$100 bluray + $300 60GB 360 = why buy a ps3?

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

hmmm lets do the real math here

xbox360 - $299 + tax = $330

blue ray player - average $150 + tax = $165

now add those together and you get $495

and you spent almost $500 and still can't play little big planet, valkyria chronicles, MGS4, resistance and a host of others.

and chances are your video game system will be RROD'ed in a short amount of time. lets not forget the $50 a year for live

z4twenny
actually, chances are u will never have rrod.
Avatar image for Thessassin
Thessassin

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 Thessassin
Member since 2007 • 1819 Posts

wow tc what a fail. thats a 100 pound blu ray player, not as good as ps3 blu ray player, 360 dosent come with wifi, or free online, + PS3 has a vast games library

and u now have to hook up 2 devices and now u risk RROD

Avatar image for MasteRich
MasteRich

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 MasteRich
Member since 2006 • 479 Posts

Yeah I think you cows can stop saying the PS3 has no games, it has a promising lineup with an already impressive library. Plus I would liek a console that doesn't charge me to use my internet connection that I am already paying for to go online...

Avatar image for eklineage
eklineage

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 eklineage
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

Why?

To be fair for me there's still Killzone 2 and God of War 3, but the first Killzone flopped and who knows when GOW3 is coming out.

Yep, looks like I won't regret selling my ps3 for a 360 after all.8)

CB4McGusto
/facepalm Yep... looks like another insecurity thread. Have fun with your 360. I'll have fun with my ps3. Cool?
Avatar image for xXSecksXx
xXSecksXx

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 xXSecksXx
Member since 2007 • 468 Posts

Why?

To be fair for me there's still Killzone 2 and God of War 3, but the first Killzone flopped and who knows when GOW3 is coming out.

Yep, looks like I won't regret selling my ps3 for a 360 after all.8)

CB4McGusto

Have a gaming PC and a PS3, why bother with the 360? Just a stripped down PC with subpar capabilities.

Avatar image for Pimpshigity21
Pimpshigity21

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Pimpshigity21
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts

Why?

To be fair for me there's still Killzone 2 and God of War 3, but the first Killzone flopped and who knows when GOW3 is coming out.

Yep, looks like I won't regret selling my ps3 for a 360 after all.8)

CB4McGusto

You sold your PS3? Smart move, you wont regret it. You will enjoy actually playing games on a gaming console.

Avatar image for Pimpshigity21
Pimpshigity21

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Pimpshigity21
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts
1. More Exclusives that can't be found on the PC or any other systems. 2. Best Blu-Ray Player which allows upgradability from a firmware update. 3. Wireless Connection 4. Upgradable Hard Drive. 5. Free Online Play. 6. All-in-One.MaximumD
All of that and people are still buying a 360 instead. What is the world coming to?
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
[QUOTE="sillaris"] True, it's all about preference and what exclusives you want to play basically. Some people like the Blu-Ray, while others (like me) could care less about it. PC is not the same as XBox 360. There are LOTS of exclusives and 3rd party games on XBox 360 that are or will ever be on a PC (Forza, Perfect Dark, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead Rising, PGR3 & 4, Dead of Alive, Rumble Rose XX, Beautiful Katamari, N3, Star Ocean: The Last Hope, Infinite Undiscovery and many others.). Many people don't even have a Pc power enough to play Crysis or GTA IV on the PC. A simplier solution for most casual gamers is a $200 Xbox 360.

********************************************************

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]I'm not one to judge but selling your PS3 for a 360? :okratos-7

Why the shock? Two months after the PS3 launched people were returning them to Gamestop, Toys R Us and Wal-Mart because they couldn't sell them on EBay for a profit. LOL!! So selling your PS3 for an XBox 360 isn't surprising at all. You can buy TWO xbox 360 for the price of one PS3. :roll:

*******************************************************

[QUOTE="MaximumD"]1. More Exclusives that can't be found on the PC or any other systems. 2. Best Blu-Ray Player which allows upgradability from a firmware update. 3. Wireless Connection 4. Upgradable Hard Drive. 5. Free Online Play. 6. All-in-One.Pimpshigity21
All of that and people are still buying a 360 instead. What is the world coming to?

