Fly Eagles fly. I'm going to say the Eagles finish 11-5 taking the NFCEast over the 9-7 Cowboys and 9-7 Giants.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i think the eagles are gonna finish the season going 2-2 winning the NFC EAST idkFly Eagles fly. I'm going to say the Eagles finish 11-5 taking the NFCEast over the 9-7 Cowboys and 9-7 Giants.
DA_B0MB
The Eagles are going good right now! Without Westbrook. So I hope they can let westbrook sit for a lil while longer and let him come back for the playoffs 100%. and let DeSean sit for as long as he needs to.
Eagles win the NFC east.
Packers make wild card.
Cowboys have a really hard schedule to end the season. Chargers, Saints, Redskins, Eagles. Idk how they will do and if they can beat the Giants out.
I really think the Boys will pull it out, although I think they have the look of a one and done. Philly will be a wildcard with the Packers.
Lmao. Don't get too ahead of yourself there. Dallas makes the playoffs if they win week 17, not sure who wins the division though... probably the Egals.I think Philly is the best team and BTW, it will be the 2009 N.F.C. East champion and 2010 Super Bowl winner FYI.
roulettethedog
I just hoping the Eagles, Cowboys and Giants all continue winning so the dream of the Packers not being in the playoffs can come true. I hate that team.MoonMarvelLmao. I just hope either the Giants, Egals, or Packers tanks the rest of the season. Why do you hate GB so much?
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]I just hoping the Eagles, Cowboys and Giants all continue winning so the dream of the Packers not being in the playoffs can come true. I hate that team.BobblesLmao. I just hope either the Giants, Egals, or Packers tanks the rest of the season. Why do you hate GB so much?
Bitter Bears fan? Prob a Vikes fan who doesn't want to see them a third time, because statistically, if you beat a team 2 times in the regular season and also see them in the play offs, you will lose the 3rd rematch. Only the Steelers were able to beat the Ravens 3 times, last year.
Lmao. I just hope either the Giants, Egals, or Packers tanks the rest of the season. Why do you hate GB so much?[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]I just hoping the Eagles, Cowboys and Giants all continue winning so the dream of the Packers not being in the playoffs can come true. I hate that team.heysharpshooter
Bitter Bears fan? Prob a Vikes fan who doesn't want to see them a third time, because statistically, if you beat a team 2 times in the regular season and also see them in the play offs, you will lose the 3rd rematch. Only the Steelers were able to beat the Ravens 3 times, last year.
Titans beat the Jags 3 times the year they went to the SB.[QUOTE="heysharpshooter"][QUOTE="Bobbles"] Lmao. I just hope either the Giants, Egals, or Packers tanks the rest of the season. Why do you hate GB so much?Bobbles
Bitter Bears fan? Prob a Vikes fan who doesn't want to see them a third time, because statistically, if you beat a team 2 times in the regular season and also see them in the play offs, you will lose the 3rd rematch. Only the Steelers were able to beat the Ravens 3 times, last year.
Titans beat the Jags 3 times the year they went to the SB.Well thats the only example I could find, PIT and BAL. I didn't see the Titans thing. Maybe I missed it...
Still, statistically, it almost never happens.
I don't take the Cowboys or the Giants seriously at this point as far the te NFC East is concerned. The Giants have been average at best since losing Plaxico and the Cowboys will need a ton of good bounces just to finish the season at 10-6. I wouldn't count on that from Dallas though. Romo breaks down when needed most. With a playoff berth on the line last year he was a major reason the Cowboys lost the game 44-6 lol. DA_B0MBHow about the game before that, which would have locked up a playoff spot? The defense let the team down by giving up back-to-back 70+ yard TD runs. Romo brought them back in that game, but the defense gave it up. The Egals game wasn't entirely his fault either, sure he sucked, but no one on that team even looked remotely motivated to beat them.
