be an overwhelming amount of white guilt you are suffering.

Back to our conversation, you never owned a slave and I was never a slave. I'm going to presume that you never called a black person the N-word, and the last time a white person called me the N-word was a few months ago when my ex-wife's (she was Filipino) white boyfriend got an attitude when I texted her and gave her a friendly reminder of some of the stipulations of our divorce decree she wasn't following. You didn't do anything wrong, so you need to stop beating yourself up for the wrong things your great, great, great, great grandfather may have did (for all you know, he may have been part of the Union Army fighting against slavery and never personally owned a slave to begin with).

I am not saying that discrimination never happened since the slave days. My father knows plenty about it being that he was a black man born in South Carolina in the late 50s. I'm just saying that your opinion that you are born guilty and owe something to another person because of the color of your skin is not a healthy way to go through life. When racists are being racist, then we address those particular people with debate, shunning, and (if they break a law during their racist actions) legal action. That doesn't mean we need to punish people that had nothing to do with it, such as the white farmers having their land taken from them because of the past. Assuming you own or plan to own a car, would you be okay if your car was taken from you without compensation for the purpose of giving a black person without a car a vehicle as reparations?

Also, I never defended the racists that are still alive, I said that the decedents of the racists shouldn't be getting punished for it by having their personal property taken from them without compensation. It's one thing to give people welfare (which isn't meant as reparations anyway, it's supposed to help people down on their luck regardless of race), it's another to take the personal property of someone's by force over what someone that shared their skin color did years or even over a century ago.

As for the immigrant children, while I don't agree with them being separated from their parents without due process, even if their parents crossed illegally instead of applying for asylum at a border crossing or embassy, there are plenty of people born and raised in the US that have their children taken away from them when they break the law. If anything, putting a child in the same holding facility as their parents may open that child up to being molested by other prisoners that slip by or overpower their parents and proceed to take advantage of the child if proper precautions are not taken. Molestation is already a huge risk immigrants take with their kids when they are on their way here from Central and South America.

Maybe the problem with my comparison between the white people of today paying for their ancestors' crimes and the immigrant children being punished for their parents' crimes wasn't that it was a false equivalence. Maybe the problem is you are against immigration enforcement altogether and as a result don't feel like people entering the country illegally did anything wrong in the first place. No, I'm not saying that entering the country illegally and doing the things slave owners did to their slaves (beatings, rape, etc.) are the same, before you accuse me of making that comparison.

Against have their children taken away from them when they break the law

Loading Video...

Under Trump's zero tolerance, not every family gets separated, it depends on their circumstances.

CNN host put her head down in shame with border agent facts. Leftist are basing their arguments from leftist fake news

Significant number of white Americans are Germans/Norwegians/Swedish are not involve with Spanish(Central/South America, west North America), French (middle/north east North America), Portuguese (east South America), British (east North America) and Russian (north-west North America) colonial American continent adventure.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56  Edited By LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180232 Posts

@ronvalencia: Separating even one family is wrong. Stop being an apologist for an embarrassment of a president.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#57 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 3576 Posts

@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

hahahaha says you avoiding every vaild argumentive statement, i made. have fun playing victim your whole life. plus why would a poc burn a cross?

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@ad1x2 said:
@theone86 said:

Maybe white people should have thought about that back when it was time for them to pay for their crimes and they were making every excuse in the book not to. And if giving up white privilege is a punishment, then you seriously need to reconsider your definition of punishment. If there really were a just punishment handed out to whites based on the unanswered crimes of their ancestors we'd be talking no less than white genocide. Nobody's asking for that, though. All people are asking for is fair treatment of minorities, acknowledgement of the ways in which they still struggle under a system that disenfranchises them, and a comparatively minuscule amount of social spending meant to correct social imbalances. Just the forty acres and a mule promise would amount to 6.4 trillion dollars, experts estimate that the total amount of stolen black labor would amount to between 25 and 60 trillion dollars. Yet people are screaming their heads off over welfare programs, which come in at a little over half a trillion, and benefit white as well minority citizens? You are more than getting off lucky by paying so little to make up for the years of enslavement, discrimination, and abuse. And like I keep saying, the effects of discrimination don't end when the discrimination does (and it doesn't always end when it's outlawed, either).