See to me people are getting smarter about their purchases. lol!! There are a lots of 360 Exclusive that can't be found on PC's. The reason PS3 exclusive are on PC is because it using a completely different development software. No developer in their right mind would want to convert ANY PS3 game to the PC as it would be too costly and a waste of time. Meanwhile, many PC Excluisve games are being made for the XBox 360, but not the PS3. LOL!! PS3 online is extremely slow. It to me less then 10min to download the XBox Live Experience update and over 30 mins to download PS3 latest update. Every download on the PS3 is very slow. Their servers and broadband are crap.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
Hmm proboly the games.
Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#61 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
Junk + Junk does not equal quality. You can have two piece of junk systems hardware wise or you can have a quality unit like PS3 that is higher quality and does more than both of those combined.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#62 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
For the games? Same reason you would buy a 360.
Avatar image for Thinker_reborn
Thinker_reborn

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Thinker_reborn
Member since 2008 • 676 Posts
Who in their right minds would sell a PS3 for 360?:lol:
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#64 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
Who in their right minds would sell a PS3 for 360?:lol:Thinker_reborn
People who don't share your opinions. I would pick the 360 over the PS3 if I had to choose only one.
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

Who in their right minds would sell a PS3 for 360?:lol:Thinker_reborn

Everybody who wants to play quality games would. Most have. Wait until the NPD numbers are released and I'll prove to you. :lol:

It's obvious at least 20-25% of PS3 owners bought the system as a Blu-Ray player only with no desire to play games on it. That would explain the poor LBP, Motorstorm 2, Valyykrie Chronicles and Resistance 2 sales. All quality games that are worth owning, but hard lackluster sales their first 2 weeks.

Avatar image for ANeuralPathway
ANeuralPathway

580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 ANeuralPathway
Member since 2008 • 580 Posts
[QUOTE="kratos-7"][QUOTE="sillaris"]

Why the shock? Two months after the PS3 launched people were returning them to Gamestop, Toys R Us and Wal-Mart because they couldn't sell them on EBay for a profit. LOL!! So selling your PS3 for an XBox 360 isn't surprising at all. You can buy TWO xbox 360 for the price of one PS3. :roll:

*******************************************************

[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"][QUOTE="MaximumD"]1. More Exclusives that can't be found on the PC or any other systems. 2. Best Blu-Ray Player which allows upgradability from a firmware update. 3. Wireless Connection 4. Upgradable Hard Drive. 5. Free Online Play. 6. All-in-One.blackace

All of that and people are still buying a 360 instead. What is the world coming to?

See to me people are getting smarter about their purchases. lol!! There are a lots of 360 Exclusive that can't be found on PC's. The reason PS3 exclusive are on PC is because it using a completely different development software. No developer in their right mind would want to convert ANY PS3 game to the PC as it would be too costly and a waste of time. Meanwhile, many PC Excluisve games are being made for the XBox 360, but not the PS3. LOL!! PS3 online is extremely slow. It to me less then 10min to download the XBox Live Experience update and over 30 mins to download PS3 latest update. Every download on the PS3 is very slow. Their servers and broadband are crap.

And yet they still can't see how a 50$ a year tax to have full access to their system adds into the console price. A tax thas price can be changed on a M$ whim.

Yeah, I don't know if I'd call people who took out ARMs to be smart consumers.

Avatar image for Pimpshigity21
Pimpshigity21

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Pimpshigity21
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts

Who in their right minds would sell a PS3 for 360?:lol:Thinker_reborn

The question is: What gamer in their right mind would buy a $600 machine with no games. I sorta understand those who purchased a PS3 for $400 (I understand they believed the Sony BS)...and I also uderstand the movie buffs where looking for a good deal...

I have to give Sony credit...they pulled the biggest con job in the history of gaming with the PS3. They did the same thing last gen, but at least they did deliver some of what they promised with the PS2.

Avatar image for Pimpshigity21
Pimpshigity21

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Pimpshigity21
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts

[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="kratos-7"] All of that and people are still buying a 360 instead. What is the world coming to?ANeuralPathway

See to me people are getting smarter about their purchases. lol!! There are a lots of 360 Exclusive that can't be found on PC's. The reason PS3 exclusive are on PC is because it using a completely different development software. No developer in their right mind would want to convert ANY PS3 game to the PC as it would be too costly and a waste of time. Meanwhile, many PC Excluisve games are being made for the XBox 360, but not the PS3. LOL!! PS3 online is extremely slow. It to me less then 10min to download the XBox Live Experience update and over 30 mins to download PS3 latest update. Every download on the PS3 is very slow. Their servers and broadband are crap.

