Could young Jordan score 100 points in a game if he was playing in today's NBA?

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts

You probably all read the news about this.

Jordan stating that with today's rules about fouling and the fact that the game is less physical than it was in late 80s-early 90s, he'd go so much to the line he could get to 100 points.

I say yes. I think his PPG would go up since there are a lot of very weak defensive teams right now. If the conditions are right, he could score 100 in a single game. But I don't think he'd willingly aim for a hundred, especially if you take 90s Jordan. But young MJ with a crappy team looks a lot like 05-06 Kobe.

I mean, take '88 Jordan, scoring 37 ppg, and put him against the Toronto Raptors. He would light them up so bad they'd all retire on the spot.

What say you?

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

Young Jordan was a crappy 3-pt shooter. I mean really REALLY crappy. As in 13% type crappy in 88. No way is young Jordan scoring 100.

Avatar image for DJ_Magneto
DJ_Magneto

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DJ_Magneto
Member since 2008 • 4675 Posts
No one can score 100 in the NBA any more. Not MJ, not Kobe. Wilt wouldn't even be able to do it today.
Avatar image for frostybanana
frostybanana

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 frostybanana
Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts
Doubt it. Jordan is the best player of all time, but I really doubt anyone can score 100 points again.
Avatar image for Lostboy1224
Lostboy1224

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 Lostboy1224
Member since 2007 • 3425 Posts
It is certainly possible. There are a hand full of teams that have really bad defense, and if Jordan makes 10 shots per quarter, while also getting to the line for some free throws (cause you know he would be getting fouled a good amount), then yes he could do that. Now this means he would have to be playing with guys who expect Jordan to shoot it 80% of the time, and have decent offensive rebounding skills. Jordan was probably the best guard at getting to the line, and in today's NBA you get foul calls for breathing on guys so it could happen. Back then if you get tackled on the way to the basket that was just a non-shooting foul you should have expected to get anyways.
Avatar image for DJ_Magneto
DJ_Magneto

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DJ_Magneto
Member since 2008 • 4675 Posts
I just read that it was actually Jordan who made this claim. While I don't think he was being too serious, I think it was his way to kind of take a jab at today's players. Like him or not for that, it just goes to show that to this day he's still a cold blooded competitor.
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

No one can score 100 in the NBA any more. Not MJ, not Kobe. Wilt wouldn't even be able to do it today.DJ_Magneto

If Kobe could get to 81, I have a feeling some player will come along eventually and get 100.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#8 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Negative. Here's why. 1. Defensive sophistication is light years better today than it was in Jordan's day Self explanatory. When Jordan was playing, maybe two players out of every five actually gave a crap about defense and played it. Complex statistical analysis showing where each player wanted to shoot the ball, where they shot best, etc. was non-existent. Defenses in today's NBA are plain, flat-out, better on average than they were in Jordan's time. This shows in the average shooting percentages for the time period. Sure, adjust for people taking a lot more threes these days and look at true shooting percentage, but defenses today are better than they were in Jordan's day. 2. The hand check rule is negated by the favorable treatment Jordan got from the refs. One of the things that Jordan's crowd of supporters always allege is that if Jordan played in the NBA with today's rules that he'd score a bazillion points, dish a kazillion assists and grab a chazillion rebounds. People forget that Jordan got favorable ref treatment that has never existed before or since. 3. Jordan couldn't shoot from deep Didn't hurt him much since the three ball was not particularly prominent in his day vs. today, but Jordan was a pretty subpar range shooter over his career. Ridiculously athletic and fundamentally sound, but Lebron's probably already a better deep shooter than Jordan was and he's "streaky" to put it nicely. 4. Quality of competition Quick! Name the top five wing players in Jordan's day. Flat out, there are more solid wing players today than you can shake a stick at. Part of this is actually a result of Jordan's legacy. An entire generation of players grew up emulating him. But really, once you get past Clyde Drexler, there weren't a TON of fantastic wing players during Jordan's heyday.
Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts
^ dude just you just owned jordan :lol: lol at MJ for thinking he could score 100 in todays game. Put Wilt in todays game against 7 ft centers and he wouldn't even get 100
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Easy

The teams were stronger in Jordan's days and he only scored what? 70 back then?

Give the weaker NBA with it's watered down talent and more wide open rules and he scores 100 without much effort besides having to shoot that many times

Avatar image for Alex3796
Alex3796

2669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 1

#11 Alex3796
Member since 2009 • 2669 Posts
Probably not.
Avatar image for radonblue
radonblue

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#12 radonblue
Member since 2010 • 83 Posts
its a possibility, never doubt his airness
Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts

I understand all you say, and I agree mostly with what you wrote. Except one thing.

