[QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="manningbowl135"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="Whiteghost09"]m'kay, so the old geiser called the "vice president" after the game from his armchair. They're still crybabyish (if that's a word). manningbowl135
It's not liek its the first time teams have accused them of the same thing. Coincidences tend to mean soemthing.
It doesn't mean anything until it's proven and NFL does something about him. Accusations are void and meaningless unless you can prove it. So far both accusers have failed to do that, therefore it's meaningless.
I didnn't say it was true. i was just pointing out that others had accused them so you cant blame the president of the patriots for contacting the Presitdent of Security to voice his concerns. Calling him a cry baby was just a little outragous for me.
I'm just saying accusations mean absolutely nothing.
[QUOTE="Whiteghost09"]I have nothing against you being a Pats fan, I'm just sayin that the organization is somewhat shady and, not corrupt but, well, lets just say unsportsmanlike...Just_Osmo
Robert Kraft is a great great man. Something that Bellichick did doesn't tarnish his reputation in my eyes, just Bellichicks. Kraft cant be expected to fire a coach who is winning Superbowls like its nothing. thats basically career suicide. The fans would end up turnign on the organization for turning a dynasty into a POSSIBLE losing team.
Kraft is still a great man, but after it turned out he didn't even discipline Bellichick, I was a bit dissapointed. I don't expect him to fire him obviously, but he should've at least done something to show that this kind of thing is not tolerated in his organization.
He was already punished by the league. Maybe he thought it was up to the commish to fork out the punishments. It's not liek when players get in trouble witht he league and get suspended/fined the owners of their team then punish them also.Correct em if I'm wrong but i'ev never heard of a owner/coach giving a player more games off when they get suspended lol.
Log in to comment