1080p @ 30 fps Or 720p @ 60 fps ?

  • 80 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GamerRadio
GamerRadio

279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 GamerRadio
Member since 2007 • 279 Posts
give me rock solid 24fps@ 720p and max out the graphical detail. Forget the framerate.
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts
lower res better  graphics
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

though I agree it's impressive, but I have to admit, X360 fans are somewhat right about it's not as impressive as Gears / Mass Effect.

I don't think the PS3 can produce the above graphics. It's already choking in Splinter Cell: Double Agent (a much less demanding game)

heretrix

I disagree. I think that most developers have not figured out how to make the PS3 do it's best stuff yet.

And to me that's it's biggest problem. The longer it takes developers to figure out the hardware, the longer the wait between really impressive titles. I don't want to pay top dollar for a console and the have to wait a year before the game library is up to speed. It's better to wait until the library suits you and then make your purchase.

Unfortunately for Sony, people like me are choosing to do exactly that.

The good thing is I have all 3 current gen systems. So I can afford to wait for the PS3.

However if it's true that developers still didn't learn the PS3, and say by 2009/10 they'll manage to tap its theoretical power, then I'm afraid by that time we won't be as impressive by current gen graphics and we'll be anticipating the next XBox that will perhaps debut in 2010.


However, the chances the PS3 can produce those graphics are really slim (even by 2010). I somewhat lost faith in my PS3 after seeing how poorly it performed in Splinter Cell: Double Agent compared to X360.

I think you will be pleasantly suprised by the end of this year and going into the next. I'd wait until E3 (or what passes for it) before I'd give up hope. I'm sure Sony and it's 3rd parties have something good coming sooner than later. Well, at least by holiday 07 anyway...I'm look at may be September or November as my target date for a purchase (unless I get an offer I can't refuse)...

If you're planning on buying the PS3, then it's better to buy it sooner than later. Cause I don't think the price will drop by May (maybe Christmas this year, and not by much).

I mean you'll pay the same amount of money even if you waited few months. So you might as well buy it now, enjoy GT HD, Motor Storm, etc.. while waiting for the PS3 games that interest you.

That's how I bought mine. I knew eventually I'm going to want one for GT5 and MGS4, and I knew that its price aint dropping any time soon. So I said I might as well buy it now, enjoy GT HD until GT5 and MG4 comes out next year.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc

6249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
Member since 2003 • 6249 Posts
[QUOTE="wapahala"][QUOTE="Kakarot00769"]

 

i would take 720p @ 60 fps anyday

akuma303x

Hell yeah! Do people even realize the difference between 30fps and 60fps?

Well that's funny, because according to " science " the human eye cant actually precieve a difference between 30 and 60 FPS. so I say 1080p at 30.

:lol: You have got to be insane! Wanna bet? There is a HUGE difference between 30 and 60 fps. The eye can detect over 60 fps. Believe me!

Avatar image for Educated_Gamer
Educated_Gamer

1095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Educated_Gamer
Member since 2007 • 1095 Posts

matters what kind of game. Racing the frames, JRPGs the resolution

but you do relize it doesnt work out like that, 720p at 60 fps is less stressful in most circumstances than 1080p at 30fps.  

Avatar image for deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc

6249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
Member since 2003 • 6249 Posts
Here.
Avatar image for Plug_One
Plug_One

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Plug_One
Member since 2007 • 501 Posts
I'm no tech junkie, but I can definitely tell when a game is 60fps. I couldn't tell 720 from 1080 if my life depended on it.
Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts

720p @ 60fps for me, by far.

720p means better framerates, better effects, better textures. Because the resolution is less, developers can do more with the graphics without sacrificing framerate.

1080p is good for sports games that only have several highly-detailed models and don't require lots of effects.

Avatar image for kentaro22
kentaro22

2694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 kentaro22
Member since 2005 • 2694 Posts
1080p @ SOLID 60fps with good graphical detail, extensive content (not a la generic oblivion), all voiced (good quality), 30 + soundtrack music, and overall good production values. 
Just a dream... hoping on the PS3 blu-ray drive and graphical capabilities in a few years.
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

matters what kind of game. Racing the frames, JRPGs the resolution

but you do relize it doesnt work out like that, 720p at 60 fps is less stressful in most circumstances than 1080p at 30fps.

Educated_Gamer

true, the question is not literal. It's somewhat simplified using framerate as an example. The intended question (technically) is; "would you rather have resolution over fidelity?"

It's somewhat to drive people to the conclusion of what it means asking for HD in this generation (be it 720p or 1080p) instead of just using standard 480p in widescreen (like what the Wii is doing in their titles).

480p is really sufficient to present superb graphics details (take Final Fantasy the movie as a 480p example).

If it weren't for MS & Sony forcing developers to target HD resolutions. We would've probably seen Kill Zone 2 trailer quality graphics by now.
Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

It's a well known fact that the difference between 30fps and 60fps is much more perceptible than the difference between 1080p and 720p, simply because of the way the human brain works and the size of the average TV screen.

While your eye cannot detect every single frame in a 60fps video (even 24fps movies are more than the eye can handle) your brain can detect much higher framerates as sort of a "sixth sense." If you do an a/b comparison of a 30fps and 60fps video, you'll easily be able to spot the 60fps video - it'll just be "smoother" somehow

On the flipside, studies have shown that for the average person to be able to tell the difference between 720p and 1080p on moving images, the person would have to be viewing on at least a 60" screen from at most 6'-7' away. For static images such as photos, it's somewhat easier to tell the difference. 

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

though I agree it's impressive, but I have to admit, X360 fans are somewhat right about it's not as impressive as Gears / Mass Effect.

I don't think the PS3 can produce the above graphics. It's already choking in Splinter Cell: Double Agent (a much less demanding game)

Mystery_Writer

I disagree. I think that most developers have not figured out how to make the PS3 do it's best stuff yet.

And to me that's it's biggest problem. The longer it takes developers to figure out the hardware, the longer the wait between really impressive titles. I don't want to pay top dollar for a console and the have to wait a year before the game library is up to speed. It's better to wait until the library suits you and then make your purchase.

Unfortunately for Sony, people like me are choosing to do exactly that.

The good thing is I have all 3 current gen systems. So I can afford to wait for the PS3.

However if it's true that developers still didn't learn the PS3, and say by 2009/10 they'll manage to tap its theoretical power, then I'm afraid by that time we won't be as impressive by current gen graphics and we'll be anticipating the next XBox that will perhaps debut in 2010.


However, the chances the PS3 can produce those graphics are really slim (even by 2010). I somewhat lost faith in my PS3 after seeing how poorly it performed in Splinter Cell: Double Agent compared to X360.

I think you will be pleasantly suprised by the end of this year and going into the next. I'd wait until E3 (or what passes for it) before I'd give up hope. I'm sure Sony and it's 3rd parties have something good coming sooner than later. Well, at least by holiday 07 anyway...I'm look at may be September or November as my target date for a purchase (unless I get an offer I can't refuse)...

If you're planning on buying the PS3, then it's better to buy it sooner than later. Cause I don't think the price will drop by May (maybe Christmas this year, and not by much).

I mean you'll pay the same amount of money even if you waited few months. So you might as well buy it now, enjoy GT HD, Motor Storm, etc.. while waiting for the PS3 games that interest you.

That's how I bought mine. I knew eventually I'm going to want one for GT5 and MGS4, and I knew that its price aint dropping any time soon. So I said I might as well buy it now, enjoy GT HD until GT5 and MG4 comes out next year.

Uh, no. I can find plenty of things to do with 600 bucks between now and the holiday season. I'm not waiting for a price drop, I'm waiting for the library to fatten itself up a bit. I really am not that interested in any of the games available right now, so waiting is just fine for me, I have plenty of stuff to keep me occupied until I get a PS3. I would be pissed if I spent that much cash on something and never used it that much except to watch movies. I can wait.:)
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

though I agree it's impressive, but I have to admit, X360 fans are somewhat right about it's not as impressive as Gears / Mass Effect.

I don't think the PS3 can produce the above graphics. It's already choking in Splinter Cell: Double Agent (a much less demanding game)

heretrix

I disagree. I think that most developers have not figured out how to make the PS3 do it's best stuff yet.

And to me that's it's biggest problem. The longer it takes developers to figure out the hardware, the longer the wait between really impressive titles. I don't want to pay top dollar for a console and the have to wait a year before the game library is up to speed. It's better to wait until the library suits you and then make your purchase.

Unfortunately for Sony, people like me are choosing to do exactly that.

The good thing is I have all 3 current gen systems. So I can afford to wait for the PS3.

However if it's true that developers still didn't learn the PS3, and say by 2009/10 they'll manage to tap its theoretical power, then I'm afraid by that time we won't be as impressive by current gen graphics and we'll be anticipating the next XBox that will perhaps debut in 2010.


However, the chances the PS3 can produce those graphics are really slim (even by 2010). I somewhat lost faith in my PS3 after seeing how poorly it performed in Splinter Cell: Double Agent compared to X360.

I think you will be pleasantly suprised by the end of this year and going into the next. I'd wait until E3 (or what passes for it) before I'd give up hope. I'm sure Sony and it's 3rd parties have something good coming sooner than later. Well, at least by holiday 07 anyway...I'm look at may be September or November as my target date for a purchase (unless I get an offer I can't refuse)...

If you're planning on buying the PS3, then it's better to buy it sooner than later. Cause I don't think the price will drop by May (maybe Christmas this year, and not by much).

I mean you'll pay the same amount of money even if you waited few months. So you might as well buy it now, enjoy GT HD, Motor Storm, etc.. while waiting for the PS3 games that interest you.

That's how I bought mine. I knew eventually I'm going to want one for GT5 and MGS4, and I knew that its price aint dropping any time soon. So I said I might as well buy it now, enjoy GT HD until GT5 and MG4 comes out next year.

Uh, no. I can find plenty of things to do with 600 bucks between now and the holiday season. I'm not waiting for a price drop, I'm waiting for the library to fatten itself up a bit. I really am not that interested in any of the games available right now, so waiting is just fine for me, I have plenty of stuff to keep me occupied until I get a PS3. I would be pissed if I spent that much cash on something and never used it that much except to watch movies. I can wait.:)

I see your point. I guess I'm a bit impatient. I paid $850 for my X360 (Christmas 2005 shortages) just to play PGR3 (I was basically obssessed about watching PGR3 clips).

The only thing that kept me from paying $1000+ on a PS3 on launch was the lack of decent racing sim game (racing sim is my fav genre along with modern warfare combat flight sims).

To me, it's very difficult to understand how people can resist buying an X360 (for example) after watching gameplay footage of say PGR3 or Gears.

What games do you play currently that are holding you off from buying say an X360?

 

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#64 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
I see your point. I guess I'm a bit impatient. I paid $850 for my X360 (Christmas 2005 shortages) just to play PGR3 (I was basically obssessed about watching PGR3 clips).

The only thing that kept me from paying $1000+ on a PS3 on launch was the lack of decent racing sim game (racing sim is my fav genre along with modern warfare combat flight sims).

To me, it's very difficult to understand how people can resist buying an X360 (for example) after watching gameplay footage of say PGR3 or Gears.

What games do you play currently that are holding you off from buying say an X360?

 

Mystery_Writer

I have a 360 and a Wii. Motorstorm does absolutely nothing for me and neither does Resistance. It's not that I dislike either genre, In fact, racing games and FPS are 2 of my favorites. The problem is neither game grabbed me. I like for there to be at least 3 titles out that I want to play on a system before I buy it.

For the 360: Oblivion, PGR 3, GRAW. Plus XBL had all of this stuff going on during E3. I just felt that it was connected to everything in the right way. It moved me away from my PC to my HDTV. I could look at videos and download some cool demos too..

For the Wii: Zelda, Wii sports. I broke the tradition with the Wii because:

a. It was cheap

b. The way I got it. It was around thanksgiving and I was walking by the Nintendo store. I saw the line and it was short (maybe 15 people, not counting the people in the store) The Wii buzz was just starting, so i decided to stand on line just to see how long I would have to wait. If it was more than a half hour I was gone. 15 minutes later I was at the register. I couldn't pass it up. (And I REALLY wanted to play Zelda)

The PS3's launch titles just don't do it for me and to be honest neither does Lair. And I'm really skeptical about Heavenly Sword. E3 will hopefully get me interested in a PS3 this year.. We'll see. 

Avatar image for MikeE21286
MikeE21286

10405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 MikeE21286
Member since 2003 • 10405 Posts

Gimme 720p @ 60fps.

The difference between 30fps and 60fps is far greater IMO than the negligible difference between 1080p and 720p

Avatar image for hazuki
hazuki

3959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#66 hazuki
Member since 2003 • 3959 Posts
I'd prefer 720p at 60fps, BUT supporting 1080i at least with the software buffering upscale. 30 fps for a game that doesn't look like the most stunning thing ever shouldn't happen.
Avatar image for springz300
springz300

2050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 springz300
Member since 2004 • 2050 Posts
or if you have a ps3 you can just have 60fps @ 1080p
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

or if you have a ps3 you can just have 60fps @ 1080pspringz300

same with X360, but that's not the point. 

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

I'll take 720p @ 60.  No doubt about it.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]I see your point. I guess I'm a bit impatient. I paid $850 for my X360 (Christmas 2005 shortages) just to play PGR3 (I was basically obssessed about watching PGR3 clips).

The only thing that kept me from paying $1000+ on a PS3 on launch was the lack of decent racing sim game (racing sim is my fav genre along with modern warfare combat flight sims).

To me, it's very difficult to understand how people can resist buying an X360 (for example) after watching gameplay footage of say PGR3 or Gears.

What games do you play currently that are holding you off from buying say an X360?

 

heretrix

I have a 360 and a Wii. Motorstorm does absolutely nothing for me and neither does Resistance. It's not that I dislike either genre, In fact, racing games and FPS are 2 of my favorites. The problem is neither game grabbed me. I like for there to be at least 3 titles out that I want to play on a system before I buy it.

For the 360: Oblivion, PGR 3, GRAW. Plus XBL had all of this stuff going on during E3. I just felt that it was connected to everything in the right way. It moved me away from my PC to my HDTV. I could look at videos and download some cool demos too..

For the Wii: Zelda, Wii sports. I broke the tradition with the Wii because:

a. It was cheap

b. The way I got it. It was around thanksgiving and I was walking by the Nintendo store. I saw the line and it was short (maybe 15 people, not counting the people in the store) The Wii buzz was just starting, so i decided to stand on line just to see how long I would have to wait. If it was more than a half hour I was gone. 15 minutes later I was at the register. I couldn't pass it up. (And I REALLY wanted to play Zelda)

The PS3's launch titles just don't do it for me and to be honest neither does Lair. And I'm really skeptical about Heavenly Sword. E3 will hopefully get me interested in a PS3 this year.. We'll see.

Oh, I c, that made sense now. I thought you don't have a next gen console and just waiting only for the PS3.

Anyway, I was speaking in general when saying I don't understand how can gamers resist buying an X360.

Also, what surprises me the most is PS3 fans bashing the X360 whenever they get the chance not paying attention to how poorly their beloved PS3 is performing right now.

I reached to the conclusion that if Sony pulled off a win this gen (became the market leader again) despite this poor first year performance, then there probably won't be any chance left for MS, no matter what they try to please consumers, to take the lead from them ever again. 

P.S. I too don't have much interest in Lair, and waiting for GS review to make a decision.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

Laughs at anyone whos says 1080P @ 30FPS. You realize that framerate is more important then resolution correct? How would you play fighters or action adventure games at 30 FPS? You want to know why PC shooters are seen better then consoles? Console FPS don't run at 60fps normally but on PC they have the option.

 

The fluidness from 30fps to 60fps is night and day to me. Play Metroid Prime and then go back to Halo just for a quick example since mostly everyone on the boards probably has access to those games. 

Avatar image for aveman1
aveman1

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 aveman1
Member since 2004 • 3383 Posts
....2560p at 70 FPS is my bare minimum....
Avatar image for kage_53
kage_53

12671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#73 kage_53
Member since 2006 • 12671 Posts
720p @60 FPS because of 4XAA
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

ummm DMC4, NGS and Heavenly Sword are all 60 FPS and 1080p. best of both :D go PS3 !

AB_Uppercut

Sigma was confirmed to run at 720P and not 1080P I thought? 

Avatar image for 16bitkevin
16bitkevin

3962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 16bitkevin
Member since 2005 • 3962 Posts
Going from 30 to 60 FPS feels a lot better than having a minimal graphical update.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

720@60fps anyday.

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

Going from 30 to 60 FPS feels a lot better than having a minimal graphical update.16bitkevin

agreed.

Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

720p60.

Better framerate, more effects, while still looking awesome.

 

Oh, and I do have a 57" 1080p HDTV. I'm not being a whiny hater :P 

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#79 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
Oh, I c, that made sense now. I thought you don't have a next gen console and just waiting only for the PS3.

Anyway, I was speaking in general when saying I don't understand how can gamers resist buying an X360.

Also, what surprises me the most is PS3 fans bashing the X360 whenever they get the chance not paying attention to how poorly their beloved PS3 is performing right now.

I reached to the conclusion that if Sony pulled off a win this gen (became the market leader again) despite this poor first year performance, then there probably won't be any chance left for MS, no matter what they try to please consumers, to take the lead from them ever again. 

P.S. I too don't have much interest in Lair, and waiting for GS review to make a decision.

Mystery_Writer

Lets just hope it's a nice tight race...It's better for us gamers.It will be interesting at any rate.

Oh and just to get back on topic, 60FPS @ 720p for me any day of the week. Games running a 60 just seem more fluid to me...It amazes me how some companies can consistantly nail it while others fail miserably..

 

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]Oh, I c, that made sense now. I thought you don't have a next gen console and just waiting only for the PS3.

Anyway, I was speaking in general when saying I don't understand how can gamers resist buying an X360.

Also, what surprises me the most is PS3 fans bashing the X360 whenever they get the chance not paying attention to how poorly their beloved PS3 is performing right now.

I reached to the conclusion that if Sony pulled off a win this gen (became the market leader again) despite this poor first year performance, then there probably won't be any chance left for MS, no matter what they try to please consumers, to take the lead from them ever again.

P.S. I too don't have much interest in Lair, and waiting for GS review to make a decision.

heretrix

Lets just hope it's a nice tight race...It's better for us gamers.It will be interesting at any rate.

Oh and just to get back on topic, 60FPS @ 720p for me any day of the week. Games running a 60 just seem more fluid to me...It amazes me how some companies can consistantly nail it while others fail miserably..

 

very true, I too hope it'll be a tight race this gen ;)

Avatar image for kage_53
kage_53

12671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 kage_53
Member since 2006 • 12671 Posts
Sigma was confirmed to run at 720P and not 1080P I thought? Blackbond
Recently announced it will be 1080p @60FPS.

ummm DMC4, NGS and Heavenly Sword are all 60 FPS and 1080p. best of both :D go PS3 ! AB_Uppercut

DMC4 is 720p @ 60 FPS. Heavenly Sword is 720p @ 30 FPS