Titans beat the Jags 3 times the year they went to the SB.[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]
Bitter Bears fan? Prob a Vikes fan who doesn't want to see them a third time, because statistically, if you beat a team 2 times in the regular season and also see them in the play offs, you will lose the 3rd rematch. Only the Steelers were able to beat the Ravens 3 times, last year.
heysharpshooter
Well thats the only example I could find, PIT and BAL. I didn't see the Titans thing. Maybe I missed it...
Still, statistically, it almost never happens.
Statistically it almost never happens? Do you even know what you're talking about or do you just watch ESPN all day and believe what you hear? Statistically it happens more than it doesn't. There has been the oppurtunity for a team to complete a 3-0 sweep 18 times, and the team completed the 3-0 sweep 11 times of those 18. Yeah...that's almost never :roll:[QUOTE="DA_B0MB"]I don't take the Cowboys or the Giants seriously at this point as far the te NFC East is concerned. The Giants have been average at best since losing Plaxico and the Cowboys will need a ton of good bounces just to finish the season at 10-6. I wouldn't count on that from Dallas though. Romo breaks down when needed most. With a playoff berth on the line last year he was a major reason the Cowboys lost the game 44-6 lol. BobblesHow about the game before that, which would have locked up a playoff spot? The defense let the team down by giving up back-to-back 70+ yard TD runs. Romo brought them back in that game, but the defense gave it up. The Egals game wasn't entirely his fault either, sure he sucked, but no one on that team even looked remotely motivated to beat them. Yeah but who remembers that game? In the end it came down to the final game of the regular season and the Cowboys got stomped with Romo at the helm. End of story.
[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="DA_B0MB"]I don't take the Cowboys or the Giants seriously at this point as far the te NFC East is concerned. The Giants have been average at best since losing Plaxico and the Cowboys will need a ton of good bounces just to finish the season at 10-6. I wouldn't count on that from Dallas though. Romo breaks down when needed most. With a playoff berth on the line last year he was a major reason the Cowboys lost the game 44-6 lol. DA_B0MBHow about the game before that, which would have locked up a playoff spot? The defense let the team down by giving up back-to-back 70+ yard TD runs. Romo brought them back in that game, but the defense gave it up. The Egals game wasn't entirely his fault either, sure he sucked, but no one on that team even looked remotely motivated to beat them. Yeah but who remembers that game? In the end it came down to the final game of the regular season and the Cowboys got stomped with Romo at the helm. End of story. If you want to put it that way, I can say the same about McNabb. He chokes in the playoffs when his team needs him most. They're one in the same.
[QUOTE="DA_B0MB"][QUOTE="Bobbles"] How about the game before that, which would have locked up a playoff spot? The defense let the team down by giving up back-to-back 70+ yard TD runs. Romo brought them back in that game, but the defense gave it up. The Egals game wasn't entirely his fault either, sure he sucked, but no one on that team even looked remotely motivated to beat them. BobblesYeah but who remembers that game? In the end it came down to the final game of the regular season and the Cowboys got stomped with Romo at the helm. End of story. If you want to put it that way, I can say the same about McNabb. He chokes in the playoffs when his team needs him most. They're one in the same.
Except the Eagles under McNabb have won a playoff game and gone to a Superbowl.
If you want to put it that way, I can say the same about McNabb. He chokes in the playoffs when his team needs him most. They're one in the same.[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="DA_B0MB"] Yeah but who remembers that game? In the end it came down to the final game of the regular season and the Cowboys got stomped with Romo at the helm. End of story. Seabas989
Except the Eagles under McNabb have won a playoff game and gone to a Superbowl.