So, in short, your question is a false equivalence (more fallacies from a conservative, surprise!) In one case you have a group of people acting out of pure malice and punishing children in a bone-headed attempt to deter immigration, and in the other case you have people trying to acknowledge the ongoing discrimination and effects of past discrimination that have never been properly addressed. Like I said, if white people in decades past would have grown some goddamned balls and owned up to their mistakes we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Your argument is a form of white supremacy. First you defend the people who victimized other people while they're alive, and then you make the case that those who are around after their dead can't be held responsible for their crimes. How convenient, then, that absolutely no one is left to be held accountable for those crimes by that logic. It's almost as if you don't anyone held responsible for racism at all.

I'll tell you what, I'll PM you my real name and phone number, and you can start sending me a percentage of your paycheck every pay period through Zelle if it resolves some of the guilt you have from what your ancestors did to mine. I've been looking at some luxury cars I wanted to upgrade to, and I'm sure that it will help when I'm trying to secure financing. Oh, wait, you probably would rather find a black guy that hates you and would take everything you got as a down payment for his 40 acres and a mule to give it to than to give it to me since I refuse to hold against you things that happened over a century ago to satisfy what appears to be an overwhelming amount of white guilt you are suffering.

Back to our conversation, you never owned a slave and I was never a slave. I'm going to presume that you never called a black person the N-word, and the last time a white person called me the N-word was a few months ago when my ex-wife's (she was Filipino) white boyfriend got an attitude when I texted her and gave her a friendly reminder of some of the stipulations of our divorce decree she wasn't following. You didn't do anything wrong, so you need to stop beating yourself up for the wrong things your great, great, great, great grandfather may have did (for all you know, he may have been part of the Union Army fighting against slavery and never personally owned a slave to begin with).

I am not saying that discrimination never happened since the slave days. My father knows plenty about it being that he was a black man born in South Carolina in the late 50s. I'm just saying that your opinion that you are born guilty and owe something to another person because of the color of your skin is not a healthy way to go through life. When racists are being racist, then we address those particular people with debate, shunning, and (if they break a law during their racist actions) legal action. That doesn't mean we need to punish people that had nothing to do with it, such as the white farmers having their land taken from them because of the past. Assuming you own or plan to own a car, would you be okay if your car was taken from you without compensation for the purpose of giving a black person without a car a vehicle as reparations?

Also, I never defended the racists that are still alive, I said that the decedents of the racists shouldn't be getting punished for it by having their personal property taken from them without compensation. It's one thing to give people welfare (which isn't meant as reparations anyway, it's supposed to help people down on their luck regardless of race), it's another to take the personal property of someone's by force over what someone that shared their skin color did years or even over a century ago.

As for the immigrant children, while I don't agree with them being separated from their parents without due process, even if their parents crossed illegally instead of applying for asylum at a border crossing or embassy, there are plenty of people born and raised in the US that have their children taken away from them when they break the law. If anything, putting a child in the same holding facility as their parents may open that child up to being molested by other prisoners that slip by or overpower their parents and proceed to take advantage of the child if proper precautions are not taken. Molestation is already a huge risk immigrants take with their kids when they are on their way here from Central and South America.

Maybe the problem with my comparison between the white people of today paying for their ancestors' crimes and the immigrant children being punished for their parents' crimes wasn't that it was a false equivalence. Maybe the problem is you are against immigration enforcement altogether and as a result don't feel like people entering the country illegally did anything wrong in the first place. No, I'm not saying that entering the country illegally and doing the things slave owners did to their slaves (beatings, rape, etc.) are the same, before you accuse me of making that comparison.

