1 AAAAE + 3 AAAE vs. 5 AAAE?

would also remind the TC that Killzone 1 got a 6.9, so expecting a 10 is putting your hopes way way high.

Killzone 2 is already scoring AAAE scores from 95% of sites.

tek91

are you going to refer to those if it's not AAA here?

[QUOTE="tek91"]

would also remind the TC that Killzone 1 got a 6.9, so expecting a 10 is putting your hopes way way high.

Killzone 2 is already scoring AAAE scores from 95% of sites.

CaseyWegner

are you going to refer to those if it's not AAA here?

nah i'll take the score it gets but it doesn't look like that will happen most gaming sites have ranked it well and even gamespot has said it's a remarkable game.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="tek91"]

would also remind the TC that Killzone 1 got a 6.9, so expecting a 10 is putting your hopes way way high.

Killzone 2 is already scoring AAAE scores from 95% of sites.

tek91

are you going to refer to those if it's not AAA here?

nah i'll take the score it gets but it doesn't look like that will happen most gaming sites have ranked it well and even gamespot has said it's a remarkable game.

that's good to hear.

[QUOTE="tek91"] [QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

are you going to refer to those if it's not AAA here?

CaseyWegner

nah i'll take the score it gets but it doesn't look like that will happen most gaming sites have ranked it well and even gamespot has said it's a remarkable game.

that's good to hear.

Now if only lems could...

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

If Killzone 2 receives a 9.0 or 9.5 would we consider the PS3 and 360 on even grounds? Considering the PS3 has an AAAAE and 360 has none, that makes up for the extra AAAE the 360 would have correct?dackchaar

I only care for RPG AAAA games, does PS3 offer me that ? That is the only thing i care about.

So far PS3 has the lowest scoring next gen JRPG's by miles

[QUOTE="dackchaar"]If Killzone 2 receives a 9.0 or 9.5 would we consider the PS3 and 360 on even grounds? Considering the PS3 has an AAAAE and 360 has none, that makes up for the extra AAAE the 360 would have correct?obamanian

I only care for RPG AAAA games, does PS3 offer me that ? That is the only thing i care about.

So far PS3 has the lowest scoring next gen JRPG's by miles

PC owns both.Master-Thief-09

[QUOTE="obamanian"]

[QUOTE="dackchaar"]If Killzone 2 receives a 9.0 or 9.5 would we consider the PS3 and 360 on even grounds? Considering the PS3 has an AAAAE and 360 has none, that makes up for the extra AAAE the 360 would have correct?Zaibach

I only care for RPG AAAA games, does PS3 offer me that ? That is the only thing i care about.

So far PS3 has the lowest scoring next gen JRPG's by miles

[QUOTE="Zaibach"][QUOTE="obamanian"]

I only care for RPG AAAA games, does PS3 offer me that ? That is the only thing i care about.

So far PS3 has the lowest scoring next gen JRPG's by miles

SpruceCaboose

Are we talking about handhelds now? i thougt this was 360 v ps3 thing lets not open the flood gates.

Zaibach

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]Are we talking about handhelds now? i thougt this was 360 v ps3 thing lets not open the flood gates.

SpruceCaboose

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"] [QUOTE="tek91"]

nah i'll take the score it gets but it doesn't look like that will happen most gaming sites have ranked it well and even gamespot has said it's a remarkable game.

XturnalS

that's good to hear.

Now if only lems could...

they deal with it no differently and you know it.

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

Malta_1980

who left out the AAAAE? :?

the one year head start doesn't matter when it took almost a year for the ps3 to catch up to just what the 360 launched with.

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

[QUOTE="Malta_1980"]

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

idontbeliveit

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

[QUOTE="idontbeliveit"][QUOTE="Malta_1980"]

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

CaseyWegner

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="idontbeliveit"] i really dont care if lems wont accept that as an excuse, everyone knows that that is a very valid reason as to why the 360 is ahead in terms of games. i'd like to compare the libraries of the PS3 and 360 if game production for the 360 stopped while the PS3s continued. then we'd have a fair comparison.idontbeliveit

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

[QUOTE="yoyo462001"][QUOTE="idontbeliveit"] no, like everyone else i go to the store and think "hmm, i want this game so i think i'll buy it". and IMO i dont agree with the PS3 taking almost a year to match the 360's launch exclusives, thats subjective.idontbeliveit

[QUOTE="yoyo462001"][QUOTE="idontbeliveit"] no, like everyone else i go to the store and think "hmm, i want this game so i think i'll buy it". and IMO i dont agree with the PS3 taking almost a year to match the 360's launch exclusives, thats subjective.idontbeliveit

[QUOTE="idontbeliveit"][QUOTE="Malta_1980"]

I think PS3's library is getting better & better... considering the console lauched a year later than 360 and the lack of titles in its first months it surely gained a lot of ground in terms of quality titles..

Funny thing is that haters after all the nonsense & comments about how PS3 'HAS NO GAMES' now are counting (making sure not to forget 1 single game) every title so when comparing numbers of AAAE & AAE's they make sure 360 comes on top... (left AAAAE out cause 360 has none)...

But to all PS3 owners remember dont point out the 1 year headstart the 360 had....fanboys get annoyed with that and for them it doesnt count in an argument..

For them 1 year headstart didnt effect the games library & sales... (in reality it does have an impact but in here we cannot use such arguments) :)

CaseyWegner

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

So you go in a store thinking "the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with", or do you think about the games it has now?

And by now I don't games that three years ago where considered AAA, but by todays standarts they are average at best.