Oh you mean when he puked on the biggest stage? Yeah, he was ready... What has McNabb won what exactly? Oh yeah....nothing. Romo=no rings, McNabb=no rings. Romo's played in a total of 2 playoff games. Peyton Manning took awhile to win his first playoff game, no one cared. After that it was, he can't win the whole thing, then he did. I hardly ever see McNabb getting this treatment from the media, just regular fans.[QUOTE="Seabas989"][QUOTE="Bobbles"] If you want to put it that way, I can say the same about McNabb. He chokes in the playoffs when his team needs him most. They're one in the same.Bobbles
Except the Eagles under McNabb have won a playoff game and gone to a Superbowl.
Oh you mean when he puked on the biggest stage? Yeah, he was ready... What has McNabb won what exactly? Oh yeah....nothing. Romo=no rings, McNabb=no rings. Romo's played in a total of 2 playoff games. Peyton Manning took awhile to win his first playoff game, no one cared. After that it was, he can't win the whole thing, then he did. I hardly ever see McNabb getting this treatment from the media, just regular fans.I'll be blunt.
Why is it that whenever Cowboy's fans defend Romo, they instantly compare him to McNabb when McNabb has won playoff games?
Afterall, he was the starter last season when they beat the Cowboys at home 44-6.
Same with Peyton Manning. Manning started off with a Colts team that was terrible. When Romo was the Qb for the Cowboys, they were in the playoffs but lost to Carolina. There record the season before wasn't terrible. I would caompare Manning to Elway and not Romo.
[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="Seabas989"]
Except the Eagles under McNabb have won a playoff game and gone to a Superbowl.
Oh you mean when he puked on the biggest stage? Yeah, he was ready... What has McNabb won what exactly? Oh yeah....nothing. Romo=no rings, McNabb=no rings. Romo's played in a total of 2 playoff games. Peyton Manning took awhile to win his first playoff game, no one cared. After that it was, he can't win the whole thing, then he did. I hardly ever see McNabb getting this treatment from the media, just regular fans.I'll be blunt.
Why is it that whenever Cowboy's fans defend Romo, they instantly compare him to McNabb when McNabb has won playoff games?
Afterall, he was the starter last season when they beat the Cowboys at home 44-6.
Same with Peyton Manning. Manning started off with a Colts team that was terrible. When Romo was the Qb for the Cowboys, they were in the playoffs but lost to Carolina. There record the season before wasn't terrible. I would caompare Manning to Elway and not Romo.
Romo never played against Carolina in the playoffs, so get your facts straight. Romo has played in two playoff games dude, it's not enough for me to say "He can't win in the playoffs". Romo has also never had quite the defensive support that McNabb has had in his career(the real reason the Egals were/are a contender). He's been a starter for about 3 years now and you people act like this will define his career when it's just started. Oh and the reason I brought up McNabb is because the NY/Philly fan(makes no sense) decided to put sole blame of the loss on Romo's shoulders and said he breaks down when they need him most. So, I put sole blame on McNabb when the Egals need him most in the playoffs during NFC championship games. Manning was criticized even when his team was great around him. Not saying Romo=Manning, I'm saying they way he is treated is how Manning was treated before he won a championship. When Romo wins a playoff game, yes when not if, I'm willing to bet he'll still be taking heat for not being able to win a SB.[QUOTE="Seabas989"][QUOTE="Bobbles"] Oh you mean when he puked on the biggest stage? Yeah, he was ready... What has McNabb won what exactly? Oh yeah....nothing. Romo=no rings, McNabb=no rings. Romo's played in a total of 2 playoff games. Peyton Manning took awhile to win his first playoff game, no one cared. After that it was, he can't win the whole thing, then he did. I hardly ever see McNabb getting this treatment from the media, just regular fans. Bobbles
I'll be blunt.
Why is it that whenever Cowboy's fans defend Romo, they instantly compare him to McNabb when McNabb has won playoff games?
Afterall, he was the starter last season when they beat the Cowboys at home 44-6.
Same with Peyton Manning. Manning started off with a Colts team that was terrible. When Romo was the Qb for the Cowboys, they were already, in the past, in the playoffs but lost to Carolina. There record the season before wasn't terrible. I would caompare Manning to Elway and not Romo.