And yet they still can't see how a 50$ a year tax to have full access to their system adds into the console price. A tax thas price can be changed on a M$ whim.

Yeah, I don't know if I'd call people who took out ARMs to be smart consumers.

That tax gurantees an online experience that is way better than the one Sony offers for free.

Keep in mind that Sony could never charge for their online offering. If they did, there would only be a couple of cows online.

Instead of spending some serious effort trying to match XBL and then giving that away for free...they instead give Home. LMFAO.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Who in their right minds would sell a PS3 for 360?:lol:Pimpshigity21

The question is: What gamer in their right mind would buy a $600 machine with no games. I sorta understand those who purchased a PS3 for $400 (I understand they believed the Sony BS)...and I also uderstand the movie buffs where looking for a good deal...

I have to give Sony credit...they pulled the biggest con job in the history of gaming with the PS3. They did the same thing last gen, but at least they did deliver some of what they promised with the PS2.

Are we still using the no games argument?

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="kratos-7"] All of that and people are still buying a 360 instead. What is the world coming to?ANeuralPathway

See to me people are getting smarter about their purchases. lol!! There are a lots of 360 Exclusive that can't be found on PC's. The reason PS3 exclusive are on PC is because it using a completely different development software. No developer in their right mind would want to convert ANY PS3 game to the PC as it would be too costly and a waste of time. Meanwhile, many PC Excluisve games are being made for the XBox 360, but not the PS3. LOL!! PS3 online is extremely slow. It to me less then 10min to download the XBox Live Experience update and over 30 mins to download PS3 latest update. Every download on the PS3 is very slow. Their servers and broadband are crap.

And yet they still can't see how a 50$ a year tax to have full access to their system adds into the console price. A tax thas price can be changed on a M$ whim.

Yeah, I don't know if I'd call people who took out ARMs to be smart consumers.

Not everyone gets XBox Live you know and 50$ a year isn't much for a gamer. It's very obviously that XBox Live server is fast and better then PSN, by a mile. I only both systems and have used both online services and LIVE is much better overall. You don't see that Sony loses money every day from running an online service for FREE. LOL!! Either Sony will start charging people or they will continue to lose millions every quarter like they have been.
Avatar image for Pimpshigity21
Pimpshigity21

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Pimpshigity21
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts
[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]

[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Who in their right minds would sell a PS3 for 360?:lol:finalfantasy94

The question is: What gamer in their right mind would buy a $600 machine with no games. I sorta understand those who purchased a PS3 for $400 (I understand they believed the Sony BS)...and I also uderstand the movie buffs where looking for a good deal...

I have to give Sony credit...they pulled the biggest con job in the history of gaming with the PS3. They did the same thing last gen, but at least they did deliver some of what they promised with the PS2.

Are we still using the no games argument?

I'm still with the no games worth playing argument (expcept for MGS4).

If I'm way off here, why don't cows buy those games? I still contend that Resistance and LBP are not that good. My opinion is based on what I've read in various forums...and the sales figures. You do have the multiplatform titles, of course...I do hope cows buy those or it wont be profitable for developers to port those over to the PS3.

Avatar image for fanboy999
fanboy999

1444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 fanboy999
Member since 2003 • 1444 Posts
I'm sure we will be seeing $100 BR players by next Christmas. Sony has 1 year to get the price of the PS3 down to around $200. If not they will be playing catchup for longer as Nintendo and Xbox go even lower. There are alot of people that bought PS3s for the "cheap" blu-ray player. Too bad it's not that cheap anymore. Too bad Sony keeps releasing $400-500 SKUs every year. What will they release next year for Christmas. A PS3 with 500GB hard drive and 2 games for $499?
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]

The question is: What gamer in their right mind would buy a $600 machine with no games. I sorta understand those who purchased a PS3 for $400 (I understand they believed the Sony BS)...and I also uderstand the movie buffs where looking for a good deal...

I have to give Sony credit...they pulled the biggest con job in the history of gaming with the PS3. They did the same thing last gen, but at least they did deliver some of what they promised with the PS2.

Pimpshigity21

Are we still using the no games argument?

I'm still with the no games worth playing argument (expcept for MGS4).

If I'm way off here, why don't cows buy those games? I still contend that Resistance and LBP are not that good. My opinion is based on what I've read in various forums...and the sales figures. You do have the multiplatform titles, of course...I do hope cows buy those or it wont be profitable for developers to port those over to the PS3.

Exacly your still with no games worth playing. Key word being you. THe no game argument is opinion based not fact so its really not usable.

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#74 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
-If you add XBL, it's $450 vs $400. -Having a PS3 instead of a Blu-Ray player and a 360 takes up less space. Oh wait, we've seen the future and Killzone 2 will flop. And God of War 3 will never come out. Forget it then.Floppy_Jim
Don't you own all three consoles this gen? Kinda craps all over that "taking up less space" theory of yours.
Avatar image for Pimpshigity21
Pimpshigity21

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Pimpshigity21
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts
[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"][QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

Are we still using the no games argument?

finalfantasy94

I'm still with the no games worth playing argument (expcept for MGS4).

If I'm way off here, why don't cows buy those games? I still contend that Resistance and LBP are not that good. My opinion is based on what I've read in various forums...and the sales figures. You do have the multiplatform titles, of course...I do hope cows buy those or it wont be profitable for developers to port those over to the PS3.

Exacly your still with no games worth playing. Key word being you. THe no game argument is opinion based not fact so its really not usable.

Well, my argument is based on the FACT that the games don't sell.

You probably think I'm wrong because...let me guess...you played the games and you liked them, right? The I liked those games argument is based on your opinion. So I guess we are back to square one...faced with the dilemma of why those games had awful sales.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]

I'm still with the no games worth playing argument (expcept for MGS4).

If I'm way off here, why don't cows buy those games? I still contend that Resistance and LBP are not that good. My opinion is based on what I've read in various forums...and the sales figures. You do have the multiplatform titles, of course...I do hope cows buy those or it wont be profitable for developers to port those over to the PS3.

Pimpshigity21

Exacly your still with no games worth playing. Key word being you. THe no game argument is opinion based not fact so its really not usable.

Well, my argument is based on the FACT that the games don't sell.

You probably think I'm wrong because...let me gues...you played the games and you liked them, right? The I liked those games argument is based on your opinion. So I guess we are back to square one...faced with the dilemma of why those games had awful sales.

Let me guess your with the "games dont sell millions of copies so they suck" argument.

Avatar image for Nick3306
Nick3306

3429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Nick3306
Member since 2007 • 3429 Posts

Why?

To be fair for me there's still Killzone 2 and God of War 3, but the first Killzone flopped and who knows when GOW3 is coming out.

Yep, looks like I won't regret selling my ps3 for a 360 after all.8)

CB4McGusto
this is why i hate this gen, fanboys.
Avatar image for naydaslayer
naydaslayer

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 naydaslayer
Member since 2008 • 371 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]

I'm still with the no games worth playing argument (expcept for MGS4).

If I'm way off here, why don't cows buy those games? I still contend that Resistance and LBP are not that good. My opinion is based on what I've read in various forums...and the sales figures. You do have the multiplatform titles, of course...I do hope cows buy those or it wont be profitable for developers to port those over to the PS3.

Pimpshigity21

Exacly your still with no games worth playing. Key word being you. THe no game argument is opinion based not fact so its really not usable.

Well, my argument is based on the FACT that the games don't sell.

You probably think I'm wrong because...let me guess...you played the games and you liked them, right? The I liked those games argument is based on your opinion. So I guess we are back to square one...faced with the dilemma of why those games had awful sales.

Here is the thing though. We don not argue about how well games sell, we argue the quality. If we argued how well things sold, Xbox would be owned by the Wii. You do not see alot of people driving exotic sports cars do you? So Lems think they suck. Haha, well at least you did not use hipocritisism in your post. You set the bar a whole new standard for Lems.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
For the same reason you own a 360, to play games. Also, I don't know if anyone noticed the failure in the TC's post. Euros=/=Dollars
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#80 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"][QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

Exacly your still with no games worth playing. Key word being you. THe no game argument is opinion based not fact so its really not usable.

finalfantasy94

Well, my argument is based on the FACT that the games don't sell.

You probably think I'm wrong because...let me gues...you played the games and you liked them, right? The I liked those games argument is based on your opinion. So I guess we are back to square one...faced with the dilemma of why those games had awful sales.