Oh, so one minute you argue that no black person needs anything from white people, and the next minute you want money from me? And not even money to say, go to school or help with the groceries, but you want to buy a luxury car no less? How hypocritical. You go around acting like any black person who acknowledges discrimination or is suffering financially because of the chronic racial imbalances is just looking for a handout, but as soon as we start talking about repatriations for slavery your mind goes straight to buying a new luxury car.

The problem is that all white people benefit from it. Those white farmers wouldn't have their land in the first place if not for it being forcibly taken from African farmers by their ancestors. Their land is a gateway to social advancement in South Africa, which is largely closed off to the black South African population. My dad got a union job through his dad (pretty sure there weren't too many black union members when he was there) and my mom got a college degree because her dad bought a house in a good neighborhood with his GI bill money (couldn't have done that if he were black, thanks to redlining). I get to go to college because I'm white, if I were born black at the same time to parents who had been in similar circumstances to mine I would not have been able to go to school. I see black people every single day who work every bit as hard as I do and don't get the same opportunities because they were born into worse circumstances. They lived in worse neighborhoods, went to worse schools, had less than me. I don't think for a second that I deserve to be where I am and they deserve to be where they are. It's just the hand each of us were dealt, and we're playing it as best we can.

That's what you don't get, I don't feel guilty at all. This isn't about guilt, it's about acknowledging that there's something wrong with our society. When black people dominate the prison population, dominate low-income areas of major cities, dominate poor schools, something is wrong. When wealthy crowds and social circles are still overwhelmingly white something is wrong. I believe in a healthy society, and a healthy society needs everyone to believe that they can make it, that they can be just as successful as anyone else. When there are real racial barriers to that, society cannot be truly healthy. If confiscating all my money and property would achieve that I would gladly do it, if it means the black people I see every day working their asses off just to scrape by could have a bit of economic security I would do it. That's the problem, though, is that white supremacy keeps everyone down. It keeps the hardworking black people I know down, it keeps the hardworking white people I know down, it keeps me down. White supremacy isn't meant to benefit all white people equally. It benefits those at the top the most, those like me in the middle in small ways like being able to get an education, and people at the bottom the least with wages of whiteness. What's funny is that those at the bottom are the ones most determined to keep their share.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@theone86: I am white, where is my free stuff?

Avatar image for jakeviir
JakeVIIR

18

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#60 JakeVIIR
Member since 2018 • 18 Posts

Reverse racism is racism. I'm Asian and when I was in my teens, others around my age and even younger would just blurt out racist crap to me. "Choong ching choong ching chi chi chahh" "Look at that Chinese boy!" "China boy china boy china boy!!!" "Ching ching ching ching ching ching" "Look at his chinky eyes!" "Don't even have eyelids!"

I'm Filipino by the way. And guess what...? They were all BLACK, a few were Hispanics. We must absolutely call out racism regardless who is it coming from.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ee322a396e26
deactivated-5ee322a396e26

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5ee322a396e26
Member since 2005 • 2510 Posts

@theone86: you think white people owe you something? That sounds like entitlement.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#62 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts

@theone86: in other words, kill all white farmers and create large amounts a famine in South Africa like Zimbabwe? So progressive!

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#63 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@FireEmblem_Man said:

@theone86: in other words, kill all white farmers and create large amounts a famine in South Africa like Zimbabwe? So progressive!

That's not what I said. And like I keep saying, this is something that could have been avoided by making South African society inclusive in the first place and making an honest attempt at equality after apartheid. They didn't do that, they doubled down on exclusion and discrimination. If they couldn't find a way to put society right when they were in power that's their own problem.

@iwilson1296 said:

@theone86: you think white people owe you something? That sounds like entitlement.

I'm white, and I never said anyone owed me anything.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#64 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts
@iwilson1296 said:

@theone86: you think white people owe you something? That sounds like entitlement.

that is what I told the bank when they wanted my payment, they just said 'actually some people really are entitled..now pay up!'