Romo never played against Carolina in the playoffs, so get your facts straight. Romo has played in two playoff games dude, it's not enough for me to say "He can't win in the playoffs". Romo has also never had quite the defensive support that McNabb has had in his career(the real reason the Egals were/are a contender). He's been a starter for about 3 years now and you people act like this will define his career when it's just started. Oh and the reason I brought up McNabb is because the NY/Philly fan(makes no sense) decided to put sole blame of the loss on Romo's shoulders and said he breaks down when they need him most. So, I put sole blame on McNabb when the Egals need him most in the playoffs during NFC championship games. Manning was criticized even when his team was great around him. Not saying Romo=Manning, I'm saying they way he is treated is how Manning was treated before he won a championship. When Romo wins a playoff game, yes when not if, I'm willing to bet he'll still be taking heat for not being able to win a SB.I know he didn't play against Carolina. I forgot to put the past in meaning they did have playoff caliber teams before Romo started.
I hate the Eagles and Cowboys yet right now I'd rather have Mcnabb then Romo when the game counts. Romo also had talent on both sides of the ball (T.O., 13-3 recored in 07 with a lot of pro bowlers that year) so I don't know what you are talking about.
I know Romo isn't a bad/terrible Qb and he is a lot better then Campbell but you bringing up other great Qb's that choke doesn't really help your arguement, especially since the ones you mentioned have won playoff games.
The schedule that the Cowboys have ain't easy. Can Romo pass that above average Qb play?
Never said he didn't have playmakers on offense. I said he's never had a defense the caliber of Philly's. That 13-3 season, the defense was giving up 20+ points a game, nothing spectacular. In fact, the Egals had a better defense that year than Dallas but only managed an 8-8 record. What does having a lot of pro bowlers prove? Mostly popularity only, because they had plenty more pro bowls on defense than the Giants did that year, but who had the better defense? I'm also not sayin Romo>McNabb, just playing the blame game like the Egals fan did.Bobbles
I'm not one to discredit teams that won 12 plus games but the reality is that Romo does have talent around him. This is a league about Qb's. Is it Campbell's fault that the Redskins lose these close games, sometimes no but he'll get blamed for them almog with the coach regardless of the circumstances.
Also, while McNabb does choke in some games, he has at least gone to a SB and 5 NFC Championships so he will always be ahead of Romo if the Cowboys can't winn in December/January. That is something Philly fans can say to Cowboys fans the same way that Cowboys have SB rings while the Eagles have none.
Did you not read the first or last sentence? "I'm not saying Romo is better than McNabb". "Never said Romo doesn't have offensive playmakers around him". Thanks for reading. Egals Defense>>Dallas Defense almost every year over the past decade. McNabb's had a top 10 defense every year he's started except for twice and one of those years was when Jeff Garcia took over. You can get away with having a decent defense and a great offense in this league, this is what Dallas did two years ago. Last year, their offense was good, not great and their defense was meh for most of the year( they played great for a string of games before imploding). They missed the playoffs. Now, like I've said recently if the Dallas defense plays like it has for most of the year, obviously this didn't happen last Sunday, then they will make the playoffs. If not, they're cooked. Bobbles
Of course I read what you wrote. Afterall I am debating with you. Was it not you who compared Romo to McNabb seeing as how I don't read your posts saying they are "one in the same" to "McNabb>Romo"?
On a more serious note, yet their defense has been inconsistent but who bobbled the snap and threw an interception at the endzone against the Giants, Romo. As I stated before, I agree with you that Romo should not get all the blame but until he wins in December and January, he will never be one in the same with McNabb. However, it's also not impossible.
Either way we shall see once they play against the Chargers, Saints, Redskins and Eagles.
Since you guys have gotten on the Romo train. I'll put it like this, besides the Eagles game last year where in my opinion no one and I mean no one showed up for that game. Romo consistently always has his team in position to win the game. Now whether he contributes tothem losing or not is up for debate. Last year when you think about what happened to them, it was all about their defense regardless of how bad Romo did down the stretch. Even in the bad games he had when it came down to winning the game he made plays for them and scored when they needed to. In my opinion the D choked last year not Romo.
[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Did you not read the first or last sentence? "I'm not saying Romo is better than McNabb". "Never said Romo doesn't have offensive playmakers around him". Thanks for reading. Egals Defense>>Dallas Defense almost every year over the past decade. McNabb's had a top 10 defense every year he's started except for twice and one of those years was when Jeff Garcia took over. You can get away with having a decent defense and a great offense in this league, this is what Dallas did two years ago. Last year, their offense was good, not great and their defense was meh for most of the year( they played great for a string of games before imploding). They missed the playoffs. Now, like I've said recently if the Dallas defense plays like it has for most of the year, obviously this didn't happen last Sunday, then they will make the playoffs. If not, they're cooked. Seabas989
Of course I read what you wrote. Afterall I am debating with you. Was it not you who compared Romo to McNabb seeing as how I don't read your posts saying they are "one in the same" to "McNabb>Romo"?
On a more serious note, yet their defense has been inconsistent but who bobbled the snap and threw an interception at the endzone against the Giants, Romo. As I stated before, I agree with you that Romo should not get all the blame but until he wins in December and January, he will never be one in the same with McNabb. However, it's also not impossible.
Either way we shall see once they play against the Chargers, Saints, Redskins and Eagles.
He bobbled the snap yes, I'll put that one on him. The INT against the Giants, really dude? It was the last play of the game and a desperation throw. Let's just forget about the play before where Patrick Crayton stopped running his route to the corner of the endzone and had he kept on his route, he has a good shot at catching a game winning TD. McNabb's been in the league for 10+ years so I'd hope he has playoff wins if he's worth anything. Romo's been a starter for three years... dang, he's such a damn joke for not having a playoff win yet. Rex Grossman has a couple playoff wins too, I guess that automatically means Rex>Romo. Send a letter to Dan Snyder to overpay for Rex Grossman, I'll keep Romo.[QUOTE="Seabas989"]
[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Did you not read the first or last sentence? "I'm not saying Romo is better than McNabb". "Never said Romo doesn't have offensive playmakers around him". Thanks for reading. Egals Defense>>Dallas Defense almost every year over the past decade. McNabb's had a top 10 defense every year he's started except for twice and one of those years was when Jeff Garcia took over. You can get away with having a decent defense and a great offense in this league, this is what Dallas did two years ago. Last year, their offense was good, not great and their defense was meh for most of the year( they played great for a string of games before imploding). They missed the playoffs. Now, like I've said recently if the Dallas defense plays like it has for most of the year, obviously this didn't happen last Sunday, then they will make the playoffs. If not, they're cooked. Bobbles
Of course I read what you wrote. Afterall I am debating with you. Was it not you who compared Romo to McNabb seeing as how I don't read your posts saying they are "one in the same" to "McNabb>Romo"?
On a more serious note, yet their defense has been inconsistent but who bobbled the snap and threw an interception at the endzone against the Giants, Romo. As I stated before, I agree with you that Romo should not get all the blame but until he wins in December and January, he will never be one in the same with McNabb. However, it's also not impossible.
Either way we shall see once they play against the Chargers, Saints, Redskins and Eagles.
He bobbled the snap yes, I'll put that one on him. The INT against the Giants, really dude? It was the last play of the game and a desperation throw. Let's just forget about the play before where Patrick Crayton stopped running his route to the corner of the endzone and had he kept on his route, he has a good shot at catching a game winning TD. McNabb's been in the league for 10+ years so I'd hope he has playoff wins if he's worth anything. Romo's been a starter for three years... dang, he's such a damn joke for not having a playoff win yet. Rex Grossman has a couple playoff wins too, I guess that automatically means Rex>Romo. Send a letter to Dan Snyder to overpay for Rex Grossman, I'll keep Romo.Thanks but no thanks to that "comment" since I would rather have Campbell over Grossman anyday.
