"levels look inconsistent" so some look good but others don't?
here a crazy idea, let the games get finished before comparing them.
Fanboys :roll:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
"levels look inconsistent" so some look good but others don't?
here a crazy idea, let the games get finished before comparing them.
Fanboys :roll:
:lol: I just watch the 1up show and TC is obviously making stuff up.
out of the 4 people talking shane is the only one that complained about the graphics, everyone else said they didn't notice that at all when they were playing and that it look fantastic. Everyone said it had great lighting and how it captured the temperature.
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3171969
its near the end
Now you can sleep at night?
fanboy.
It must kill you inside that after three years you still dont have a game that looks better or is as technichely impressive as killzone 2. Well, technically, neither do you. I do though ;)they all also say its a good looking game but thers better. claywalker21no you tryed to twist their words to make it seem like RE5 sucks, despite them constantly hailing the game as great.
Your obviously a KZ2 fanboy that can't stand I game that might look better.
the show word for word--------------
shane - in terms of graphics, no else here is a little bit disappointed? From level to level its inconsistent. For example the oil refinery, textures arn't that immpressive, the water level the boat geometry looks archic, boxy, I don't know may be it not done.
Matt- Not saying you couldn't zoom in to find a low res texture, But I didn't notice this at all.
Shane- Really? It looks fine, it looks good.
Shane- The first Village looks really good.
no you tryed to twist their words to make it seem like RE5 sucks, despite them constantly hailing the game as great.[QUOTE="claywalker21"]they all also say its a good looking game but thers better. -Mad_Rhetoric-
Your obviously a KZ2 fanboy that can't stand I game that might look better.
the show word for word--------------
shane - in terms of graphics, no else here is a little bit disappointed? From level to level its inconsistent. For example the oil refinery, textures arn't that immpressive, the water level the boat geometry looks archic, boxy, I don't know may be it not done.
Matt- Not saying you couldn't zoom in to find a low res texture, But I didn't notice this at all.
Shane- Really? It looks fine, it looks good.
Shane- The first Village looks really good.
WTF are you talking about i said that it was going to get AAA in my first post,i even said after the quote that they went on to say how amazing the game was.[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"]no you tryed to twist their words to make it seem like RE5 sucks, despite them constantly hailing the game as great.[QUOTE="claywalker21"]they all also say its a good looking game but thers better. claywalker21
Your obviously a KZ2 fanboy that can't stand I game that might look better.
the show word for word--------------
shane - in terms of graphics, no else here is a little bit disappointed? From level to level its inconsistent. For example the oil refinery, textures arn't that immpressive, the water level the boat geometry looks archic, boxy, I don't know may be it not done.
Matt- Not saying you couldn't zoom in to find a low res texture, But I didn't notice this at all.
Shane- Really? It looks fine, it looks good.
Shane- The first Village looks really good.
WTF are you talking about i said that it was going to get AAA in my first post,i even said after the quote that they went on to say how amazing the game was. Capcom themselves could claim that RE5 doesnt look as good as KZ2 and -Mad_Rhetoric- would still deny it :([QUOTE="claywalker21"][QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"] no you tryed to twist their words to make it seem like RE5 sucks, despite them constantly hailing the game as great.WTF are you talking about i said that it was going to get AAA in my first post,i even said after the quote that they went on to say how amazing the game was. Capcom themselves could claim that RE5 doesnt look as good as KZ2 and -Mad_Rhetoric- would still deny it :( :lol: your the guy who said GOW3 would have the better graphics than KZ2Your obviously a KZ2 fanboy that can't stand I game that might look better.
the show word for word--------------
shane - in terms of graphics, no else here is a little bit disappointed? From level to level its inconsistent. For example the oil refinery, textures arn't that immpressive, the water level the boat geometry looks archic, boxy, I don't know may be it not done.
Matt- Not saying you couldn't zoom in to find a low res texture, But I didn't notice this at all.
Shane- Really? It looks fine, it looks good.
Shane- The first Village looks really good.
II_Seraphim_II
Killzone 2 always was king if you ask me.bethwoI agree from the videos and previews. It looks that good.
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="claywalker21"] WTF are you talking about i said that it was going to get AAA in my first post,i even said after the quote that they went on to say how amazing the game was. -Mad_Rhetoric-Capcom themselves could claim that RE5 doesnt look as good as KZ2 and -Mad_Rhetoric- would still deny it :( :lol: your the guy who said GOW3 would have the better graphics than KZ2 And?
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="claywalker21"] WTF are you talking about i said that it was going to get AAA in my first post,i even said after the quote that they went on to say how amazing the game was. -Mad_Rhetoric-Capcom themselves could claim that RE5 doesnt look as good as KZ2 and -Mad_Rhetoric- would still deny it :( :lol: your the guy who said GOW3 would have the better graphics than KZ2 It will you just wait and see.
[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"]no you tryed to twist their words to make it seem like RE5 sucks, despite them constantly hailing the game as great.[QUOTE="claywalker21"]they all also say its a good looking game but thers better. killzowned24
Your obviously a KZ2 fanboy that can't stand I game that might look better.
the show word for word--------------
shane - in terms of graphics, no else here is a little bit disappointed? From level to level its inconsistent. For example the oil refinery, textures arn't that immpressive, the water level the boat geometry looks archic, boxy, I don't know may be it not done.