Let me guess your with the "games dont sell millions of copies so they suck" argument.

It's more like games that should be selling a million copies, haven't yet. Resistance 2 should have been over the 1 million mark by now. Definitely worldwide it should have been. So should LBP. It's quite obvious that many quality PS3 games aren't selling like they should. Neither game has past 1 million worldwide yet. LBP will next week, but it should have within it's first 3 weeks easily. http://vgchartz.com/weekly.php
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
It's more like games that should be selling a million copies, haven't yet. Resistance 2 should have been over the 1 million mark by now. Definitely worldwide it should have been. So should LBP. It's quite obvious that many quality PS3 games aren't selling like they should. Neither game has past 1 million worldwide yet. LBP will next week, but it should have within it's first 3 weeks easily. http://vgchartz.com/weekly.phpblackace
How do you know they havn't sold a million yet? And don't give me VGChartz, we know nothing about U.S. until NPD is out, and we know nothing of Europe and WW sales unless the publishers disclose it themselves We know Gears 2 did 2.1 million on day one but what has it done since then..we don't know, so why do people try to pass it off like we know?
Avatar image for Dr_DudeMan
Dr_DudeMan

2794

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#82 Dr_DudeMan
Member since 2006 • 2794 Posts
As you stated ... Killzone 2, God of War 3, MGS4 ... those are the only console games that remotely interest me in addition to street fighter 2 turbo hd and street fighter 4. Otherwise, my mac will be great for starcraft 2 and diablo 3. That is why I opted for the ps3, its got the games I want and it is a full featured blu-ray player instead of a low end 100 dollar entry level player.
Avatar image for naruto7777
naruto7777

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 naruto7777
Member since 2007 • 8059 Posts

have a gaming PC? why buy a 360? its 95% mutiplats

sillaris
really sure a $1000 pc sounds nice over a $300 xbox 360
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
-If you add XBL, it's $450 vs $400. -Having a PS3 instead of a Blu-Ray player and a 360 takes up less space. Oh wait, we've seen the future and Killzone 2 will flop. And God of War 3 will never come out. Forget it then.Floppy_Jim
Oh, plus if the bluray player breaks, you have no more gaming console. Wait, actually thats a con, not a pro. I'd rather have them seperate, its like, why buy a tv with a 'vhs' or 'dvd' player built in, when you can get them seperate and upgrade them individually as needed?
Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#85 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts
$100 for Blu-Ray, $300 for Xbox 360, $50 a year for Live, waiting time for console repairs, and possible $99 repair fees. The PS3 is $400, the 360 with a blu-ray player, and live for two years would total $500, and by two years time, you would likely have the RROD.
Avatar image for I_Helios_I
I_Helios_I

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 I_Helios_I
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

That Blu-Ray player isn't $100 U.S. Dollars, its 100 U.K. Pounds lol.

That would come out to about $150 U.S. taking into account the exchange rate.

So $150+$300=$450

How does that equal the better deal?

Plus that Blu-Ray player is from a little known brand in the U.K. named BUSH......

If you have faith in something named Bush you haven't payed attention for the past 8 years.....

Avatar image for iam2green
iam2green

13991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 iam2green
Member since 2007 • 13991 Posts

have a gaming PC? why buy a 360? its 95% mutiplats

sillaris
true lol and blu ray drives r coming out. i don't care about blu ray i'm still buying DVDs.
Avatar image for -Master_St3ve-
-Master_St3ve-

1421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 -Master_St3ve-
Member since 2007 • 1421 Posts
RROD?MightyMuna
lol he wins
Avatar image for Rai
Rai

629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Rai
Member since 2003 • 629 Posts
a lot of cheaper blu ray players don't have support for profile 2.0 yet and the reason the PS3 is considered the best blu ray player is because everything can be upgraded through a firmware update. Once the Sony/Samsung/Sharp 2.0 blu ray players drop to that price than you can make the case of not buying a PS3 but by then the PS3 library will be plentiful.mmirza23
well said
Avatar image for WalterPaladines
WalterPaladines

1742

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 WalterPaladines
Member since 2003 • 1742 Posts
that's a 100 pound($200) blu ray player, and the offer was only available on BLACK FRIDAY Also the Ps3 has the games that interest me, and I like a Quality Gaming Console that wont break on me 10 times in 2 years. Killzone 2, LBP, God of War 3, FFXIII versus, Disgaea 3, White Knight Chronicles, Uncharted 1 and 2, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk and much more. /thread
Avatar image for Watercube
Watercube

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Watercube
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts
Because it has the games I want? Plus built-in wireless and free online play? And that BR Player built-in already? I don't really care if you like the 360, I really don't. You shouldn't care if I like the PS3, either.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]Junk + Junk does not equal quality. You can have two piece of junk systems hardware wise or you can have a quality unit like PS3 that is higher quality and does more than both of those combined.

huh? *goes back to playing gears 2*
Avatar image for ownage_denied
ownage_denied

871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 ownage_denied
Member since 2008 • 871 Posts

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]RROD?blackace
Jasper GPU already being installed in new XBox 360. The RROD issue will be over by the end of the year. I already own a PS3, so there's no need of me getting a Blu-Ray player. I have only 3 Blu-ray movies which came with the 60GB PS3 when I bought it on EBay. I'm still sticking with DVD's for now. See no reason to get Blu-Ray movies yet.

Yea because all the gamers who bought a 360 before Jasper won't have to worry about RROD anymore :roll:.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
Member since 2006 • 2521 Posts

A sole BR Player can do ONE THING

A PS3 = BR Player, DVD player, plays games and more ;)

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]-If you add XBL, it's $450 vs $400. -Having a PS3 instead of a Blu-Ray player and a 360 takes up less space. Oh wait, we've seen the future and Killzone 2 will flop. And God of War 3 will never come out. Forget it then.Phazevariance
Oh, plus if the bluray player breaks, you have no more gaming console. Wait, actually thats a con, not a pro. I'd rather have them seperate, its like, why buy a tv with a 'vhs' or 'dvd' player built in, when you can get them seperate and upgrade them individually as needed?

1. the ps3 isnt known for breaking like the 360 is, so theres not a great chance of that happening. 2. well the 360 has a dvd player in it, correct? how is that any different than the ps3 having a bluray player?
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

Because of the many great exclusive out only on PS3.... thats a huge reason why to get a PS3... but having a PS3 & 360 is a great idea cause you get 2 amazing consoles + one of them being also a blu-ray player...

Avatar image for dmc333
dmc333

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 dmc333
Member since 2002 • 766 Posts
99 pounds is not dollars.
Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

$400 ps3 = why buy two seperate products that cost the same ? And if you really want a $200 blu-ray player (like other threads that I have seen) because it is an important feature , why not get a $200 ps3 console along with it ? That is a bargain for a great system for games like Uncharted series , Warhawk , Resistance series , MGS4 , LBP , Valkyria Chronicles , Killzone 2 , God of War III , etc even if you have a 360.

Why are so many lemmings endorsing the ps3 with these arguments ? Seems like you're trying to sell people on ps3s more than you are trying to convince them they shouldn't get one.

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

9373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 9373 Posts

$400 ps3 = why buy two seperate products that cost the same ? And if you really want a $200 blu-ray player (like other threads that I have seen) because it is an important feature , why not get a $200 ps3 console along with it ? That is a bargain for a great system for games like Uncharted series , Warhawk , Resistance series , MGS4 , LBP , Valkyria Chronicles , Killzone 2 , God of War III , etc even if you have a 360.

Why are so many lemmings endorsing the ps3 with these arguments ? Seems like you're trying to sell people on ps3s more than you are trying to convince them they shouldn't get one.

Nike_Air

thank you.. the simplist logic seems to escape the minds of these fanboys...

having a single PS3 means only needing one HDMI connection, one peice of hardware taking up space, one power outlet needed, and so-on.. why double your troubles when you can just get a PS3?..

Avatar image for Ninten007
Ninten007

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Ninten007
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts

The TC has already expressed his regret for selling his PS3 for a 360 in some of those Killzone 2 blowout threads. Now he is trying to make himself feel better by justifying the prices of those things.

Kids, this is why you dont sell your consoles. Just because Sony, MS, or Nintendo are in a slump does not mean they will announce something huge just one day after you sold your console.

In this case, Sony was in a slump, TC sold PS3, few weeks later he sees Uncharted 2 gameplay, GOW 3 gameplay, Killzone 2 gameplay and many exclusives announced, thus regretting selling it.