JeMarcus Russell is far from the worst if you look at his numbers. I'm not saying he's been great, but part of his lack of success is playing on a bad team. Harrington was the same way, he had a couple of decent seasons. Boller played decent in Baltimore, I wouldn't say he's a great QB but not the worst of the decade. Leinart, I don't think it's fiar to judge him based on what he's done so far. He hasn't played great, but he also hasn't gotten a solid season as starter. Bulger, you guys are going to make me laugh. I will agree he's had a downturnt the past couple of seasons, but he's been a good QB in the past, to even suggest that a two-time pro bowler is one of the worst QB's of the decade is ludacris. Grossman wasn't great, but I certainly don't think he's the worst of the decade, although that honor, IMO, goes to another Bear, Cade McNown. Grossman had some knocks against him coming in, some people thought he'd be good, others not so good, and who knows how well he can do in the right system. The Texans have liked him so far and he's complained a lot about the system he worked in, which I would disregard if anyone else was running it besides Ron Turner. The thing with McNown is that everyone expected so much, everyone expected him to be great and he was such a bust as to not even be funny. You can talk about other rookies like Leinart, but he makes Leinart look like Joe Montana. This guy was the biggest bust ever, he beats out everyone else in my book. And if you want other QB's that are worse than guys like Russell you can go back to the Bears yet again. Henry Burris, nough said.
Log in to comment