Matt- Not saying you couldn't zoom in to find a low res texture, But I didn't notice this at all.
Shane- Really? It looks fine, it looks good.
Shane- The first Village looks really good.
they are all fanboys trying to protect RE5 clearly, shane has the man in him to admit it. lol at the clear fanboy cover by the matt guy... didnt notice...yeah right!! Oh BS! Shane will bash anything not PS3 and listen to the past 1up podcasts if you doubt me.. Shane was the ONLY ONE to notice this and yet "everyone else is trying to protect it.." :roll: Had this game been PS3 ONLY Shane would be shouting from the Heavens how great this game is. He did the exact same thing with DMC 4. When the game was only coming out for the PS3 he couldn't shut up about how much better it was than NG2 even though neither game was released yet. As soon as the game was announced for the 360 he reverted back to talking about Heavenly Sword..[QUOTE="EuroMafia"][QUOTE="claywalker21"] It must kill you inside that after three years you still dont have a game that looks better or is as technichely impressive as killzone 2.Espada12If people cared that much about graphics we'd all be PC gamers.
Make the game have below average graphics and watch it get bashed, not only on SW but in the real world. I don't understand what people say this. Graphics are very important to a game.
I didn't say they weren't.:lol: your the guy who said GOW3 would have the better graphics than KZ2-Mad_Rhetoric-And im also the guy who admitted that the GoW trailer graphics were a let down. It's called admitting when you are wrong, you should try it some time. :wink: And seeing as GoW3 is still a long ways from being complete, I stand by my words, It will have better graphics than KZ2.
[QUOTE="Espada12"][QUOTE="EuroMafia"] If people cared that much about graphics we'd all be PC gamers.EuroMafia
Make the game have below average graphics and watch it get bashed, not only on SW but in the real world. I don't understand what people say this. Graphics are very important to a game.
I didn't say they weren't. You used a terrible logic. Ppl would definitely like games on their consoles to look as good as the PC version does.[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"] no you tryed to twist their words to make it seem like RE5 sucks, despite them constantly hailing the game as great.they are all fanboys trying to protect RE5 clearly, shane has the man in him to admit it. lol at the clear fanboy cover by the matt guy... didnt notice...yeah right!! Oh BS! Shane will bash anything not PS3 and listen to the past 1up podcasts if you doubt me.. Shane was the ONLY ONE to notice this and yet "everyone else is trying to protect it.." :roll: Had this game been PS3 ONLY Shane would be shouting from the Heavens how great this game is. He did the exact same thing with DMC 4. When the game was only coming out for the PS3 he couldn't shut up about how much better it was than NG2 even though neither game was released yet. As soon as the game was announced for the 360 he reverted back to talking about Heavenly Sword..Your obviously a KZ2 fanboy that can't stand I game that might look better.
the show word for word--------------
shane - in terms of graphics, no else here is a little bit disappointed? From level to level its inconsistent. For example the oil refinery, textures arn't that immpressive, the water level the boat geometry looks archic, boxy, I don't know may be it not done.
Matt- Not saying you couldn't zoom in to find a low res texture, But I didn't notice this at all.
Shane- Really? It looks fine, it looks good.
Shane- The first Village looks really good.
OhSnapitz
Clearly you didnt play the demo because the textures are crap.
NG2 is bad truth. Heavenly Sword has far better lighting and physics and art work.
[QUOTE="EuroMafia"][QUOTE="Espada12"]I didn't say they weren't. You used a terrible logic. Ppl would definitely like games on their consoles to look as good as the PC version does. Of course they would. The problem is, however, that, with the exception of the first year-ish of a console's lifespan, that would not be the case; PC hardware advances, and new, more powerful graphics engines come in to take advantage of the new, more powerful hardware. Consoles, however, lack that luxury. Developers just have to make the best they can with the tools they have. After about a year or two into a generation, even mid-level PCs will be far beyond consoles in terms of both power and visuals.Make the game have below average graphics and watch it get bashed, not only on SW but in the real world. I don't understand what people say this. Graphics are very important to a game.
Dystopian-X
Of course they would. The problem is, however, that, with the exception of the first year-ish of a console's lifespan, that would not be the case; PC hardware advances, and new, more powerful graphics engines come in to take advantage of the new, more powerful hardware. Consoles, however, lack that luxury. Developers just have to make the best they can with the tools they have. After about a year or two into a generation, even mid-level PCs will be far beyond consoles in terms of both power and visuals.thepwninatorWell I know all that. I was just saying that consolites do care about graphics and they would like to have better graphics for the most part, it doesn't have to do anything with PC gaming since there are other reasons why some won't acknowledged it.
I played the japanese demo and the graphics are pretty good, not as good as Gears 2, i noticed some tearing but its still WIP after all... Furzjodlerwhy its called a demo, wait untill the final version before saying it doesn't compare to gears 2. RE5 kills gears 2's character models/fire/explosions...easily.
[QUOTE="PKim7"]I wish Marcus and Dom never gave Chris steroids; but peer pressure is tough. Eyezonmiiguess you never played RE1 on PS1 and seen Jack Krauser in RE4.
I have RE1 on Saturn and DS and from what I remember; Chris and Jill aren't buff. As for Jack: he took steroids too. Chris from RE:CV is more ideal than the one from RE: 5.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment