[QUOTE="Casual_Gamer_"] now try using actual game names ;)Casual_Gamer_
But you asked for numbers. :|
i asked for something real. I'm sure you can click on the link and see the names Even if we only limit the games to what many cosnole players consider games mean are FPS,TPS, platformers, Sports, Racing, Rpg's must have a 5million budget and more must be hyped to hell and back and must look good still the pc has more games than the PS3
Ok system warriors after another thread it dawned on me that apparently 1 AAAE trumps an infinite number of AAE and AE games and the same goes for AAAAE and AAAE. So what would you wrather have , 1 AAAAE and a forgetable catalog for the year, 10 AAAE games and a fogetable catalog for the year, or 100 AAE + AE games for the year.
soiheardyoulike
who would buy 100 games in a year anyway, they dont even make so much....i would choose 10aae. enuff for me...
I'd take the 11 higher rated games. I don't play that much.. I played about 5 different Games this year.. and next year.. not much will change. I'll be fine with Fighting Games forever. Throw in 2 or 3 "other" games like VC or UC2 and I'm fine :)
The 10 AAAE, I don't have time to play 100 games this year. I would rather play a few good games than a whole lot of mediocre ones. Gaming is only one of my hobbies.
Who the hell would pick 10 AAAs over 100 AAs+A? :?
I'd pick the 100 AAs+A, easily.
Stevo_the_gamer
I would take the 10 AAAs game easily over the 100 AAs titles for several reasons! The first reason and for most important reason is who here have the rich and money that is able to afford all of them; there might be a selective few that could afford that much games, but it won't be much! Another main reason for me is the amount of time alotted, unless someone spend most of the day gaming or all of the games are relatively short, I doubt anyone can get through all the games in a year. Sure you can saved it for next year but by that time newer games will be out. Maybe this is just me, but I rather played all of my games instead of being able to only get through a few while letting the rest collect dust.
It really depends on what the games actually are. If the AAAAE has as much replay value as Pokemon has (for me), I'd be tempted to take that, especially knowing how good it is.
I would more than likely take the 100 AA + A games though.
10 AAA, especially considering the strong possibility that you may not truly like the AAAE game. Both GTA4 and MGS4 have been disappointments in my book, but 9.5's like Uncharted 2 or games like Mass Effect (8.5 here) have been some of my favorites this generation.
1 game isn't much, no matter how good it is. Look at MGS4, great game, but if it were the only game that would suck. 10 AAAE's is a good balance between a lot of games and quality. AAA games are mad good as is, and 10 is more than I can afford =P
I would pick the 10AAAE's. I can't afford over 100 games, let alone the time to play them. Sure, I'd be able to pick and choose, but there needs to be more details on the consistency of those AAE and if they are mainly 8.5 or 8.0, etc. With the 10, I'd know I could buy them all, and have an excellent experience.
Same. Rather have a huge choice of really good games as opposed to a small number of AAA. Some of my favorites this gen scored 8.5 anyway, like Valkyria Chronicles.
[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]I'd take 10 Uncharted 2's over anything.Toriko42
No you wouldn't I'd take 100 AAEs Yeah I would. And by that I mean 10 games of equal quality to UC2. Of course the 100 AA's are tempting... but 1) I would never have the time to play all those games in a year anyways and 2) there's a good chance I wont like any of them nearly as much as the 10 UC2 quality games. Quantity can be good, but I'd rather have 10 games that are extremely memorable and keep me coming back for more than 100 games that aren't as memorable and don't keep my attention as long.
10 AAAE for me. Who in their right mind would want 1 AAAAE? Even if it was Ocarina of Time (which is my all time favorite game) I couldn't stand playing just one single game for an entire year, no matter how good it is.
I would take 100 7.0-8.5 games. I have had too much fun with games in this score range to turn down that many. The AAAAE and AAAE game score is for SW ownage and worthless when I fire up a console. The more good games I have the better.
The first reason and for most important reason is who here have the rich and money that is able to afford all of them; there might be a selective few that could afford that much games, but it won't be much!
Another main reason for me is the amount of time alotted, unless someone spend most of the day gaming or all of the games are relatively short, I doubt anyone can get through all the games in a year.
-DarthMaul-
1) TC never said you had to buy them. He merely stated which library would you rather have:
1 AAAA + bad games in one year
10 AAA + bad games in one year
100 AA and A games in one year
2) Unless those AAA games are long RPGs or sandbox games -- it don't take that much time to complete a game.
3) Also, what if you only like a few of those AAA games? With over 100 games, you have FAR more variety and FAR more options to choose from and the odds are FAR higher for you to enjoy more games.
Log in to comment