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts
@theone86 said:

Oh, so one minute you argue that no black person needs anything from white people, and the next minute you want money from me? And not even money to say, go to school or help with the groceries, but you want to buy a luxury car no less? How hypocritical. You go around acting like any black person who acknowledges discrimination or is suffering financially because of the chronic racial imbalances is just looking for a handout, but as soon as we start talking about repatriations for slavery your mind goes straight to buying a new luxury car.

You missed the point of the beginning of my post, I was being sarcastic in regards to you sending me your money. I neither want it nor would I accept it if you tried to give it to me unless we were performing a mutual financial transaction with each other. I've already owned two luxury cars that my hard work paid for, not someone else's hard work given to me in a handout.

All I'm saying is that you may want to chill with that mentality you have. You can say all day that you don't feel guilty, but while I don't see anything wrong with occasional donations, if you're talking about giving up the majority of your hard-earned belongings for the purpose of lifting up someone that may have grown up less fortunate than you because of the color of their skin, then you're sure not acting like someone that doesn't feel guilty.

While some black people behind bars may be free men if they had better lawyers or more sympathetic juries, there are plenty of others that are there because they screwed up. A good example is one of my cousins that was locked up for beating his girlfriend, white privilege didn't make him hit her.

There is room for improvement in our country so that we don't have as many poor people, and while I have absolutely no regrets serving in the military, money provided by Uncle Sam didn't have to be my primary option to get college money without taking student loans. That doesn't mean people that are black are doomed to poverty and/or confinement if they aren't good enough to get a $153 million Lakers contract, or are fortunate enough to go from Harvard, to a state senator, to the highest office in the land.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ee322a396e26
deactivated-5ee322a396e26

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 deactivated-5ee322a396e26
Member since 2005 • 2510 Posts

@theone86: ok , do you think white people owe black people something?

Avatar image for deactivated-5ee322a396e26
deactivated-5ee322a396e26

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-5ee322a396e26
Member since 2005 • 2510 Posts

@tryit: which bank do you go to?

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Dude, don't stoop to posting far left garbage. You might as well have posted info wars, in terms of the level of bias. Shame.

I actually clicked it, and they have MTV News video embedded in the article, LOL!

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#70 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 3576 Posts
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Dude, don't stoop to posting far left garbage. You might as well have posted info wars, in terms of the level of bias. Shame.

I actually clicked it, and they have MTV News video embedded in the article, LOL!

Yeah @theone86 isn't very good at sourcing information nor coming up with any rebuttals. He's a SWJ they known for cherry picking and using terrible sources

Avatar image for jackamomo
Jackamomo

2157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#71  Edited By Jackamomo
Member since 2017 • 2157 Posts

It's the act if using racism as a defensive tool when no racism existed in the first place to gain the upper hand in an otherwise even fight.

That is, to accuse an innocent and non-racist person of racism against the accuser in order to illigitimise the accused arguing position.

If they are suggesting racism can only be against black people, that's it bit narrow minded.

Otherwise I thought maybe it was playing the race card.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#72 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts
@jackamomo said:

It's the act if using racism as a defensive tool when no racism existed in the first place to gain the upper hand in an otherwise even fight.

That is, to accuse an innocent and non-racist person of racism against the accuser in order to illigitimise the accused arguing position.

If they are suggesting racism can only be against black people, that's it bit narrow minded.

Otherwise I thought maybe it was playing the race card.

the ONLY way to take the higher ground is to ignore label flinging, dont pull out your Snowflake Card fit over it, and stick to the substance.

The reality is most people are racist and the dont know it, second off a belief system is not the problem, what people DO is. So focus on the is being DONE...not the useless labels people apply to it.

your chance to take the higher ground, just ignore the labels and stick to substance

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@ronvalencia: Separating even one family is wrong. Stop being an apologist for an embarrassment of a president.

Separating families are dependant on the situation e.g. parent having a past criminal record.

Loading Video...

For US citizens, parent with a criminal record gets separated from their children. Why the double the standard?

Without the wall, you're supporting enticement for Latino families to separate their children and sending them to the border without their parents.

Left's argument on separating families are weak when left supports the unborn babies killing.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#74  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

It's the idea that racism against a larger group is less important or less cruel and thus should not be called racism. I disagree with the term.

The lists of bad things that one people did to another people can only ever grow. How could it possibly shrink? I think that it's best to avoid creating more hate. Getting recognition of past wrongdoings is a powerful thing. It should be acknowledged, and we should learn to never do those things again. I hope we can all work on a better world. I think the more pressing matter is how we can make the world a more fair place to be born into today. Aren't we all born into this world without knowing what to do, hoping for health, safety and riches? We were all born innocent. That's something all people in this world have in common, so we should stand together in making a world that can provide health, safety and riches for humanity. No matter where you are on Earth.

And then we can tackle the problems that humanity runs into together.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

VOX's argument is not applicable for this generation. There's a large immigration surge after US civil war (ends 1865) and during German revolution 1848 and most of these "white" immigrants has very little to do with black slavery.

https://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2014/10/22/emigration-to-and-within-the-united-states-in-the-1800s/

US is effectively the new European Union with a single dominant language i.e. English (a mixing of Germanic, French and Latin languages).

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180232 Posts

@ronvalencia: Yeah that's BS. Not many families IF ANY are separated over misdemeanors.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts

Power + Privilege = Racism

Power + Privilege = White people

So when a minority is discriminative to a dominant group, it's called reverse racism. Why? Because the US is obsessed with race.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180232 Posts

@Gaming-Planet said:

Power + Privilege = Racism

Power + Privilege = White people

So when a minority is discriminative to a dominant group, it's called reverse racism. Why? Because the US is obsessed with race.

The US isn't the only country with racism. Also racism is a belief that not all races are equal. That is not an ideology of only the white race.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#79 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 3576 Posts

@LJS9502_basic: Drugs are misdemeanors but if you have them in your house herr, doc will remove your children

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180232 Posts

@npiet1 said:

@LJS9502_basic: Drugs are misdemeanors but if you have them in your house herr, doc will remove your children

That comes down to a dangerous environment. Being in the country illegally in no way is a dangerous environment and they first place children with family if possible FYI.

Avatar image for dreman999
dreman999

11514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 dreman999
Member since 2004 • 11514 Posts

@theone86: dude, do not lie to your self. Racism is racism no matter if you are the dominant race or not.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#82 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Dude, don't stoop to posting far left garbage. You might as well have posted info wars, in terms of the level of bias. Shame.

I actually clicked it, and they have MTV News video embedded in the article, LOL!

Okay, never taking your opinion seriously again.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83  Edited By SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Dude, don't stoop to posting far left garbage. You might as well have posted info wars, in terms of the level of bias. Shame.

I actually clicked it, and they have MTV News video embedded in the article, LOL!

Okay, never taking your opinion seriously again.

Considering what you list as sources, like vox or salon, I’m not phased by that. If it makes you feel good, I’m happy for you.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Dude, don't stoop to posting far left garbage. You might as well have posted info wars, in terms of the level of bias. Shame.

I actually clicked it, and they have MTV News video embedded in the article, LOL!

Okay, never taking your opinion seriously again.

Considering what you list as sources, like vox or salon, I’m not phased by that. If it makes you feel good, I’m happy for you.

He's quite nuts. I'm done conversing with that extremist.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#85 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Gaming-Planet said:

Power + Privilege = Racism

Power + Privilege = White people

So when a minority is discriminative to a dominant group, it's called reverse racism. Why? Because the US is obsessed with race.

The US isn't the only country with racism. Also racism is a belief that not all races are equal. That is not an ideology of only the white race.

The term comes from US history, that's why I bring it up.