As I stated before, we shall see once they play against the Chargers, Saints, Redskins and Eagles.
Hey maybe if you have the 2000 Ravens, 2002 Bucs or the 2006 Bears, the Cowboys could go to the Superbowl. :P
Pffft no way, at least the Eagles don't have Wade Phillips or Romeo :lol: I don't know what Egals fans are crying about, they will probably make it to another NFC Championship game. X360PS3AMD05And lose like they did in 4 of the other 5 they were in. McNabb always chokes.
Pffft no way, at least the Eagles don't have Wade Phillips or Romeo :lol: I don't know what Egals fans are crying about, they will probably make it to another NFC Championship game. X360PS3AMD05what eagle fan in here is "crying" all i see is a cowgirls argument going on
[QUOTE="Seabas989"]
[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Did you not read the first or last sentence? "I'm not saying Romo is better than McNabb". "Never said Romo doesn't have offensive playmakers around him". Thanks for reading. Egals Defense>>Dallas Defense almost every year over the past decade. McNabb's had a top 10 defense every year he's started except for twice and one of those years was when Jeff Garcia took over. You can get away with having a decent defense and a great offense in this league, this is what Dallas did two years ago. Last year, their offense was good, not great and their defense was meh for most of the year( they played great for a string of games before imploding). They missed the playoffs. Now, like I've said recently if the Dallas defense plays like it has for most of the year, obviously this didn't happen last Sunday, then they will make the playoffs. If not, they're cooked. Bobbles
Of course I read what you wrote. Afterall I am debating with you. Was it not you who compared Romo to McNabb seeing as how I don't read your posts saying they are "one in the same" to "McNabb>Romo"?
On a more serious note, yet their defense has been inconsistent but who bobbled the snap and threw an interception at the endzone against the Giants, Romo. As I stated before, I agree with you that Romo should not get all the blame but until he wins in December and January, he will never be one in the same with McNabb. However, it's also not impossible.
Either way we shall see once they play against the Chargers, Saints, Redskins and Eagles.
He bobbled the snap yes, I'll put that one on him. The INT against the Giants, really dude? It was the last play of the game and a desperation throw. Let's just forget about the play before where Patrick Crayton stopped running his route to the corner of the endzone and had he kept on his route, he has a good shot at catching a game winning TD. McNabb's been in the league for 10+ years so I'd hope he has playoff wins if he's worth anything. Romo's been a starter for three years... dang, he's such a damn joke for not having a playoff win yet. Rex Grossman has a couple playoff wins too, I guess that automatically means Rex>Romo. Send a letter to Dan Snyder to overpay for Rex Grossman, I'll keep Romo. I seriously thought I was the only one who saw thatLol this thread is so bitter. The NFC East has the best fans.DA_B0MBI hate em. I'm part of the group but why do the Giants/Eagles/Skins fans only hate the Cowboys. I thought atleast the Skins fans were supposed to hate the Cowboys the most but it really seems like the Eagles fans do.
[QUOTE="DA_B0MB"]Lol this thread is so bitter. The NFC East has the best fans.waynehead895I hate em. I'm part of the group but why do the Giants/Eagles/Skins fans only hate the Cowboys. I thought atleast the Skins fans were supposed to hate the Cowboys the most but it really seems like the Eagles fans do.
Because there is a ton of Cowboys fans all over the Northeast/East coast in which some of them have never been to Dallas. They are annoying with the only other fanbases I can think of that are almost as bad in D.C. are Steelers fans and Patriots fans.
I can't speak much for Eagles fans but I have a friend who is an Eagles fan and he despises the Cowboys mainly because of T.O. back when he played at Dallas.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment