Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon have agreed to terms with the Pistons

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts

Ben Gordon will receive a five-year, $55 million deal
Charlie Villanueva gets a five-year deal for $35 million

what a way to start the nba free agency

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

just saw this on ESPN, and wow.......seriously?.......really??????? Joey D better have something better for Detroit cause those players dont seem worth the money. Certainly not a championship contending team.

Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanueva
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts
Waaay too much money for Gordon. It would've been nice to see the Bulls keep him, but $55 mil for an undersized SG who plays no defense and can disappear for entire games at a time? No thanks.
Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts
[QUOTE="chAzN93"]ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanueva

good pickup? where is he gonna play? Stuckey is their 1 and RIP is their 2. If they wanna play him in the backcourt w/ stuckey that means you'll have RIP at the 3 and Prince at the 4. That aint gonna work. There is NO WAY Rip can guard a SF. Can't happen. Maybe they are gonna trade Rip or Prince, cause right now, as assembled, that roster will not work
Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#6 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts
I won't lie both are good pickups. Gordon averaged 20 points, but for 11 mil a year? I doubt he'll live up to that. Detriot is still behind Celtics, Magic, and Cavs.
Avatar image for im_mr_brown
im_mr_brown

2970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 im_mr_brown
Member since 2006 • 2970 Posts
I'm saddened by this. Not to a division rival Ben... Geeze...
Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts
ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanuevachAzN93
Villanueva is a very skilled big man, it's like people don't even know who he is :? when he was getting more minutes from the bucks he was averaging some really nice numbers
Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#9 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanuevachAzN93
To the contrary, Villanueva is ok, but Gordon? Uhhh...
Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
[QUOTE="sixringz1"][QUOTE="chAzN93"]ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanueva

good pickup? where is he gonna play? Stuckey is their 1 and RIP is their 2. If they wanna play him in the backcourt w/ stuckey that means you'll have RIP at the 3 and Prince at the 4. That aint gonna work. There is NO WAY Rip can guard a SF. Can't happen. Maybe they are gonna trade Rip or Prince, cause right now, as assembled, that roster will not work

haha unless you think stuckey is a solid one ben gordon will obviously be their 1
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

[QUOTE="sixringz1"][QUOTE="chAzN93"]ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanueva chAzN93
good pickup? where is he gonna play? Stuckey is their 1 and RIP is their 2. If they wanna play him in the backcourt w/ stuckey that means you'll have RIP at the 3 and Prince at the 4. That aint gonna work. There is NO WAY Rip can guard a SF. Can't happen. Maybe they are gonna trade Rip or Prince, cause right now, as assembled, that roster will not work

haha unless you think stuckey is a solid one ben gordon will obviously be their 1

:lol: Ben Gordon will be their ONE? :lol: :lol: :lol: I guess the Pistons don't care about being good..

Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts
[QUOTE="sixringz1"][QUOTE="chAzN93"]ben gordon is a good pick up but i donno why they want vilanueva chAzN93
good pickup? where is he gonna play? Stuckey is their 1 and RIP is their 2. If they wanna play him in the backcourt w/ stuckey that means you'll have RIP at the 3 and Prince at the 4. That aint gonna work. There is NO WAY Rip can guard a SF. Can't happen. Maybe they are gonna trade Rip or Prince, cause right now, as assembled, that roster will not work

haha unless you think stuckey is a solid one ben gordon will obviously be their 1

U must not be familiar with ben gordon. He's NEVER PLAYED PG in his life. He's a 2. He was a 2 at UConn. He was a 2 in Chi with Heinrich and now Rose at the 1
Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
[QUOTE="chAzN93"][QUOTE="sixringz1"]good pickup? where is he gonna play? Stuckey is their 1 and RIP is their 2. If they wanna play him in the backcourt w/ stuckey that means you'll have RIP at the 3 and Prince at the 4. That aint gonna work. There is NO WAY Rip can guard a SF. Can't happen. Maybe they are gonna trade Rip or Prince, cause right now, as assembled, that roster will not worksixringz1
haha unless you think stuckey is a solid one ben gordon will obviously be their 1

U must not be familiar with ben gordon. He's NEVER PLAYED PG in his life. He's a 2. He was a 2 at UConn. He was a 2 in Chi with Heinrich and now Rose at the 1

he will obviously be their back up 2 but you know they will play him at 1 with rip at 2 alot
Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts
[QUOTE="sixringz1"][QUOTE="chAzN93"] haha unless you think stuckey is a solid one ben gordon will obviously be their 1 chAzN93
U must not be familiar with ben gordon. He's NEVER PLAYED PG in his life. He's a 2. He was a 2 at UConn. He was a 2 in Chi with Heinrich and now Rose at the 1

he will obviously be their back up 2 but you know they will play him at 1 with rip at 2 alot

back up 2? So you go out on the first day of free agency and give a guy 11 million a year for 5 years to be a BACKUP? That makes ZERO SENSE. Either they are going to trade Rip or they have a roster that doesn't fit, and will be taken advantage of night in night out on the Defensive end
Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#15 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
[QUOTE="chAzN93"][QUOTE="sixringz1"]U must not be familiar with ben gordon. He's NEVER PLAYED PG in his life. He's a 2. He was a 2 at UConn. He was a 2 in Chi with Heinrich and now Rose at the 1sixringz1
he will obviously be their back up 2 but you know they will play him at 1 with rip at 2 alot

back up 2? So you go out on the first day of free agency and give a guy 11 million a year for 5 years to be a BACKUP? That makes ZERO SENSE. Either they are going to trade Rip or they have a roster that doesn't fit, and will be taken advantage of night in night out on the Defensive end

Imagine if they do that Rondo deal that have been floating around the league.
Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts
[QUOTE="sixringz1"][QUOTE="chAzN93"] he will obviously be their back up 2 but you know they will play him at 1 with rip at 2 alot Master_Live
back up 2? So you go out on the first day of free agency and give a guy 11 million a year for 5 years to be a BACKUP? That makes ZERO SENSE. Either they are going to trade Rip or they have a roster that doesn't fit, and will be taken advantage of night in night out on the Defensive end

Imagine if they do that Rondo deal that have been floating around the league.

I don't know if that will work either cause Ray Allen was in that deal too. So once again you'd have 2 all star calibur 2 guards. That won't happen but something is going on here. There's no way anybody can tell me they're done dealing. Cause if they are, this lineup will get them killed. They will lose all their games 120-110. They'll have improved offense but ALWAYS be at a disadvantage on the defensive end
Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
[QUOTE="chAzN93"][QUOTE="sixringz1"]U must not be familiar with ben gordon. He's NEVER PLAYED PG in his life. He's a 2. He was a 2 at UConn. He was a 2 in Chi with Heinrich and now Rose at the 1sixringz1
he will obviously be their back up 2 but you know they will play him at 1 with rip at 2 alot

back up 2? So you go out on the first day of free agency and give a guy 11 million a year for 5 years to be a BACKUP? That makes ZERO SENSE. Either they are going to trade Rip or they have a roster that doesn't fit, and will be taken advantage of night in night out on the Defensive end

well yeah i know thats alot of money NBA.com: "Ben agreed to come here knowing he would come off the bench," the source said. "That makes it completely different than Iverson coming here ... Gordon is choosing to come here and play the super sub role."
Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts
[QUOTE="sixringz1"][QUOTE="chAzN93"] he will obviously be their back up 2 but you know they will play him at 1 with rip at 2 alot chAzN93
back up 2? So you go out on the first day of free agency and give a guy 11 million a year for 5 years to be a BACKUP? That makes ZERO SENSE. Either they are going to trade Rip or they have a roster that doesn't fit, and will be taken advantage of night in night out on the Defensive end

well yeah i know thats alot of money NBA.com: "Ben agreed to come here knowing he would come off the bench," the source said. "That makes it completely different than Iverson coming here ... Gordon is choosing to come here and play the super sub role."

Well more power to him. I personally don't understand that. But if he wants to sign a contract with a new team and come off the bench rather than starting somewhere else, than once again, more power to him. It makes no sense to me.
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

^^He can still get big minutes coming off the bench, an awesome 3 guard rotation will help. They still need some of those fowards they drafted to work out to be contenders, Detroit really needs to start building commodities with the draft players.

Edit: Also keep in mind that they just drafted Prince the sequel in austin daye. This with gordon means that Prince and Ripper can be used for trade bait now, they are not irreplaceable like in the past.

Avatar image for xbox360isgr8t
xbox360isgr8t

6600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 xbox360isgr8t
Member since 2006 • 6600 Posts
seriously ben? you turned the bulls down twice. because you wanted to make a million more a year so 5 mil more than what they bulls offered. come on. atleast he is only good for offense. but will get roasted on d.
Avatar image for silky_smooth8
silky_smooth8

3659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 silky_smooth8
Member since 2003 • 3659 Posts
60 ish million for a sixth man? yikes....now all they need is okafor to bring back the 04 championship huskies
Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts

^^He can still get big minutes coming off the bench, an awesome 3 guard rotation will help. They still need some of those fowards they drafted to work out to be contenders, Detroit really needs to start building commodities with the draft players.

Edit: Also keep in mind that they just drafted Prince the sequel in austin daye. This with gordon means that Prince and Ripper can be used for trade bait now, they are not irreplaceable like in the past.

DaBrainz

oh he can get big minutes off the bench and score the same, but that team is now completely lost on the Defensive end. You have a 55 million dollar man on the bench while Rip is at the 2 and then when they want to play a 3 guard lineup, who is going to guard the 3. I mean in that conference alone you have the likes of lebron, pierce, granger, butler, you can even throw joe johnson in that mix. ALL of those players are the same height and AT LEAST 30lbs heavier than RIP. They will post him up and abuse that lineup. And if you have the 3 guard lineup in that means there is NO WAY prince could be in the game at the same time because he would have to play the 4 and he's waaaayyyyyy too frail to do that. So there goes your best perimeter defender. There is NO WAY i can see them going into this season with their roster set like it is now. I have to believe they will make more moves.

And for Austin Daye, he is NOWHERE near the sequel to Prince. He may be around the same height and weight but he is a very poor athlete. He's already had 2 knee surgeries and has a limited vertical (and he's what, 20 years old). Prince can run and jump, and has far better footwork than Daye. Sequel? No. Poor Man's Prince? yes.

But i do agree with you for RIP and Prince being trade bait. Like i said earlier, there is no way this team can expect to be successful with the way they are currently constructed. There HAS TO BE more moves coming.

Avatar image for BeanTownBrown86
BeanTownBrown86

3654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 BeanTownBrown86
Member since 2005 • 3654 Posts

as of now its allllriiighhttt....there both solid pick ups but i dont see Detroit doing much anymore in the long run....

Avatar image for white_sox
white_sox

17442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#24 white_sox
Member since 2006 • 17442 Posts

Where's BG7 going to play? Are they planning on trading Rip because having two shooting guards is exactly the same mistake they made last year.

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
Stop hating on Ben! One look at the Bulls/Celtics series shows how good he is. Ben > Stuckey. I'd bench stuckey and put Ben in or trade Rip who is declining.
Avatar image for im_mr_brown
im_mr_brown

2970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 im_mr_brown
Member since 2006 • 2970 Posts
Stop hating on Ben! One look at the Bulls/Celtics series shows how good he is. Ben > Stuckey. I'd bench stuckey and put Ben in or trade Rip who is declining.MoonMarvel
But, Ben is a ball dominant guard with horrible handles. He often dribbles off of his feet or will just lose the ball. His passing skills are just alright. I don't think he'll be good at point guard at all. He's best just getting his shots off of screens. He isn't horrible on defense either. I think he did an admirable job on Ray Allen, chasing him through those double screens. I can see him replacing old man Rip but not Stuckey. He just doesn't have good point guard skills or instincts.
Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]Stop hating on Ben! One look at the Bulls/Celtics series shows how good he is. Ben > Stuckey. I'd bench stuckey and put Ben in or trade Rip who is declining.im_mr_brown
But, Ben is a ball dominant guard with horrible handles. He often dribbles off of his feet or will just lose the ball. His passing skills are just alright. I don't think he'll be good at point guard at all. He's best just getting his shots off of screens. He isn't horrible on defense either. I think he did an admirable job on Ray Allen, chasing him through those double screens. I can see him replacing old man Rip but not Stuckey. He just doesn't have good point guard skills or instincts.

Notice I said or trade rip. But benching Ben is a no go, won't work well. Morale would suffer. Trade Rip.
Avatar image for im_mr_brown
im_mr_brown

2970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 im_mr_brown
Member since 2006 • 2970 Posts
[QUOTE="im_mr_brown"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]Stop hating on Ben! One look at the Bulls/Celtics series shows how good he is. Ben > Stuckey. I'd bench stuckey and put Ben in or trade Rip who is declining.MoonMarvel
But, Ben is a ball dominant guard with horrible handles. He often dribbles off of his feet or will just lose the ball. His passing skills are just alright. I don't think he'll be good at point guard at all. He's best just getting his shots off of screens. He isn't horrible on defense either. I think he did an admirable job on Ray Allen, chasing him through those double screens. I can see him replacing old man Rip but not Stuckey. He just doesn't have good point guard skills or instincts.

Notice I said or trade rip. But benching Ben is a no go, won't work well. Morale would suffer. Trade Rip.

Whoops, didn't read it clearly. I completely agree with you. Being benched was one of his problems in Chicago. I still think a Stuckey/Gordon back court would be pretty bad but who knows they may be great together. Either way, I miss Ben already. Who's give the Bulls those 4 point plays, or go on a hot shooting streak, or pull out some amazing clutch shots? If anyone says John Salmons, I'm going to be angry. I bet the Bulls don't even make any moves this offseason.
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

I bet the Bulls don't even make any moves this offseason.im_mr_brown

Yeah...I have a feeling they're just throwing away this season and waiting for the 2010 free agents (which sucks now, but will be nice in 2010 if they can get someone like Chris Bosh as opposed to overspending on some mediocre player now).

Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#30 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts

[QUOTE="im_mr_brown"] I bet the Bulls don't even make any moves this offseason.JML897

Yeah...I have a feeling they're just throwing away this season and waiting for the 2010 free agents (which sucks now, but will be nice in 2010 if they can get someone like Chris Bosh as opposed to overspending on some mediocre player now).

alot of teams are gonna get ready for it
Avatar image for im_mr_brown
im_mr_brown

2970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 im_mr_brown
Member since 2006 • 2970 Posts

[QUOTE="im_mr_brown"] I bet the Bulls don't even make any moves this offseason.JML897

Yeah...I have a feeling they're just throwing away this season and waiting for the 2010 free agents (which sucks now, but will be nice in 2010 if they can get someone like Chris Bosh as opposed to overspending on some mediocre player now).

I also get the feeling that the Bulls are going to tank this season. The 2010 draft is supposedly stacked from what I'm reading. C'mon lottery pick and Chris Bosh!
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="im_mr_brown"] I bet the Bulls don't even make any moves this offseason.im_mr_brown

Yeah...I have a feeling they're just throwing away this season and waiting for the 2010 free agents (which sucks now, but will be nice in 2010 if they can get someone like Chris Bosh as opposed to overspending on some mediocre player now).

I also get the feeling that the Bulls are going to tank this season. The 2010 draft is supposedly stacked from what I'm reading. C'mon lottery pick and Chris Bosh!

thats dumb, why the hell would a playoff team tank a season for a lottery pick when we're a big trade/free agent signing away from being champion contenders?

as for BG7, farewell to you, its been a great run with many great moments, its too bad our front office adn you were never on the same page, best of luck in detroit(although you're our division rival:evil: )his instant scoring will certainly be missed, but there is plenty of talent on this bulls team to make up for it(and to make up for his average D)but the bulls just gotta move on and make the best of it all.

the torch is officially being handed down to D. Rose, now is defintly the time for him to step up his game, and make this his team

Avatar image for Swavo69420
Swavo69420

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Swavo69420
Member since 2006 • 808 Posts
Ben Gordan was one of only 3 players (Kevin Martin and Danny Granger are the others) last year to score 20+ a game and shoot 40%+ from downtown... Martin and Granger aren't exactly defensive stoppers either plus Gordan did it coming off the bench... Pistons got old, they got younger and more atheletic with these signings and I don't think they're done (They still have $4 million left and could make a trade with a team working against the cap Tyson Chandler or Carlos Boozer come to mind)... Chandler would be a great fit they need a defensive presense in the middle, Chandler could provide that... Avery Johnson will probably be the head coach is also a defensive minded guy (Dallas improved defensively under Johnson making it to the finals after being a run and gun team under Don Nelson)... Basically they traded A.I. for Gordan and Villanueva after making the mistake of trading Billups instead of RIP... Does the signings make them a title contender...??? Probably not (Likely a 4 or 5 seed) but does it make them better then last year, Absolutely...
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
I don't think they're done dealing. Wouldn't surprise me to see Rip get traded. The Pistons seem like their going for a youth movement.
Avatar image for white_sox
white_sox

17442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#35 white_sox
Member since 2006 • 17442 Posts
[QUOTE="Swavo69420"] Martin and Granger aren't exactly defensive stoppers either plus Gordan did it coming off the bench...

Ben started 75 games last year...
Avatar image for chatri10
chatri10

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 chatri10
Member since 2002 • 752 Posts

[QUOTE="im_mr_brown"][QUOTE="JML897"]

Yeah...I have a feeling they're just throwing away this season and waiting for the 2010 free agents (which sucks now, but will be nice in 2010 if they can get someone like Chris Bosh as opposed to overspending on some mediocre player now).

kidcool189

I also get the feeling that the Bulls are going to tank this season. The 2010 draft is supposedly stacked from what I'm reading. C'mon lottery pick and Chris Bosh!

thats dumb, why the hell would a playoff team tank a season for a lottery pick when we're a big trade/free agent signing away from being champion contenders?

The Spurs tank their seaon when David Robinson got hurt. We all know what happen the next year. They got Tim Duncan. Does that worth tanking a playoff team?

Avatar image for chatri10
chatri10

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#37 chatri10
Member since 2002 • 752 Posts

I was surprise when the Pistone trade away Billups. That got to be the dumbest move ever. then I thought that they might want to rebuild. Now they over pay an under size SG who can't defend and only have average speed for a 6'2 guy. Their rebuilding process is ruin.

Avatar image for LTomlinson21
LTomlinson21

24423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#38 LTomlinson21
Member since 2004 • 24423 Posts
The money values may have not been spot, but the players are pretty damn good.
Avatar image for JohnnyDanger87
JohnnyDanger87

315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 JohnnyDanger87
Member since 2009 • 315 Posts
As a Bulls fan Im really disappointed to hear about Gordon signing with the Pistons, I guess they feel that pairing Rose with Salmons was the better option.