Maybe white people should have thought about that back when it was time for them to pay for their crimes and they were making every excuse in the book not to. And if giving up white privilege is a punishment, then you seriously need to reconsider your definition of punishment. If there really were a just punishment handed out to whites based on the unanswered crimes of their ancestors we'd be talking no less than white genocide. Nobody's asking for that, though. All people are asking for is fair treatment of minorities, acknowledgement of the ways in which they still struggle under a system that disenfranchises them, and a comparatively minuscule amount of social spending meant to correct social imbalances. Just the forty acres and a mule promise would amount to 6.4 trillion dollars, experts estimate that the total amount of stolen black labor would amount to between 25 and 60 trillion dollars. Yet people are screaming their heads off over welfare programs, which come in at a little over half a trillion, and benefit white as well minority citizens? You are more than getting off lucky by paying so little to make up for the years of enslavement, discrimination, and abuse. And like I keep saying, the effects of discrimination don't end when the discrimination does (and it doesn't always end when it's outlawed, either).
So, in short, your question is a false equivalence (more fallacies from a conservative, surprise!) In one case you have a group of people acting out of pure malice and punishing children in a bone-headed attempt to deter immigration, and in the other case you have people trying to acknowledge the ongoing discrimination and effects of past discrimination that have never been properly addressed. Like I said, if white people in decades past would have grown some goddamned balls and owned up to their mistakes we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Your argument is a form of white supremacy. First you defend the people who victimized other people while they're alive, and then you make the case that those who are around after their dead can't be held responsible for their crimes. How convenient, then, that absolutely no one is left to be held accountable for those crimes by that logic. It's almost as if you don't anyone held responsible for racism at all.
I'll tell you what, I'll PM you my real name and phone number, and you can start sending me a percentage of your paycheck every pay period through Zelle if it resolves some of the guilt you have from what your ancestors did to mine. I've been looking at some luxury cars I wanted to upgrade to, and I'm sure that it will help when I'm trying to secure financing. Oh, wait, you probably would rather find a black guy that hates you and would take everything you got as a down payment for his 40 acres and a mule to give it to than to give it to me since I refuse to hold against you things that happened over a century ago to satisfy what appears to be an overwhelming amount of white guilt you are suffering.
Back to our conversation, you never owned a slave and I was never a slave. I'm going to presume that you never called a black person the N-word, and the last time a white person called me the N-word was a few months ago when my ex-wife's (she was Filipino) white boyfriend got an attitude when I texted her and gave her a friendly reminder of some of the stipulations of our divorce decree she wasn't following. You didn't do anything wrong, so you need to stop beating yourself up for the wrong things your great, great, great, great grandfather may have did (for all you know, he may have been part of the Union Army fighting against slavery and never personally owned a slave to begin with).
I am not saying that discrimination never happened since the slave days. My father knows plenty about it being that he was a black man born in South Carolina in the late 50s. I'm just saying that your opinion that you are born guilty and owe something to another person because of the color of your skin is not a healthy way to go through life. When racists are being racist, then we address those particular people with debate, shunning, and (if they break a law during their racist actions) legal action. That doesn't mean we need to punish people that had nothing to do with it, such as the white farmers having their land taken from them because of the past. Assuming you own or plan to own a car, would you be okay if your car was taken from you without compensation for the purpose of giving a black person without a car a vehicle as reparations?
Also, I never defended the racists that are still alive, I said that the decedents of the racists shouldn't be getting punished for it by having their personal property taken from them without compensation. It's one thing to give people welfare (which isn't meant as reparations anyway, it's supposed to help people down on their luck regardless of race), it's another to take the personal property of someone's by force over what someone that shared their skin color did years or even over a century ago.
As for the immigrant children, while I don't agree with them being separated from their parents without due process, even if their parents crossed illegally instead of applying for asylum at a border crossing or embassy, there are plenty of people born and raised in the US that have their children taken away from them when they break the law. If anything, putting a child in the same holding facility as their parents may open that child up to being molested by other prisoners that slip by or overpower their parents and proceed to take advantage of the child if proper precautions are not taken. Molestation is already a huge risk immigrants take with their kids when they are on their way here from Central and South America.
Maybe the problem with my comparison between the white people of today paying for their ancestors' crimes and the immigrant children being punished for their parents' crimes wasn't that it was a false equivalence. Maybe the problem is you are against immigration enforcement altogether and as a result don't feel like people entering the country illegally did anything wrong in the first place. No, I'm not saying that entering the country illegally and doing the things slave owners did to their slaves (beatings, rape, etc.) are the same, before you accuse me of making that comparison.
Log in to comment