Red Sox to include Ellsbury for Santana deal

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for D3s7rUc71oN
D3s7rUc71oN

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 D3s7rUc71oN
Member since 2004 • 5180 Posts

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20071202&content_id=2315278&vkey=hotstove2007&fext=.jsp:|

ESPN.com -- citing sources -- reported Sunday that Boston had backed off its refusal to include Ellsbury. But if Ellsbury is to be in the deal, the Red Sox will pull back left-handed starter Jon Lester.

At least Jon Lester won't be traded too if it happens as that will be giving too much to the Twins. I think the Red Sox now have a better chance in landing Santana, but who knows what will happen.

Avatar image for AgileNate
AgileNate

2999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 AgileNate
Member since 2003 • 2999 Posts
After the world series, I dont want Ellsbury to leave the sox. He is amazing. I will be mad to see him leave. Santana is definitely good but Ellsbury shown that he can play in the regular season and the post season.
Avatar image for Dutch_Mix
Dutch_Mix

29266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#3 Dutch_Mix
Member since 2005 • 29266 Posts
Jacoby is awesome. I'd hate to lose him even if we did get Santana.
Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts
Some scouts say that he has reached his peak and that his stock will be never higher than this.
Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

They will do what they want so i'm not going to worry to much. But if Ellsbury leaves I'd be sad. Plus I don't see it happening. We need a centerfielde4r if they let coco go.

Avatar image for Ngamer05
Ngamer05

11577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Ngamer05
Member since 2003 • 11577 Posts
I can't believe the Twins would rather have Jacoby put in the deal than Lester or Buchholz. Jacoby is so overrated and even baseball scouts have said it.
Avatar image for hmac777
hmac777

1351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 hmac777
Member since 2007 • 1351 Posts
Not at all, if anything ellsbury is underrated. He came up at the most intense part of the season, faced supposedly the best teams of the year, and was absolutely dominant. He's a huge asset at the plate and even more so in the field. He puts a much needed hustle in the outfield and swings the bat like a seasoned veteren. The Sox don't need 7 starters they already have a ferocious pitching staff, they need better defense and a firmer line up.
Avatar image for tryfe_lyn
tryfe_lyn

4122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#8 tryfe_lyn
Member since 2005 • 4122 Posts
I would hate to see the young talent go...but Johan is straight up nasty!!!
Avatar image for shaunmc
shaunmc

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#9 shaunmc
Member since 2003 • 1957 Posts
Ellsbury isn't an elite prospect by any means. Red Sox fans should be happy to see him included in a deal if it means they get to keep Bucholz.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
I think the speculation is all fairly moot. In a deal for a guy like Santana I think any number of names get thrown at the wall each day to see if they stick. Who actually gets traded in the end doesn't have much to do with the early offers.
Avatar image for rocket9434
rocket9434

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 rocket9434
Member since 2006 • 2665 Posts
I personally don't think the deal will happen, but who knows? I would hate to see Jacoby leave but like the Sox know in the past a veterancontributes a lot more then a rookie.
Avatar image for shaunmc
shaunmc

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#12 shaunmc
Member since 2003 • 1957 Posts
That's a misconeption. Not only can rookies contribute just as much as vets, but they do so at a fraction of the price. Look at the San Francisco Giants as example one of why a team full of veterans won't get you very far.
Avatar image for NetYankEagle
NetYankEagle

11090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 NetYankEagle
Member since 2007 • 11090 Posts
honestly i doubt this elsbury dude is even gonna have a great career hes too overrated IMO Sox fans treating him like the second coming of Babe Ruth.
Avatar image for mvphalo8
mvphalo8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 mvphalo8
Member since 2005 • 10748 Posts

If the deal does go through, the Sox are going to have so many pitchers. :lol:

Which is a good thing.

Avatar image for Sports-Fan
Sports-Fan

608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Sports-Fan
Member since 2007 • 608 Posts
honestly i doubt this elsbury dude is even gonna have a great career hes too overrated IMO Sox fans treating him like the second coming of Babe Ruth.NetYankEagle
Which is the polar opposite of you treating Hughes like a second coming of Cy Young, right?
Avatar image for NetYankEagle
NetYankEagle

11090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 NetYankEagle
Member since 2007 • 11090 Posts
[QUOTE="NetYankEagle"]honestly i doubt this elsbury dude is even gonna have a great career hes too overrated IMO Sox fans treating him like the second coming of Babe Ruth.Sports-Fan
Which is the polar opposite of you treating Hughes like a second coming of Cy Young, right?

yea because me sayign Hughes was scouted by basically everybody and was said to have the potential to become a roger clemens type pitcher means im praising him as he will become the next Cy Young yup exactly good job kid :roll: Just give up
Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

[QUOTE="Sports-Fan"][QUOTE="NetYankEagle"]honestly i doubt this elsbury dude is even gonna have a great career hes too overrated IMO Sox fans treating him like the second coming of Babe Ruth.NetYankEagle
Which is the polar opposite of you treating Hughes like a second coming of Cy Young, right?

yea because me sayign Hughes was scouted by basically everybody and was said to have the potential to become a roger clemens type pitcher means im praising him as he will become the next Cy Young yup exactly good job kid :roll: Just give up


You said he was the next Roger Clemens. Thats about the same thing.

Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

[QUOTE="NetYankEagle"][QUOTE="Sports-Fan"][QUOTE="NetYankEagle"]honestly i doubt this elsbury dude is even gonna have a great career hes too overrated IMO Sox fans treating him like the second coming of Babe Ruth.Just_Osmo

Which is the polar opposite of you treating Hughes like a second coming of Cy Young, right?

yea because me sayign Hughes was scouted by basically everybody and was said to have the potential to become a roger clemens type pitcher means im praising him as he will become the next Cy Young yup exactly good job kid :roll: Just give up


You said he was the next Roger Clemens. Thats about the same thing.

Exactly. He obviously isn't basing his opinions on fanboyism.:roll:

Avatar image for NetYankEagle
NetYankEagle

11090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 NetYankEagle
Member since 2007 • 11090 Posts

[QUOTE="NetYankEagle"][QUOTE="Sports-Fan"][QUOTE="NetYankEagle"]honestly i doubt this elsbury dude is even gonna have a great career hes too overrated IMO Sox fans treating him like the second coming of Babe Ruth.Just_Osmo

Which is the polar opposite of you treating Hughes like a second coming of Cy Young, right?

yea because me sayign Hughes was scouted by basically everybody and was said to have the potential to become a roger clemens type pitcher means im praising him as he will become the next Cy Young yup exactly good job kid :roll: Just give up


You said he was the next Roger Clemens. Thats about the same thing.

Quote me were i said he WILL BE THE NEXT ROGER CLEMENS.
Avatar image for dru26
dru26

5505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 dru26
Member since 2005 • 5505 Posts

Phil Hughes was voted the No.1 pitching prospect in many minor league publications. Bucholz was also rated very high,yet not as highly touted as Hughes. Lester was projected as a number 3 starter, at best, coming up.

As a side note Ian kennedy won AAA pitcher of the year award last season.

Avatar image for dru26
dru26

5505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 dru26
Member since 2005 • 5505 Posts
Ellsbury and Lester would get the deal done, but the Twins would be flat out crazy to accept one of them, over a deal that contained Hughes and Melky.
Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts
I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
I don't understand why some are comparing Hughes with Ellsbury. Hughes has been a phenom prospect since 17. He was I think the 2nd best pitching prospect when Felix Hernandez was a prospect and no.1 when he was not. Ellsbury's potential is not on his level, never have been, not even close. I really don't understand why Red Sox fans are upset about giving him away. Santana gives you 20 wins with that lineup and with him and Beckett healthy, it's almost hard NOT to win a 4 game playoff series. And if Matsuzaka can continue adjusting to the majors, then watch out. With Santana, they could be the best team in the league by miles and miles. And he's 29! He has at least 4 years of elite ball and most likely 6-7 years left if he can adjust to throwing with less power. That's worth 4 Ellsburies.
Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
dkhw

Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
Just_Osmo


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts
[QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
dkhw


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts
[QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
Just_Osmo


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.

Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts
[QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
dkhw


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.


We will see. Next few weeks will be rumor filled and tense.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
[QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
dkhw


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.

Wow the Angels? They have the best farm system in football except maybe Devil Rays. If they're serious about Santana, the Sox should say good bye to him right now.

Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts
[QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
manningbowl135


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.