Wing players.

Wing players in today's NBA are better than they were 20 years ago, that's true. On offense. Name me 3 or 4 elite defenders who could defend Jordan today? Look, elite perimeter defenders are rare, very rare these days. I mean, hell, if a very average defender like LeBron makes the All-Defensive team, there's a freaking problem.

Back in the days, when Jordan was playing, you had All-time perimeter defenders, like DJ, Joe Dumars, Craig Ehlo (even if he got owned by MJ more than once), John Starks, Bryon Russell, Gary Payton, etc.

Now you've got Battier who's excellent, Kobe, Ron, Iggy and a few are pretty good, but that's about it.

Plus, you had beasts protecting the key, like Robinson, Hakeem, Ewing, Parish, Shaq. Now you've got Dwight and Timmy D, and that's about it.

I agree defenses are more complex and players generally more athletic than they were 20 years ago, but the lack of real perimeter stoppers make me think it would be possible.

Then again, Jordan wouldn't, because he's just not that kind of player.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

I understand all you say, and I agree mostly with what you wrote. Except one thing.

Wing players.

Wing players in today's NBA are better than they were 20 years ago, that's true. On offense. Name me 3 or 4 elite defenders who could defend Jordan today? Look, elite perimeter defenders are rare, very rare these days. I mean, hell, if a very average defender like LeBron makes the All-Defensive team, there's a freaking problem.

Back in the days, when Jordan was playing, you had All-time perimeter defenders, like DJ, Joe Dumars, Craig Ehlo (even if he got owned by MJ more than once), John Starks, Bryon Russell, Gary Payton, etc.

Now you've got Battier who's excellent, Kobe, Ron, Iggy and a few are pretty good, but that's about it.

Plus, you had beasts protecting the key, like Robinson, Hakeem, Ewing, Parish, Shaq. Now you've got Dwight and Timmy D, and that's about it.

I agree defenses are more complex and players generally more athletic than they were 20 years ago, but the lack of real perimeter stoppers make me think it would be possible.

Then again, Jordan wouldn't, because he's just not that kind of player.

BaraChat

It's not just wing players

How many great teams does the NBA have now?

People are getting all bent out of shape because the Heat have 3 All Stars but Jordan put up 63 against a HOF trio and he took on the Lakers with another HOF trio.

It was a stronger NBA in Jordan's time, a good chunk of players who start in the NBA today would have a hard time being second string back then. That's who Jordan would be playing against

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts

No. I always knew the dude was arrogant but seriously! NOBODY can score 100 today, the talent pool is one of the deepest ever and the difference between players isnt that great. Jordan was seen as head and shoulders above everybody in the 90's, now Kobe, LeBron, Durant, Wade....Not so much of a huge difference.

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="BaraChat"]

I understand all you say, and I agree mostly with what you wrote. Except one thing.

Wing players.

Wing players in today's NBA are better than they were 20 years ago, that's true. On offense. Name me 3 or 4 elite defenders who could defend Jordan today? Look, elite perimeter defenders are rare, very rare these days. I mean, hell, if a very average defender like LeBron makes the All-Defensive team, there's a freaking problem.

Back in the days, when Jordan was playing, you had All-time perimeter defenders, like DJ, Joe Dumars, Craig Ehlo (even if he got owned by MJ more than once), John Starks, Bryon Russell, Gary Payton, etc.

Now you've got Battier who's excellent, Kobe, Ron, Iggy and a few are pretty good, but that's about it.

Plus, you had beasts protecting the key, like Robinson, Hakeem, Ewing, Parish, Shaq. Now you've got Dwight and Timmy D, and that's about it.

I agree defenses are more complex and players generally more athletic than they were 20 years ago, but the lack of real perimeter stoppers make me think it would be possible.

Then again, Jordan wouldn't, because he's just not that kind of player.

It's not just wing players

How many great teams does the NBA have now?

People are getting all bent out of shape because the Heat have 3 All Stars but Jordan put up 63 against a HOF trio and he took on the Lakers with another HOF trio.

It was a stronger NBA in Jordan's time, a good chunk of players who start in the NBA today would have a hard time being second string back then. That's who Jordan would be playing against

Not sure if serious. Kobe, Wade, Lebron, Durant, Duncan......These guys would be great in ANY period. And the Lakers when they played the Bulls were old and worn down. And the Bulls LOST to that Celtic team.
Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts

Back in the days, when Jordan was playing, you had All-time perimeter defenders, like DJ, Joe Dumars, Craig Ehlo (even if he got owned by MJ more than once), John Starks, Bryon Russell, Gary Payton, etc.