[QUOTE="idontbeliveit"][QUOTE="yoyo462001"]well did the PS3 come of the PS2? and because of that shouldn't every Dev want to develop for the new Sony system? answer to both is yes, you need to face that Ms did a good job getting devs to develop and stop bringing in nonsense about 1 year lead, there is no rule in the real world thats says your not allowed to go a year ahead, its just cows finding anything they can to show the 360 library is bad.yoyo462001

[QUOTE="idontbeliveit"][QUOTE="yoyo462001"]well did the PS3 come of the PS2? and because of that shouldn't every Dev want to develop for the new Sony system? answer to both is yes, you need to face that Ms did a good job getting devs to develop and stop bringing in nonsense about 1 year lead, there is no rule in the real world thats says your not allowed to go a year ahead, its just cows finding anything they can to show the 360 library is bad.SecretPolice

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

LosDaddie

cough 1 year head start cough

perfect dark and ghost recon shouldn't even count. Those games are average at best on todays standards. I mean nobody's buying a 360 to play the great Perfect Dark lol. When those games were released there was nothing to compare them to so they got high scores.bokiloki

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

cough 1 year head start cough

I normally don't want to say this but this just proof's how superior the PS3 actually is. The PS3 came out 1 year after the 360 and it still managed to come very very close and even surpassed the 360 game library in quality. The Xbox 360 is such a failure... Lets check sales. The PS3 20million in 2 years and the 360 28 million in 3 years. That means the PS3 sold an average of 10m units per year while the 360 sold 8million a year. Wow what a fail for MS. Sales wise 1st. Wii 2nd. PS3 and Xbox3rd sells the less every year even though it has been 200$ cheaper than the PS3 wow what a failure.

So much for that many Sony haters in 2006 and 2007 and just look now the PS3 is the best console money can buy.

[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

dsmccracken

cough 1 year head start cough

I am just stating that in 2 years of the PS3 it's almost even with the xbox 360 which is basically crazy considering the 1 year head start, for having a 1 year head start they should've already had like 20 or 40 more games.

if the rrod didn't happen they would have probably sold less most m$ customers who get rrod buy a new one and don't use the warranty or they use the warranty and pay a fee which helps m$ salez.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="idontbeliveit"] i really dont care if lems wont accept that as an excuse, everyone knows that that is a very valid reason as to why the 360 is ahead in terms of games. i'd like to compare the libraries of the PS3 and 360 if game production for the 360 stopped while the PS3s continued. then we'd have a fair comparison.DarkyC

how many times must it be said that the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with?

and does it really even matter? do you go to the store and think, "hmm. the 360 has more high scoring exclusives than the ps3 but that's because it came out a year earlier. i think i'll go with the ps3 just to be fair."?

So you go in a store thinking "the ps3 took almost a year just to match the exclusives the 360 launched with", or do you think about the games it has now?

And by now I don't games that three years ago where considered AAA, but by todays standarts they are average at best.

So games from last gen (or gens before that) that you thought were brilliant are all of a sudden average?

I play plenty of 'old' games. :|

We might have better looking games now than we did in the beginning of this gen, but a great game is a great game.

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

tek91

cough 1 year head start cough

Again, the PS Brand merely matching its competitor in games & sales is both a failure for Sony and a success for the competitor. :)

PC owns both.Master-Thief-09

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="tek91"]

cough 1 year head start cough

tek91

I am just stating that in 2 years of the PS3 it's almost even with the xbox 360 which is basically crazy considering the 1 year head start, for having a 1 year head start they should've already had like 20 or 40 more games.

if the rrod didn't happen they would have probably sold less most m$ customers who get rrod buy a new one and don't use the warranty or they use the warranty and pay a fee which helps m$ salez.

[QUOTE="dackchaar"]If Killzone 2 receives a 9.0 or 9.5 would we consider the PS3 and 360 on even grounds? Considering the PS3 has an AAAAE and 360 has none, that makes up for the extra AAAE the 360 would have correct?superkoolstud

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

cough 1 year head start cough

[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

Gotta love how the PS Brand just merely matching the Xbox Brand (in games & sales)is now seen as a success. :)

TX360

cough 1 year head start cough

[QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"]PC owns both.SeanDiff

Actually, Critics generally agree. Hence the PC having the most AAA/AA exclusives every single year and generation on the majority of sites. Gamespot included in that. We are at GS and, at GS, PC has more AAA/AA exclusives overall and just since this current console generation began.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=0

After playing the KZ2 demo, I know it'll get a 9.0 here, it just won't deserve it. It's generic as anything, pretty, but generic, and graphics don't make gameplay. I'd give the demo a 6. It's fair, no more.

But, yes, GS is all graphics, they give Disgaea 3 a 7.5 because of graphics, instead of the 10 it deserved for exceptional mindblowingly amazing gameplay...*sigh*

After playing the KZ2 demo, I know it'll get a 9.0 here, it just won't deserve it. It's generic as anything, pretty, but generic, and graphics don't make gameplay. I'd give the demo a 6. It's fair, no more.

But, yes, GS is all graphics, they give Disgaea 3 a 7.5 because of graphics, instead of the 10 it deserved for exceptional mindblowingly amazing gameplay...*sigh*

PC owns both.Master-Thief-09

PC owned by both.

[QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"]PC owns both.THQ88

PC owned by both.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=0

PC: 11 AAA Exclusives and 63 AA Exclusives.

360: 5 AAA Exclusives and 15 AA Exclusives.

PS3: 1 AAAAE, 2 AAA Exclusives, and 6 AA Exclusives.

I'd mention Wii but the numbers are so low it's even more sad than the other 2 consoles. This is since the beginning of this console generation, not overall. In other words it's leaving out a lot of past titles on PC that scored AAA/AA and were exclusive (alot).

In short, You Fail.