I still believe racism is when someone discriminates someone based on their race and excludes them from equal opportunity. Reverse racism is just redundant.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#86 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@npiet1 said:

Blah, blah, blah, racist nonsense. Blah, blah, blah, strawman argument. Blah, blah, blah, statement that completely ignores my previous argument. Blah, blah, blah, if you put off paying for a crime long enough then nobody has to pay for it! Blah, blah, blah, racism doesn't exist anymore, despite myriad evidence proving that it does, because I say so! Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Done talking with you now. Go burn a cross or whatever you do in your free time.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/20/12556820/slavery-history-excuses

Dude, don't stoop to posting far left garbage. You might as well have posted info wars, in terms of the level of bias. Shame.

I actually clicked it, and they have MTV News video embedded in the article, LOL!

Okay, never taking your opinion seriously again.

Considering what you list as sources, like vox or salon, I’m not phased by that. If it makes you feel good, I’m happy for you.

Right back atcha. If you think that Vox is on the same level of ridiculousness as Breitbart then your worldview is severely twisted.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

@theone86: says the person posting vox and salon links, or defending antifa? K. We await BuzzFeed for next time.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@SOedipus said:

@theone86: says the person posting vox and salon links, or defending antifa? K. We await BuzzFeed for next time.

Says the person comparing a poorly-sourced, hate-driven troll factory to a well-sourced, well-respected, left leaning publication. Have you actually ever read Vox or are you just smearing it because you saw someone else do it on some alt-right cesspool of a forum somewhere?

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89  Edited By SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:

@theone86: says the person posting vox and salon links, or defending antifa? K. We await BuzzFeed for next time.

Says the person comparing a poorly-sourced, hate-driven troll factory to a well-sourced, well-respected, left leaning publication. Have you actually ever read Vox or are you just smearing it because you saw someone else do it on some alt-right cesspool of a forum somewhere?

I have read Vox’s shit, and I think it’s garbage. This is the only forum I freqent. So if this place is alt-right, then yes. You tell me.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:

@theone86: says the person posting vox and salon links, or defending antifa? K. We await BuzzFeed for next time.

Says the person comparing a poorly-sourced, hate-driven troll factory to a well-sourced, well-respected, left leaning publication. Have you actually ever read Vox or are you just smearing it because you saw someone else do it on some alt-right cesspool of a forum somewhere?

I have read Vox’s shit, and I think it’s garbage. This is the only forum I freqent. So if this place is alt-right, then yes. You tell me.

Wow, what a well-formed, substantiated, logical, and cogent argument. The intellects of the writers at Vox must pale in comparison to yours!

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:

@theone86: says the person posting vox and salon links, or defending antifa? K. We await BuzzFeed for next time.

Says the person comparing a poorly-sourced, hate-driven troll factory to a well-sourced, well-respected, left leaning publication. Have you actually ever read Vox or are you just smearing it because you saw someone else do it on some alt-right cesspool of a forum somewhere?

I have read Vox’s shit, and I think it’s garbage. This is the only forum I freqent. So if this place is alt-right, then yes. You tell me.

Wow, what a well-formed, substantiated, logical, and cogent argument. The intellects of the writers at Vox must pale in comparison to yours!

Ok.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:
@theone86 said:
@SOedipus said:

@theone86: says the person posting vox and salon links, or defending antifa? K. We await BuzzFeed for next time.

Says the person comparing a poorly-sourced, hate-driven troll factory to a well-sourced, well-respected, left leaning publication. Have you actually ever read Vox or are you just smearing it because you saw someone else do it on some alt-right cesspool of a forum somewhere?

I have read Vox’s shit, and I think it’s garbage. This is the only forum I freqent. So if this place is alt-right, then yes. You tell me.

Wow, what a well-formed, substantiated, logical, and cogent argument. The intellects of the writers at Vox must pale in comparison to yours!

Ok.

Nice comeback.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

@theone86: thanks.