Now you've got Battier who's excellent, Kobe, Ron, Iggy and a few are pretty good, but that's about it.

BaraChat

there's some pretty dam good defensive players Kobe went up against this last decade. Andrei Kirilenko, Doug Christie, Shane Battier, Bruce Bowen just to name a few and he owned them all at one point or another. The best wing player when Jordan played was on MJ's team and his name is Scottie Pippen. The ones you listed are all good but my point is all the ones I mentioned are as good as the wing players Jordan went up against. Did you ever see someone put a hand right in Jordans face for an entire series while he was shooting before?

battier

yeah Jordan wouldn't even come close to 100

Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts

Yeah seeing as you mentioned guys like Doug Christie and Andrei Kirilenko, I'm 100% confident in my argument about Joe Dumars, DJ and John Starks. You can't compare Hall of Famers to some dudes who barely ever made an All-Star team... (Bowen and Battier are good, even great, but not Dennis Johnson great, far from it).

And look, I'm not saying that today's NBA is crappy or anything, (in fact, I love players like Kobe and Wade and the young generation. Heck, I've just bought Durant's and Rose's jerseys) but you can't convince me that today's perimeter defenders are even near what you'd see from 85 to 95.

I can't help but feel that my post is kinda offensive but it's definitely not what I intended... Most of the arguments by posters make a lot of sense. That's the kind of discussion I like. :)

Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts
I know starks is a good defender even though MJ dropped 53 on him before, but there is nothing he did that really seperates him from someone like Bruce Bowen besides his obviously superior offense. both were pesky defenders, both are great perimeter defenders, both get right up on you. Even though the game was more physical back then MJ used to pull up right over Starks and get all the shots he wanted. you put Kobe in his prime against Starks and he would have torched Starks just the same way.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
In todays sissified league where nobody plays defense, no doubt about it, but he would have to be on a mission to prove a point in order to hog it that much and his teams to give him the ball.
Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

Jordan, score 100.....NO. Too late to elaborate.

Avatar image for M_1_A_M_I
M_1_A_M_I

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 M_1_A_M_I
Member since 2010 • 938 Posts
Ummmm no...
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
People say "MJ is better than Kobe, so if Kobe can score 81 in a game how many would MJ have scored?"
Avatar image for csimonma
csimonma

2820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 csimonma
Member since 2005 • 2820 Posts
I think he was just exaggerating when he said that or talking out of his ass, meh.
Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts
I know starks is a good defender even though MJ dropped 53 on him before, but there is nothing he did that really seperates him from someone like Bruce Bowen besides his obviously superior offense. both were pesky defenders, both are great perimeter defenders, both get right up on you. Even though the game was more physical back then MJ used to pull up right over Starks and get all the shots he wanted. you put Kobe in his prime against Starks and he would have torched Starks just the same way.andyboiii
I agree with that. The thing is, d'you think Kobe could score 100 on that crappy Raptors team if he put his mind to it before the game? I think yes. It's not that much of a stretch. And '05 Kobe would do it, as opposed to MJ, who was more of a team player (after 1988) than '05 Kobe, so MJ wouldn't do it because it's simply not him to hog the ball that much. But I'd argue that '88 MJ (37 ppg) could probably average 40ppg in today's NBA.
Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#26 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
Yes. Fact.
Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

I agree with andyboii, but I'll take it even further. I don't think Starks is in Bowens class as a defender. Starks was 6'5", 190lbs, Bowen is listed as 6'7", 200. Bowen made the 1st team All defense 5 years straight, after making the 2nd team 3 years straight. Starks never made the 1st team, and made the 2nd team once (92-93). I admired Starks's heart/hustle, but he was to small for Jordan at 6'6" 216(probably not his weight the first few years, but at least 200). Starks was more like a Raja Bell type of defender, tough/scrappy/pesky. But Bell is listed as 6'5"/206 and made the 1st team all defense once and 2nd team once. Starks gave good effort but was not as good a match for MJ as Bowen would have been.

I took "hand-checking" into consideration for all the above and below, I just think it's effect is overstated concerning great offensive players. I believe a collasping zone, with no "illegal defense" rule is tougher to play against. Getting by the first man is no problem for a great offensive player hand checking or not, it's the 2nd and 3rd man waiting for you that's the problem. Just my opinion.

As far as a comparison of MJ's and Kobe's defenders: (BTW, Detroit and New York were not the only teams in the NBA in MJ's day. He faced some mediore and bad defensive teams also, including expansion teams. And after a certain point, when MJ really got established, several complained that you were not allowed to lay a hand on him without a whistle. So his whole career was not spent fighting through and conquering great/tough defenses.)

MJ (6'6", 216): Dumars, 6'3/195, Starks, 6'5"/190, Dennis Johnson, 6'4"/185 (but was already in the NBA 8-9 years before MJ and probably not at his atheletic/defensive best), Paul Pressy, 6'5"/185, Sidney Moncrief, 6'3"/180, Alvin Robertson, 6'3"/185,... Michael Cooper, 6'5"/170, Derek Harper, 6'4"185, Nate McMillian, 6'5" (Cooper, Harper and McMillian all were excellent defenders but played mostly in the west and didn't face MJ that much), Bobby Phills, 6'5"/226

Kobe(6'6", 205): Bruce Bowen, 6'7"/200, Raja Bell, 6'5"/206, Shane Battier, 6'8"/220, Thabo Sefalosa, 6'7"/215, Ron Artest, 6"7"/260 really!, Doug Christie, 6'6"/200, Matt Barnes, 6'7"/226, Rueben Patterson, 6'5"/224,.....Gary Payton could go on either list but played in the west so didn't face MJ much (shame cause he could D MJ up), but probably didn't face Kobe much either playing the point. Also Rueben Patterson (6'5"/224) didn't make a All Defensive list but was a pesky defender against Kobe (but not a "Kobe Stopper"!)

I may have missed some guys on either side. But none of MJ's defenders (on this list) were 200+lbs, and of his primary defenders in the east all were 6'5" or below, yes they could hand check.

All of Kobe's primary opponents on D were 6'5" or more and all were 200+ lbs, hand-checking or not they were all physical and would get up in his jersey(Bowen, Bell, Battier, Sefalosa, Artest, Christie, Barnes. Those guys were bigger, bulkier, and still atheletic enough to be very good defenders, as good if not better in some cases than MJ faced. But you be the judge.

Kobe on that 05 team was no more of a "ball hog" than MJ would have been

Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

Depends really on which bad team he plays. Cleveland, oh yes.

Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

No. No way Jordan socores 100 today. 100??! How about 80?? 70?? They had sad defensive teams in Jordans day, yet he never scored out of the 60's, and took overtime and double ot to accomplish his highest totals. Doug Collins is qouted as saying that Jordan "played for stats" so it wasn't from lack of trying that MJ didn't get past the 60's. That's why he has the NBA record for leading the league in "field goal attempts" (9 years).

I don't believe Jordan has a greater ability to get to the basket than Kobe had in his atheletic prime against today's defenses and MJ sucked at 3pt shooting so I just don't see Jordan getting 100. It's more believable to me that Kobe could do it under the rigt circumstances, more so than MJ, with Kobe getting 55 in one half before.

Scoring 100 points in one game has been done only once in history. It was done by a Giant, playing under the basket, with his team, in the 2nd half, immediately fouling the other team in order to get the ball back in Wilts hand. Even with that Wilt barely made it to 100 in regualtion (he had 98 with under a minute to play). That's how hard it is to get 100.

I've said before that MJ was the most selfish/egotistical player in history, I hope he was joking about 100 points, but I doubt it.

Avatar image for HurricaneHugo
HurricaneHugo

40807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 HurricaneHugo
Member since 2002 • 40807 Posts
If Kobe can get 81 then MJ can do 100.
Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

If Kobe can get 81 then MJ can do 100.HurricaneHugo

How so?

Avatar image for No_Hablo_Ingles
No_Hablo_Ingles

8448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 No_Hablo_Ingles
Member since 2009 • 8448 Posts
I think the answer to this question is a "no" but depending on who he plays he could get 70-80 (Raptors and Cavs for instance). If there was anyone in the NBA that would score 100 now, it would be Durant or Melo.
Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

I think the answer to this question is a "no" but depending on who he plays he could get 70-80 (Raptors and Cavs for instance). If there was anyone in the NBA that would score 100 now, it would be Durant or Melo.No_Hablo_Ingles

But Jordan played against Raptors and Cavs "like" teams in his day and his tops is 69, even with the 3 pt line closer for a time.

Avatar image for No_Hablo_Ingles
No_Hablo_Ingles

8448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 No_Hablo_Ingles
Member since 2009 • 8448 Posts

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"]I think the answer to this question is a "no" but depending on who he plays he could get 70-80 (Raptors and Cavs for instance). If there was anyone in the NBA that would score 100 now, it would be Durant or Melo.mont13

But Jordan played against Raptors and Cavs "like" teams in his day and his tops is 69, even with the 3 pt line closer for a time.

Which is why I said he could score 70-80. He's never had to score quite like Kobe did in the 2005 year (I think that's the years at least...). In my opinion, the only players that can score 100 points are players that are forced to carry the team on their back.
Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

[QUOTE="mont13"]

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"]I think the answer to this question is a "no" but depending on who he plays he could get 70-80 (Raptors and Cavs for instance). If there was anyone in the NBA that would score 100 now, it would be Durant or Melo.No_Hablo_Ingles

But Jordan played against Raptors and Cavs "like" teams in his day and his tops is 69, even with the 3 pt line closer for a time.

Which is why I said he could score 70-80. He's never had to score quite like Kobe did in the 2005 year (I think that's the years at least...). In my opinion, the only players that can score 100 points are players that are forced to carry the team on their back.

Jordan was in a similar situation his first few years in the NBA, where he felt he had to carry the load......and tried to. Still didn't crack 70.

Avatar image for TheGrat1
TheGrat1

4330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 TheGrat1
Member since 2008 • 4330 Posts
Maybe, if he ball-hogged the entire game and intentionally tried to score 100, then he definately could. Would have to be a pretty crappy team though.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"]I think the answer to this question is a "no" but depending on who he plays he could get 70-80 (Raptors and Cavs for instance). If there was anyone in the NBA that would score 100 now, it would be Durant or Melo.mont13

But Jordan played against Raptors and Cavs "like" teams in his day and his tops is 69, even with the 3 pt line closer for a time.

Jordan played against stronger teams

Back then you didn't have players leave high school in droves or come out after one year of college that often.

Jordan's season average would be 8-10 points higher and his steals would probably be over 4 taking advantage of the players, then one night he would just go off and try for 100

I mean think of it, there's nothing like the Bad Boys in the NBA today because players would be suspended left and right and that goes for the Celtics too. Heck, even the Showtime Lakers would have to tone down their D in today's NBA.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Jordan in his prime with a crap team who gives him the ball, everyone says he is better than Kobe, teams are worse these days, so i think it's easy to say if he wanted to he could drop 100. Just lock the thread already.
Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts

Jordan played against stronger teams

Jaysonguy

sorry buddy Jordan played against some bad teams back then too. Not every team was the bad boy pistons or like the 80's Celtics defensive squad. If he couldn't drop 100 in his prime against weak team back then, then he couldn't do it now

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#40 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Jordan played against stronger teams

andyboiii

sorry buddy Jordan played against some bad teams back then too. Not every team was the bad boy pistons or like the 80's Celtics defensive squad. If he couldn't drop 100 in his prime against weak team back then, then he couldn't do it now

Because we know teams right now are beastly on defense.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Jordan played against stronger teams

andyboiii

sorry buddy Jordan played against some bad teams back then too. Not every team was the bad boy pistons or like the 80's Celtics defensive squad. If he couldn't drop 100 in his prime against weak team back then, then he couldn't do it now

More teams and the reasons I pointed out above mean that the bad teams now are worse then the bad teams then.

Also the fact that Jordan wouldn't be worn down during a season by teams like the Bad Boys means that he would be fresher for all of his other games.

Gives Jordan the easy schedule that players get today and he'd put up monster numbers.

Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts
Because we know teams right now are beastly on defense. Master_Live
there are good and bad defensive squads for every decade. Jordan played against bad defensive squads too ;) if he couldn't do in his prime in 1992 against the Timberwolves who for a year averaged 107 points scored against them then he couldn't score 100 today
Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts

Also the fact that Jordan wouldn't be worn down during a season by teams like the Bad Boys

Jaysonguy

worn out? :lol:

please, there weren't as many defensive squads like the bad boys back then

no one can score 100 points in todays game. Put Wilt against 7 footers and see if he can score 100

Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

Out of an 82 game season MJ didn't play 41 against Detroit and 41 against New York, or any other high combo of great defensive teams. Trust me, he faced plenty of cup cake, bottom feeder, defensive teams.

As said before he led the NBA in fga's 9 times (record) so it wasn't for lack of trying, for 3 years the 3pt line was closer, he had plenty of "revenge games" when he tried to embarass other players by scoring big on them...Jordan had PLENTY of opportunity to get 100, but did'nt get out of the 60's and needed ot and double ot for most of those. 100, no, not in any era.

Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts

Oh monty you will do whatever you can to hate on Jordan. ;) Once again i'm here to save the day and make sense of this topic. I don't think ANYONE could score 100 points in a game through the NATURAL FLOW of the offense. Kobe still had 19 to goand that's 2/3 of his normal avg for a game. It won't happen. Now if you take the NATURAL FLOW out of the game and make it a priority to get someone to shoot every possession, forget kobe or michael, ANY prolific scorer would have a shot.

And for those that don't buy that i have one name for you - David Robinson. He scored 71 points in 1994 but nobody ever talks about it. The reason he did that was cause he needed that many points to overtake shaq for the scoring title that year. So the offense went through him as much as humanly possilble. And lets be real here, David Robinson was a SOLID, AT BEST, offensive player. He was better than Ewing but had nowhere near the skill of Hakeem. So you're telling me that someone like Robinson can put up 74 when the team funnels all the plays through him, but a great scorer like MJ can't? It's all in the approach. Kobe, Tmac in his prime, Durant, maybe even Melo could do it if it was the teams primary goal, like it was for Robinson. But to do it through the natural flow of the game, not buying it - from anyone

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Also the fact that Jordan wouldn't be worn down during a season by teams like the Bad Boys

andyboiii

worn out? :lol:

please, there weren't as many defensive squads like the bad boys back then

no one can score 100 points in todays game. Put Wilt against 7 footers and see if he can score 100

Down actually

And yes, one of the things about the great defensive teams in the era where you could actually come in contact with other players is that when you faced the Pistons or the Celtics they made you feel it for a week. Playing the Pistons just wasn't a one night event, they knocked you around trying to win that game but you dealt with the knocks for the next 3 games you played.

These days what's the biggest thing going? fatigue from flying?

Avatar image for mont13
mont13

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 mont13
Member since 2006 • 1468 Posts

I guess this 6 ringz dude is going to interrupt my sleep tonight. Nah, Gervin and David Thompson had a similar battle both great scorers, when their teams were "trying" to get them the ball to score as many as possible to win the scoring title. Neither cracked 80 let alone 100.

Your in the big leagues now homie ...step up ya game!;) later.

Avatar image for sixringz1
sixringz1

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 sixringz1
Member since 2004 • 1116 Posts

I guess this 6 ringz due is going to interrupt my sleep tonight. Nah, Gervin and David Thompson had a similar battle both great scorers, when their teams were "trying" to get them the ball to score as many as possible to win the scoring title. Neither cracked 80 let alone 100.

Your in the big leagues now homie ...step up ya game!;) later.

mont13

if it was the PRIMARY GOAL for the team, i would give elite scorers A SHOT. I'm sorry but the fact that david robinson scored 71 points in a game speaks volumes to me. If the perfect scenerio presented itself (bad team, end of season, nothing to play for, etc) there's a CHANCE. But nobody, not even Jordan (i bet you can't believe i said that), could do it in the natural flow of the offense. Hell i'm not even convinced Wilt did it.LOL! The only thing i've ever seen from that game is him holding that piece of paper with 100 points on it. Were there actually any witnesses to that game? lol

Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#49 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts

I guess this 6 ringz due is going to interrupt my sleep tonight. Nah, Gervin and David Thompson had a similar battle both great scorers, when their teams were "trying" to get them the ball to score as many as possible to win the scoring title. Neither cracked 80 let alone 100.

Your in the big leagues now homie ...step up ya game!;) later.

mont13

Thompson did get 78 (or 73?) in a game though.Well I know he had 53 at the half of one game.

Fact is, I think there are a few players in NBA history who could get 100 points in 48 minutes if they (and their teams) put their minds to it. I wouldn't put it past '01 Shaq, '88 Jordan, '05 Kobe, '62 Wilt & Baylor, '72 Kareem or even other great scorers like Rick Barry, David Thompson, George Gervin, Pete Maravich, etc. You only have to be quite hot, play an especially bad defensive team and have teammates and coaches that would allow you to do it. But it's 99.99999% impossible in the normal flow of the game.

The only time that happened, in March of 62, the opposite team (Knicks) was especially pissed at the Warriors for doing so, and you can bet the reaction would be 100x as violent in today's game.

I think it would be possible, I just don't think common sense (and respect for the game) would allow it.

Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#50 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts
I don't think so!