Wow the Angels? They have the best farm system in football except maybe Devil Rays. If they're serious about Santana, the Sox should say good bye to him right now.

LOL...football...well, if Angels are willing to part with Weaver and Adenhart, yeah, Angels will have the best starting pitching next season.

Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts
[QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
manningbowl135


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.

Wow the Angels? They have the best farm system in football except maybe Devil Rays. If they're serious about Santana, the Sox should say good bye to him right now.

Well thank god all they have is football players. Because last I checked the Twins don't need any running backs or wide receivers!

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
[QUOTE="manningbowl135"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
Just_Osmo


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.

Wow the Angels? They have the best farm system in football except maybe Devil Rays. If they're serious about Santana, the Sox should say good bye to him right now.

Well thank god all they have is football players. Because last I checked the Twins don't need any running backs or wide receivers!

haha...simple mistake. I talk about football mostly so...:)

Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts
[QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="manningbowl135"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I don't understand Red Sox. Ellsbury is pretty good, but not Santana good, and I don't think Lester is as good as some people make him out to be. You are getting the best pitcher in the league, and with thim on the roster you have a rotation that has Santana, Beckett, Masutzaka, Schilling, Wakefield, and Buchholz. I don't get it. This could be a dynasty in making with 2 bonafide aces and two potential aces. Also, it's not like Coco Crisp is a bad CF anyways. Red Sox improve their pitching by miles and still come away with a very good lineup for the next season.
manningbowl135


Lester Coco Jed Lowrie +1 Minor League Pitcher is a good offer. I'm pretty sure we can get santana without ellsbury or bucky

Not good enough. Jed Lowrie will be a decent player, but Twins still need to get two prospects who can be a decen impact players.

I forget what pitching prospect they offered. But if the Yankees are not in the talks then that package looks better then everyone elses so far.

Angels are in talk with the Twins and what they offer will be much better than what Red Sox is willing to give up right now.

Wow the Angels? They have the best farm system in football except maybe Devil Rays. If they're serious about Santana, the Sox should say good bye to him right now.

Well thank god all they have is football players. Because last I checked the Twins don't need any running backs or wide receivers!

haha...simple mistake. I talk about football mostly so...:)

I know i was just ridin yah :-)

Avatar image for digiram79
digiram79

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 digiram79
Member since 2007 • 251 Posts
I don't want them giving up Ellsbury either.
Avatar image for Just_Osmo
Just_Osmo

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Just_Osmo
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

I don't want them giving up Ellsbury either. digiram79

Looks liek we wont have to. We are the only bidder left for santana.

Avatar image for Soxguy09
Soxguy09

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 Soxguy09
Member since 2007 • 902 Posts
I have been trying to pay attention to this too. I dont think they should give ellsbury up. Hes not worth putting in to get santana. I think the prospect coco and lester(that im not too happy about giving away) is good enough. If we cant get santana without giving up ellsbury, then i think its a stupid move by the sox.
Avatar image for cobb45
cobb45

1179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 cobb45
Member since 2004 • 1179 Posts

[QUOTE="digiram79"]I don't want them giving up Ellsbury either. Just_Osmo

Looks liek we wont have to. We are the only bidder left for santana.

Seems like the Mariners are showing interest and are willing to trade a top OF prospect and a pitcher, but the likelyhood they would land Santana is unlikely.

Link

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
[QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="digiram79"]I don't want them giving up Ellsbury either. cobb45

Looks liek we wont have to. We are the only bidder left for santana.

Seems like the Mariners are showing interest and are willing to trade a top OF prospect and a pitcher, but the likelyhood they would land Santana is unlikely.

Link

Mariners are my favorite team. They're willing to give up a great OF prospect and their 5th overall pick from last year: pitcher Morrow. That's a good deal, but the big problem lies with Santana. He may want more money than M's can give him and he probably wants a bigger market. Either way, it'll be my dream scenario if my favorite pitcher goes to my favorite team. Ichiro FTW!

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#39 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

I have been trying to pay attention to this too. I dont think they should give ellsbury up. Hes not worth putting in to get santana. I think the prospect coco and lester(that im not too happy about giving away) is good enough. If we cant get santana without giving up ellsbury, then i think its a stupid move by the sox.Soxguy09

Here lies the problem...greedy Boston fans who want somehow for the Twins to gift them the best pitcher in the league for a poo poo platter. Maybe those 86 years of not knowing how to win has damage their brains when they can't seen to comprehend that the main goal of the game is to win the damm WS not to have the best prospects. Now I ask u **** Boston fans, do you want to become a dynasty like the Yanks were in the 90's, the Reds in the 70's and the Yanks in the 60's?... Then ship Ellsbury and whatever the Twins want without killing your farm system and get Santana and be happy. But no, u want to get both things or better yet; u want the Yanks and other teams to have a chance to catch u?

Idiot Boston fans can't see the gold even when it from of them. Its like they're afraid of winning.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
[QUOTE="cobb45"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="digiram79"]I don't want them giving up Ellsbury either. manningbowl135

Looks liek we wont have to. We are the only bidder left for santana.

Seems like the Mariners are showing interest and are willing to trade a top OF prospect and a pitcher, but the likelyhood they would land Santana is unlikely.

Link

Mariners are my favorite team. They're willing to give up a great OF prospect and their 5th overall pick from last year: pitcher Morrow. That's a good deal, but the big problem lies with Santana. He may want more money than M's can give him and he probably wants a bigger market. Either way, it'll be my dream scenario if my favorite pitcher goes to my favorite team. Ichiro FTW!

They'd probably have to make another deal like with Ichiro where they're paying the guy until the end of time. What happens when the Mariners are playing 10 or 15 years down the road and they're still paying these guys?

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
[QUOTE="manningbowl135"][QUOTE="cobb45"][QUOTE="Just_Osmo"]

[QUOTE="digiram79"]I don't want them giving up Ellsbury either. duxup

Looks liek we wont have to. We are the only bidder left for santana.

Seems like the Mariners are showing interest and are willing to trade a top OF prospect and a pitcher, but the likelyhood they would land Santana is unlikely.

Link

Mariners are my favorite team. They're willing to give up a great OF prospect and their 5th overall pick from last year: pitcher Morrow. That's a good deal, but the big problem lies with Santana. He may want more money than M's can give him and he probably wants a bigger market. Either way, it'll be my dream scenario if my favorite pitcher goes to my favorite team. Ichiro FTW!

They'd probably have to make another deal like with Ichiro where they're paying the guy until the end of time. What happens when the Mariners are playing 10 or 15 years down the road and they're still paying these guys?

Well to be fair the Mariners are right after Yankees and Red Sox for highest payroll in baseball. So it's not like the owner is afraid of paying players.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts

[QUOTE="Soxguy09"]I have been trying to pay attention to this too. I dont think they should give ellsbury up. Hes not worth putting in to get santana. I think the prospect coco and lester(that im not too happy about giving away) is good enough. If we cant get santana without giving up ellsbury, then i think its a stupid move by the sox.Master_Live

Here lies the problem...greedy Boston fans who want somehow for the Twins to gift them the best pitcher in the league for a poo poo platter. Maybe those 86 years of not knowing how to win has damage their brains when they can't seen to comprehend that the main goal of the game is to win the damm WS not to have the best prospects. Now I ask u **** Boston fans, do you want to become a dynasty like the Yanks were in the 90's, the Reds in the 70's and the Yanks in the 60's?... Then ship Ellsbury and whatever the Twins want without killing your farm system and get Santana and be happy. But no, u want to get both things or better yet; u want the Yanks and other teams to have a chance to catch u?

Idiot Boston fans can't see the gold even when it from of them. Its like they're afraid of winning.

Exactly. Santana is the best pitcher in baseball, maybe by far the best pitcher in baseball. Boston fans want the Twins to give him away, in his prime I might add, for an outfielder who hit .268 last year and can't hit for power and a prospect pitcher who was never, ever among the highest touted in the majors. They didn't mind giving up their best prospect for Josh Beckett, Hanley Ramirez, who was probably a top 5 hitter last season, but for Santana, who is a thousand times better than Beckett was back then, they're lowballing the Twins. It's just so freaking stupid. He was ripe for the picking Boston! Yankees were out and you were the only ones left. If you just sweetened the offer just a bit, you could probably get a deal done. Now the Mariners and Angels have joined the party and who knows what you have to give up or if you get him at all. If they lose Santana b/c they didn't want to give up Ellsbury or some other prospect, it's akin to self-sabotage.